Condi Rice says No to possible VP nod fromTrump

[JimH52]

Condoleezza Rice 'not interested' in being Trump's vice president | Fox News':

Ha Ha.....No Republican that wants a political future will attach him/herself to Donnie.

Notice the only way blacks get included in the GOP is if they are appointed or picked? Is that because white Republicans wont vote for a black? Not enough for them to win any high office. OK they'll say they'd be voting for her as VP but that's not really the same as condi winning the primaries herself. Shed be his capable experienced loyal token. Just like his wife. Even she don't like getting with that

There have been a few black Republican congressmen, but when such a high percentage of a population is in the other party, you wouldn't expect to see many.


And the Colin Powell polls of the 90s, showed that Republicans would be happy to support a black President, if he wasn't Obama.

Mention his name now and see shudders from the GOP RWers...

Which is based on the fact that he has since betrayed us.

My point about those polls still stands.

He was black back in the 90s and the Republican voters supported him.

Which disproves sealy's claim that white gop voters would not vote for a black guy.

They supported him or bush? Because as soon as he didn't support bush Republicans stopped supporting him.

And what election did Powell win to prove republicans voters will support a black? What did Herman Cain or Ben carson win? Tokens.

Is there a black Republican governor? Has there ever been?

Governor Wilder in Virginia was the first back Governor in the south.

 

[sealybobo]

Condoleezza Rice 'not interested' in being Trump's vice president | Fox News':

Ha Ha.....No Republican that wants a political future will attach him/herself to Donnie.

Notice the only way blacks get included in the GOP is if they are appointed or picked? Is that because white Republicans wont vote for a black? Not enough for them to win any high office. OK they'll say they'd be voting for her as VP but that's not really the same as condi winning the primaries herself. Shed be his capable experienced loyal token. Just like his wife. Even she don't like getting with that

There have been a few black Republican congressmen, but when such a high percentage of a population is in the other party, you wouldn't expect to see many.


And the Colin Powell polls of the 90s, showed that Republicans would be happy to support a black President, if he wasn't Obama.

Mention his name now and see shudders from the GOP RWers...

Which is based on the fact that he has since betrayed us.

My point about those polls still stands.

He was black back in the 90s and the Republican voters supported him.

Which disproves sealy's claim that white gop voters would not vote for a black guy.

He was never VOTED into anything. Yes, they supported him, but that is often very different from voting for him.

They supported bush not Powell.

Fact is they'd vote for ANYONE over hillary so doesn't really matter. But the party knows many whites would stay home if they nominated a black. They aren't ready yes. That goes for women too.

 

[sealybobo]

Notice the only way blacks get included in the GOP is if they are appointed or picked? Is that because white Republicans wont vote for a black? Not enough for them to win any high office. OK they'll say they'd be voting for her as VP but that's not really the same as condi winning the primaries herself. Shed be his capable experienced loyal token. Just like his wife. Even she don't like getting with that

There have been a few black Republican congressmen, but when such a high percentage of a population is in the other party, you wouldn't expect to see many.


And the Colin Powell polls of the 90s, showed that Republicans would be happy to support a black President, if he wasn't Obama.

Mention his name now and see shudders from the GOP RWers...

Which is based on the fact that he has since betrayed us.

My point about those polls still stands.

He was black back in the 90s and the Republican voters supported him.

Which disproves sealy's claim that white gop voters would not vote for a black guy.

They supported him or bush? Because as soon as he didn't support bush Republicans stopped supporting him.

And what election did Powell win to prove republicans voters will support a black? What did Herman Cain or Ben carson win? Tokens.

Is there a black Republican governor? Has there ever been?

Governor Wilder in Virginia was the first back Governor in the south.

I thought Democrats were racist in the 50s?

 

[JimH52]

There have been a few black Republican congressmen, but when such a high percentage of a population is in the other party, you wouldn't expect to see many.


And the Colin Powell polls of the 90s, showed that Republicans would be happy to support a black President, if he wasn't Obama.

Mention his name now and see shudders from the GOP RWers...

Which is based on the fact that he has since betrayed us.

My point about those polls still stands.

He was black back in the 90s and the Republican voters supported him.

Which disproves sealy's claim that white gop voters would not vote for a black guy.

They supported him or bush? Because as soon as he didn't support bush Republicans stopped supporting him.

And what election did Powell win to prove republicans voters will support a black? What did Herman Cain or Ben carson win? Tokens.

Is there a black Republican governor? Has there ever been?

Governor Wilder in Virginia was the first back Governor in the south.

I thought Democrats were racist in the 50s?

Wilder became Governor in 1990.

 

[Correll]

The party will not ditch him, and deny him the nomination simply because he passed the 1237 mark, how are they going to steal it from him??

How is he unelectable when he beat 13 other people running against him, and had about roughly 13 Million + votes in the primaries..

If they deny, him his supporters will burn down Cleveland, I don't think the party wants to go down that road.

Who will they put in his place, Hillary will kill Cruz, Rubio, or Kasich Or anyone they wanna stick in his place..

I'm not voting for the asshole, but it's a little late in the game for substitution.

The celebrity effect gave him wins, however I don't see that carrying over enough into the general election, especially once the Dems really start laying into him.

And anyone they put in his place has the advantage of not being under the gun for the past 2-3 months.

The fact you won't vote for him proves the point.

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

This is what happens when Republicans convince their dumb constituents that all governments are evil.

Rather than appeal to common sense Republicans pray on stupidity

This isn't an anti-government populist rebellion.

The policies that Trump is building his platform around are not rolling back government polices.

Better Trade policy to bring back manufacturing jobs? That's not stupid. Hell, that's common sense.

Deporting illegals who take jobs and lower wages? That's not stupid. Hell, that's common sense.

Your sources of information are lying to you, for you to be so misinformed.

 

[Correll]

Condoleezza Rice 'not interested' in being Trump's vice president | Fox News':

Ha Ha.....No Republican that wants a political future will attach him/herself to Donnie.

Notice the only way blacks get included in the GOP is if they are appointed or picked? Is that because white Republicans wont vote for a black? Not enough for them to win any high office. OK they'll say they'd be voting for her as VP but that's not really the same as condi winning the primaries herself. Shed be his capable experienced loyal token. Just like his wife. Even she don't like getting with that

There have been a few black Republican congressmen, but when such a high percentage of a population is in the other party, you wouldn't expect to see many.


And the Colin Powell polls of the 90s, showed that Republicans would be happy to support a black President, if he wasn't Obama.

Mention his name now and see shudders from the GOP RWers...

Which is based on the fact that he has since betrayed us.

My point about those polls still stands.

He was black back in the 90s and the Republican voters supported him.

Which disproves sealy's claim that white gop voters would not vote for a black guy.

They supported him or bush? Because as soon as he didn't support bush Republicans stopped supporting him.

And what election did Powell win to prove republicans voters will support a black? What did Herman Cain or Ben carson win? Tokens.

Is there a black Republican governor? Has there ever been?

THey supported Powell for the Presidency long after Bush was retired.

He refused to run. He didn't WANT to be President.

But the polls verified that Republicans, white republican voters, would have strongly supported POwell, if he had accepted that support.

Pretending that that didn't happen because he refused to run is disingenuous.


Carson? Cain? Tokens?

Tokens are when jobs they don't deserve are given to people because of skin color or some such "identity".


Cain and Carson both ran in large pacts and gathered various levels of support from, in their particular cases, the Conservative wing of the GOP.

They lose against fierce competition.

IMO, Cain was robbed, mostly be the lying Lefty press.


BUT, that is not what "tokens" are.

 

[Correll]

The party will not ditch him, and deny him the nomination simply because he passed the 1237 mark, how are they going to steal it from him??

How is he unelectable when he beat 13 other people running against him, and had about roughly 13 Million + votes in the primaries..

If they deny, him his supporters will burn down Cleveland, I don't think the party wants to go down that road.

Who will they put in his place, Hillary will kill Cruz, Rubio, or Kasich Or anyone they wanna stick in his place..

I'm not voting for the asshole, but it's a little late in the game for substitution.

The celebrity effect gave him wins, however I don't see that carrying over enough into the general election, especially once the Dems really start laying into him.

And anyone they put in his place has the advantage of not being under the gun for the past 2-3 months.

The fact you won't vote for him proves the point.

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

Anger CANNOT win the General, but it will get a lot of crazies out.

Your characterization of the Working Class Whites and Middle Class Whites as "crazies" reflects the contempt I was referring to before, and is why Trump will win that demographic by large margin.

 

[Correll]

Notice the only way blacks get included in the GOP is if they are appointed or picked? Is that because white Republicans wont vote for a black? Not enough for them to win any high office. OK they'll say they'd be voting for her as VP but that's not really the same as condi winning the primaries herself. Shed be his capable experienced loyal token. Just like his wife. Even she don't like getting with that

There have been a few black Republican congressmen, but when such a high percentage of a population is in the other party, you wouldn't expect to see many.


And the Colin Powell polls of the 90s, showed that Republicans would be happy to support a black President, if he wasn't Obama.

Mention his name now and see shudders from the GOP RWers...

Which is based on the fact that he has since betrayed us.

My point about those polls still stands.

He was black back in the 90s and the Republican voters supported him.

Which disproves sealy's claim that white gop voters would not vote for a black guy.

He was never VOTED into anything. Yes, they supported him, but that is often very different from voting for him.

They supported bush not Powell.

Fact is they'd vote for ANYONE over hillary so doesn't really matter. But the party knows many whites would stay home if they nominated a black. They aren't ready yes. That goes for women too.

Nothing supports that except all the lies you have been told by the lib press.

The exit polls at the time showed Powell beating Bill Clinton by a comfortable margin.

 

[sealybobo]

Notice the only way blacks get included in the GOP is if they are appointed or picked? Is that because white Republicans wont vote for a black? Not enough for them to win any high office. OK they'll say they'd be voting for her as VP but that's not really the same as condi winning the primaries herself. Shed be his capable experienced loyal token. Just like his wife. Even she don't like getting with that

There have been a few black Republican congressmen, but when such a high percentage of a population is in the other party, you wouldn't expect to see many.


And the Colin Powell polls of the 90s, showed that Republicans would be happy to support a black President, if he wasn't Obama.

Mention his name now and see shudders from the GOP RWers...

Which is based on the fact that he has since betrayed us.

My point about those polls still stands.

He was black back in the 90s and the Republican voters supported him.

Which disproves sealy's claim that white gop voters would not vote for a black guy.

They supported him or bush? Because as soon as he didn't support bush Republicans stopped supporting him.

And what election did Powell win to prove republicans voters will support a black? What did Herman Cain or Ben carson win? Tokens.

Is there a black Republican governor? Has there ever been?

THey supported Powell for the Presidency long after Bush was retired.

He refused to run. He didn't WANT to be President.

But the polls verified that Republicans, white republican voters, would have strongly supported POwell, if he had accepted that support.

Pretending that that didn't happen because he refused to run is disingenuous.


Carson? Cain? Tokens?

Tokens are when jobs they don't deserve are given to people because of skin color or some such "identity".


Cain and Carson both ran in large pacts and gathered various levels of support from, in their particular cases, the Conservative wing of the GOP.

They lose against fierce competition.

IMO, Cain was robbed, mostly be the lying Lefty press.


BUT, that is not what "tokens" are.

Who are your black Republican future stars? Why don't Cain and carson try to win office they are qualified for like mayor?

That's the problem with you guys. You think bush bachmann Cain carson fiorino trump are qualified.

 

[sealybobo]

There have been a few black Republican congressmen, but when such a high percentage of a population is in the other party, you wouldn't expect to see many.


And the Colin Powell polls of the 90s, showed that Republicans would be happy to support a black President, if he wasn't Obama.

Mention his name now and see shudders from the GOP RWers...

Which is based on the fact that he has since betrayed us.

My point about those polls still stands.

He was black back in the 90s and the Republican voters supported him.

Which disproves sealy's claim that white gop voters would not vote for a black guy.

He was never VOTED into anything. Yes, they supported him, but that is often very different from voting for him.

They supported bush not Powell.

Fact is they'd vote for ANYONE over hillary so doesn't really matter. But the party knows many whites would stay home if they nominated a black. They aren't ready yes. That goes for women too.

Nothing supports that except all the lies you have been told by the lib press.

The exit polls at the time showed Powell beating Bill Clinton by a comfortable margin.

Same polls showed Romney winning

 

[JakeStarkey]

Condoleezza Rice 'not interested' in being Trump's vice president | Fox News':

Ha Ha.....No Republican that wants a political future will attach him/herself to Donnie.

Notice the only way blacks get included in the GOP is if they are appointed or picked? Is that because white Republicans wont vote for a black? Not enough for them to win any high office. OK they'll say they'd be voting for her as VP but that's not really the same as condi winning the primaries herself. Shed be his capable experienced loyal token. Just like his wife. Even she don't like getting with that

There have been a few black Republican congressmen, but when such a high percentage of a population is in the other party, you wouldn't expect to see many.


And the Colin Powell polls of the 90s, showed that Republicans would be happy to support a black President, if he wasn't Obama.

Yes if a black con was running against a white liberal you would vote for them true.

The day you find a black that believes the way you do and is electable, run one.

Trump would be smart to pick a black woman. But better a Hispanic woman

Americans overwhelmingly and correctly have contempt for the far right.

 

[martybegan]

I don't think he will be in the general election so the point is moot.

The Party will have to bite the bullet and deny him the nomination as un-electable.

At that point, we will find out if Condi's declaration is due to Trump, or is more of the Sherman-esque variety.

The party will not ditch him, and deny him the nomination simply because he passed the 1237 mark, how are they going to steal it from him??

How is he unelectable when he beat 13 other people running against him, and had about roughly 13 Million + votes in the primaries..

If they deny, him his supporters will burn down Cleveland, I don't think the party wants to go down that road.

Who will they put in his place, Hillary will kill Cruz, Rubio, or Kasich Or anyone they wanna stick in his place..

I'm not voting for the asshole, but it's a little late in the game for substitution.

The celebrity effect gave him wins, however I don't see that carrying over enough into the general election, especially once the Dems really start laying into him.

And anyone they put in his place has the advantage of not being under the gun for the past 2-3 months.

The fact you won't vote for him proves the point.

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

I agree totally. The problem is the angry might not be enough to stop President Clinton II from being in a position to screw with things from 2nd amendment rights to religious fr

I don't think he will be in the general election so the point is moot.

The Party will have to bite the bullet and deny him the nomination as un-electable.

At that point, we will find out if Condi's declaration is due to Trump, or is more of the Sherman-esque variety.

The party will not ditch him, and deny him the nomination simply because he passed the 1237 mark, how are they going to steal it from him??

How is he unelectable when he beat 13 other people running against him, and had about roughly 13 Million + votes in the primaries..

If they deny, him his supporters will burn down Cleveland, I don't think the party wants to go down that road.

Who will they put in his place, Hillary will kill Cruz, Rubio, or Kasich Or anyone they wanna stick in his place..

I'm not voting for the asshole, but it's a little late in the game for substitution.

The celebrity effect gave him wins, however I don't see that carrying over enough into the general election, especially once the Dems really start laying into him.

And anyone they put in his place has the advantage of not being under the gun for the past 2-3 months.

The fact you won't vote for him proves the point.

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

They have every right to be angry, we have been getting 2 flavors of the same bullshit for a few decades now. Hell, Clinton I was more of a fiscal conservative than any of the last 2, and future 2.

 

[martybegan]

The party will not ditch him, and deny him the nomination simply because he passed the 1237 mark, how are they going to steal it from him??

How is he unelectable when he beat 13 other people running against him, and had about roughly 13 Million + votes in the primaries..

If they deny, him his supporters will burn down Cleveland, I don't think the party wants to go down that road.

Who will they put in his place, Hillary will kill Cruz, Rubio, or Kasich Or anyone they wanna stick in his place..

I'm not voting for the asshole, but it's a little late in the game for substitution.

The celebrity effect gave him wins, however I don't see that carrying over enough into the general election, especially once the Dems really start laying into him.

And anyone they put in his place has the advantage of not being under the gun for the past 2-3 months.

The fact you won't vote for him proves the point.

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

This is what happens when Republicans convince their dumb constituents that all governments are evil.

Rather than appeal to common sense Republicans pray on stupidity

Who says all government is evil. Too much government is the problem.

 

[sealybobo]

T

The party will not ditch him, and deny him the nomination simply because he passed the 1237 mark, how are they going to steal it from him??

How is he unelectable when he beat 13 other people running against him, and had about roughly 13 Million + votes in the primaries..

If they deny, him his supporters will burn down Cleveland, I don't think the party wants to go down that road.

Who will they put in his place, Hillary will kill Cruz, Rubio, or Kasich Or anyone they wanna stick in his place..

I'm not voting for the asshole, but it's a little late in the game for substitution.

The celebrity effect gave him wins, however I don't see that carrying over enough into the general election, especially once the Dems really start laying into him.

And anyone they put in his place has the advantage of not being under the gun for the past 2-3 months.

The fact you won't vote for him proves the point.

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

I agree totally. The problem is the angry might not be enough to stop President Clinton II from being in a position to screw with things from 2nd amendment rights to religious fr

The party will not ditch him, and deny him the nomination simply because he passed the 1237 mark, how are they going to steal it from him??

How is he unelectable when he beat 13 other people running against him, and had about roughly 13 Million + votes in the primaries..

If they deny, him his supporters will burn down Cleveland, I don't think the party wants to go down that road.

Who will they put in his place, Hillary will kill Cruz, Rubio, or Kasich Or anyone they wanna stick in his place..

I'm not voting for the asshole, but it's a little late in the game for substitution.

The celebrity effect gave him wins, however I don't see that carrying over enough into the general election, especially once the Dems really start laying into him.

And anyone they put in his place has the advantage of not being under the gun for the past 2-3 months.

The fact you won't vote for him proves the point.

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

They have every right to be angry, we have been getting 2 flavors of the same bullshit for a few decades now. Hell, Clinton I was more of a fiscal conservative than any of the last 2, and future 2.

Then why did Republicans lie and call him a socialist? Hard to take conservatives serious when 1 minute Clinton's a lib the next he's in bed with wallstreet

 

[martybegan]

T

The celebrity effect gave him wins, however I don't see that carrying over enough into the general election, especially once the Dems really start laying into him.

And anyone they put in his place has the advantage of not being under the gun for the past 2-3 months.

The fact you won't vote for him proves the point.

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

I agree totally. The problem is the angry might not be enough to stop President Clinton II from being in a position to screw with things from 2nd amendment rights to religious fr

The celebrity effect gave him wins, however I don't see that carrying over enough into the general election, especially once the Dems really start laying into him.

And anyone they put in his place has the advantage of not being under the gun for the past 2-3 months.

The fact you won't vote for him proves the point.

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

They have every right to be angry, we have been getting 2 flavors of the same bullshit for a few decades now. Hell, Clinton I was more of a fiscal conservative than any of the last 2, and future 2.

Then why did Republicans lie and call him a socialist? Hard to take conservatives serious when 1 minute Clinton's a lib the next he's in bed with wallstreet

Some Republicans call everyone a socialist. Bernie is actually a socialist, Obama and Hillary are progressive statists, and Bill was a progressive statist with a smidge of conservative economic sense.

 

[sealybobo]

T

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

I agree totally. The problem is the angry might not be enough to stop President Clinton II from being in a position to screw with things from 2nd amendment rights to religious fr

The Celebrity Effect got him a hearing.

HIs polices and communication skills are what fueled his wins.

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

They have every right to be angry, we have been getting 2 flavors of the same bullshit for a few decades now. Hell, Clinton I was more of a fiscal conservative than any of the last 2, and future 2.

Then why did Republicans lie and call him a socialist? Hard to take conservatives serious when 1 minute Clinton's a lib the next he's in bed with wallstreet

Some Republicans call everyone a socialist. Bernie is actually a socialist, Obama and Hillary are progressive statists, and Bill was a progressive statist with a smidge of conservative economic sense.

He was a triangulators that's for sure. The Clinton's give in too much to the GOP it's one of the things I don't love about her. It's why we went with Obama over hillary. But I liked the clintons

 

[martybegan]

T

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

I agree totally. The problem is the angry might not be enough to stop President Clinton II from being in a position to screw with things from 2nd amendment rights to religious fr

I really doubt that. He channeled anger that has been simmering in middle america. Bernie did the same thing but he ran into a much more polished party machine then Trump did.

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

They have every right to be angry, we have been getting 2 flavors of the same bullshit for a few decades now. Hell, Clinton I was more of a fiscal conservative than any of the last 2, and future 2.

Then why did Republicans lie and call him a socialist? Hard to take conservatives serious when 1 minute Clinton's a lib the next he's in bed with wallstreet

Some Republicans call everyone a socialist. Bernie is actually a socialist, Obama and Hillary are progressive statists, and Bill was a progressive statist with a smidge of conservative economic sense.

He was a triangulators that's for sure. The Clinton's give in too much to the GOP it's one of the things I don't love about her. It's why we went with Obama over hillary. But I liked the clintons

Clinton I was president during my college years, and he was moderated by a Republican Congress (after the AW Ban disaster), but right now using precedent from Bush II and Obama the president wields too much power by way of federal agencies that expand their own power without going back to congress.

And Hillary to me is far more of a true blue lefty than Bill was or is.

 

[sealybobo]

And tr

T

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

I agree totally. The problem is the angry might not be enough to stop President Clinton II from being in a position to screw with things from 2nd amendment rights to religious fr

They are angry because their interests have not been represented for a long time.

By speaking to their interests Trump is showing his support for THEM.

"Channeling anger"?


Maybe. Or maybe they've noticed that the same people who have nothing but contempt for Trump and the same people that have nothing but contempt for them.

Maybe their have noticed how similar the lies the libs says about Trump are to the lies the libs say about them.


Anger is the rational response to being shit on for long periods of time, by assholes.

They have every right to be angry, we have been getting 2 flavors of the same bullshit for a few decades now. Hell, Clinton I was more of a fiscal conservative than any of the last 2, and future 2.

Then why did Republicans lie and call him a socialist? Hard to take conservatives serious when 1 minute Clinton's a lib the next he's in bed with wallstreet

Some Republicans call everyone a socialist. Bernie is actually a socialist, Obama and Hillary are progressive statists, and Bill was a progressive statist with a smidge of conservative economic sense.

He was a triangulators that's for sure. The Clinton's give in too much to the GOP it's one of the things I don't love about her. It's why we went with Obama over hillary. But I liked the clintons

Clinton I was president during my college years, and he was moderated by a Republican Congress (after the AW Ban disaster), but right now using precedent from Bush II and Obama the president wields too much power by way of federal agencies that expand their own power without going back to congress.

And Hillary to me is far more of a true blue lefty than Bill was or is.

And trumps your answer? You better dump him at the convention

 

[JakeStarkey]

Want to save the GOP?

We dump Trump at the convention and go with Kasich who can still beat Hillary.

 

[BIG YANK BAL 1976]

And tr

T

I agree totally. The problem is the angry might not be enough to stop President Clinton II from being in a position to screw with things from 2nd amendment rights to religious fr
They have every right to be angry, we have been getting 2 flavors of the same bullshit for a few decades now. Hell, Clinton I was more of a fiscal conservative than any of the last 2, and future 2.

Then why did Republicans lie and call him a socialist? Hard to take conservatives serious when 1 minute Clinton's a lib the next he's in bed with wallstreet

Some Republicans call everyone a socialist. Bernie is actually a socialist, Obama and Hillary are progressive statists, and Bill was a progressive statist with a smidge of conservative economic sense.

He was a triangulators that's for sure. The Clinton's give in too much to the GOP it's one of the things I don't love about her. It's why we went with Obama over hillary. But I liked the clintons

Clinton I was president during my college years, and he was moderated by a Republican Congress (after the AW Ban disaster), but right now using precedent from Bush II and Obama the president wields too much power by way of federal agencies that expand their own power without going back to congress.

And Hillary to me is far more of a true blue lefty than Bill was or is.

And trumps your answer? You better dump him at the convention

They can't just dump him, sorry he got the required amount of delegates, so all they can basically do is have regrets and buyers remorse, and prepare for a nasty hangover on November 9, the man isn't going anywhere..

He beat roughly 20 other people to win the whole enchilada, And to be honest with you none of those 20 other people can beat Clinton, she's just got too many weapons, money, support staff, and demographics, to lose..