Moonglow
Diamond Member
Ok Pops, whatever you say..Since there is considerably fewer priest than general population, I can see the correlation..Yet that is no excuse for a priest to piddle the youngsters.we were discussing celibacy and human instincts. My opinion is that celibacy is unnatural and could be a cause for the catholic church having such a high perversion rate.wtf?
Actually the percentage of priests who are pedophiles is lower than the percentage in the overall general population.
It's always wise to research a subject before trying to debate itSince there is considerably fewer priest than general population, I can see the correlation..Yet that is no excuse for a priest to piddle the youngsters.we were discussing celibacy and human instincts. My opinion is that celibacy is unnatural and could be a cause for the catholic church having such a high perversion rate.wtf?
Actually the percentage of priests who are pedophiles is lower than the percentage in the overall general population.
It's always wise to research a subject before trying to debate it
I respectfully urge you to reconsider what the lady said . If she had said that the raw number of priests who are pedophiles was less than the raw number of non-priests, your comments would be appropriate. However, what she said was that the percentage of priests who are pedophiles was less than the percentage of those who were non-priests. . Whatever percentages she refers to would apply to any population size. Equating percentages to raw numbers is a statistical faux pas
I am not aware of any study that confirms what the lady says, but if it's true than one must conclude that priest are less inclined to be pedophiles than non-priests. If true (and I don't know that it is) that means that all condemnation of priests as pedophiles is completely baseless.
I will close with an example and a question:
The example: Suppose there was a country whose population consisted of one million red people and only one thousand blue people. Suppose further that two thousand red people were pedophiles and all one thousand blue people were pedophiles. There are a twice as many red pedophiles than blue ones, but if you select a blue baby sitter you are certain of getting a pedophile and if you select a red one your chances of getting a pedophile are only two tenths of one percent.
The question: Which baby sitter would you prefer, a red one of or a blue one?
Conclusion: Sometimes raw numbers are more important than percentages. The trick is to know which criterion is appropriate in any given situation. In situations such as this percentages are superior benchmarks.