California: There are three genders.

Leftists really helping the middle class out as usual.

"The state of California will now legally recognize non-binary as a third gender on official state identification documents.

In June, the District of Columbia followed Oregon's lead and began offering the gender-neutral choice of "X" on driver licenses and identification cards, and similar legislation is currently pending in New York."

California legally recognizes a third gender on driver's license

Even in a creationism museum, you won't encounter anything so blatantly anti-science. And now, they are making it the law. Unhinged regressivism on display.

Since gender is cultural, not biological, there is no anti-science about it.

It's downright preposterous that a conservative deigns to proffer what science can or cannot show as part of an argument they make for or against anything. That science has yet to establish whether exists or does not the Biblical God has never stopped many conservatives from believing such a being does exist. That the preponderance of climate scientists agree that anthropogenic climate change is real and material has not stopped many conservatives from accepting as much and the implications thereof.

Instead, what many conservatives do is ascribe to and cite science's findings when it affirms a political objective they have and reject them when they don't, sometimes even going as far as to assert that scientists subvert scientific method to political preferences...that even as those very conservatives exercise nothing resembling the rigor of the scientific method in presenting their opposing ideas. I'm sorry, but one cannot be taken seriously or as credible when one does that.
Of course climate change is real. The climate has been changing since the earth has had a climate. It doesn't take too much common sense to figure that one out.

Equivocation in and of itself as well as by way of oversimplification of the term I used.
That the preponderance of climate scientists agree that anthropogenic climate change is real and material has not stopped many conservatives from accepting as much and the implications thereof.

What on earth does climate change have to do with gender? Even the polar bears are face palming at your stupidity now.

It's been a blast to observe the thread, there are exactly as many insane people self identifying as I suspected.
 
Leftists really helping the middle class out as usual.

"The state of California will now legally recognize non-binary as a third gender on official state identification documents.

In June, the District of Columbia followed Oregon's lead and began offering the gender-neutral choice of "X" on driver licenses and identification cards, and similar legislation is currently pending in New York."

California legally recognizes a third gender on driver's license

Even in a creationism museum, you won't encounter anything so blatantly anti-science. And now, they are making it the law. Unhinged regressivism on display.

Since gender is cultural, not biological, there is no anti-science about it.

It's downright preposterous that a conservative deigns to proffer what science can or cannot show as part of an argument they make for or against anything. That science has yet to establish whether exists or does not the Biblical God has never stopped many conservatives from believing such a being does exist. That the preponderance of climate scientists agree that anthropogenic climate change is real and material has not stopped many conservatives from accepting as much and the implications thereof.

Instead, what many conservatives do is ascribe to and cite science's findings when it affirms a political objective they have and reject them when they don't, sometimes even going as far as to assert that scientists subvert scientific method to political preferences...that even as those very conservatives exercise nothing resembling the rigor of the scientific method in presenting their opposing ideas. I'm sorry, but one cannot be taken seriously or as credible when one does that.
Of course climate change is real. The climate has been changing since the earth has had a climate. It doesn't take too much common sense to figure that one out.

Equivocation in and of itself as well as by way of oversimplification of the term I used.
That the preponderance of climate scientists agree that anthropogenic climate change is real and material has not stopped many conservatives from accepting as much and the implications thereof.


There is no equivocation in that statement. It's simple truth.
 
bathrooms for all.jpg
 
What's the big outrage other than yeah, california does it so it must be crazy. So now, if police pull over a motorist, or question a suspect, they know who they're dealing with, especially if there's an arrest or if there's an accident. But, california... ripe for outrage from the ultra right.
Calls mental illness an outrage.
 
Leftists really helping the middle class out as usual.

"The state of California will now legally recognize non-binary as a third gender on official state identification documents.

In June, the District of Columbia followed Oregon's lead and began offering the gender-neutral choice of "X" on driver licenses and identification cards, and similar legislation is currently pending in New York."

California legally recognizes a third gender on driver's license

Even in a creationism museum, you won't encounter anything so blatantly anti-science. And now, they are making it the law. Unhinged regressivism on display.

Since gender is cultural, not biological, there is no anti-science about it.

It's downright preposterous that a conservative deigns to proffer what science can or cannot show as part of an argument they make for or against anything. That science has yet to establish whether exists or does not the Biblical God has never stopped many conservatives from believing such a being does exist. That the preponderance of climate scientists agree that anthropogenic climate change is real and material has not stopped many conservatives from accepting as much and the implications thereof.

Instead, what many conservatives do is ascribe to and cite science's findings when it affirms a political objective they have and reject them when they don't, sometimes even going as far as to assert that scientists subvert scientific method to political preferences...that even as those very conservatives exercise nothing resembling the rigor of the scientific method in presenting their opposing ideas. I'm sorry, but one cannot be taken seriously or as credible when one does that.
Of course climate change is real. The climate has been changing since the earth has had a climate. It doesn't take too much common sense to figure that one out.
Equivocation in and of itself as well as by way of oversimplification of the term I used.
That the preponderance of climate scientists agree that anthropogenic climate change is real and material has not stopped many conservatives from accepting as much and the implications thereof.
There is no equivocation in that statement. It's simple truth.
Argument by assertion, while also standing on your equivocal remark from before.
 
Best thing about freedom, which libs believe is only on their side regarding whether society should accept a persons identity crises, is that I also have the freedom to not accept that behavior as a norm and never will.

Your identity crisis is your belief that anyone who not identical to you must somehow be afflicted with some sort of pernicious abnormality.
Yet you want everyone to think exactly the same. Will never happen.
I personally could care less if someone wishes to be a freak or live outside the norm. I already live with that in society. Gives me a good laugh every time I see some mentally ill person claim to be what they clearly are not.
However, you can't stand the notion that a large percentage of the population will never accept your viewpoint. Nor are required to accept it.
 
Best thing about freedom, which libs believe is only on their side regarding whether society should accept a persons identity crises, is that I also have the freedom to not accept that behavior as a norm and never will.

Your identity crisis is your belief that anyone who not identical to you must somehow be afflicted with some sort of pernicious abnormality.

Dear NYcarbineer: And isn't that how the LGBT
are coming across as well? If others don't believe "identically"
about gender defined internally by personal identity
vs. scientifically by genetics and birth,
then those "opposing" beliefs are inferior, should be excluded or punished.

Why aren't both beliefs treated equally?

Look at LordBrownTrout reply
as coming across as "intolerant" of the other views?

If it's wrongful for the science-based definition of gender to exclude and disparage
those of the faith based "identity" approach to gender,
isn't it equally damaging and discriminatory for
the "identity" approach to gender to demean and disparage
those of the scientific/genetic approach to determining gender?

Why is it okay for one side to discriminate but wrong for the other???
 
Leftists really helping the middle class out as usual.

"The state of California will now legally recognize non-binary as a third gender on official state identification documents.

In June, the District of Columbia followed Oregon's lead and began offering the gender-neutral choice of "X" on driver licenses and identification cards, and similar legislation is currently pending in New York."

California legally recognizes a third gender on driver's license

Even in a creationism museum, you won't encounter anything so blatantly anti-science. And now, they are making it the law. Unhinged regressivism on display.

Since gender is cultural, not biological, there is no anti-science about it.
Correct.

It’s also a civil liberties issue, where the Constitution recognizes the right to self-determination, the right to make personal decisions about one’s life, including the right to make decisions as to gender.

Needless to say, authoritarian conservatives are frightened by such expressions of individual liberty, and seek to compel conformity, the consequence of their fear, ignorance, bigotry, and hate.

"authoritarian conservatives are frightened by such expressions of individual liberty"

A man having his dick and testicles chopped off is an expression of individual liberty....um okay, whatever :uhoh3:
 
The goofy warden bitch at the prison said gender was assigned to you at birth and I asked her who assigned it? She wouldn't say....
God did.....

Now you can also say natural selection of the XX-XY CROMOZONEs.. and the Sperm that won...

Both present themselves as (decisions) genitalia at birth.
 
Leftists really helping the middle class out as usual.

"The state of California will now legally recognize non-binary as a third gender on official state identification documents.

In June, the District of Columbia followed Oregon's lead and began offering the gender-neutral choice of "X" on driver licenses and identification cards, and similar legislation is currently pending in New York."

California legally recognizes a third gender on driver's license

Even in a creationism museum, you won't encounter anything so blatantly anti-science. And now, they are making it the law. Unhinged regressivism on display.

Since gender is cultural, not biological, there is no anti-science about it.

It's downright preposterous that a conservative deigns to proffer what science can or cannot show as part of an argument they make for or against anything. That science has yet to establish whether exists or does not the Biblical God has never stopped many conservatives from believing such a being does exist. That the preponderance of climate scientists agree that anthropogenic climate change is real and material has not stopped many conservatives from accepting as much and the implications thereof.

Instead, what many conservatives do is ascribe to and cite science's findings when it affirms a political objective they have and reject them when they don't, sometimes even going as far as to assert that scientists subvert scientific method to political preferences...that even as those very conservatives exercise nothing resembling the rigor of the scientific method in presenting their opposing ideas. I'm sorry, but one cannot be taken seriously or as credible when one does that.
Of course climate change is real. The climate has been changing since the earth has had a climate. It doesn't take too much common sense to figure that one out.
Equivocation in and of itself as well as by way of oversimplification of the term I used.
That the preponderance of climate scientists agree that anthropogenic climate change is real and material has not stopped many conservatives from accepting as much and the implications thereof.
There is no equivocation in that statement. It's simple truth.
Argument by assertion, while also standing on your equivocal remark from before.

Again, its simple truth. Im only stating proven science in regards to continuous climate change over millennia. Your assertion and equivocation arguments are unfounded and basically just folly.
 
Leftists really helping the middle class out as usual.

"The state of California will now legally recognize non-binary as a third gender on official state identification documents.

In June, the District of Columbia followed Oregon's lead and began offering the gender-neutral choice of "X" on driver licenses and identification cards, and similar legislation is currently pending in New York."

California legally recognizes a third gender on driver's license

Even in a creationism museum, you won't encounter anything so blatantly anti-science. And now, they are making it the law. Unhinged regressivism on display.

Since gender is cultural, not biological, there is no anti-science about it.
Correct.

It’s also a civil liberties issue, where the Constitution recognizes the right to self-determination, the right to make personal decisions about one’s life, including the right to make decisions as to gender.

Needless to say, authoritarian conservatives are frightened by such expressions of individual liberty, and seek to compel conformity, the consequence of their fear, ignorance, bigotry, and hate.

"authoritarian conservatives are frightened by such expressions of individual liberty"

A man having his dick and testicles chopped off is an expression of individual liberty....um okay, whatever :uhoh3:

You wish to pretend that is the only liberty conservatives have fought against?
 
Best thing about freedom, which libs believe is only on their side regarding whether society should accept a persons identity crises, is that I also have the freedom to not accept that behavior as a norm and never will.

Your identity crisis is your belief that anyone who not identical to you must somehow be afflicted with some sort of pernicious abnormality.

Dear NYcarbineer: And isn't that how the LGBT
are coming across as well? If others don't believe "identically"
about gender defined internally by personal identity
vs. scientifically by genetics and birth,
then those "opposing" beliefs are inferior, should be excluded or punished.

?

LGBT people want conservatives to stop trying to deny them equal rights.
 
Best thing about freedom, which libs believe is only on their side regarding whether society should accept a persons identity crises, is that I also have the freedom to not accept that behavior as a norm and never will.

Your identity crisis is your belief that anyone who not identical to you must somehow be afflicted with some sort of pernicious abnormality.

Dear NYcarbineer: And isn't that how the LGBT
are coming across as well? If others don't believe "identically"
about gender defined internally by personal identity
vs. scientifically by genetics and birth,
then those "opposing" beliefs are inferior, should be excluded or punished.

?

LGBT people want conservatives to stop trying to deny them equal rights.

No, LGBT are intolerant of other views and as such, the intolerance should and will be thrown back into their face.
 
Best thing about freedom, which libs believe is only on their side regarding whether society should accept a persons identity crises, is that I also have the freedom to not accept that behavior as a norm and never will.

Your identity crisis is your belief that anyone who not identical to you must somehow be afflicted with some sort of pernicious abnormality.

Dear NYcarbineer: And isn't that how the LGBT
are coming across as well? If others don't believe "identically"
about gender defined internally by personal identity
vs. scientifically by genetics and birth,
then those "opposing" beliefs are inferior, should be excluded or punished.

?

LGBT people want conservatives to stop trying to deny them equal rights.
Same lie puked out a trillion times does not make it less a lie, liar.
 
You can tell that the US society has sank to the bottom of the barrel when it's considered normal behaviour to bully people who are going through a very rough time.
 
Best thing about freedom, which libs believe is only on their side regarding whether society should accept a persons identity crises, is that I also have the freedom to not accept that behavior as a norm and never will.

Your identity crisis is your belief that anyone who not identical to you must somehow be afflicted with some sort of pernicious abnormality.

Dear NYcarbineer: And isn't that how the LGBT
are coming across as well? If others don't believe "identically"
about gender defined internally by personal identity
vs. scientifically by genetics and birth,
then those "opposing" beliefs are inferior, should be excluded or punished.

?

LGBT people want conservatives to stop trying to deny them equal rights.

No, LGBT are intolerant of other views and as such, the intolerance should and will be thrown back into their face.

They are intolerant of being discriminated against. That's a sentiment every American has the right to act on.
 
The goofy warden bitch at the prison said gender was assigned to you at birth and I asked her who assigned it? She wouldn't say....
God did.....

Now you can also say natural selection of the XX-XY CROMOZONEs.. and the Sperm that won...

Both present themselves as (decisions) genitalia at birth.

Genitals are organs. So is the brain.
The identity inside the brain is still different from the physical differences in the brain associated with gender. Close NYcarbineer but we can't get away totally from the faith based freedom of choice in identity that is separate from both the physical differences in brains and other organs associated with gender. It's similar to the brains of secular nontheists being different from religious believers but ppl still have a choice and govt cannot endorse prayer just because someone's brain is geared toward that. And brains of liberals are different from brains of conservatives but people still have free choice in those matters of beliefs as well, even if some ppl cannot help that their brains inherently adhere to those beliefs. Neither side should be in the business of abusing govt to force one set over another at the expense of equal beliefs of others. We still have free choice of identity even where our brains show biases and differences that correlate with our preferences.
 
Best thing about freedom, which libs believe is only on their side regarding whether society should accept a persons identity crises, is that I also have the freedom to not accept that behavior as a norm and never will.

Your identity crisis is your belief that anyone who not identical to you must somehow be afflicted with some sort of pernicious abnormality.

Dear NYcarbineer: And isn't that how the LGBT
are coming across as well? If others don't believe "identically"
about gender defined internally by personal identity
vs. scientifically by genetics and birth,
then those "opposing" beliefs are inferior, should be excluded or punished.

?

LGBT people want conservatives to stop trying to deny them equal rights.

No, LGBT are intolerant of other views and as such, the intolerance should and will be thrown back into their face.

They are intolerant of being discriminated against. That's a sentiment every American has the right to act on.
Great NYcarbineer ! So let's be fair and equal and not discriminate either against Christian's who want to express their faith based beliefs with crosses prayers nativity scene s Christmas etc. If one set of expressions and practice has to be removed from public policy to remain neutral and not impose on others who disagree or reject those expressions of beliefs, the same treatment should apply to LGBT beliefs. But if you say not to discriminate but to ENDORSE LGBt beliefs through public policy, the Christians have the same right not to be forced to keep their beliefs in private as well!!!

Or else you are advocating discrimination by Creed, by treating these beliefs differently!! Either remove both or include both. If govt endorses one set of faith based beliefs then all deserve to be endorsed and recognized by govt. Right?
 

Forum List

Back
Top