Brink of Revolution

[Daryl Hunt]

...View attachment 331724

Good point.

Then again, sometimes it's quite dangerous NOT to do what you're told...

Sane, intelligent, nonviolent people of goodwill know the difference.

I see all these people in their 20s, 30s, and 40s with masks on. Then I see 80 year olds not giving a damn. You know why? Because they lived through WWII, Korea, Vietnam, The Cold War, etc. They’re not scared of a walmart brand flu.

You have selective eyesight, cupcake.

I'm nearly 70, I don't wear a mask, liar.

That's your choice. I don't normally either. I do sometimes when the need arises. But I have neighbors of late age that won't leave their homes without it. The lie is you saying that I am a liar.

 

[satrebil]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

How about... no, bootlicker.

Government is derived from the CONSENT of the governed. The guns were there to remind TPTB that consent can be revoked.

 

[miketx]

...View attachment 331724

Good point.

Then again, sometimes it's quite dangerous NOT to do what you're told...

Sane, intelligent, nonviolent people of goodwill know the difference.

I see all these people in their 20s, 30s, and 40s with masks on. Then I see 80 year olds not giving a damn. You know why? Because they lived through WWII, Korea, Vietnam, The Cold War, etc. They’re not scared of a walmart brand flu.

You have selective eyesight, cupcake.

I'm nearly 70, I don't wear a mask, liar.

That's your choice. I don't normally either. I do sometimes when the need arises. But I have neighbors of late age that won't leave their homes without it. The lie is you saying that I am a liar.

Nope you lie.

 

[miketx]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

Make us leave our guns at home liar!

 

[MisterBeale]

...View attachment 331724

Good point.

Then again, sometimes it's quite dangerous NOT to do what you're told...

Sane, intelligent, nonviolent people of goodwill know the difference.

See, that is the thing about those of you who watch TEE VEE and don't question the corporate propaganda machine, you don't question the narrative.

Sane, intelligent, nonviolent folks of goodwill KNOW we are being lied to, because we do our research and listen to other folks around the nation and around the world.



That clip was originally from Italy. They used it again, and again. In NY, I heard they used it in PA, they definitely used it in NY, and again in Chicago. When they were busted. . . they "claim," it was just a mistake. . . sure . . . .

Oh, hell, various media chains and outlets reuse footage all the time... cheaper and less hassle than suiting up in 20 different hospitals.

But the Confirmed Cases and Mortality numbers tell us all we need to know about the very real need for various Emergency Public Health measures.

You media-conspiracy types will whistle a different tune if we start losing 3,000 souls per day, for a sustained period, as the Trump Admin now predicts.

They are lying about the confirmed cases and the mortality too.

They lie about everything.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

How about... no, bootlicker.

Government is derived from the CONSENT of the governed. The guns were there to remind TPTB that consent can be revoked.

Wrong. They were there to intimate everyone around them. They knew that they didn't intimidate the Government. It was a bunch of small tooled people carrying their Phallic Symbols. Nothing more. The message could have been louder and more to the point with a bunch of signs stating their disapproval. If you want a slaughter, use those guns. It's called Mass Murder and Mass suicide.

Get your Revolution done at the voting booth.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

Make us leave our guns at home liar!

Wow, another case of a gunnutter throwing himself to the ground in a fit or rage.......and missing.

 

[satrebil]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

How about... no, bootlicker.

Government is derived from the CONSENT of the governed. The guns were there to remind TPTB that consent can be revoked.

Wrong. They were there to intimate everyone around them. They knew that they didn't intimidate the Government. It was a bunch of small tooled people carrying their Phallic Symbols. Nothing more. The message could have been louder and more to the point with a bunch of signs stating their disapproval. If you want a slaughter, use those guns. It's called Mass Murder and Mass suicide.

Get your Revolution done at the voting booth.

Yeah, they were totally there to intimidate all the other people who agreed with them.

What a fucking clown you are.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

How about... no, bootlicker.

Government is derived from the CONSENT of the governed. The guns were there to remind TPTB that consent can be revoked.

Wrong. They were there to intimate everyone around them. They knew that they didn't intimidate the Government. It was a bunch of small tooled people carrying their Phallic Symbols. Nothing more. The message could have been louder and more to the point with a bunch of signs stating their disapproval. If you want a slaughter, use those guns. It's called Mass Murder and Mass suicide.

Get your Revolution done at the voting booth.

Yeah, they were totally there to intimidate all the other people who agreed with them.

What a fucking clown you are.

So everyone that was there agreed with them. Right, cupcake. You can't wait until the first volley if fired, can you. It's called Mass Murder and Mass Suicide.

 

[otto105]

And that's in ultra liberal California, Dems overplayed their hand.

What does public polling tell you?

 

[satrebil]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

How about... no, bootlicker.

Government is derived from the CONSENT of the governed. The guns were there to remind TPTB that consent can be revoked.

Wrong. They were there to intimate everyone around them. They knew that they didn't intimidate the Government. It was a bunch of small tooled people carrying their Phallic Symbols. Nothing more. The message could have been louder and more to the point with a bunch of signs stating their disapproval. If you want a slaughter, use those guns. It's called Mass Murder and Mass suicide.

Get your Revolution done at the voting booth.

Yeah, they were totally there to intimidate all the other people who agreed with them.

What a fucking clown you are.

So everyone that was there agreed with them. Right, cupcake. You can't wait until the first volley if fired, can you. It's called Mass Murder and Mass Suicide.

If they didn't agree with the protest what the fuck were they doing there then, brainlet? Counter-protesting in defiance of the stay at home orders they supposedly support?

Just shut up, idiot.

 

[freyasman]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

With all due respect, Kondor...I've seen a lot of confrontations between progressives and conservatives on the street and unless it's an Antifa mob attacking one conservative...your side almost ALWAYS get's it's ass handed to it! Just saying...

It won't be the Right against the Left.

It will be the foolhardy Hyper-Right against Law Enforcement, the National Guard, and, if necessary, Regulars.

And, at that point, the Hyper-Right clowns will run like jackrabbits; hell, most will slink off the field before the fun even starts.

At this point, it has become glaringly obvious that you have no idea about the military, LE, people who value freedom, guerilla warfare, asymmetric warfare, lawfare in the courts, constitutional remedies to official oppression, etc.

You are making a fool of yourself and showcasing your complete ignorance....... please carry on.

And you seem to believe that some foolish bunch of gunnutters firing on civilians will get them support from LE and the Military. Newsflash: It's called Mass Murder and will be dealt with harshly.

Yeah just like that.... keep doing that.
It lets everyone know you're a retard and not to be taken seriously.

 

[freyasman]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

You don't get to dictate to people how they are allowed to respond to assaults on their freedom.
If you have a problem with armed men coming after you, don't do shit that makes the most well behaved and least violent group in the country want to shoot you.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

How about... no, bootlicker.

Government is derived from the CONSENT of the governed. The guns were there to remind TPTB that consent can be revoked.

Wrong. They were there to intimate everyone around them. They knew that they didn't intimidate the Government. It was a bunch of small tooled people carrying their Phallic Symbols. Nothing more. The message could have been louder and more to the point with a bunch of signs stating their disapproval. If you want a slaughter, use those guns. It's called Mass Murder and Mass suicide.

Get your Revolution done at the voting booth.

Yeah, they were totally there to intimidate all the other people who agreed with them.

What a fucking clown you are.

So everyone that was there agreed with them. Right, cupcake. You can't wait until the first volley if fired, can you. It's called Mass Murder and Mass Suicide.

If they didn't agree with the protest what the fuck were they doing there then, brainlet? Counter-protesting in defiance of the stay at home orders they supposedly support?

Just shut up, idiot.

If you build a Burger Joint in the Desert and bury it in the sand, why have it in the first place. Obviously, there was a group that they were protesting to. Your logic is flawed.

 

[freyasman]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

How about... no, bootlicker.

Government is derived from the CONSENT of the governed. The guns were there to remind TPTB that consent can be revoked.

Wrong. They were there to intimate everyone around them. They knew that they didn't intimidate the Government. It was a bunch of small tooled people carrying their Phallic Symbols. Nothing more. The message could have been louder and more to the point with a bunch of signs stating their disapproval. If you want a slaughter, use those guns. It's called Mass Murder and Mass suicide.

Get your Revolution done at the voting booth.

If the public officials weren't intimidated, then why did they have state cops guarding them and why were they wearing body armor?

I think all your whining and insulting is just you trying to cover up your fear that someone might actually hold these shitbags responsible for their bullshit. And if that happens, then who are you going to run sniveling to when someone hurts your feelings?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

With all due respect, Kondor...I've seen a lot of confrontations between progressives and conservatives on the street and unless it's an Antifa mob attacking one conservative...your side almost ALWAYS get's it's ass handed to it! Just saying...

It won't be the Right against the Left.

It will be the foolhardy Hyper-Right against Law Enforcement, the National Guard, and, if necessary, Regulars.

And, at that point, the Hyper-Right clowns will run like jackrabbits; hell, most will slink off the field before the fun even starts.

At this point, it has become glaringly obvious that you have no idea about the military, LE, people who value freedom, guerilla warfare, asymmetric warfare, lawfare in the courts, constitutional remedies to official oppression, etc.

You are making a fool of yourself and showcasing your complete ignorance....... please carry on.

And you seem to believe that some foolish bunch of gunnutters firing on civilians will get them support from LE and the Military. Newsflash: It's called Mass Murder and will be dealt with harshly.

Yeah just like that.... keep doing that.
It lets everyone know you're a retard and not to be taken seriously.

I can always tell when I hit it right on the head. You Rumpsters resort to insults and name calling and nothing else.

 

[satrebil]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

How about... no, bootlicker.

Government is derived from the CONSENT of the governed. The guns were there to remind TPTB that consent can be revoked.

Wrong. They were there to intimate everyone around them. They knew that they didn't intimidate the Government. It was a bunch of small tooled people carrying their Phallic Symbols. Nothing more. The message could have been louder and more to the point with a bunch of signs stating their disapproval. If you want a slaughter, use those guns. It's called Mass Murder and Mass suicide.

Get your Revolution done at the voting booth.

Yeah, they were totally there to intimidate all the other people who agreed with them.

What a fucking clown you are.

So everyone that was there agreed with them. Right, cupcake. You can't wait until the first volley if fired, can you. It's called Mass Murder and Mass Suicide.

If they didn't agree with the protest what the fuck were they doing there then, brainlet? Counter-protesting in defiance of the stay at home orders they supposedly support?

Just shut up, idiot.

If you build a Burger Joint in the Desert and bury it in the sand, why have it in the first place. Obviously, there was a group that they were protesting to. Your logic is flawed.

They were protesting their government you fantastically retarded motherfucker. Jesus Christ are you illiterate?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

You don't get to dictate to people how they are allowed to respond to assaults on their freedom.
If you have a problem with armed men coming after you, don't do shit that makes the most well behaved and least violent group in the country want to shoot you.

Newsflash: Here, they would be breaking the law. It's a felony to have firearms in the places they were at and it would have been handled with more than a few SWAT teams who would be better armed and larger in number to do arrests. If needed, the State Police would join in, and about 5 surrounding Counties Police Forces. Those were government facilities in that picture. If any City, County or State doesn't enforce that law then they need to be voted out of office post haste. Yes, cupcake, it's all done at the voting booth.

 

[freyasman]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

With all due respect, Kondor...I've seen a lot of confrontations between progressives and conservatives on the street and unless it's an Antifa mob attacking one conservative...your side almost ALWAYS get's it's ass handed to it! Just saying...

It won't be the Right against the Left.

It will be the foolhardy Hyper-Right against Law Enforcement, the National Guard, and, if necessary, Regulars.

And, at that point, the Hyper-Right clowns will run like jackrabbits; hell, most will slink off the field before the fun even starts.

At this point, it has become glaringly obvious that you have no idea about the military, LE, people who value freedom, guerilla warfare, asymmetric warfare, lawfare in the courts, constitutional remedies to official oppression, etc.

You are making a fool of yourself and showcasing your complete ignorance....... please carry on.

And you seem to believe that some foolish bunch of gunnutters firing on civilians will get them support from LE and the Military. Newsflash: It's called Mass Murder and will be dealt with harshly.

Yeah just like that.... keep doing that.
It lets everyone know you're a retard and not to be taken seriously.

I can always tell when I hit it right on the head. You Rumpsters resort to insults and name calling and nothing else.

I can always tell when a person has no clue about violence. They usually don't let their ignorance get in the way of their absolute certainty of how it will work out in their favor.

They're almost always wrong.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Revolution?

By whom?

Unstable, bigoted, drunk, old, fat right-wing pu$$ie$ with guns, rambling-on about conspiracies to keep them locked-up forevermore?

Nothing that your average Girl Scout troop can't handle.

I think you already saw how we handle that in Colorado. Show up unarmed and behave yourself (screaming at the top of your lungs while waving signs is okay) but bring one firearm and you are going to go to the ground while crying "I have a permit".

This was inside the capital building of Michigan two days ago. . .

No one went to the ground. . . folks showed up to warn legislators EXACTLY how they felt about them taking freedom away.

It's called armed intimidation. And it's wrong. Do it without the firearms and they might get my support. But showing up with firearms is sending the wrong message.

View attachment 331724

You seem to forget that we have the Constitution of the United States. Something they didn't have and you and yours overlook when it's convenient.

Yep, we sure do. And part of that Constitution is the 2nd Amendment, written intrinsically as a last line of defense against government tyranny. "Armed intimidation" of government is LITERALLY THE FUCKING POINT.

There you go again. Ignoring the Constitution for your purposes. Read the rest of it and follow it not just one very narrow interpretation of a single line of one Amendment. Your Armed Statement stomps all over the 1st Amendment harshly and a few others as well. Like I said, I don't take your right to protest, just leave the guns at home and do it peacefully without intimidation of others.

How about... no, bootlicker.

Government is derived from the CONSENT of the governed. The guns were there to remind TPTB that consent can be revoked.

Wrong. They were there to intimate everyone around them. They knew that they didn't intimidate the Government. It was a bunch of small tooled people carrying their Phallic Symbols. Nothing more. The message could have been louder and more to the point with a bunch of signs stating their disapproval. If you want a slaughter, use those guns. It's called Mass Murder and Mass suicide.

Get your Revolution done at the voting booth.

Yeah, they were totally there to intimidate all the other people who agreed with them.

What a fucking clown you are.

So everyone that was there agreed with them. Right, cupcake. You can't wait until the first volley if fired, can you. It's called Mass Murder and Mass Suicide.

If they didn't agree with the protest what the fuck were they doing there then, brainlet? Counter-protesting in defiance of the stay at home orders they supposedly support?

Just shut up, idiot.

If you build a Burger Joint in the Desert and bury it in the sand, why have it in the first place. Obviously, there was a group that they were protesting to. Your logic is flawed.

They were protesting their government you fantastically retarded motherfucker. Jesus Christ are you illiterate?

They were on Government Facilities opening carrying firearms. And it doesn't matter if you have a permit to carry. And don't expect the LE to give you a verbal warning before they detain you. You are armed and they won't take any chances. It's a felony and you are going to go to jail and probably lose your right to own weapons forever.