- Apr 17, 2009
- 112,950
- 38,428
Actually...instead of calling it commie, which it isn’t...consider the merits because there are are some. It has nothing to do with preparing kids for the adult world because Kids are not adults. Not physiologically, not mentally, and not developmentally and not with what their bodies and brains need. The problem with early start times now is their day doesn’t start then. It starts much much earlier with hours simply spent on a bus. Start times are now staggered to accommodate bussing and that is a big driver behind these increasingly early start times.Just when you think the state could't get more comical, here they come again.
They passed a bill to ban schools from starting before 8:30 am because they believe it would help if students got more sleep. Well duh! It's always been like that, but if a student needs more sleep, wouldn't it be more logical to go to sleep earlier?
Before liberalism, schools were designed to prepare kids for the adult world such as getting a job and going to work. So what's next when these kids get out of school, a law that states businesses can't open until 8:30?
A state has the right to do stupid things like this, but this is one of many reminders of what we don't want for the rest of the country.
California votes to bar schools from starting before 8:30am to help give students more sleep
You and I are probably the same age or close I think. Every school I went to I either walked, biked or had a bus ride that was maybe half an hour. I don’t think that is the case any. School consolidation means kids have to be up much earlier, get back much later and when you add in all the extra curricular stuff kids do these days along with homework, early to bed isn’t early enough. If you want to insist on comparing it to adults...the average work schedule is between 8 and 5, but school starts even earlier?
Some interesting info....
Later School Start Times: Lazy or Legit?
So adults don't have to wake up early to get ready for work, eat breakfast, commute to work?
I start at 7:00 am but I'm up at 5:30 to get ready for the day. Granted I do stay up until 11:00 pm or so, but I usually take an hour or two nap when I get home from work. I don't sacrifice sleep for anything because of how important it is.
Time is just a number. For those trying to site liberal studies that says kids do better because they start later, then WTF do they do when the time changes twice a year? After all, if they start school at 8:30 now, what do they do when time changes back and they are at school 7:30 the old time? It sounds like a farce to me.
Sure, people like to stay up late. I know I do, and I'm 58 years old! But the world doesn't revolve around me. My boss says be here at 7:00, I better be there at 7:00. It's discipline; something we should be teaching our kids; especially in the high school years.
We're the same age then
Why do you call them liberal studies? They aren't partisan.
Because liberal studies are FOS. Time is just a number. In other words, if the entire country moved the clocks back two hours, we would all adjust and continue living our normal lives. It's like the example I gave of time change. When the clocks go back or forth an hour, we still wake up at X time and go to bed at X time.
It's not the clock on the wall, it's lack of discipline that keeps kids up. It's mental, not physical.
I don't think it's that simple Ray. We're not saying LESS schooling, we're saying don't start so early - keep in mind a start time of 7:30 is usually preceded by an hours worth of bussing. Something neither you nor I likely had to contend with.
In this particular case - is it really so bad? What if it was Alabama that decided to do this instead of California. Would it be Commiebama?