Congratulations, Illinois!!!

That's obvious, but it does point out the benefit of the MSM in the Metro/ghetto areas for dimocrats.

Well, maybe instead of complaining how they vote, you could give then a good reason to vote for you?

Naw... too simple.

We, unlike the dims, don't like to lie to people and play Santa Claus to get their votes. The dims depend on the slaves they have to vote for them, and their willing accomplices in the media perpetuate it.

As soon as you said slaves, I knew you weren't being serious. :eusa_boohoo:
 
That's obvious, but it does point out the benefit of the MSM in the Metro/ghetto areas for dimocrats.

Well, maybe instead of complaining how they vote, you could give then a good reason to vote for you?

Naw... too simple.

We, unlike the dims, don't like to lie to people and play Santa Claus to get their votes. The dims depend on the slaves they have to vote for them, and their willing accomplices in the media perpetuate it.

Republicans play Santa Claus to the one percent. They could care less about the 47% and their votes.
 
Well, maybe instead of complaining how they vote, you could give then a good reason to vote for you?

Naw... too simple.

We, unlike the dims, don't like to lie to people and play Santa Claus to get their votes. The dims depend on the slaves they have to vote for them, and their willing accomplices in the media perpetuate it.

Republicans play Santa Claus to the one percent. They could care less about the 47% and their votes.

horseshit, its the dems who want to enslave half of the population in order to buy their votes. Make them dependent on the govt, preach about the evil rich----sounds very much like Lenin and Hitler.

study some world history RW, your perspective might change.
 
We, unlike the dims, don't like to lie to people and play Santa Claus to get their votes. The dims depend on the slaves they have to vote for them, and their willing accomplices in the media perpetuate it.

Republicans play Santa Claus to the one percent. They could care less about the 47% and their votes.

horseshit, its the dems who want to enslave half of the population in order to buy their votes. Make them dependent on the govt, preach about the evil rich----sounds very much like Lenin and Hitler.

study some world history RW, your perspective might change.

OMG :eek:

Both Lenin AND Hitler?

Well you certainly convinced me.
 
Republicans play Santa Claus to the one percent. They could care less about the 47% and their votes.

horseshit, its the dems who want to enslave half of the population in order to buy their votes. Make them dependent on the govt, preach about the evil rich----sounds very much like Lenin and Hitler.

study some world history RW, your perspective might change.

OMG :eek:

Both Lenin AND Hitler?

Well you certainly convinced me.

as I said, study some world history.

you can add Castro, Pol Pot, Chavez, Idi Amin, and Mao to the list.

Obama is not doing anything new, he is copying the socialist dictators of the past.

the sad thing is that people like you are so blinded by hate and envy that you go right along with it.
 
horseshit, its the dems who want to enslave half of the population in order to buy their votes. Make them dependent on the govt, preach about the evil rich----sounds very much like Lenin and Hitler.

study some world history RW, your perspective might change.

OMG :eek:

Both Lenin AND Hitler?

Well you certainly convinced me.

as I said, study some world history.

you can add Castro, Pol Pot, Chavez, Idi Amin, and Mao to the list.

Obama is not doing anything new, he is copying the socialist dictators of the past.

the sad thing is that people like you are so blinded by hate and envy that you go right along with it.

Just more of your ignorant idiocy from the right.
 
i heard they have carry permits now too. its good to see a backward liberal state finally stepping into the modern world
 
They aren't stepping into the modern world, but the ancient world. The world of Greece, Rome and Egypt at their fall.
 
And now that there are so many more who will be drawing Social Security benefits that come as part of marriage, Obama will be overjoyed to double the Social Security tax that comes out of our checks each month, and cut our benefits in half! WOOOOOO HOOOOOOO CELEBRATE~!

This is what happens when we heteros demanded the government get into marriage. Don't be a sourpuss now that gays get to eat at the same lunch counter as you.
 
Well done, if only Australia could get with the times and follow - gay marriage is now legal in the ACT, but the Federal government is going to court to overturn the ruling. Homophobes.

Noomi, I know we have had out difference, but I am glad you bring an international opinion to this board. That said, I wouldn't put down Australia, they have much going for them and much to envy. I have a buddy who left the States for Australia's oil industry and he isn't coming back. But I digress.

I live in IL and welcome this law, however, it ignorant to say that the people against it are homophobes (some are, but most aren't). In fact the vast majority of IL legislators voted for civil unions just last years, which gave gays all the legal protections and tax benefits that marriage offers. They were just opposed to the religious part of the union, which I think they have incorrect, but I do see their point.

Actually, I don't care who you screw. It is the financial aspect that I find troublesome. Our SS system was not designed for the extra people. We better be recruiting more illegals to pay into it.

Gays have been paying into Social Security. Did you think they should be paying in but not reaping the benefits the rest of us do? You are pretty goddam one way.
 
The next ACLU suit----------bigamists and polygamists are being discriminated against by the federal and state governments. We demand equal marriage rights for multi-person marriages.

Don't laugh, its the next logical step now that man/man and woman/woman marriage is legal.

Watch, it will be with us very soon.

Oh, right!! Yeah. Just like gays got equal rights right after interracial couples.

:eusa_whistle:

not the same thing and you know it. interracial marriage is a man and woman of different races.

gay marriage is something quite different----biologically.

Biology?

This isn't about biology.

Besides, Negroes were considered subhuman.

And what is it about a joint tax return that requires the name of one person with a penis and one person with a vagina? Does the tax return not fit in the mailbox otherwise?
 
Noomi, I know we have had out difference, but I am glad you bring an international opinion to this board. That said, I wouldn't put down Australia, they have much going for them and much to envy. I have a buddy who left the States for Australia's oil industry and he isn't coming back. But I digress.

I live in IL and welcome this law, however, it ignorant to say that the people against it are homophobes (some are, but most aren't). In fact the vast majority of IL legislators voted for civil unions just last years, which gave gays all the legal protections and tax benefits that marriage offers. They were just opposed to the religious part of the union, which I think they have incorrect, but I do see their point.

Actually, I don't care who you screw. It is the financial aspect that I find troublesome. Our SS system was not designed for the extra people. We better be recruiting more illegals to pay into it.

Gays have been paying into Social Security. Did you think they should be paying in but not reaping the benefits the rest of us do? You are pretty goddam one way.

I didn't even think that last night. I was seriously going "Yes, what about the extra burden?"

/ponder
 
i heard they have carry permits now too. its good to see a backward liberal state finally stepping into the modern world

In Illinois, we won't have "Carry" completed until March at least. The democrat Governor has forced expense and delaying as much as possible.
 
Actually, I don't care who you screw. It is the financial aspect that I find troublesome. Our SS system was not designed for the extra people. We better be recruiting more illegals to pay into it.

Gays have been paying into Social Security. Did you think they should be paying in but not reaping the benefits the rest of us do? You are pretty goddam one way.

I didn't even think that last night. I was seriously going "Yes, what about the extra burden?"

/ponder

It would be an extra burden to pay for all the adopted children when one 'spouse' dies or goes on disability.

Marriage is NOT the only thing that will change. Surrogacy will become more commonplace than it is now, and the birth mother will be able to sign away all responsibility. Also, if the birth father changes his mind, then there is another baby on welfare benefits. There are many issues around this, all of them in some way financial.

My husband paid into SS and he never drew a dime.
 

Forum List

Back
Top