Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You're just figuring out now that this is what hearings are really for? well if the right hasn't taught you anything else it has taught you that, now wait till you see/find out what judicial activism and special counsels are for and really do.It is the Republican way; from Birthers to today's Kangaroo Court and attack on Mr Strzok's entire professional and personal character. Some of these attack were way beyond the pale; mean, nasty, despicable and had no relevance to the outcome of the election, and the FACT that Russia attacked our democracy.
They gave in to pressure from the presidentYeah, he was fired by the FBI.Did anyone provide any proof that he took any actions that were corrupt?That's not what I got out of it at all (watched almost the whole thing.) Mostly I came away with D's not wanting to address the reason they were all there, rather using it as a stage to bitch about other things - mostly the children on the border. Republican's for the most part asked relevant questions, though a couple strayed into the premise of the thread here - adultery is bad character.
All in all I came away with the impression that the D's have zero interest in if this guy corrupted two of the most important cases in my lifetime. It's not a good look for D's...
Disliking someone is not corruption
What evil positions?Not all of them. Just the ones who act like Nazis and racists.^ This coming from the party that calls everyone they disagree with a Nazi or a racist.
Which, when said by a LIbEral/Democrat means nothing more or less than refusing to agree with the insane, immoral, and often outright evil positions which LIbErals/Democrats promote.
Why? Were you surprised by the truthfulness of it?^ This coming from the party that calls everyone they disagree with a Nazi or a racist.It is the Republican way; from Birthers to today's Kangaroo Court and attack on Mr Strzok's entire professional and personal character. Some of these attack were way beyond the pale; mean, nasty, despicable and had no relevance to the outcome of the election, and the FACT that Russia attacked our democracy.
Interesting response.
When the R's find corruption, please let the D's know will you? And if you find it, tell the D's exactly what it is.That's not what I got out of it at all (watched almost the whole thing.) Mostly I came away with D's not wanting to address the reason they were all there, rather using it as a stage to bitch about other things - mostly the children on the border. Republican's for the most part asked relevant questions, though a couple strayed into the premise of the thread here - adultery is bad character.
All in all I came away with the impression that the D's have zero interest in if this guy corrupted two of the most important cases in my lifetime. It's not a good look for D's...
The demonrat arrogant stooge is typical of deep state pawns. Reminds me of Lois Lerner. They can't see anything wrong in their actions.It is the Republican way; from Birthers to today's Kangaroo Court and attack on Mr Strzok's entire professional and personal character. Some of these attack were way beyond the pale; mean, nasty, despicable and had no relevance to the outcome of the election, and the FACT that Russia attacked our democracy.
HaHaHahaha you said "DEEP STATE" that's funny.
Denying it doesn't mean it isn't real.
Wake the fuck up to reality buddy.
You're right. Denying it doesn't mean it isn't real. The fact that it's not real means it isn't real.
How about constantly pitting races against each other and creating racial animosity?What evil positions?Not all of them. Just the ones who act like Nazis and racists.^ This coming from the party that calls everyone they disagree with a Nazi or a racist.
Which, when said by a LIbEral/Democrat means nothing more or less than refusing to agree with the insane, immoral, and often outright evil positions which LIbErals/Democrats promote.
Why? So you can continue to deny the obvious? No thanks. Go dance for some other organ grinder.When the R's find corruption, please let the D's know will you? And if you find it, tell the D's exactly what it is.That's not what I got out of it at all (watched almost the whole thing.) Mostly I came away with D's not wanting to address the reason they were all there, rather using it as a stage to bitch about other things - mostly the children on the border. Republican's for the most part asked relevant questions, though a couple strayed into the premise of the thread here - adultery is bad character.
All in all I came away with the impression that the D's have zero interest in if this guy corrupted two of the most important cases in my lifetime. It's not a good look for D's...
Thanks man. Now you should post something interesting, then maybe an interesting conversation will ensue.^ This coming from the party that calls everyone they disagree with a Nazi or a racist.It is the Republican way; from Birthers to today's Kangaroo Court and attack on Mr Strzok's entire professional and personal character. Some of these attack were way beyond the pale; mean, nasty, despicable and had no relevance to the outcome of the election, and the FACT that Russia attacked our democracy.
Interesting response.
That came back when Obama was elected. That baby belongs to the Right. The Right couldn't handle another black president. The Tea party taught us that; def shepherd: Racism Is Alive And Well: 35 Incredibly Racist Anti-Obama ImagesHow about constantly pitting races against each other and creating racial animosity?What evil positions?Not all of them. Just the ones who act like Nazis and racists.^ This coming from the party that calls everyone they disagree with a Nazi or a racist.
Which, when said by a LIbEral/Democrat means nothing more or less than refusing to agree with the insane, immoral, and often outright evil positions which LIbErals/Democrats promote.
What's disgraceful? His affair? You know you don't want to go down that rabbit hole.Blah, blah, blah...the FBI has no issue with attacking the character of people like Flynn, Cohen, Carter Page, or multiple people in the TRUMP administrations. The FBI takes no issue with intimidating and threatening people, so don't expect any sympathy for disgraced FBI agent Strzok.
In order to assassinate someone's character, Catcher...they first have to have some! The man you're referring to used his position as a top FBI agent to play politics in our last election. He had Anthony Weiner's laptop with thousands of Hillary Clinton's emails on it that he sat on for three weeks before making James Comey aware of what was on that computer. He's the one who chose to slow walk the Clinton investigation and push the Trump collusion investigation. He's the one that changed the language in the FBI report about Hillary Clinton's email servers. His claim that he wasn't biased is a blatant lie!It is the Republican way; from Birthers to today's Kangaroo Court and attack on Mr Strzok's entire professional and personal character. Some of these attack were way beyond the pale; mean, nasty, despicable and had no relevance to the outcome of the election, and the FACT that Russia attacked our democracy.
Its true that you people started making everything about race when obama got elected. Any criticism of him was met with super lazy accusations of racism.That came back when Obama was elected. That baby belongs to the Right. The Right couldn't handle another black president. The Tea party taught us that; def shepherd: Racism Is Alive And Well: 35 Incredibly Racist Anti-Obama ImagesHow about constantly pitting races against each other and creating racial animosity?What evil positions?Not all of them. Just the ones who act like Nazis and racists.^ This coming from the party that calls everyone they disagree with a Nazi or a racist.
Which, when said by a LIbEral/Democrat means nothing more or less than refusing to agree with the insane, immoral, and often outright evil positions which LIbErals/Democrats promote.
The Right didn't want answers. Every time he tried, they cut him off. Do you know how I know? Because it was the Left who was calling for him to answer after the Right cut him off. The Right has no interest in any answers. This was a circus by the Right, because they know Mueller has more indictments and guilty please coming down the pipe. Strzok is nothing but fodder for later on, when the Right tries to make the case against what the Right knows Mueller has. The problem with using Strzok, is the fact that he was so insignificant. The IG report found nothing on Strzok that said he did anything to compromise the Mueller investigation. And the oversight found nothing either. The problem you people have is this; you're too damn obvious. Your desperation is crystal clear. The party has zero interest in right or wrong, the rule of law, the country, anything.The Democratic members of that committee didn't want to see answers...they repeatedly shouted over anyone who was trying to ask questions...doing their level best to turn the entire testimony into farce. Peter Strzok isn't some delicate little flower that needed to be protected from harsh questioning...HE'S A MEMBER OF THE FBI! IF HE CAN'T HANDLE THE QUESTIONS BEING ASKED HE SHOULD HAVE RESIGNED LONG AGO BECAUSE HE ISN'T WORTHY OF CARRYING THE ID OF AN FBI AGENT!!!
If he had played politics, Hillary would have won. He also didn't report Trump/Russia until the election was over. So who was his bias for again did you say? If his bias was a lie, he sure had a weird way of showing it.In order to assassinate someone's character, Catcher...they first have to have some! The man you're referring to used his position as a top FBI agent to play politics in our last election. He had Anthony Weiner's laptop with thousands of Hillary Clinton's emails on it that he sat on for three weeks before making James Comey aware of what was on that computer. He's the one who chose to slow walk the Clinton investigation and push the Trump collusion investigation. He's the one that changed the language in the FBI report about Hillary Clinton's email servers. His claim that he wasn't biased is a blatant lie!It is the Republican way; from Birthers to today's Kangaroo Court and attack on Mr Strzok's entire professional and personal character. Some of these attack were way beyond the pale; mean, nasty, despicable and had no relevance to the outcome of the election, and the FACT that Russia attacked our democracy.
did you have lunch with dean Wry?.....you are getting to sound like him....It is the Republican way; from Birthers to today's Kangaroo Court and attack on Mr Strzok's entire professional and personal character. Some of these attack were way beyond the pale; mean, nasty, despicable and had no relevance to the outcome of the election, and the FACT that Russia attacked our democracy.
I find all the GOP congressmen are very partisan and hateful.The House GOP on the judicial committee are sickening.
I find all the GOP congressmen are very partisan and hateful. From the tea party to the Freedom Caucus, to the Trump Admin.
I said it before and I'll say it again, never will I ever vote for any republican. Never.
