CNN Admits Walz signed bill allowing post-birth “abortions”

[pknopp]

Because the “undecided moderates” are not reliable voters. Elections are won by motivating the base.

Isn't it kinda sad that this is the base?

 

[Thunderbird]

What to watch for during the Vance-Walz VP debate | CNN Politics

Democrat Tim Walz and Republican JD Vance are set to meet Tuesday night in the only vice presidential debate of the 2024 election – and in what might be the last time the two campaigns square off onstage.

amp.cnn.com

(Vance) said last week at a campaign event in Charlotte, North Carolina, that Walz, as Minnesota governor, backed a measure that would allow abortion “right up to the moment of birth, even to the point at which doctors wouldn’t be required to provide life-saving care to a baby who survived a botched abortion.”

“That is just sick,” he said.

Walz signed the measure into law in early 2023. Advocates at the time said it was intended to keep decisions about reproductive care in the hands of women and their doctors, rather than politicians and judges.

I’m guessing that will be edited soon.

Depraved and very extreme.

 

[Independent thinker]

What to watch for during the Vance-Walz VP debate | CNN Politics

Democrat Tim Walz and Republican JD Vance are set to meet Tuesday night in the only vice presidential debate of the 2024 election – and in what might be the last time the two campaigns square off onstage.

amp.cnn.com

(Vance) said last week at a campaign event in Charlotte, North Carolina, that Walz, as Minnesota governor, backed a measure that would allow abortion “right up to the moment of birth, even to the point at which doctors wouldn’t be required to provide life-saving care to a baby who survived a botched abortion.”

“That is just sick,” he said.

Walz signed the measure into law in early 2023. Advocates at the time said it was intended to keep decisions about reproductive care in the hands of women and their doctors, rather than politicians and judges.

I’m guessing that will be edited soon.

I always wonder, if the decision is between a woman and her doctor, that implies the doctor could have veto power. In other words, the woman doesn't have the right to choose as long as she also needs the consent of the doctor as well.