Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 81,079
- 2,635
It's quite amusing watching you pretend like you know what they did or did not know about Obama in order to perpetuate your lie.Yet your initial claim wasn't just that his publisher said that -- it was that Obama said that. Your check remains the forgery it's always been.Exactly, the inherent truth of liberalism, anything contradictory to that is a lie. I call it rejecting your crap. Tom-ay-to, tom-ah-toThank you. I like it too. It's synonymous with "lying."I love that word, kazzing, and you're right that I don't accept the bull crap from the left. Kazzing is a great name for that.
So explain to me why or even how if you are doing a bio blurb on an unknown person who is known for nothing you would write a bio of them without talking to them. That's the level of idiocy you liberal clowns sink to
And who cares what you do or don't accept? You still can't prove a word you're saying. All you can do is kaz.
And lastly, I don't have to explain anything. You wrote a check you can't cash. Don't expect me to make your check look real. That's your job and so far, you've offered nothing but kazzes to back it up.
I cashed the check and spent the money. His publisher proved he said he was born in Kenya, it was in his bio.
And I know you can't prove anything, that's why I asked. Stop being a clown. Oops, you can't...![]()
Yes, his publisher said that, they would have no way of knowing where he was born other than asking him.
So you are to write a biography about an unknown author knowing nothing but their name. Tell me how you go about that
Suffice it to say, you have yet to prove any of this.
Oh, and get this ... innuendo is not proof.
![eusa_naughty :eusa_naughty: :eusa_naughty:](/styles/smilies/eusa_naughty.gif)