Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 26,080
- 9,631
I think we triggered someone.... ![Grinning face with smiling eyes :smile: 😄](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f604.png)
![Grinning face with smiling eyes :smile: 😄](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f604.png)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you need historyAre they reflecting on that history or honoring it?
Did they invade and slaughter the citizens of a country that didn't attack the United States?Yeah… and so we’re Patton, and McAurther, and Eisenhower.
Captain Backwards
Then we will have to agree to disagree though it does beg the question why it was organizing like the Sons and Daughters of the Confederacy who put them up and still defend them to this day. Is it your claim that these organizations want to educate people on what trash human beings the Confederates were?
What's the rational underpinning of this argument? That's all knowledge is contained and retained via statue? Do you advocate for Nazi statues in order to preserve that history?
I notice how you have adorable pretend arguments (that's me being generous) and no real serious ones, as yet.
Newsflash… the Confederacy attacked the USDid they invade and slaughter the citizens of a country that didn't attack the United States?
These are democrat artifacts being removed, kyzr, and that's good, right?
No it didn't, dumbfuck. Ft Sumter was not in the United States after South Carolina seceded.Newsflash… the Confederacy attacked the US
sure sugarTowns and cities across the South erected statues and monuments honoring heroes of the Confederacy on public land. Even though 40 percent of the Confederacy were slaves, none of those monuments honored slaves who also gave their lives
Those same towns and cities are today electing to remove those monuments. It is their right …..just like it was their right to put them up in the first place
sure sugar
Horse shit. It was Federal propertyNo it didn't, dumbfuck. Ft Sumter was not in the United States after South Carolina seceded.
It was federal property, not territory. It was still within the borders of South Carolina. The federal government owns the Post Office down the street from where I live. Does that mean Congress gets to charge me property taxes?Horse shit. It was Federal property
What the fuck do you think you are talking about?Property. It was still within the borders of South Carolina. The federal government owns the Post Office down the street from where I live. Does that mean Congress gets to set the speed limits there?
Another imbecile who doesn't know the difference between property and territory.What the fuck do you think you are talking about?
Jesus shit up
Again , what the fuck do you think you are talking aboutAnother imbecile who doesn't know the difference between property and territory.
Progs don't want it to rule on that because they are afraid of the answer. That's why Lincoln tried to have Roger Taney arrested.Interesting fact: The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled on the very real question of whether the Confederate states had the Constitutional right to secede. In fact, concern over this point was the main reason why Jefferson Davis was never prosecuted for treason...fear of how the case might end up.
I have no strong opinion on what to do about Confederate monuments, most of which were erected long after the last Civil War soldier was dead.