Charlottesville To Remove confederate Statues That Helped Spark Deadly Rally

[Asclepias]

Why the fuck are they venerating losers down there anyway?

This is America the only wars we don't win are ones we don't feel like finishing.

Nothing to be ashamed of, losing to a superior force.


View attachment 513317

The Alamo was a last stand

Lee thought he could just win battles with no "macro" strategy to win the war and got his ass kicked for it.

They could have done much better than they did. Most obviously pulling in the British to support them as their best play. But just crushing Northern industry instead of focusing on winning irrelevant battles would have went a long way to the South having a chance.

I'm not sure if those at the Alamo had a lot of strategic options on the table. The South may have fought brilliant battles but they never even attempted to win the war.

"Better"? Easy to say after the fact. The numbers starting out were pretty clear. The North had tremendous advantages in numbers of men and numbers of cannons and machine guns and industry and ability to feed and arm troops and the majority of the professional army, and I don't even know what else.


There is no shame is fighting bravely against great odds, but still losing.

Machine guns??

Please. Just shut up

Yes, machine guns, you drooling moron.

View attachment 513475

Gatling guns were neither tactically nor strategically significant in the Civil War you fucking moron.

STFU

Perhaps. Name me a something significant that the South had more of.

Thats easy. They definitely had more hardcore inbred racists. They got their asses kicked and died trying to keep Blacks enslaved.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed Lincoln to free the slaves, moron.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed southeners to own humans idiot.

ROFL! Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution, moron. What do you imagine the 3/5ths compromise was about?

"Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution"

No they are not you idiot. Show me where the word "slave" appears in the constitution. I will wait.

 

[bripat9643]

Why the fuck are they venerating losers down there anyway?

This is America the only wars we don't win are ones we don't feel like finishing.

Nothing to be ashamed of, losing to a superior force.


View attachment 513317

The Alamo was a last stand

Lee thought he could just win battles with no "macro" strategy to win the war and got his ass kicked for it.

They could have done much better than they did. Most obviously pulling in the British to support them as their best play. But just crushing Northern industry instead of focusing on winning irrelevant battles would have went a long way to the South having a chance.

I'm not sure if those at the Alamo had a lot of strategic options on the table. The South may have fought brilliant battles but they never even attempted to win the war.

"Better"? Easy to say after the fact. The numbers starting out were pretty clear. The North had tremendous advantages in numbers of men and numbers of cannons and machine guns and industry and ability to feed and arm troops and the majority of the professional army, and I don't even know what else.


There is no shame is fighting bravely against great odds, but still losing.

Machine guns??

Please. Just shut up

Yes, machine guns, you drooling moron.

View attachment 513475

Gatling guns were neither tactically nor strategically significant in the Civil War you fucking moron.

STFU

Perhaps. Name me a something significant that the South had more of.

Thats easy. They definitely had more hardcore inbred racists. They got their asses kicked and died trying to keep Blacks enslaved.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed Lincoln to free the slaves, moron.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed southeners to own humans idiot.

ROFL! Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution, moron. What do you imagine the 3/5ths compromise was about?

"Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution"

No they are not you idiot. Show me where the word "slave" appears in the constitution. I will wait.

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.​

​

"All other persons" means people who aren't free.

 

[Asclepias]

Why the fuck are they venerating losers down there anyway?

This is America the only wars we don't win are ones we don't feel like finishing.

Nothing to be ashamed of, losing to a superior force.


View attachment 513317

The Alamo was a last stand

Lee thought he could just win battles with no "macro" strategy to win the war and got his ass kicked for it.

They could have done much better than they did. Most obviously pulling in the British to support them as their best play. But just crushing Northern industry instead of focusing on winning irrelevant battles would have went a long way to the South having a chance.

I'm not sure if those at the Alamo had a lot of strategic options on the table. The South may have fought brilliant battles but they never even attempted to win the war.

"Better"? Easy to say after the fact. The numbers starting out were pretty clear. The North had tremendous advantages in numbers of men and numbers of cannons and machine guns and industry and ability to feed and arm troops and the majority of the professional army, and I don't even know what else.


There is no shame is fighting bravely against great odds, but still losing.

Machine guns??

Please. Just shut up

Yes, machine guns, you drooling moron.

View attachment 513475

Gatling guns were neither tactically nor strategically significant in the Civil War you fucking moron.

STFU

Perhaps. Name me a something significant that the South had more of.

Thats easy. They definitely had more hardcore inbred racists. They got their asses kicked and died trying to keep Blacks enslaved.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed Lincoln to free the slaves, moron.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed southeners to own humans idiot.

ROFL! Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution, moron. What do you imagine the 3/5ths compromise was about?

"Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution"

No they are not you idiot. Show me where the word "slave" appears in the constitution. I will wait.

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.​

​

"All other persons" means people who aren't free.

So you cant find the word "slave" Typical of people that dont know the constitution.

 

[meaner gene]

"All other persons" means people who aren't free.

Not according to the USSC at the time.

 

[Nostra]

Have black kids stopped dying by the dozens from guns in Chicago now that these statues are gone?

thats a great goalpost you got there. I wonder how many confederate statues there were in Chicago.

So this libtard hissy fit isn't improving the lives of blacks.

Got it.

 

[Asclepias]

Have black kids stopped dying by the dozens from guns in Chicago now that these statues are gone?

thats a great goalpost you got there. I wonder how many confederate statues there were in Chicago.

So this libtard hissy fit isn't improving the lives of blacks.

Got it.

How has your life improved while the statues were still standing?

 

[bripat9643]

Why the fuck are they venerating losers down there anyway?

This is America the only wars we don't win are ones we don't feel like finishing.

Nothing to be ashamed of, losing to a superior force.


View attachment 513317

The Alamo was a last stand

Lee thought he could just win battles with no "macro" strategy to win the war and got his ass kicked for it.

They could have done much better than they did. Most obviously pulling in the British to support them as their best play. But just crushing Northern industry instead of focusing on winning irrelevant battles would have went a long way to the South having a chance.

I'm not sure if those at the Alamo had a lot of strategic options on the table. The South may have fought brilliant battles but they never even attempted to win the war.

"Better"? Easy to say after the fact. The numbers starting out were pretty clear. The North had tremendous advantages in numbers of men and numbers of cannons and machine guns and industry and ability to feed and arm troops and the majority of the professional army, and I don't even know what else.


There is no shame is fighting bravely against great odds, but still losing.

Machine guns??

Please. Just shut up

Yes, machine guns, you drooling moron.

View attachment 513475

Gatling guns were neither tactically nor strategically significant in the Civil War you fucking moron.

STFU

Perhaps. Name me a something significant that the South had more of.

Thats easy. They definitely had more hardcore inbred racists. They got their asses kicked and died trying to keep Blacks enslaved.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed Lincoln to free the slaves, moron.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed southeners to own humans idiot.

ROFL! Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution, moron. What do you imagine the 3/5ths compromise was about?

"Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution"

No they are not you idiot. Show me where the word "slave" appears in the constitution. I will wait.

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.​

​

"All other persons" means people who aren't free.

So you cant find the word "slave" Typical of people that dont know the constitution.

People who aren't free are slaves, jackass. It doesn't matter if the word is actually used.

 

[meaner gene]

Slaves are mentioned in the Constitution, but not by that name

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person

 

[Asclepias]

Why the fuck are they venerating losers down there anyway?

This is America the only wars we don't win are ones we don't feel like finishing.

Nothing to be ashamed of, losing to a superior force.


View attachment 513317

The Alamo was a last stand

Lee thought he could just win battles with no "macro" strategy to win the war and got his ass kicked for it.

They could have done much better than they did. Most obviously pulling in the British to support them as their best play. But just crushing Northern industry instead of focusing on winning irrelevant battles would have went a long way to the South having a chance.

I'm not sure if those at the Alamo had a lot of strategic options on the table. The South may have fought brilliant battles but they never even attempted to win the war.

"Better"? Easy to say after the fact. The numbers starting out were pretty clear. The North had tremendous advantages in numbers of men and numbers of cannons and machine guns and industry and ability to feed and arm troops and the majority of the professional army, and I don't even know what else.


There is no shame is fighting bravely against great odds, but still losing.

Machine guns??

Please. Just shut up

Yes, machine guns, you drooling moron.

View attachment 513475

Gatling guns were neither tactically nor strategically significant in the Civil War you fucking moron.

STFU

Perhaps. Name me a something significant that the South had more of.

Thats easy. They definitely had more hardcore inbred racists. They got their asses kicked and died trying to keep Blacks enslaved.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed Lincoln to free the slaves, moron.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed southeners to own humans idiot.

ROFL! Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution, moron. What do you imagine the 3/5ths compromise was about?

"Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution"

No they are not you idiot. Show me where the word "slave" appears in the constitution. I will wait.

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.​

​

"All other persons" means people who aren't free.

So you cant find the word "slave" Typical of people that dont know the constitution.

People who aren't free are slaves, jackass. It doesn't matter if the word is actually used.

You claimed that the word slaves was specifically mentioned in the constitution but its not. Dont be embarrassed you didnt know. Be grateful I educated you.

"Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution"

 

[Asclepias]

Slaves are mentioned in the Constitution, but not by that name

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person

and it never says anyone has the right to have a slave either.

 

[meaner gene]

People who aren't free are slaves, jackass. It doesn't matter if the word is actually used.

Free blacks, and free former slaves, were included in the 3/5ths.

 

[Flash]

Why the fuck are they venerating losers down there anyway?

This is America the only wars we don't win are ones we don't feel like finishing.

Nothing to be ashamed of, losing to a superior force.


View attachment 513317

The Alamo was a last stand

Lee thought he could just win battles with no "macro" strategy to win the war and got his ass kicked for it.

They could have done much better than they did. Most obviously pulling in the British to support them as their best play. But just crushing Northern industry instead of focusing on winning irrelevant battles would have went a long way to the South having a chance.

I'm not sure if those at the Alamo had a lot of strategic options on the table. The South may have fought brilliant battles but they never even attempted to win the war.

"Better"? Easy to say after the fact. The numbers starting out were pretty clear. The North had tremendous advantages in numbers of men and numbers of cannons and machine guns and industry and ability to feed and arm troops and the majority of the professional army, and I don't even know what else.


There is no shame is fighting bravely against great odds, but still losing.

Machine guns??

Please. Just shut up

Yes, machine guns, you drooling moron.

View attachment 513475

Gatling guns were neither tactically nor strategically significant in the Civil War you fucking moron.

STFU

Perhaps. Name me a something significant that the South had more of.

Thats easy. They definitely had more hardcore inbred racists. They got their asses kicked and died trying to keep Blacks enslaved.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed Lincoln to free the slaves, moron.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed southeners to own humans idiot.

But yet slavery was legal in the US for 80 years prior to the Civil War, during the war and for almost a year afterwards. Hell, that asshole Lincoln didn't even have the courage to make his infamous Emancipation Proclamation stick because there were several areas exempted.

The US flag is the flag of slavery.

Especially nowadays when the filthy Socialists are making us slaves of the state.

 

[bripat9643]

Why the fuck are they venerating losers down there anyway?

This is America the only wars we don't win are ones we don't feel like finishing.

Nothing to be ashamed of, losing to a superior force.


View attachment 513317

The Alamo was a last stand

Lee thought he could just win battles with no "macro" strategy to win the war and got his ass kicked for it.

They could have done much better than they did. Most obviously pulling in the British to support them as their best play. But just crushing Northern industry instead of focusing on winning irrelevant battles would have went a long way to the South having a chance.

I'm not sure if those at the Alamo had a lot of strategic options on the table. The South may have fought brilliant battles but they never even attempted to win the war.

"Better"? Easy to say after the fact. The numbers starting out were pretty clear. The North had tremendous advantages in numbers of men and numbers of cannons and machine guns and industry and ability to feed and arm troops and the majority of the professional army, and I don't even know what else.


There is no shame is fighting bravely against great odds, but still losing.

Machine guns??

Please. Just shut up

Yes, machine guns, you drooling moron.

View attachment 513475

Gatling guns were neither tactically nor strategically significant in the Civil War you fucking moron.

STFU

Perhaps. Name me a something significant that the South had more of.

Thats easy. They definitely had more hardcore inbred racists. They got their asses kicked and died trying to keep Blacks enslaved.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed Lincoln to free the slaves, moron.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed southeners to own humans idiot.

ROFL! Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution, moron. What do you imagine the 3/5ths compromise was about?

"Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution"

No they are not you idiot. Show me where the word "slave" appears in the constitution. I will wait.

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.​

​

"All other persons" means people who aren't free.

So you cant find the word "slave" Typical of people that dont know the constitution.

People who aren't free are slaves, jackass. It doesn't matter if the word is actually used.

You claimed that the word slaves was specifically mentioned in the constitution but its not. Dont be embarrassed you didnt know. Be grateful I educated you.

"Slaves are specifically mentioned in the Constitution"

No I didn't, turd.

 

[rightwinger]

People who aren't free are slaves, jackass. It doesn't matter if the word is actually used.

Free blacks, and free former slaves, were included in the 3/5ths.

Nope

Article one, section two of the Constitution of the United States declared that any person who was not free would be counted as three-fifths of a free individual for the purposes of determining congressional representation

 

[bripat9643]

Slaves are mentioned in the Constitution, but not by that name

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person

and it never says anyone has the right to have a slave either.

It doesn't say you have the right to own a house either.

 

[meaner gene]

and it never says anyone has the right to have a slave either.

Yes and no

No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.

 

[Correll]

Which Presidential election do you think MOST demonstrates the "southern strategy" and why?

Goldwater started it (Operation Dixie), Nixon ....

Seriously. WTF is wrong with you?

I asked for your best example and you give me a fucking Gish Galloping list?

ONe more fucking time. You think Carter didn't prove nothing, THAN GIVE ME YOUR FUCKING BEST EXAMPLE.


You don't have ONE GOOD EXAMPLE? The Southern Strategy is the HUGE POWERFUL FORCE, but so subtle that you CAN'T GIVE ONE GOOD EXAMPLE?


Starting to sound like complete bullshit, doesn't it?


GIVE ME YOUR BEST SHOT.

You basically asked the question “which drop of water caused the flood”. It wasn’t a single example. It took decades.

And I love the irony of a Trump cultists asking what’s wrong with me…

You have a claim, ie that the GOP has been for "decades" campaigning to get wacist votes in the South, to eventually flip the south from reliably dem to reliably gop.


I've asked you to support that claim. YOu have been mostly unable to do so. Most of your tries have been to cite other people that agree with you, which is not supporting evidence.

You did cite a report that Nixon eliminated a gop sub committee and at least one person believed the reason was wacism, AND, you found a report of secret recordings showing Nixon making wacist comments.


In my attempts to counter your evidence I have been forced to cite the voting records of Republican Presidents, over decades, the policies of hte republican party, over decades, and the voting of hte South for dems with strong civil rights records.

Weak ass shit, I know, when compared to a sub committee being eliminated and the use of inappropriate language behind closed doors.

I’ve given you examples again and again and again. You ignore every one. Every not crazy human being on the planet understand the Southern strategy was a real thing…which leaves you in which category?

I did not ignore them. I addressed them, repeatedly.

Sure, everyone believes in the Southern Strategy and to prove it, you can point to that one time that Nixon eliminated a republican sub committee and that other time he said some wacist shit behind closed doors.

That you pretend I ignored them, and then played the Appeal to Popularity card, is you losing.


If I want to talk about how FDR got the blacks to start voting dem, I would point to the NEW DEAL the WPA and Social Security and a host of massive government spending that greatly helped poor blacks during the Great Depression.

If you want to talk about how Nixon got the southern whites to start voting GOP, you point to a gop sub committee, and bad words behind closed doors.


And you think that, you are making your point?


The fact that most people agree with you, just means that you can lie a lot, you can fool a lot of people.

 

[Asclepias]

Why the fuck are they venerating losers down there anyway?

This is America the only wars we don't win are ones we don't feel like finishing.

Nothing to be ashamed of, losing to a superior force.


View attachment 513317

The Alamo was a last stand

Lee thought he could just win battles with no "macro" strategy to win the war and got his ass kicked for it.

They could have done much better than they did. Most obviously pulling in the British to support them as their best play. But just crushing Northern industry instead of focusing on winning irrelevant battles would have went a long way to the South having a chance.

I'm not sure if those at the Alamo had a lot of strategic options on the table. The South may have fought brilliant battles but they never even attempted to win the war.

"Better"? Easy to say after the fact. The numbers starting out were pretty clear. The North had tremendous advantages in numbers of men and numbers of cannons and machine guns and industry and ability to feed and arm troops and the majority of the professional army, and I don't even know what else.


There is no shame is fighting bravely against great odds, but still losing.

Machine guns??

Please. Just shut up

Yes, machine guns, you drooling moron.

View attachment 513475

Gatling guns were neither tactically nor strategically significant in the Civil War you fucking moron.

STFU

Perhaps. Name me a something significant that the South had more of.

Thats easy. They definitely had more hardcore inbred racists. They got their asses kicked and died trying to keep Blacks enslaved.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed Lincoln to free the slaves, moron.

Nothing in the Constitution allowed southeners to own humans idiot.

But yet slavery was legal in the US for 80 years prior to the Civil War, during the war and for almost a year afterwards. Hell, that asshole Lincoln didn't even have the courage to make his infamous Emancipation Proclamation stick because there were several areas exempted.

The US flag is the flag of slavery.

Especially nowadays when the filthy Socialists are making us slaves of the state.

Being legal doesnt mean its in the constitution stupid.

 

[Asclepias]

Slaves are mentioned in the Constitution, but not by that name

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person

and it never says anyone has the right to have a slave either.

It doesn't say you have the right to own a house either.

I never said it did. You are the one that claimed you had a right to own a slave.

 

[Flash]

It looks like the filthy Left Wing assholes are going after the Alamo next.

'The Myth Itself Becomes a Stand-in.' What Can the Alamo's History Teach Us About Teaching History?

The way Texans tell its story relates to how Americans—especially Mexican Americans—see each other more broadly

time.com