Cakes, Fakes & Counter-Quakes; Do The Kleins Have A Countersuit Against The Lesbians?

[Silhouette]

Christians don't have to prove a damn thing.

well, they kind of should if they are going to insist they have the right to violate laws the rest of us thought were kind of reasonable.

You thought they were kind of reasonable? No, you and those lesbians knew they violated 1st Amendment rights; which is why the lesbians would not let up when they were told no. Your cult wants to force Christianity to its knees on this issue. If you think that's going to happen, you're seriously mistaken.

Again, Johnny come lately PA laws created by inspiration from an illegal precedent (Obergefell's rampant swiss-cheese failures to abide by law and separation of powers), will not dominate the protections for religion within the individual at the SCOTUS level. But you folks HAD to push it. And now you've gotten exactly what you should've predicted: a microscopic examination by an otherwise squeamish court system of exactly what makes "LGBT" tick and why that "ticking" should 1. Exclude other kink minorities like polygamy and 2. Be legally dominant to religious protections in the Constitution.

Y'all just don't know when to stop. And now your bullshit lies of "homosexuality, transgenderism, etc. etc. etc. is inborn and not behavioral!" are going to bite you in the ass.

 

[rightwinger]

Christians don't have to prove a damn thing.

well, they kind of should if they are going to insist they have the right to violate laws the rest of us thought were kind of reasonable.

You thought they were kind of reasonable? No, you and those lesbians knew they violated 1st Amendment rights; which is why the lesbians would not let up when they were told no. Your cult wants to force Christianity to its knees on this issue. If you think that's going to happen, you're seriously mistaken.

Again, Johnny come lately PA laws created by inspiration from an illegal precedent (Obergefell's rampant swiss-cheese failures to abide by law and separation of powers), will not dominate the protections for religion within the individual at the SCOTUS level. But you folks HAD to push it. And now you've gotten exactly what you should've predicted: a microscopic examination by an otherwise squeamish court system of exactly what makes "LGBT" tick and why that "ticking" should 1. Exclude other kink minorities like polygamy and 2. Be legally dominant to religious protections in the Constitution.

Y'all just don't know when to stop. And now your bullshit lies of "homosexuality, transgenderism, etc. etc. etc. is inborn and not behavioral!" are going to bite you in the ass.

PA laws have been around over 50 years
Sadly, they were necessary to fight Jim Crow

Jim Crow 2017 aims to block access of gays to marriage

 

[Pop23]

Suicide is a Sin.

And someone is hurt in a suicide. Not only the poor fool who found a permanent solution to a temporary problem, but his family having to deal with the aftermath, whatever poor schlub has the bad luck to find the body, etc.

On the other hand, no one is really hurt by a gay wedding. If offends the bible thumping homophobes, but that's on them, not the folks getting married.

Your opinion noted.

Shall I continue, changing the goal post don’t help you though.

Lusting after the neighbors wife. A sin

Wanting the neighbors property. A sin

And if supplying a cake for sinful purpose is, in his opinion a Sin, then he is not only hurting himself, but his staff and the sinners.

 

[Silhouette]

^^ Promoting homosexual spread though any culture is not just a sin Pop, it's a mortal sin. There are different types. One you can recover from (venial sins) and others you cannot and will be tortured in the fires of Hell for eternity (mortal sin)

PA laws have been around over 50 years
Sadly, they were necessary to fight Jim Crow

Jim Crow 2017 aims to block access of gays to marriage

You mean PA laws about RACE? Where again in the US Constitution does it say "protection also for minority deviant sex kink/behaviors but not polyamory (polygamy) sex kink/behavior"? Can you post a quote and a link where minority deviant behaviors (except polygamy) are treated as equal to race from the US Constitution?

That's a rhetorical question, because that language doesn't exist, nor is alluded to at all in the US Constitution. What document will your team cite when it comes up against the actual language in the Constitution protecting the Kleins? Judicial cases? You're aware the judicial branch of government cannot add new language to the Constitution, which is the last dominant law of the land?

 

[JoeB131]

You thought they were kind of reasonable? No, you and those lesbians knew they violated 1st Amendment rights; which is why the lesbians would not let up when they were told no. Your cult wants to force Christianity to its knees on this issue. If you think that's going to happen, you're seriously mistaken.

Actually, here's what's already happening. Christianity is trying to run away from you homophobes as quickly as it can. Because honestly, you are kind of ugly people no one wants to be associated with.

Again, Johnny come lately PA laws created by inspiration from an illegal precedent (Obergefell's rampant swiss-cheese failures to abide by law and separation of powers), will not dominate the protections for religion within the individual at the SCOTUS level. But you folks HAD to push it. And now you've gotten exactly what you should've predicted: a microscopic examination by an otherwise squeamish court system of exactly what makes "LGBT" tick and why that "ticking" should 1. Exclude other kink minorities like polygamy and 2. Be legally dominant to religious protections in the Constitution.

Um, guy, you've been predicting this for the last two years... and if anything, gay marriage has become more accepted, not less. Now, the thing is PA laws aren't a new thing. They were largely instituted back in the 1960's so businesses couldn't keep discriminating against blacks. The religious issue was also litigated more than 50 years ago, when some idiot try to use religion to justify segregation.

Y'all just don't know when to stop. And now your bullshit lies of "homosexuality, transgenderism, etc. etc. etc. is inborn and not behavioral!" are going to bite you in the ass.

Meh, not really. If any behavior is in decline, it's religious stupidity, and we are all better off for it.

 

[Pop23]

^^ Promoting homosexual spread though any culture is not just a sin Pop, it's a mortal sin. There are different types. One you can recover from (venial sins) and others you cannot and will be tortured in the fires of Hell for eternity (mortal sin)

PA laws have been around over 50 years
Sadly, they were necessary to fight Jim Crow

Jim Crow 2017 aims to block access of gays to marriage

You mean PA laws about RACE? Where again in the US Constitution does it say "protection also for minority deviant sex kink/behaviors but not polyamory (polygamy) sex kink/behavior"? Can you post a quote and a link where minority deviant behaviors (except polygamy) are treated as equal to race from the US Constitution?

That's a rhetorical question, because that language doesn't exist, nor is alluded to at all in the US Constitution. What document will your team cite when it comes up against the actual language in the Constitution protecting the Kleins? Judicial cases? You're aware the judicial branch of government cannot add new language to the Constitution, which is the last dominant law of the land?

Damning yourself to eternal damnation is suicide.

No one, in their right mind would urge someone to jump from a building, except if involved a fucking cake?

 

[JoeB131]

Your opinion noted.

Shall I continue, changing the goal post don’t help you though.

Lusting after the neighbors wife. A sin

Wanting the neighbors property. A sin

Meh, can't see how those are sins... those are just feelings unless you act on them.

This is what was truly fucked up about Catholicism, that merely wanting to do something was as bad as doing it.

Well, maybe it was on the list of "things that are fucked up about Catholicism". Buggering little boys and collaborating with the Nazis were pretty fucked up, too.

 

[Silhouette]

. Now, the thing is PA laws aren't a new thing. They were largely instituted back in the 1960's so businesses couldn't keep discriminating against blacks. The religious issue was also litigated more than 50 years ago, when some idiot try to use religion to justify segregation.

What does race have to do Constitutionally with minority deviant sex kinks (except polygamy) under the 14th Amendment? Can you please explain your comparison? Because comparing a noble race of people to sticking your dick in another' guy's asshole, using it like an artificial vagina, is very insulting to the black people you keep comparing your cult's imaginary "Constitutional rights" to..

 

[Pop23]

You thought they were kind of reasonable? No, you and those lesbians knew they violated 1st Amendment rights; which is why the lesbians would not let up when they were told no. Your cult wants to force Christianity to its knees on this issue. If you think that's going to happen, you're seriously mistaken.

Actually, here's what's already happening. Christianity is trying to run away from you homophobes as quickly as it can. Because honestly, you are kind of ugly people no one wants to be associated with.

Again, Johnny come lately PA laws created by inspiration from an illegal precedent (Obergefell's rampant swiss-cheese failures to abide by law and separation of powers), will not dominate the protections for religion within the individual at the SCOTUS level. But you folks HAD to push it. And now you've gotten exactly what you should've predicted: a microscopic examination by an otherwise squeamish court system of exactly what makes "LGBT" tick and why that "ticking" should 1. Exclude other kink minorities like polygamy and 2. Be legally dominant to religious protections in the Constitution.

Um, guy, you've been predicting this for the last two years... and if anything, gay marriage has become more accepted, not less. Now, the thing is PA laws aren't a new thing. They were largely instituted back in the 1960's so businesses couldn't keep discriminating against blacks. The religious issue was also litigated more than 50 years ago, when some idiot try to use religion to justify segregation.

Y'all just don't know when to stop. And now your bullshit lies of "homosexuality, transgenderism, etc. etc. etc. is inborn and not behavioral!" are going to bite you in the ass.

Meh, not really. If any behavior is in decline, it's religious stupidity, and we are all better off for it.

WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER

This is not about cake, or the LGBTs claim of discrimination, it’s haters doing what haters do!

Thanks.

 

[JoeB131]

Damning yourself to eternal damnation is suicide.

Again, a God who would make someone gay and then condemn him to "eternal" damnation is kind of a fucked up psychopath.

Why do you guys want to worship someone you wouldn't want in your life as a real person?

If you had a friend who demanded you constantly praise him, and threatened to do horrible things to you if you didn't, and demanded to dictate how you live, you'd get this sociopath the fuck out of your life as quickly as you possibly could.

(Unrelated Donald Trump Picture)

But you all worship an imaginary being who does this because someone showed you a book with talking snakes and giants in it that says so.

 

[JoeB131]

WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER

This is not about cake, or the LGBTs claim of discrimination, it’s haters doing what haters do!

Thanks.

Hey, I'm all for anything that makes Christians miserable. They lost the plot a long time ago.

 

[Pop23]

Your opinion noted.

Shall I continue, changing the goal post don’t help you though.

Lusting after the neighbors wife. A sin

Wanting the neighbors property. A sin

Meh, can't see how those are sins... those are just feelings unless you act on them.

This is what was truly fucked up about Catholicism, that merely wanting to do something was as bad as doing it.

Well, maybe it was on the list of "things that are fucked up about Catholicism". Buggering little boys and collaborating with the Nazis were pretty fucked up, too.

You claim to know about Christian religion but don’t even know the 10 commandments?

Even lusting for many things are sins.

 

[Pop23]

WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER

This is not about cake, or the LGBTs claim of discrimination, it’s haters doing what haters do!

Thanks.

Hey, I'm all for anything that makes Christians miserable. They lost the plot a long time ago.

Shows your intent. You like being the victim!

 

[rightwinger]

^^ Promoting homosexual spread though any culture is not just a sin Pop, it's a mortal sin. There are different types. One you can recover from (venial sins) and others you cannot and will be tortured in the fires of Hell for eternity (mortal sin)

PA laws have been around over 50 years
Sadly, they were necessary to fight Jim Crow

Jim Crow 2017 aims to block access of gays to marriage

You mean PA laws about RACE? Where again in the US Constitution does it say "protection also for minority deviant sex kink/behaviors but not polyamory (polygamy) sex kink/behavior"? Can you post a quote and a link where minority deviant behaviors (except polygamy) are treated as equal to race from the US Constitution?

That's a rhetorical question, because that language doesn't exist, nor is alluded to at all in the US Constitution. What document will your team cite when it comes up against the actual language in the Constitution protecting the Kleins? Judicial cases? You're aware the judicial branch of government cannot add new language to the Constitution, which is the last dominant law of the land?

PA is about more than race

It includes sex, religion and sexuality

 

[rightwinger]

You thought they were kind of reasonable? No, you and those lesbians knew they violated 1st Amendment rights; which is why the lesbians would not let up when they were told no. Your cult wants to force Christianity to its knees on this issue. If you think that's going to happen, you're seriously mistaken.

Actually, here's what's already happening. Christianity is trying to run away from you homophobes as quickly as it can. Because honestly, you are kind of ugly people no one wants to be associated with.

Again, Johnny come lately PA laws created by inspiration from an illegal precedent (Obergefell's rampant swiss-cheese failures to abide by law and separation of powers), will not dominate the protections for religion within the individual at the SCOTUS level. But you folks HAD to push it. And now you've gotten exactly what you should've predicted: a microscopic examination by an otherwise squeamish court system of exactly what makes "LGBT" tick and why that "ticking" should 1. Exclude other kink minorities like polygamy and 2. Be legally dominant to religious protections in the Constitution.

Um, guy, you've been predicting this for the last two years... and if anything, gay marriage has become more accepted, not less. Now, the thing is PA laws aren't a new thing. They were largely instituted back in the 1960's so businesses couldn't keep discriminating against blacks. The religious issue was also litigated more than 50 years ago, when some idiot try to use religion to justify segregation.

Y'all just don't know when to stop. And now your bullshit lies of "homosexuality, transgenderism, etc. etc. etc. is inborn and not behavioral!" are going to bite you in the ass.

Meh, not really. If any behavior is in decline, it's religious stupidity, and we are all better off for it.

WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER

This is not about cake, or the LGBTs claim of discrimination, it’s haters doing what haters do!

Thanks.

Haters don't bake cakes

 

[JoeB131]

You claim to know about Christian religion but don’t even know the 10 commandments?

Even lusting for many things are sins.

Yup. Also boiling a kid in its' mother's milk is a bad thing. Oh, wait, that's a different ten commandments.

So let's look at the list of the Ten Commandments.

1) No other Gods- You guys aren't going around killing the Hindus or the Buddhists like God tells you to.

2) No Graven Images - Holy SHIT, someone better tell the Catholics!

3) No using the Lord's name in vain. Well, we aren't stoning anyone for that.

4) Keep Holy the Sabbath- Shit, we need to start stoning those fucks who work on Sunday.

I'm happy to say that I'm not coveting anyone's Oxen when we get to number 10, but I think most of us would have been stoned for the first four.

 

[Silhouette]

PA is about more than race

It includes sex, religion and sexuality

So then you affirm that polygamists can already legally marry, since polyamory is just another deviant sex kink? No? Why not, specifically? Do PA laws cover polygamists or not?

 

[Pop23]

You claim to know about Christian religion but don’t even know the 10 commandments?

Even lusting for many things are sins.

Yup. Also boiling a kid in its' mother's milk is a bad thing. Oh, wait, that's a different ten commandments.

So let's look at the list of the Ten Commandments.

1) No other Gods- You guys aren't going around killing the Hindus or the Buddhists like God tells you to.

2) No Graven Images - Holy SHIT, someone better tell the Catholics!

3) No using the Lord's name in vain. Well, we aren't stoning anyone for that.

4) Keep Holy the Sabbath- Shit, we need to start stoning those fucks who work on Sunday.

I'm happy to say that I'm not coveting anyone's Oxen when we get to number 10, but I think most of us would have been stoned for the first four.

You guys?

This is about “a baker”.

Dodgeball much?

 

[JoeB131]

Shows your intent. You like being the victim!

Naw, I stopped being the victim when I walked away from their crazy religion after my Mom's funeral. You know, the one where the psycho old nun said God had a good reason for her death.

You see, I'm not gay and I'm pretty indifferent to whether or not they can get married. I think it's fair that they should be able to, because, hey, why should just the straights have to suffer?

But the PURE MISERY that Christians get knowing they not only have to acknowledge gay marriages, but they will be put through the wringer if they try to impose their superstition on them... that's PURE FUCKING GOLD.

 

[JoeB131]

You guys?

This is about “a baker”.

Dodgeball much?

Who I am sure has worked on Sunday and said, "God Damn" when he hit his knee on a low table.