Change the Premise and Opposition Wins Gay Legal Challenges: Simple as That

[Silhouette]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Because a majority gets to decide who rises to their acme of socially-acceptable marriage; and a minority of behaviors DO NOT. The majority has said "between a man and a woman". That means that the behaviors [or even status in the case of minors] of gay, lesbian, polygamist or incest or under-aged do not qualify for the standards the majority has set for itself. That's why. That's because people who erroneously label themselves with the name of the deviant sexual behavior they pracitice, "gays" and "lesbians" live in a democracy with majority rule. If they want to move to socialist Sweden or some such then as I understand it, they can now marry polygamist gay or what have you. That's not how we do things in the US when it comes to regulating human behaviors. The majority has to agree or disagree for a behavior to be legal or illegal. It's different from fascism or socialism or communism.

 

[rightwinger]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Because a majority gets to decide who rises to their acme of socially-acceptable marriage; and a minority of behaviors DO NOT. The majority has said "between a man and a woman". That means that the behaviors [or even status in the case of minors] of gay, lesbian, polygamist or incest or under-aged do not qualify for the standards the majority has set for itself. That's why. That's because people who erroneously label themselves with the name of the deviant sexual behavior they pracitice, "gays" and "lesbians" live in a democracy with majority rule. If they want to move to socialist Sweden or some such then as I understand it, they can now marry polygamist gay or what have you. That's not how we do things in the US when it comes to regulating human behaviors. The majority has to agree or disagree for a behavior to be legal or illegal. It's different from fascism or socialism or communism.

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on whats for supper

That is why we have courts. To protect the rights of the minority. The majority does NOT get to vote on what rights the minority are allowed

 

[Slyhunter]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Because then they feel like they have the right to PDA in public. We don't want that shit in our parks or our restaurants.

 

[rightwinger]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Because then they feel like they have the right to PDA in public. We don't want that shit in our parks or our restaurants.

What a superb legal mind

 

[Pop23]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Whether born that way (they obviously are) or by choice, why shouldn't nudists be allowed to practice that behavior in public?

How does their nudity effect your marriage?

They knew they liked being nude at a very young age

Why is one behavior protected and others not?

 

[Pop23]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Because a majority gets to decide who rises to their acme of socially-acceptable marriage; and a minority of behaviors DO NOT. The majority has said "between a man and a woman". That means that the behaviors [or even status in the case of minors] of gay, lesbian, polygamist or incest or under-aged do not qualify for the standards the majority has set for itself. That's why. That's because people who erroneously label themselves with the name of the deviant sexual behavior they pracitice, "gays" and "lesbians" live in a democracy with majority rule. If they want to move to socialist Sweden or some such then as I understand it, they can now marry polygamist gay or what have you. That's not how we do things in the US when it comes to regulating human behaviors. The majority has to agree or disagree for a behavior to be legal or illegal. It's different from fascism or socialism or communism.

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on whats for supper

That is why we have courts. To protect the rights of the minority. The majority does NOT get to vote on what rights the minority are allowed

According to Jake there are more wolves than sheep. So why the fear of democracy?

 

[Silhouette]

Because a majority gets to decide who rises to their acme of socially-acceptable marriage; and a minority of behaviors DO NOT. The majority has said "between a man and a woman". That means that the behaviors [or even status in the case of minors] of gay, lesbian, polygamist or incest or under-aged do not qualify for the standards the majority has set for itself. That's why. That's because people who erroneously label themselves with the name of the deviant sexual behavior they pracitice, "gays" and "lesbians" live in a democracy with majority rule. If they want to move to socialist Sweden or some such then as I understand it, they can now marry polygamist gay or what have you. That's not how we do things in the US when it comes to regulating human behaviors. The majority has to agree or disagree for a behavior to be legal or illegal. It's different from fascism or socialism or communism.

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on whats for supper

That is why we have courts. To protect the rights of the minority. The majority does NOT get to vote on what rights the minority are allowed

According to Jake there are more wolves than sheep. So why the fear of democracy?

Yep, exactly. They know. It's why they won't try for gay marriage initiative in CA for example. They know.

And BTW, gays are not mere sheep. If you cross this cult, you will find that out soon enough. Some minority behaviors are needing a smack down. Germany in the 1930s should've figured that one out.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Because a majority gets to decide who rises to their acme of socially-acceptable marriage; and a minority of behaviors DO NOT.

You should write a letter to the Supreme Court and tell them that the got the Loving decision wrong in 1967 when they ruled in the Loving case that denying interracial Civil Marriage was unconstitutional. Blacks were not denied Civil Marriage and whites were not denied Civil Marriage - it was the behavior (i.e. interracial marriage) that was in question.



>>>>

 

[rightwinger]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Whether born that way (they obviously are) or by choice, why shouldn't nudists be allowed to practice that behavior in public?

How does their nudity effect your marriage?

They knew they liked being nude at a very young age

Why is one behavior protected and others not?

There are laws against public indecency.....Homosexuality is perfectly legal

 

[rightwinger]

Because a majority gets to decide who rises to their acme of socially-acceptable marriage; and a minority of behaviors DO NOT. The majority has said "between a man and a woman". That means that the behaviors [or even status in the case of minors] of gay, lesbian, polygamist or incest or under-aged do not qualify for the standards the majority has set for itself. That's why. That's because people who erroneously label themselves with the name of the deviant sexual behavior they pracitice, "gays" and "lesbians" live in a democracy with majority rule. If they want to move to socialist Sweden or some such then as I understand it, they can now marry polygamist gay or what have you. That's not how we do things in the US when it comes to regulating human behaviors. The majority has to agree or disagree for a behavior to be legal or illegal. It's different from fascism or socialism or communism.

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on whats for supper

That is why we have courts. To protect the rights of the minority. The majority does NOT get to vote on what rights the minority are allowed

According to Jake there are more wolves than sheep. So why the fear of democracy?

It is why we have courts

To protect the rights of the sheep

 

[Slyhunter]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Whether born that way (they obviously are) or by choice, why shouldn't nudists be allowed to practice that behavior in public?

How does their nudity effect your marriage?

They knew they liked being nude at a very young age

Why is one behavior protected and others not?

There are laws against public indecency.....Homosexuality is perfectly legal

It shouldn't be practiced in public. Due to public indecency.

 

[WorldWatcher]

It shouldn't be practiced in public. Due to public indecency.

Neither homosexual or heterosexuals should be having sex in public. Public indecency laws make it illegal no matter the gender composition of the couple.



>>>>

 

[Slyhunter]

It shouldn't be practiced in public. Due to public indecency.

Neither homosexual or heterosexuals should be having sex in public. Public indecency laws make it illegal no matter the gender composition of the couple.



>>>>

Not talking about having sex. Talking about kissing and making out in parks. Having Gay pride parades where they dress up as the characters of the YMCA or other outlandish gear. I'm talking about acting gay in public.

 

[rightwinger]

Whether born that way (they obviously are) or by choice, why shouldn't nudists be allowed to practice that behavior in public?

How does their nudity effect your marriage?

They knew they liked being nude at a very young age

Why is one behavior protected and others not?

There are laws against public indecency.....Homosexuality is perfectly legal

It shouldn't be practiced in public. Due to public indecency.

Having sex in public is against the law. Public displays of affection are not

 

[WorldWatcher]

It shouldn't be practiced in public. Due to public indecency.

Neither homosexual or heterosexuals should be having sex in public. Public indecency laws make it illegal no matter the gender composition of the couple.



>>>>

Not talking about having sex. Talking about kissing and making out in parks. Having Gay pride parades where they dress up as the characters of the YMCA or other outlandish gear. I'm talking about acting gay in public.

Is that different than acting straight in public?



>>>>

 

[Seawytch]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Whether born that way (they obviously are) or by choice, why shouldn't nudists be allowed to practice that behavior in public?



How does their nudity effect your marriage?



They knew they liked being nude at a very young age



Why is one behavior protected and others not?

Public nudity is illegal. Would you like to make being gay in public illegal? Bring back public stonings?

 

[Seawytch]

It shouldn't be practiced in public. Due to public indecency.

Neither homosexual or heterosexuals should be having sex in public. Public indecency laws make it illegal no matter the gender composition of the couple.







>>>>

Not talking about having sex. Talking about kissing and making out in parks. Having Gay pride parades where they dress up as the characters of the YMCA or other outlandish gear. I'm talking about acting gay in public.

Are you sure you're not talking about Spring Break and Mardi Gras? That's straight folks.

 

[Pop23]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Whether born that way (they obviously are) or by choice, why shouldn't nudists be allowed to practice that behavior in public?

How does their nudity effect your marriage?

They knew they liked being nude at a very young age

Why is one behavior protected and others not?

There are laws against public indecency.....Homosexuality is perfectly legal

Deflection from your own argument?

You are the one that posted the question. Whether it's behavior or not.

There is no conclusive evidence that homosexuals are born that way.

Everyone is born naked. There is no argument.

Are nudists discriminated against?

How does someone being nude effect your marriage?

Nudists believe they were born that way.

Nudists knew they liked being nude from an early age.

Every one of your arguments work for nudism.

Get it?

 

[Pop23]

Whether born that way or by choice, why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry the person they love?

Whether born that way (they obviously are) or by choice, why shouldn't nudists be allowed to practice that behavior in public?



How does their nudity effect your marriage?



They knew they liked being nude at a very young age



Why is one behavior protected and others not?

Public nudity is illegal. Would you like to make being gay in public illegal? Bring back public stonings?

That's it? It's illegal? That's your argument?

Times are changing right?

I used you're arguments to show how silly yours were, and all you can come up with is that?

 

[Pop23]

Neither homosexual or heterosexuals should be having sex in public. Public indecency laws make it illegal no matter the gender composition of the couple.



>>>>

Not talking about having sex. Talking about kissing and making out in parks. Having Gay pride parades where they dress up as the characters of the YMCA or other outlandish gear. I'm talking about acting gay in public.

Is that different than acting straight in public?



>>>>

Prove she's straight

Maybe she's just behaving as an exhibitionist?

Maybe she was born an exhibitionist?

Maybe she knew she was an exhibitionist from a young age?

How does her exhibitionism effect your marriage?