California suffering through SEVERE climate change

Have to admire the consistentcy of the AGWCult as they give the exact same answer to any question.

Q. Can you point to any repeatable lab work showing how a 120ppm increase in CO2 causes "climate change"?

A. Denier!! Just fucking die!!!

Q. How much do we have to reduce CO2 in order to prevent these imaginary consequences you guys make up on a daily basis?

A. Denier!!! Just fucking die!!!
 
I find it interesting that several people here want to blame liberal politicians for causing California's water shortage because they failed to build enough dams and reservoirs.

I think we can very easily go back just a little further and find a far more fundamental cause. More people moved to California than the environment could ever support. Who is to blame for that? Land developers, real estate moguls, investors... in short, businessmen looking to make a profit.

Environmentally conscientious citizens and politicians realizing that raping the water supply from the coast to the San Joaquin mountains to support a thin strip of wealthy beach-goers was not a scheme that would work out for anyone. Think of it as some of the earliest water rationing.

But humans are absurdly slow to learn. Be that as it may, this drought looks to last long enough that a sufficient number might actually get the message and move.

And this will be just another one of those drastic climatic changes that just happen to coincide with increased global warming. We fully expect you all to deny any connection whatsoever. It's just normal. It's just a natural cycle. It's what always happens. Right?
I think we can very easily go back just a little further and find a far more fundamental cause. More people moved to California than the environment could ever support. Who is to blame for that? Land developers, real estate moguls, investors... in short, businessmen looking to make a profit.
holy crap another mystery post by Crick. Isn't that what I and others have already stated months and months ago? Hey, did you convert?
 
That is NOT what you've been saying. You've said that the blame lies with the people who resisted the theft of the state's water supplies to support the burgeoning coastal developments. Your argument has been that all water should have been dammed up to supply the unchecked population.
 
Have to admire the consistentcy of the AGWCult as they give the exact same answer to any question.

Q. Can you point to any repeatable lab work showing how a 120ppm increase in CO2 causes "climate change"?

A. Denier!! Just fucking die!!!

Q. How much do we have to reduce CO2 in order to prevent these imaginary consequences you guys make up on a daily basis?

A. Denier!!! Just fucking die!!!
good generic reply denierboi :thup:
 
Have to admire the consistentcy of the AGWCult as they give the exact same answer to any question.

Q. Can you point to any repeatable lab work showing how a 120ppm increase in CO2 causes "climate change"?

A. Denier!! Just fucking die!!!

Q. How much do we have to reduce CO2 in order to prevent these imaginary consequences you guys make up on a daily basis?

A. Denier!!! Just fucking die!!!
good generic reply denierboi :thup:

Where's the lab work linking 120ppm of CO2 with climate chage?

How much do we have to lower CO2 to prevent Guam from tipping over?
 
That is NOT what you've been saying. You've said that the blame lies with the people who resisted the theft of the state's water supplies to support the burgeoning coastal developments. Your argument has been that all water should have been dammed up to supply the unchecked population.
yea dude, it is.
 
Have to admire the consistentcy of the AGWCult as they give the exact same answer to any question.

Q. Can you point to any repeatable lab work showing how a 120ppm increase in CO2 causes "climate change"?

A. Denier!! Just fucking die!!!

Q. How much do we have to reduce CO2 in order to prevent these imaginary consequences you guys make up on a daily basis?

A. Denier!!! Just fucking die!!!
good generic reply denierboi :thup:

Where's the lab work linking 120ppm of CO2 with climate chage?

How much do we have to lower CO2 to prevent Guam from tipping over?
more generic statements? Look at the Left Coast Frank57 :banghead: Climate Change is as plain as the nose on your face :deal:
 
Have to admire the consistentcy of the AGWCult as they give the exact same answer to any question.

Q. Can you point to any repeatable lab work showing how a 120ppm increase in CO2 causes "climate change"?

A. Denier!! Just fucking die!!!

Q. How much do we have to reduce CO2 in order to prevent these imaginary consequences you guys make up on a daily basis?

A. Denier!!! Just fucking die!!!
good generic reply denierboi :thup:

Where's the lab work linking 120ppm of CO2 with climate chage?

How much do we have to lower CO2 to prevent Guam from tipping over?
more generic statements? Look at the Left Coast Frank57 :banghead: Climate Change is as plain as the nose on your face :deal:
what's the change?
 
Have to admire the consistentcy of the AGWCult as they give the exact same answer to any question.

Q. Can you point to any repeatable lab work showing how a 120ppm increase in CO2 causes "climate change"?

A. Denier!! Just fucking die!!!

Q. How much do we have to reduce CO2 in order to prevent these imaginary consequences you guys make up on a daily basis?

A. Denier!!! Just fucking die!!!
good generic reply denierboi :thup:

Where's the lab work linking 120ppm of CO2 with climate chage?

How much do we have to lower CO2 to prevent Guam from tipping over?
more generic statements? Look at the Left Coast Frank57 :banghead: Climate Change is as plain as the nose on your face :deal:

Can you explain to us how CO2 only warmed the deep Pacific Ocean?

I'm not understanding how this worked at all, maybe someone form the AGWCult has an answer, and calling me a "DENIER!" isn't a real scientific answer
 
Frank, listening to you demand information that you've already been given on multiple occasions is tiresome. And it's not as if you make any efforts worth while in any other regard.

Warm surface waters are being driven against shorelines by winds changed by global warming. That warm water is subducted and replaced with colder water pulled up from the depths. Changes in global wind patterns are causing increased turnover that is cooling the surface and warming the depths.

Do you understand? Yes or No.

Are you going to remember this or are you going to blabber about CO2 in the ocean depths or LW radiation reaching thousands of feet down or make some other completely nonsensical charge?
 
Frank, listening to you demand information that you've already been given on multiple occasions is tiresome. And it's not as if you make any efforts worth while in any other regard.

Warm surface waters are being driven against shorelines by winds changed by global warming. That warm water is subducted and replaced with colder water pulled up from the depths. Changes in global wind patterns are causing increased turnover that is cooling the surface and warming the depths.

Do you understand? Yes or No.

Are you going to remember this or are you going to blabber about CO2 in the ocean depths or LW radiation reaching thousands of feet down or make some other completely nonsensical charge?
Cough cough, ahem (clear throat), BULLSHIT
 
Frank, listening to you demand information that you've already been given on multiple occasions is tiresome. And it's not as if you make any efforts worth while in any other regard.

Warm surface waters are being driven against shorelines by winds changed by global warming. That warm water is subducted and replaced with colder water pulled up from the depths. Changes in global wind patterns are causing increased turnover that is cooling the surface and warming the depths.

Do you understand? Yes or No.

Are you going to remember this or are you going to blabber about CO2 in the ocean depths or LW radiation reaching thousands of feet down or make some other completely nonsensical charge?
How long does it take the pacific to recover from a sunami?
 
Frank, listening to you demand information that you've already been given on multiple occasions is tiresome. And it's not as if you make any efforts worth while in any other regard.

Warm surface waters are being driven against shorelines by winds changed by global warming. That warm water is subducted and replaced with colder water pulled up from the depths. Changes in global wind patterns are causing increased turnover that is cooling the surface and warming the depths.

Do you understand? Yes or No.

Are you going to remember this or are you going to blabber about CO2 in the ocean depths or LW radiation reaching thousands of feet down or make some other completely nonsensical charge?
yeah come on 57Frank. It isn't as if you would change your mind even. We all know that don't we 57Frank (the '57' is for Celsius in this instance) CrusaderFrank
 
Frank, listening to you demand information that you've already been given on multiple occasions is tiresome. And it's not as if you make any efforts worth while in any other regard.

Warm surface waters are being driven against shorelines by winds changed by global warming. That warm water is subducted and replaced with colder water pulled up from the depths. Changes in global wind patterns are causing increased turnover that is cooling the surface and warming the depths.

Do you understand? Yes or No.

Are you going to remember this or are you going to blabber about CO2 in the ocean depths or LW radiation reaching thousands of feet down or make some other completely nonsensical charge?
yeah come on 57Frank. It isn't as if you would change your mind even. We all know that don't we 57Frank (the '57' is for Celsius in this instance) CrusaderFrank
why don't you just post up what he asks for? Are you afraid of the details in such a post? Seems you avoid that response like it was ebola. Come now dotster what say you, post up that there experimentaaaa ok? let's call a duck a duck and move on.
 

Forum List

Back
Top