Zone1 Calling/accusing other members "groomer"

[Moonglow]

Like I said in the thread this asinine rule was discussed.
'Groomer" a year ago even, I would have agreed the word is basically the same as calling someone a pedophile, since that is the only time anyone ever used it.
But here we are today. No one would have ever DREAMED people would place their OWN CHILDREN in highly sexualized environments to enhance their narcissistic virtue signaling.
No one could have ever thought this would happen.
Obviously those parents are not pedophiles. But the closest word in the English language to describe this abhorrent behavior is grooming. So the usage of the word changed to include people, WHO ARE NOT PEDOPHILES, but place young children in highly sexualized situations.

Asinine. Absurd. Ridiculous and stupid.

And to note.. I don't believe I have actually used the word here specifically to a member.
Probably just said you are out of your narcissistic mind.

You must have missed the nudist movement.

 

[Moonglow]

This thread proves otherwise buddy.

Hardly, here is yet another blind net-casting accusation of guilt.

 

[Coyote]

Because it's just a word to describe what you stand for in that circumstance. We call each other every other name in the book? Why ban specifically that word and the G word?

Because it is probably the worst crime in our society. It isn’t just a word. It’s a monstrous act. And to falsely accuse someone is just as monstrous. We hate pedos.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

We hate pedos.

Bullshit

 

[Dogmaphobe]

mhg

….lotta bullshit there, and way more than the daily recommended dose of self-absorbed melodrama.

IF you contacted a Sr Mod, and you weren’t clear on that, it would have been looked at seriously. If it didn’t have merit, that would have been explained to you. I’m guessing the real reason you don’t contact a Sr Mod is because you want to be free to lob your pedo-grenades at those you dislike rather make a case.

A "pedo Grenade"

Is that like what happens when a certain malignant narcissist says I am "projecting" when I'm talking about her friend Delta4Embassny?

That type of pedo bombing? I've never done anythenen close to that.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Bullshit

It's like saying how much she hates kittens when she leaves all those saucers of milk on her doorstep.

 

[Zincwarrior]

This thread proves otherwise buddy.

Ioh contraire, it proves you people can't give up your latest gate tag for anyone who disagrees with you. Any other board would accept this without issue. But here it's 30 pages of ranting about Mods scheming and other bullshit, just because you can't insult other posters in some fashion. It's both sad and pathetic.

 

[Road Runner]

Because it is probably the worst crime in our society. It isn’t just a word. It’s a monstrous act. And to falsely accuse someone is just as monstrous. We hate pedos.

If you hate pedos then why don't you want them exposed to the whole entire board if there's evidence to back it up? On another website of mine a fifteen year old girl was being sexually harassed by a thirty-three year old man. He threatened to kidnap her and force her to cuddle with him. ALL of my online friends reposted the warning about him in my status update thread because we wanted to make sure he was exposed and he couldn't hurt other children on that website until the police got a hold of him. That could never happen here because you care more about protecting the pedophile than the kids. End of story.

 

[Zincwarrior]

A "pedo Grenade"

Is that like what happens when a certain malignant narcissist says I am "projecting" when I'm talking about her friend Delta4Embassny?

That type of pedo bombing? I've never done anythenen close to that.

Dude here's an idea, leave.

 

[Road Runner]

Ioh contraire, it proves you people can't give up your latest gate tag for anyone who disagrees with you. Any other board would accept this without issue. But here it's 30 pages of ranting about Mods scheming and other bullshit, just because you can't insult other posters in some fashion. It's both sad and pathetic.

We're pathetic? Read post #508.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's like saying how much she hates kittens when she leaves all those saucers of milk on her doorstep.

Her political ideas prevents her from being non partisan.

But defending child molesting for the sake of "moderation".... no just no

 

[Zincwarrior]

If you hate pedos then why don't you want them exposed to the whole entire board if there's evidence to back it up? On another website of mine a fifteen year old girl was being sexually harassed by a thirty-three year old man. He threatened to kidnap her and force her to cuddle with him. ALL of my online friends reposted the warning about him in my status update thread because we wanted to make sure he was exposed and he couldn't hurt other children on that website until the police got a hold of him. That could never happen here because you care more about protecting the pedophile than the kids. End of story.

That's not what's happening. Your not some super sleuth exposing evil doers. You're just insulting people who disagree with you.

 

[BlueGin]

Good thing posters here are not doing that.

They sure as hell are.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Dude here's an idea, leave.

You should , you lie constantly

 

[BlueGin]

Go get it!

They like to play fast and loose with their own “ rules”.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Dude here's an idea, leave.

Isn't it fun, kids, when it's the moderators who are the least well-behaved posters in a thread?

 

[Natural Citizen]

I have no interest in censoring public libraries for your Taliban fantasies.

So people that disagree with child porn in libraries are related to the “ Taliban” now huh? Seems you mods don’t mind defamatory language so much after all.

I dunno. Guess his insinuation checks the right boxes?

It's a rather consistent phenomenon with him, though, if we pay attention. He's comfortable.

And, unfortunately, another product of someone else exercising very bad judgement.

I think his peers find him humorous or something. Or so I've read them say around here. He clearly feels encouraged. Thus the level of comfort that goes with the consistency.

 

[Road Runner]

That's not what's happening. Your not some super sleuth exposing evil doers. You're just insulting people who disagree with you.

Even if that wasn't a lie that still couldn't happen here because it's forbidden to call people pedos.

 

[Coyote]

Ooh -- it's that insanity accusation.

Support my wanting to have the little kiddies viewing gay porn or else you're insane!!

They really aren’t that complicated.

No accusing or implying a member is pedo.

No discussing specific moderation actions on the open boards.

No divulging the contents of PM’s on the open boards.

And, what surprise, you’ve violated at least TWO OF THOSE on this thread alone.

And here you are still, crying and complaining about being so persecuted and such a victim (ad nauseam )…and your posts are still here.

You must be special.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

You should , you lie constantly

My not wanting children exposed to gay pornography really has him in a snit.