teapartysamurai
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 20,056
- 2,562
Front page of Drudge Report!
UNANIMOUS: Supreme Court sides with WAL-MART in sex-discrimination case...
UNANIMOUS: Blocks states' climate change lawsuit...
Won't hear ACORN claim over gov't funding...
DRUDGE REPORT 2011®
And the lawsuits from States suing Obama care haven't even reached the USSC!
I thought you libs told us it was "Constitutional" if the USSC said so!
I mean you libs sure told us that in the affirmative when it came to Roe v. Wade and all those "separation of church and state" decisions!
But Bush v. Gore comes along and suddenly what the USSC says isn't the last word on the Constitution any more!
So, what will be the flip flop on these?
I mean you idiot libs can't have it both ways. You can't tell us that Roe v. Wade is the final Constitutional word on abortion BUT any USSC decision that goes against your agenda ISN'T the final Constitutional word.
So, which flip flop will we get on this one?
I can't wait to hear!
UNANIMOUS: Supreme Court sides with WAL-MART in sex-discrimination case...
UNANIMOUS: Blocks states' climate change lawsuit...
Won't hear ACORN claim over gov't funding...
DRUDGE REPORT 2011®
And the lawsuits from States suing Obama care haven't even reached the USSC!
I thought you libs told us it was "Constitutional" if the USSC said so!
I mean you libs sure told us that in the affirmative when it came to Roe v. Wade and all those "separation of church and state" decisions!
But Bush v. Gore comes along and suddenly what the USSC says isn't the last word on the Constitution any more!
So, what will be the flip flop on these?
I mean you idiot libs can't have it both ways. You can't tell us that Roe v. Wade is the final Constitutional word on abortion BUT any USSC decision that goes against your agenda ISN'T the final Constitutional word.
So, which flip flop will we get on this one?
I can't wait to hear!