Casey Anthony

[oldsalt]

That was pathetic.

No, what's pathetic is posters like you, who fall back to unverifiable qualifications ( look at me syndrome), to try and bolster their flagging argument. Paaaathetic.


Now back to the trial.

If she has a legal background (as do I), we're not supposed to offer the possible LEGAL ramifications? Since when does this board deny a persons credentials when forming an opiinion?

LOL, not denied by the board, but why on an anon. board, would I be expected to take someone's word? Not happening. Now if someone wants to give specifics that are verifiable, have at!

 

[oldsalt]

just a quick thought regarding the broken neck searches, i know i have been surfing the net while listening to the news or reading something and thought "what is that? or really?"

goodness only knows the wild and wacky crap i've googled which i have never again looked for, utilized nor remember.

just sayin'

Well, if each piece of circumstantial evidence is isolated and looked at alone, perhaps. Combine broken neck searches, with all the other searches, in a time when ICA was the likely one at home, Ga and Cindy at work, coupled with the fact of Caylee winding up dead, etc.......Putting all the evidence together......just sayin'.

 

[oldsalt]

I'd bet my next pay check that she's guilty.

Well, if the jury thinks so, Florida juries do not rule kindly to women who are so brutal as the evidence suggests. Aileen Carol Wuornos executed October 9, 2002

Oh yeah, now there's a good analogy. A frustrated lesbian who shot and killed only men she used and who then tried to screw her. Just like Casey Anthony. Now why didn't I think of that?

So, if ICA is convicted of murder 1 of her own child daughter, that's a less heinous crime???

 

[oldsalt]

No, I didn't read where you said that. I don't read every single post in this thread unless it is a response to something that I posted or a point that someone made that I was interested in. If you notice, this thread gains about 5 pages a day. I don't have the time to read through them all, but I have read most of them.

Well, I think that the prosecution is doing a fine job. You ask how there could be no bodily fluid in the vehicle? Could it be that she maybe was wrapped up in plastic, a blanket or something of the sort? Hell, even a tarp could have been layed down in the trunk. That no fluid argument is a weak one by them in my opinion. ~BH

I agree. The DT seems to be all over the map, trying to discredit thing that if you believe their story, didn't even happen! That's like a legal wassup! Again, I assert, the defense is going to be messed up, they didn't have much to work with. Laying out all the evidence, way beyond a reasonable doubt Casey killed her little girl.

Isn't that what a defense team is supposed to do? Imagine that.

Be putting on a half assed defense? Nope, they're not. Imagine that.

 

[R.D.]

To your first rebuttal, Cindy herself testified she didn't know Casey was pregnant because she had never discussed it with her. A photo at some wedding with Casey obviously about 7 months pregnant standing with her mother was when that testimony took place.

As for your second, I have a different opinion. So sue me.

Your not going to convince me. Why try?

Sue you? Opinions are worthless, what would I get?


Just now Ashton:
"Why didn't you wrap your pigs in a blanket"

The bug boy is now a prosecution witness. Poor Bozo

 

[R.D.]

just a quick thought regarding the broken neck searches, i know i have been surfing the net while listening to the news or reading something and thought "what is that? or really?"

goodness only knows the wild and wacky crap i've googled which i have never again looked for, utilized nor remember.

just sayin'

That's true

But the collection of searches and the time frame that makes it suspicious.

 

[Kiki Cannoli]

To your first rebuttal, Cindy herself testified she didn't know Casey was pregnant because she had never discussed it with her. A photo at some wedding with Casey obviously about 7 months pregnant standing with her mother was when that testimony took place.

As for your second, I have a different opinion. So sue me.

Your not going to convince me. Why try?

Sue you? Opinions are worthless, what would I get?


Just now Ashton:
"Why didn't you wrap your pigs in a blanket"

The bug boy is now a prosecution witness. Poor Bozo

the pigs in a blanket line was funny - you know he was waiting to use it!

 

[R.D.]

v
the pigs in a blanket line was funny - you know he was waiting to use it!

I actually feel bad for this kid. Ashton is tearing him apart

 

[Kiki Cannoli]

just a quick thought regarding the broken neck searches, i know i have been surfing the net while listening to the news or reading something and thought "what is that? or really?"

goodness only knows the wild and wacky crap i've googled which i have never again looked for, utilized nor remember.

just sayin'

That's true

But the collection of searches and the time frame that makes it suspicious.

Understood, and I agree (with you too OldSalt.) Truth is when I hear google searches being entered into evidence, I cringe...my internet footprint is circumspect at best.

 

[R.D.]

Understood, and I agree (with you too OldSalt.) Truth is when I hear google searches being entered into evidence, I cringe...my internet footprint is circumspect at best.

I hear ya.

Regarding the rumors of her doing porn I absolutely did not investigate

 

[Dabs]

Careful, fellas, Dabs doesn't like anyone discussing other cases... She always has her trigger finger on the neg rep.

You betcha, and btw Maggot, it takes a bitch to know a bitch.
So careful ladies, and gents, if you aren't on Maggot's good side, you'll be Rep-ed with being called a Bitch

God you're dumb. It's called retaliation for a neg rep "someone" gave me..."because [you] can." Funny how that works, ain't it?

Call me dumb all you like, but I believe it's your dumbass that tries to drill into our heads stuff you think you know all about, about this case, when you can't even get the damn name straight!
You keep calling them the Anderson's.....wtf??..they are the Anthony's!
How are we supposed to listen to your babble and believe half of what you say, when you can't get the simple name correct even.
Ready for another cause I can?

 

[Dabs]

Have you seen the pleadings? Are the lesser includeds in it or not? If not, it is either guilty of captial murder or not guily. I have not seen them and will not act like I have.

Well why not? You act like you know everything else because of your so-called "education"? Grab some wood there sister, and just calm down for a minute. I could really care less about your red diaper doper baby education. Nor do I give a crap about what your leftist professor brainwashed you with, told or taught you.

Fact is, You're playing the same spin artist game that your fellow Attorneys are playing on Fox, Nancy Grace and C.N.N every night and day. Let me guess something, you're a Defense attorney eh? ~BH

At what time does anyone on HLN or CNN root for the defense? Good grief, even Dr. Drew has lost my confidence. What an idiot. Are we supposed to continue to believe he takes a rational approach to addiction with his hit reality show "Celebrity Rehab"? I mean why not just haul those celebrities in, call 'em all drunks and druggies and throw 'em in 10X10 rooms to detox? It's how he's treated Casey Anthony after all, sans all the background, much of it still unknown.

All that said, I really wonder why some of you feel this compulsion to go off all half-cocked just because someone disagrees with you. This isn't even a POLITICAL thread, yet you've gotta throw in your stupid dig about "leftist" professors. I will say the same thing to you: Grab some wood buster and calm down.

Personally, I'm fucking sick of the attitudes.

I'm fucking sick of you too~

 

[R.D.]

I'm fucking sick of you too~

She lacks self awareness - as does her reluctant team mate.


Don't let them bother you

 

[oldsalt]

To your first rebuttal, Cindy herself testified she didn't know Casey was pregnant because she had never discussed it with her. A photo at some wedding with Casey obviously about 7 months pregnant standing with her mother was when that testimony took place.

As for your second, I have a different opinion. So sue me.

Your not going to convince me. Why try?

Sue you? Opinions are worthless, what would I get?


Just now Ashton:
"Why didn't you wrap your pigs in a blanket"

The bug boy is now a prosecution witness. Poor Bozo

I could see that coming early on!

 

[oldsalt]

You betcha, and btw Maggot, it takes a bitch to know a bitch.
So careful ladies, and gents, if you aren't on Maggot's good side, you'll be Rep-ed with being called a Bitch

God you're dumb. It's called retaliation for a neg rep "someone" gave me..."because [you] can." Funny how that works, ain't it?

Call me dumb all you like, but I believe it's your dumbass that tries to drill into our heads stuff you think you know all about, about this case, when you can't even get the damn name straight!
You keep calling them the Anderson's.....wtf??..they are the Anthony's!
How are we supposed to listen to your babble and believe half of what you say, when you can't get the simple name correct even.
Ready for another cause I can?

It's because of the vast superior legal training 'they' have, that their opinions are so valid, dontcha know!

 

[R.D.]

By the way

ICAbitch laughed at the pig in blanked remark

 

[oldsalt]

By the way

ICAbitch laughed at the pig in blanked remark

I don't see how, under the circumstances, anyone could laugh, let alone ICA.

 

[Dabs]

By the way

ICAbitch laughed at the pig in blanked remark

I don't see how, under the circumstances, anyone could laugh, let alone ICA.

I agree with you.
But I'm betting, ICA is capable of laughing when she dumped her child's body, if she was the dumper.

 

[MaggieMae]

just a quick thought regarding the broken neck searches, i know i have been surfing the net while listening to the news or reading something and thought "what is that? or really?"

goodness only knows the wild and wacky crap i've googled which i have never again looked for, utilized nor remember.

just sayin'

Me too, especially when I'm really not even sure what I'm searching for in the first place. I always just figure Google does. An voila! They do, or die trying!

 

[MaggieMae]

No, what's pathetic is posters like you, who fall back to unverifiable qualifications ( look at me syndrome), to try and bolster their flagging argument. Paaaathetic.


Now back to the trial.

If she has a legal background (as do I), we're not supposed to offer the possible LEGAL ramifications? Since when does this board deny a persons credentials when forming an opiinion?

LOL, not denied by the board, but why on an anon. board, would I be expected to take someone's word? Not happening. Now if someone wants to give specifics that are verifiable, have at!

And you would believe it then, why? Anyone can pretend they graduated Yale and who would know otherwise? Me, I wasn't a lawyer, but a legal researcher responsible for digging up all that precedent like the two sides often discuss in this case. I also had to be very familiar with state and federal court procedure, what's allowed and what isn't. And sometimes the only way to verify what a person says is to do your own fact-checking.