I read today that the Yemen legislature has proposed a bill to set marriage at 18 for females in the wake of this tragic incident. I'll post the article when I find it.I don't think child marriage can be directly traced to religion with Christianity, Hinduism or Judaism, the way it can with Islam. And proof of that is the Muslims themselves, and the fact that they cite Mohammad's marriage to Aisha as the reason.We aren't talking about rates only, although that is part of it. It is well documented that Child marriages occur in the West among Muslim communities as well.
It is also well documented that those are uncommon and occur primarily in new immigrant communities from - guess where?
They do, but to a far less extent and they also occur in many other areas around the world and in different religions as I've repeatedly pointed out.
Religion may play a factor but it is not the dominant factor and you haven't proved that it is. What you keep on trying to claim is that in Islamic countries religion is the overriding reason while in other countries, it's something else. This just doesn't fly since you have countries in Africa side by side with high rates and different religions.
You have a prophet that by SOME accounts married a 9 year old and by OTHER accounts, consumated marriage at 16 - you have by no means a definitive fact here and by no means is that age an agreed upon marriagable age in all or even most Islamic countries (looking at age of marriage laws). You keep ignoring that.
The example I gave you was not simply "idolizing" young brides - it was a specific example of child marriage to a god (aspect).
Not at all. I have never made the claim that religion has no effect. My argument is that the effect religion plays is less than some of the other effects such as poverty and that is an argument supported in the sources I've used.
That's how it worked in the old days, religion was the greatest influence, so it affected culture and in turn culture affected religious practices. As hard as you try, you can't separate the two.
If the two are that intertwined Roudy (and I agree, they are though child marriages long predated Islam), then why aren't you making the same case for Hindu and Christian countries? Africa leads the pack in child marriages with by far the most number of countries involved and both Christian and Muslim religions.
Again the reason I brought up Iran, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia was not because of frequency, but because in those countries child marriage was legalized specifically because of Islam and Mohammad's marriage to a 9 year old.
Re Aisha's age, perhaps you can tell that to the religious courts and Islamic clerics who claim that Aisha was 9, as justification for child marriage. After all, wouldn't they be the ones who know more about Islam and Mohammad than you and I? I think a majority of Muslims agree that Mohammad was engaged to Aisha when she was 6 and the marriage was consummated when she was it her 8 or 9 depending on which source you go by. There is no real dispute as to her age. Your view is not mainstream at all on this.