Charlie Gard has passed

[Political Junky]

Well the .leftists got their fitst post birth legal abortion. They will claim their is precedent to abort babies up to one year of age.

Think not? It's coming.

Petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama's Science Czar, John Holdren had written in the 1970's that in order to control population, forced sterilization, forced abortion and that infants up to two years old could be "aborted".

Big Dogs Weblog » infanticide excerpt below: ...

John Holdren, a Harvard University Professor (aren’t they all), who has advocated in the past that it would be okay to abort an infant up to two years old. That’s right, kill babies. His reasoning is that until the baby can realize that there’s a tomorrow, the baby is not really human. He also has postulated that sterilants (birth control drugs) should be added to the water we drink, on the grounds that there are already too many people, and certainly too many of the wrong kind, whatever that is supposed to mean.

www.mylot.com/post/2080901/0bama-science-czar-ok-to-kill-toddlers

This is the goal of Progressives.

I have a newsflash for the professor, you kill a child it's not abortion, it's murder.

Sick bastard needs "aborted'

They removed life support. It happens often.

 

[koshergrl]

Sometimes there is a fine line between parental rights and child abuse.

Bullshit. There is no fine fucking line. Child abuse is when you abuse a child. When you hit, rape, imprison them.

The *fine line* that leftists imagine exists, is the line that exists between them, and other people. If you choose not to raise your children according to state dictates, then you are *abusive*. If you are not teaching your children according to current psycholunatic babble, you're "abusive". If you choose a medical treatment that they don't agree with, you've *abusive*.

In short, their enemies are almost always the ones on the *other side* of the child abuse/parenting lines. Funny how that works.

What if parents deny life saving treatment for their child?

If they beat off lifeguards when their kid is drowning, they should be prosecuted.

When they decide to use treatment that isn't orthodox or *accepted* by the masses, that's their business.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

What if parents deny life saving treatment for their child?

What if a GOVERNMENT denies life saving treatment for your child?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Well the .leftists got their fitst post birth legal abortion. They will claim their is precedent to abort babies up to one year of age.

Think not? It's coming.

Petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama's Science Czar, John Holdren had written in the 1970's that in order to control population, forced sterilization, forced abortion and that infants up to two years old could be "aborted".

Big Dogs Weblog » infanticide excerpt below: ...

John Holdren, a Harvard University Professor (aren’t they all), who has advocated in the past that it would be okay to abort an infant up to two years old. That’s right, kill babies. His reasoning is that until the baby can realize that there’s a tomorrow, the baby is not really human. He also has postulated that sterilants (birth control drugs) should be added to the water we drink, on the grounds that there are already too many people, and certainly too many of the wrong kind, whatever that is supposed to mean.

www.mylot.com/post/2080901/0bama-science-czar-ok-to-kill-toddlers

This is the goal of Progressives.

I have a newsflash for the professor, you kill a child it's not abortion, it's murder.

Sick bastard needs "aborted'

They removed life support. It happens often.

I was responding to the professor advocating "aborting" children up to age two.

Get up to speed and then comment

 

[Coyote]

Is this parental rights or child abuse?

Letting them die: parents refuse medical help for children in the name of Christ

 

[koshergrl]

Well the .leftists got their fitst post birth legal abortion. They will claim their is precedent to abort babies up to one year of age.

Think not? It's coming.

Petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama's Science Czar, John Holdren had written in the 1970's that in order to control population, forced sterilization, forced abortion and that infants up to two years old could be "aborted".

Big Dogs Weblog » infanticide excerpt below: ...

John Holdren, a Harvard University Professor (aren’t they all), who has advocated in the past that it would be okay to abort an infant up to two years old. That’s right, kill babies. His reasoning is that until the baby can realize that there’s a tomorrow, the baby is not really human. He also has postulated that sterilants (birth control drugs) should be added to the water we drink, on the grounds that there are already too many people, and certainly too many of the wrong kind, whatever that is supposed to mean.

www.mylot.com/post/2080901/0bama-science-czar-ok-to-kill-toddlers

This is the goal of Progressives.

I have a newsflash for the professor, you kill a child it's not abortion, it's murder.

Sick bastard needs "aborted'

They removed life support. It happens often.

Sorry, you don't get to just remove the life support of anybody who happens to temporarily be dependent upon it, you sick fuck.

 

[Coyote]

What if parents deny life saving treatment for their child?

What if a GOVERNMENT denies life saving treatment for your child?

Example?

 

[koshergrl]

Is this parental rights or child abuse?

Letting them die: parents refuse medical help for children in the name of Christ

That is a sick, mentally ill girl who is being used by the state to harass her parents.

A statist bitch had a bad day. And here we are years later.

She's probably placed this girl with foster parents who she knows personally. People she sets up with a tidy little monthly sum.

It's a sick and perverted system. I know because I've been working in it for decades.

 

[Markle]

That is a matter of opinion. I remember when my grandmother died and there was a heated debate about continuing the care.
I GUARANTEE you no one celebrated when she died. There is a level of suffering that no human should be subjected to.
You ARE looking at this through emotional goggles.

In addition to everyone having a will, I strongly believe everyone should have a living will. This alleviates the entire family from being forced to make such painful decisions as you indicated. No one wants to be the one who pops up and says, okay, she's unconscious, hardly knows anyone time to pull the plug. Everybody with me?

 

[PredFan]

A Socialized Medicine Death Panel killed that child.

You drank the Kool-Aid.

Shut up dumbass, it's the absolute truth.

 

[Coyote]

Sometimes there is a fine line between parental rights and child abuse.

Bullshit. There is no fine fucking line. Child abuse is when you abuse a child. When you hit, rape, imprison them.

The *fine line* that leftists imagine exists, is the line that exists between them, and other people. If you choose not to raise your children according to state dictates, then you are *abusive*. If you are not teaching your children according to current psycholunatic babble, you're "abusive". If you choose a medical treatment that they don't agree with, you've *abusive*.

In short, their enemies are almost always the ones on the *other side* of the child abuse/parenting lines. Funny how that works.

What if parents deny life saving treatment for their child?

If they beat off lifeguards when their kid is drowning, they should be prosecuted.

When they decide to use treatment that isn't orthodox or *accepted* by the masses, that's their business.

If a child's life could be saved or pain relieved by basic medical care that the parents refuse in lieu of "non traditional" treatment with no proven track record how is that not child abuse?

What is the difference between beating off lifeguards and beating off doctors?

 

[PredFan]

How sad! This case was total and complete bullshit. Fuck the courts that ruled against his parents.

Man. You try hard sometimes. Don't worry, bro. You are so cool that all of us love you. You don't have to appease the idiots.

That baby had a terminal illness which resulted in his life being one of unending suffering. Nothing could have saved him. His passing may be the best thing that ever happened to him.

That's the lie you tell yourself. Truth is, the US could have given him a chance.

 

[PredFan]

How sad! This case was total and complete bullshit. Fuck the courts that ruled against his parents.

Let's just hope we don't end up with that bs here.

You idiot. Do you know how many people there are who DIE in the US from shit that Brits never die from because they have universal health care? Try learning.

Name one thing, liar.

 

[Markle]

Meanwhile, they still don't give a shit if human trafficking victims are cooked to death in big rigs that aren't checked at the border.

Who are "they"?

 

[Coyote]

Is this parental rights or child abuse?

Letting them die: parents refuse medical help for children in the name of Christ

That is a sick, mentally ill girl who is being used by the state to harass her parents.

A statist bitch had a bad day. And here we are years later.

She's probably placed this girl with foster parents who she knows personally. People she sets up with a tidy little monthly sum.

It's a sick and perverted system. I know because I've been working in it for decades.

Is this parental rights or child abuse?

Letting them die: parents refuse medical help for children in the name of Christ

That is a sick, mentally ill girl who is being used by the state to harass her parents.

A statist bitch had a bad day. And here we are years later.

She's probably placed this girl with foster parents who she knows personally. People she sets up with a tidy little monthly sum.

It's a sick and perverted system. I know because I've been working in it for decades.

She is only one example, there are more in the articles.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Sometimes there is a fine line between parental rights and child abuse.

Bullshit. There is no fine fucking line. Child abuse is when you abuse a child. When you hit, rape, imprison them.

The *fine line* that leftists imagine exists, is the line that exists between them, and other people. If you choose not to raise your children according to state dictates, then you are *abusive*. If you are not teaching your children according to current psycholunatic babble, you're "abusive". If you choose a medical treatment that they don't agree with, you've *abusive*.

In short, their enemies are almost always the ones on the *other side* of the child abuse/parenting lines. Funny how that works.

What if parents deny life saving treatment for their child?

If they beat off lifeguards when their kid is drowning, they should be prosecuted.

When they decide to use treatment that isn't orthodox or *accepted* by the masses, that's their business.

If a child's life could be saved or pain relieved by basic medical care that the parents refuse in lieu of "non traditional" treatment with no proven track record how is that not child abuse?

What is the difference between beating off lifeguards and beating off doctors?

I've never really undetstood why a parent would do that, I undetstand certain religions go by it but I could never do it.

The vaccine thing is another one I see articles on.

 

[PredFan]

What harm would have been done to try to save the child's life? None at all.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What harm would have been done to try to save the child's life? None at all.

That's the sticky thing, trying it cost the state or insurance nothing and even if it failed maybe it could help down the road in another case

 

[Coyote]

What if parents deny life saving treatment for their child?

What if a GOVERNMENT denies life saving treatment for your child?

Example?

Are you fucking retarded?
Did you forget the title of this thread?

The gubmint didn't deny it. The courts did. The treatment also wasn't life saving.

 

[Markle]

And the US specialist went to the UK and said he had between 11% and 52% of the treatment doing 'something'....

Something...well that's quite a goal! What constitutes "something"?