Celebrating Robert E. Lee's Birthday Today Brings Out Southern Pride And Patriotism

Speaking of failures Robert E. Lee failed miserably in his attempt to be a traitor.
 
Who said blacks don't have the same legal rights?

You did.

You "legally" can do those things, but most Blacks can't do those things.

I said you legally can do those things. Most blacks aren't able to. They aren't social or economic equals of Whites.

What makes you think most blacks aren't able to do the same thing legally? I'm Black. I have the same rights as all other people do. I would bet I am the social or economic superior to most white people.
 

I said you legally can do those things. Most blacks aren't able to. They aren't social or economic equals of Whites.

What makes you think most blacks aren't able to do the same thing legally? I'm Black. I have the same rights as all other people do. I would bet I am the social or economic superior to most white people.

I said blacks can legally do whatever they want. Blacks aren't the social or economic equals of Whites. You deny this?
 
I said you legally can do those things. Most blacks aren't able to. They aren't social or economic equals of Whites.

What makes you think most blacks aren't able to do the same thing legally? I'm Black. I have the same rights as all other people do. I would bet I am the social or economic superior to most white people.

I said blacks can legally do whatever they want. Blacks aren't the social or economic equals of Whites. You deny this?

You have resorted to lying again. You said legally they couldn't do the same thing.
 
What makes you think most blacks aren't able to do the same thing legally? I'm Black. I have the same rights as all other people do. I would bet I am the social or economic superior to most white people.

I said blacks can legally do whatever they want. Blacks aren't the social or economic equals of Whites. You deny this?

You have resorted to lying again. You said legally they couldn't do the same thing.

No I didn't. I have always said you can legally do the same things.

Are you saying blacks are the social and economic equals of whites?
 
If that was his goal, than he failed, affirmative action is the law of the land.

Part of setting the standard and leveling the playing ground.

Part of the Civil Rights law was ended: good.

Affirmative Action will soon be ended as well.

Success, yes; you, failure indeed.
Kind of like Bush using socialism to bail out Wall Street, it was to save "capitalism".

Discrimination needs to be used to guarantee "equality". LOL

Doubleplusgood mate.

If King did indeed support a merit based society, that sure didn't happen, thus, he failed. Even you admit, his supposed plan of a society based on merit is not feasible right now, but it will be later, somewhere down the road, time unknown. Your language of someday maybe is his language, and is the language of all utopian idealists throughout history. This state of "equality" will never exist.

See, you use words you don't understand the meaning of.

I admitted nothing of the sort; it is a process, and we are getting there.

You mistake "equality of opportunity" as "equality of conditions," like any good national socialist.
 
What a great day to be a southerner as we celebrate a great man in the name of Robert E. Lee. Today tens of millions of Americans are showing their southern pride and patriotism across America. Robert E. Lee was a true gentleman who loved his heritage as he fought for states rights.


leegeneral2.jpg



rebel-flag.jpg

Why are are you flying a flag that was not used until after the Civil War was over?

The topic is not focused primarily on the civil war but Robert E. Lee and southern pride and heritage. The flag meets the criteria.

That is a flag of treason....nothing more.
 
Part of setting the standard and leveling the playing ground.

Part of the Civil Rights law was ended: good.

Affirmative Action will soon be ended as well.

Success, yes; you, failure indeed.
Kind of like Bush using socialism to bail out Wall Street, it was to save "capitalism".

Discrimination needs to be used to guarantee "equality". LOL

Doubleplusgood mate.

If King did indeed support a merit based society, that sure didn't happen, thus, he failed. Even you admit, his supposed plan of a society based on merit is not feasible right now, but it will be later, somewhere down the road, time unknown. Your language of someday maybe is his language, and is the language of all utopian idealists throughout history. This state of "equality" will never exist.

See, you use words you don't understand the meaning of.

I admitted nothing of the sort; it is a process, and we are getting there.

You mistake "equality of opportunity" as "equality of conditions," like any good national socialist.
I mistake no such thing.

Neither "equality of opportunity" or "equality of conditions" exists. You admitted this, and until the playing field is "level", we "need" affirmative action you said.

And you are just proving my point. This strive towards "equality" by the left is always a process, there will be no end, because there is no defined end.
 
Kind of like Bush using socialism to bail out Wall Street, it was to save "capitalism".

Discrimination needs to be used to guarantee "equality". LOL

Doubleplusgood mate.

If King did indeed support a merit based society, that sure didn't happen, thus, he failed. Even you admit, his supposed plan of a society based on merit is not feasible right now, but it will be later, somewhere down the road, time unknown. Your language of someday maybe is his language, and is the language of all utopian idealists throughout history. This state of "equality" will never exist.

See, you use words you don't understand the meaning of.

I admitted nothing of the sort; it is a process, and we are getting there.

You mistake "equality of opportunity" as "equality of conditions," like any good national socialist.
I mistake no such thing.

Neither "equality of opportunity" or "equality of conditions" exists. You admitted this, and until the playing field is "level", we "need" affirmative action you said.

And you are just proving my point. This strive towards "equality" by the left is always a process, there will be no end, because there is no defined end.

You are a certainly mistaken iceman, and I admitted nothing of the sort. I said it was a process, and we are getting there.

You prove my point, as we are moving toward 'equality of opportunity', while you want 'equality of condition for white man' as a good little white national socialist.

That's over, and never coming back.
 
See, you use words you don't understand the meaning of.

I admitted nothing of the sort; it is a process, and we are getting there.

You mistake "equality of opportunity" as "equality of conditions," like any good national socialist.
I mistake no such thing.

Neither "equality of opportunity" or "equality of conditions" exists. You admitted this, and until the playing field is "level", we "need" affirmative action you said.

And you are just proving my point. This strive towards "equality" by the left is always a process, there will be no end, because there is no defined end.

You are a certainly mistaken iceman, and I admitted nothing of the sort. I said it was a process, and we are getting there.

You prove my point, as we are moving toward 'equality of opportunity', while you want 'equality of condition for white man' as a good little white national socialist.

That's over, and never coming back.
Yes you did, you said the playing field isn't "level", and there needs to be affirmative action until it is "level". The playing field not being level as you said implies it is unequal, thus an absence of "equality of opportunity" and "equality of condition".

What is the process, and what is the end?

I don't support egalitarianism of any kind. I am anti-egalitarian. I am not a national socialist either, I am sympathetic to the ideology, but it isn't my first preference.
 
This traitorous flag in all of its variations cant be burnt or pissed on enough times. :lol:

Nice+flag.jpg


18628-piss-on-the-rebel-flag.jpg
 
That is a flag of treason....nothing more.

Treason is an American value.

Not in this case. This was insurrection.

Will you do whatever the federal government tells you?

If you respond no, that could mean, by your definition of treason, that you are a traitor.

If you respond yes, then you are admitting that you incapable of thinking and doing for yourself.
 
Illiteracy, funny you bring that up. LOL

Nearly Half Of Detroit's Adults Are Functionally Illiterate, Report Finds

MLK's dream coming to fruition.

It appears you are still frightened. :lol:

I don't care what happens to Detroit, the black community should be "frightened" though. But statistically speaking, a lot of them can't read the article and won't be able to figure out the problem to begin with.

Nobody is all that worried, as long as they can read a ballot well enough to mark the box next the the straight Democratic ticket.
 

Forum List

Back
Top