CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,715
- 69,868
Karl Marx was about as wrong as he could be, the only person as wrong on the economy is Paul Krugman
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Karl Marx believed that competitive markets would eventually devolve into monopolies whereby the market winners would capture the political machinery and hold non property owners captive to rising prices and diminishing services... until you had a whole underclass of alienated slaves working only for subsistence. But because the wealthy had so much money they would buy media and convince stupid people that their concentrated power must be defended on the grounds of freedom
Krugman has a book out called, "End this Depression Now"
Unkotare likes to always play the fool for some reason.
Krugman has a book out called, "End this Depression Now"
Unkotare likes to always play the fool for some reason.
Paul Krugman is a leftist whackjob.
Yup- Krugman the Nobel prize winner is a loon...only in the ignorant Pub dupe alternate universe...
The reason the Bush depression was relatively painless was 3-4 TRILLION in stimulus,
Thanks for the dumbazz Pub dupe debt cult talking points. Krugman agrees lol.
The reason the Bush depression was relatively painless was 3-4 TRILLION in stimulus,
dear, government spending depresses the economy because it shrinks the private economy which is responsible for growth. If you tax venture capital, for example, you have fewer new ventures like Apple, Google etc etc.
Is that really over your head??
So is the freedom of capitalism worth the possibility of ending up with nothing?
Yes.....
in fact that is a big Hell Yes.
the other option is
So is the security of communism worth the reality of ending up with nothing?
Yup- and a socialist these days IS a social democrat, and Hitler had no bomb, or he would have used it, Prof. Beck. Link to anything? Change the channel, you are sorely misled.
Do you think Hitler was a socialist? That's where this idiocy begins.
When I was visiting Prague a few years ago and sitting in an Irish bar on the main drag there, some guy from Ireland wanted to chat since I'm an American and he was Irish going to college there. I saw his "Che" lighter on the table and knew he was a moron, especially when he claimed to be a Communist studing in Prague.
I have an Economics degree and MBA, so this was like dinner time for me ripping into his beliefs.
After beating him over the head about Bush, Iraq, capitalism, etc he finally he admitted "Communism only works when EVERYONE is under it." In order for communists to get their way, they can't have competition of ideas.
He claimed the USSR failed because the Americans and British wouldn't help them with trade....so capitalists isolated them economicallly and it's our fault they failed, not the communist model.
His demented mind and comments showed the naive level of communist followers, especially young morons like him.
When I was visiting Prague a few years ago and sitting in an Irish bar on the main drag there, some guy from Ireland wanted to chat since I'm an American and he was Irish going to college there. I saw his "Che" lighter on the table and knew he was a moron, especially when he claimed to be a Communist studing in Prague.
I have an Economics degree and MBA, so this was like dinner time for me ripping into his beliefs.
After beating him over the head about Bush, Iraq, capitalism, etc he finally he admitted "Communism only works when EVERYONE is under it." In order for communists to get their way, they can't have competition of ideas.
He claimed the USSR failed because the Americans and British wouldn't help them with trade....so capitalists isolated them economicallly and it's our fault they failed, not the communist model.
His demented mind and comments showed the naive level of communist followers, especially young morons like him.
If you do indeed have degree or two in economics it sounds like the Irishman completely destroyed you, not with his arguments but yours. Your arguments do not sound at all like the arguments of someone with a background in that subject.