Buys Ad To Warn About Socialism

the world’s oldest and longest-lived political party), united in their opposition to the Federalists’ ideas of a strong central government that could grant the power to incorporate a national bank and bestow benefits to favored businesses through the use of tariffs and trade regulation."


too stupid!! only libertarians today are against a central bank! Any opposition to corporations then was because they there government monopolies. You know less than nothing. You are a liberal.
Here is another study. Add this to the list of impartial studies showing that you are stupid.
Alterman Study: Conservatives Display Ignorance « Nel's New Day
And having a stupid person, such as you, ed, say that people are ignorant is a double negative. Which suggests that they are smart.
 
Add this to the list of impartial studies showing that you are stupid.

of course if our founders and Friedman were stupid you would not be so afraid to say why for the whole world to see. What does your fear tell you about your IQ and character???
 
Add this to the list of impartial studies showing that you are stupid.

of course if our founders and Friedman were stupid you would not be so afraid to say why for the whole world to see. What does your fear tell you about your IQ and character???
eddy, me boy. You are driveling again. Making no sense at all. Except to yourself. You are a con. And cons tend to be stupid. Not your fault. Go see your handler, and see if he has some meds for you.
 
Add this to the list of impartial studies showing that you are stupid.

of course if our founders and Friedman were stupid you would not be so afraid to say why for the whole world to see. What does your fear tell you about your IQ and character???
eddy, me boy. You are driveling again. Making no sense at all. Except to yourself. You are a con. And cons tend to be stupid. Not your fault. Go see your handler, and see if he has some meds for you.

xpwarningarrogant.jpg
 
Which was the more liberal government, the government the under the Articles of Confederation or the government under the Constitution?
 
Which was the more liberal government, the government the under the Articles of Confederation or the government under the Constitution?

The Federal government got bigger under the Constitution. Only a child would not know that.

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow, so very very slow!!!
 
Which was the more liberal government, the government the under the Articles of Confederation or the government under the Constitution?

The Federal government got bigger under the Constitution. Only a child would not know that.

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow, so very very slow
Can you answer the question or not?

too stupid by 1000% but perfectly liberal!! government was very very tiny under the Constitution and even tinier under the Articles so both would qualify as very very conservative governments.

Therefore, the government was not liberal under either Articles or Constitution!!

See why we are 100% positive a liberal will be slow??
 
Last edited:
Which was the more liberal government, the government the under the Articles of Confederation or the government under the Constitution?

The Federal government got bigger under the Constitution. Only a child would not know that.

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow, so very very slow
Can you answer the question or not?

too stupid by 1000% but perfectly liberal!! government was very very tiny under the Constitution and even tinier under the Articles so both would qualify as very very conservative governments.

Therefore, the government was not liberal under either Articles or Constitution!!

See why we are 100% positive a liberal will be slow??

Is that how the ideologies of liberalism and conservatism are defined is by the size of government?
 
Which was the more liberal government, the government the under the Articles of Confederation or the government under the Constitution?

The Federal government got bigger under the Constitution. Only a child would not know that.

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow, so very very slow
Can you answer the question or not?

too stupid by 1000% but perfectly liberal!! government was very very tiny under the Constitution and even tinier under the Articles so both would qualify as very very conservative governments.

Therefore, the government was not liberal under either Articles or Constitution!!

See why we are 100% positive a liberal will be slow??
 
Which was the more liberal government, the government the under the Articles of Confederation or the government under the Constitution?

The Federal government got bigger under the Constitution. Only a child would not know that.

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow, so very very slow
Can you answer the question or not?

too stupid by 1000% but perfectly liberal!! government was very very tiny under the Constitution and even tinier under the Articles so both would qualify as very very conservative governments.

Therefore, the government was not liberal under either Articles or Constitution!!

See why we are 100% positive a liberal will be slow??

Is that how the ideologies of liberalism and conservatism are defined is by the size of government?


yes founders considered government focus of evil in human history so they gifted to us Constitution to protect us from big liberal government.
 
The Federal government got bigger under the Constitution. Only a child would not know that.

See why we are positive a liberal will be slow, so very very slow

too stupid by 1000% but perfectly liberal!! government was very very tiny under the Constitution and even tinier under the Articles so both would qualify as very very conservative governments.

Therefore, the government was not liberal under either Articles or Constitution!!

See why we are 100% positive a liberal will be slow??

Is that how the ideologies of liberalism and conservatism are defined is by the size of government?


yes founders considered government focus of evil in human history so they gifted to us Constitution to protect us from big liberal government.


If the founders considered big government evil why did they write a Constitution that enlarged government and gave that government even more size and power than the previous government? Shouldn't the founders have reduced the size and power of government, rather than enlarge the government? How did enlarging governemnt with the constitution protect us from big liberal government?
 
If the founders considered big government evil why did they write a Constitution that enlarged government and gave that government even more size and power than the previous government?

too stupid!! Founders were not anarchists!!!They wanted a tiny government and gave us the Constitution to insure it


Shouldn't the founders have reduced the size and power of government, rather than enlarge the government?

too stupid and perfectly liberal!! Founders were not anarchists



How did enlarging governemnt with the constitution protect us from big liberal government?

Too stupid and 100% liberal!! The Constitution created a tiny Federal government with a few carefully enumerated powers. LIberals have subverted the Constitution.

"They are not to do anything they please to provide for the general welfare, but only to lay taxes for that purpose. To consider the latter phrase not as describing the purpose of the first, but as giving a distinct and independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless. It would reduce the whole instrument to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and as they sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please...Certainly no such universal power was meant to be given them. It was intended to lace them up straightly within the enumerated powers and those without which, as means, these powers could not be carried into effect."

Thomas Jefferson, Opinion on National Bank, 1791
 
Might want to read Madison and Hamilton's view of the necessary and proper clause in the Federalist Papers. But the question: did the framers create a liberal or conservative government when they changed a government with no powers to a government with 17 plus powers? Which is the more liberal a government with power or a government with no power?
 
Might want to read Madison and Hamilton's view of the necessary and proper clause in the Federalist Papers.

too stupid and 1000% liberal!! As soon as Jefferson and Madison saw Hamilton's liberal interpretation of it they formed the Republican Party to destroy Hamilton, his party, and liberalism. They succeeded on all counts in what Jefferson called the Second American Revolution. Conservatism became the tradition of America until the communist inspired New Deal!

Welcome to your first lesson in American History, my child. How old are you???


But the question: did the framers create a liberal or conservative government when they changed a government with no powers to a government with 17 plus powers?

too stupid!! its not "either, or", dummy!!! 0-17 is in the conservative range in anybody's mind who is sane which of course explains why no liberal would want in a million years to go back to the tiny government of 1800!!

Which is the more liberal a government with power or a government with no power?

its not "either, or," dummy!! you lack the IQ even of a liberal!!
 
"There is no hope, no freedom, no pride in achievement".

Isn't that exactly what the Obama, Reid, Romney, Pelosi and the rest of the elitists want?

If we have no hope, no freedom and no pride then we will remain the subservient beings they seek to make us all into.

Immie
 
"There is no hope, no freedom, no pride in achievement".

Isn't that exactly what the Obama, Reid, Romney, Pelosi and the rest of the elitists want?

If we have no hope, no freedom and no pride then we will remain the subservient beings they seek to make us all into.

Immie

yes its a great plan: the treasonous libs encourage everyone to be subservient, dependent, and to vote for putting stolen money in their pockets. Its the basic Marxist /Obama plan.
 
Might want to read Madison and Hamilton's view of the necessary and proper clause in the Federalist Papers.

too stupid and 1000% liberal!! As soon as Jefferson and Madison saw Hamilton's liberal interpretation of it they formed the Republican Party to destroy Hamilton, his party, and liberalism. They succeeded on all counts in what Jefferson called the Second American Revolution. Conservatism became the tradition of America until the communist inspired New Deal!

Welcome to your first lesson in American History, my child. How old are you???


But the question: did the framers create a liberal or conservative government when they changed a government with no powers to a government with 17 plus powers?

too stupid!! its not "either, or", dummy!!! 0-17 is in the conservative range in anybody's mind who is sane which of course explains why no liberal would want in a million years to go back to the tiny government of 1800!!

Which is the more liberal a government with power or a government with no power?

its not "either, or," dummy!! you lack the IQ even of a liberal!!

OK, let's try it this way. If a group creates a new government with more power than the previous government, would you consider the creative group to be more on the liberal side or the conservative?
 
"I’ve paid $1.9 billion in taxes in my lifetime, now I am being told that I am not contributing my fair share?" Peterffy said in an interview."

How much more of his 'fair share' is Peterffy suppose to pay? You guys won't be happy until the government confiscates all pay and doles out stipends.


The "fair share" term is used to make plunder sound just.
 

Forum List

Back
Top