Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If at this stage of enlightenment you continue to believe there is some valid comparison between marijuana and heroin you really should keep it to yourself. Because if you someday become aware of the facts you will be severely embarrassed.Maybe chemical messing with it will finally make it deadly enough for druggies to kill themselves off. Look at what happened with heroin. It's become self cleaning.
Do you believe that laws against drug use are the main cause of drug overdose?I don't use anything. Which is why I get such a kick out of overdose deaths.
Making any form of edible marijuana requires special knowledge of an extraction process before proper cooking or baking is possible. Because of the suppressive influence of the drug laws that process has remained largely obscure. Consequently, far too many ill-informed experimenters think cooking or baking with raw leaf and seeds is all that is necessary. But the fact is the effect of that mistake is severely damaging to the liver and in sufficient quantity can be fatal.Here is a fun one.
Denver coroner: Man fell to death after eating marijuana cookies
More. More. More.
Marijuana is HARMLESS, ya hear.
Janis Joplin died because of drug laws?Do you believe that laws against drug use are the main cause of drug overdose?I don't use anything. Which is why I get such a kick out of overdose deaths.
In this case the brownie was bought commercially. Who cares why it's fatal. It's fatal and we need more of it.Making any form of edible marijuana requires special knowledge of an extraction process before proper cooking or baking is possible. Because of the suppressive influence of the drug laws that process has remained largely obscure. Consequently, far too many ill-informed experimenters think cooking or baking with raw leaf and seeds is all that is necessary. But the fact is the effect of that mistake is severely damaging to the liver and in sufficient quantity can be fatal.Here is a fun one.
Denver coroner: Man fell to death after eating marijuana cookies
More. More. More.
Marijuana is HARMLESS, ya hear.
So the cause of death in these cases is not marijuana but ignorance.
While there are examples of suicidal excess it is more likely that Joplin's (and Presley's) overdose was the unintentional result of erroneous dilution measurement by the dealer, which is not uncommon where bootleg drugs are concerned.Janis Joplin died because of drug laws?
Legalize it all. There is no reason cheap krikodil can't be picked up at Walgreens.
I don't know the source of your information but you should understand that hundreds of thousands of pot brownies are consumed every day, some of which are home-made while others are commercially available from knowledgeable and experienced bakers and the only effect produced by them is the desired euphoric tranquility. Yet your thinking is swayed by one death, which could be the result of a heart attack or some other organic deficiency -- or deliberate poisoning.In this case the brownie was bought commercially. Who cares why it's fatal. It's fatal and we need more of it.
In extreme examples of degenerate suicidal addiction I believe that to be a perfectly reasonable solution to an otherwise insoluble problem. Provide these hopeless with the equivalent of a comfortable prison cell and as much of their drug of choice as they want until they overdose.Everyone has the right to defend themselves and their homes from the impaired druggie. Other than that, letting them die is hardly violent. Just give them more drugs until they peacefully pass on.
Exactly. They don't suffer. They are fed, comfortable, safe. Everyone is safe from them. Those who use aren't really human beings anyway. They are more like animated meat.In extreme examples of degenerate suicidal addiction I believe that to be a perfectly reasonable solution to an otherwise insoluble problem. Provide these hopeless with the equivalent of a comfortable prison cell and as much of their drug of choice as they want until they overdose.Everyone has the right to defend themselves and their homes from the impaired druggie. Other than that, letting them die is hardly violent. Just give them more drugs until they peacefully pass on.
nope....its because like so many others like you,you are too chicken shit to leave.....For the 100th time, I'm here for the sabotage.well at least you have told everyone were your loyalties lie.....why are you still here?...go live in china you are always touting them....we dont need a person like you here,but they would love a person like you over there,just make sure you leave your citizenship at the airport....We made it 50 plus years. We certainly won't make it another 50 with a majority of people addicted to some drug. We wouldn't survive an entire country composed of drunks. Our future is Portugal. Illiterate druggies begging from one another.they also cant withstand the widespread ignorance of people who cant accept the fact that its no longer 1948....Sell? No. It's make sure they take it, but keep the fruit juice away. Too sugary. Not good for kids.You almost gotta laugh, the same limp wristed dumbasses who are locking up citizens for the crime of smoking a freaking legal cigarette want to sell a gateway drug to our kids.
No civilization can withstand the widespread impairment of its people.
Hopefully Russia or China puts us out of our misery.
Our founders would be rolling in their graves if they knew we banned something that grows in a ditch.
The faster druggies die off the better. Legalize it all. There is no reason why krokodil can't be picked up at the nearest Walgreens.
Did they use drugs, smoke pot? They are addicts. They might not be using right now, but they are still addicts. Unlike someone who has never used drugs.like you had proof when you were calling anyone who smoked pot 30 years ago an addict,right?...your opinion wasnt proof either but yet you kept on calling those people "addicts"....so how does it feel when you are on the other end?....If you have proof to the contrary, I would be interested in seeing such proof. Opinion is not proof.sure you dont.....I don't use anything. Which is why I get such a kick out of overdose deaths.
To the addict, everyone is an addict. To the alcoholic, everyone is an alcoholic. It's part of the disease.
Let the druggies go. Stop trying to get people to stop taking drugs. Some will, some won't. Stop taking care of them. Stop trying to stop overdose deaths. Let them go.
Alcoholics are more realistic. If they haven't had a drink in 50 years, they know they are still alcoholics.
Have you ever talked to an alcoholic that hasn't had a drink in 30 years? They admit they are still alcoholics.oh geezus....you should learn what an addict is....here is a clue,if a person is not addicted to the drug and hasnt even seen it in 30 years.....HE AINT ADDICTED TO IT....educated person my ass....Did they use drugs, smoke pot? They are addicts. They might not be using right now, but they are still addicts. Unlike someone who has never used drugs.like you had proof when you were calling anyone who smoked pot 30 years ago an addict,right?...your opinion wasnt proof either but yet you kept on calling those people "addicts"....so how does it feel when you are on the other end?....If you have proof to the contrary, I would be interested in seeing such proof. Opinion is not proof.sure you dont.....
To the addict, everyone is an addict. To the alcoholic, everyone is an alcoholic. It's part of the disease.
Let the druggies go. Stop trying to get people to stop taking drugs. Some will, some won't. Stop taking care of them. Stop trying to stop overdose deaths. Let them go.
Alcoholics are more realistic. If they haven't had a drink in 50 years, they know they are still alcoholics.
Someone that isn't currently using, is still an addict. They are an addict that isn't currently using.
To me, personally, I do not see a difference. If I know that someone used drugs 30 years ago, I will treat them as if they are high right now.
...for rope, not dope. Smoke some rope hemp and get back to us....and that they grew by the hundreds of acres.Our founders would be rolling in their graves if they knew we banned something that grows in a ditch.
I wouldn't know. I've never seen it. What I have seen are the streets of Los Angeles. Although I have not seen it directly, I am informed that in the northeast, overdose deaths happen at the rate of one a day. I have no reason to disbelieve that.Did they use drugs, smoke pot? They are addicts. They might not be using right now, but they are still addicts. Unlike someone who has never used drugs.like you had proof when you were calling anyone who smoked pot 30 years ago an addict,right?...your opinion wasnt proof either but yet you kept on calling those people "addicts"....so how does it feel when you are on the other end?....If you have proof to the contrary, I would be interested in seeing such proof. Opinion is not proof.sure you dont.....I don't use anything. Which is why I get such a kick out of overdose deaths.
To the addict, everyone is an addict. To the alcoholic, everyone is an alcoholic. It's part of the disease.
Let the druggies go. Stop trying to get people to stop taking drugs. Some will, some won't. Stop taking care of them. Stop trying to stop overdose deaths. Let them go.
Alcoholics are more realistic. If they haven't had a drink in 50 years, they know they are still alcoholics.
And yet...tens of millions of people drink alcohol without being addicted!
Sorry to break the bad news to you, but Reefer Madness is NOT a documentary!
