Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They all became republicans, as LBJ said they would, when he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.& .. they no longer exist...not enough room in the big tent is my guess.
They all became republicans, as LBJ said they would, when he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.& .. they no longer exist...not enough room in the big tent is my guess.
Having two distinct choices is probably better for the nation than having two virtually indistinguishable choices, making elections quasi-farcical.They all became republicans, as LBJ said they would, when he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.& .. they no longer exist...not enough room in the big tent is my guess.
Close- but there is more to it.
There is less room for moderation in either party.
Conservative Democrats couldn't compete with Conservative Republicans when it came to getting Conservative votes- they lost both liberal Democratic votes, and Conservative Republican votes.
Just as liberal Republicans have lost Conservative Republican votes, and liberal Democrat votes.
Fewer and fewer of what we would consider 'moderates'- everyone wants to appeal to the loud fringe on the right and left- and are willing to eat their own if any Republican or Democrat strays too far from the 'proper' path.
Having two distinct choices is probably better for the nation than having two virtually indistinguishable choices, making elections quasi-farcical.They all became republicans, as LBJ said they would, when he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.& .. they no longer exist...not enough room in the big tent is my guess.
Close- but there is more to it.
There is less room for moderation in either party.
Conservative Democrats couldn't compete with Conservative Republicans when it came to getting Conservative votes- they lost both liberal Democratic votes, and Conservative Republican votes.
Just as liberal Republicans have lost Conservative Republican votes, and liberal Democrat votes.
Fewer and fewer of what we would consider 'moderates'- everyone wants to appeal to the loud fringe on the right and left- and are willing to eat their own if any Republican or Democrat strays too far from the 'proper' path.
And the Right believes, or pretends to believe, their rewrite of history.At least you still have a sense of humor...They all became republicans, as LBJ said they would, when he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.& .. they no longer exist...not enough room in the big tent is my guess.
Having two distinct choices is probably better for the nation than having two virtually indistinguishable choices, making elections quasi-farcical.They all became republicans, as LBJ said they would, when he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.& .. they no longer exist...not enough room in the big tent is my guess.
Close- but there is more to it.
There is less room for moderation in either party.
Conservative Democrats couldn't compete with Conservative Republicans when it came to getting Conservative votes- they lost both liberal Democratic votes, and Conservative Republican votes.
Just as liberal Republicans have lost Conservative Republican votes, and liberal Democrat votes.
Fewer and fewer of what we would consider 'moderates'- everyone wants to appeal to the loud fringe on the right and left- and are willing to eat their own if any Republican or Democrat strays too far from the 'proper' path.
I disagree- what a shock.
Conservative Democrats and Liberal Republicans provided a nuance that is antithetical to the extremes of the right and the left that demand that candidates toe some extreme set of views.
I don't see a downside to having two CLEAR choices. I see plenty of downsides to having two mushy liberal parties where all positions are reduced to the greatest common factor.
More rewrite of history. I should have clarified that they've rewritten "World History". They teach that anything that's ever been bad was Liberal.The democrat party of 2014 more resembles a party the Bavarian press was writing about with considerable sarcasm back in the 1930's. It was a magnet for degenerates, homosexual pedophiles, homosexual pederasts, queer thugs, criminals of every stripe, Jew-haters and race-baiters of rabid enthusiasm, and all other manner of societal reptile. Its leader was a queer who entertained the very sickest fetishes. That shouldn't surprise anyone should it...I mean the analogy?
More rewrite of history. I should have clarified that they've rewritten "World History". They teach that anything that's ever been bad was Liberal.The democrat party of 2014 more resembles a party the Bavarian press was writing about with considerable sarcasm back in the 1930's. It was a magnet for degenerates, homosexual pedophiles, homosexual pederasts, queer thugs, criminals of every stripe, Jew-haters and race-baiters of rabid enthusiasm, and all other manner of societal reptile. Its leader was a queer who entertained the very sickest fetishes. That shouldn't surprise anyone should it...I mean the analogy?
Yep -More rewrite of history. I should have clarified that they've rewritten "World History". They teach that anything that's ever been bad was Liberal.The democrat party of 2014 more resembles a party the Bavarian press was writing about with considerable sarcasm back in the 1930's. It was a magnet for degenerates, homosexual pedophiles, homosexual pederasts, queer thugs, criminals of every stripe, Jew-haters and race-baiters of rabid enthusiasm, and all other manner of societal reptile. Its leader was a queer who entertained the very sickest fetishes. That shouldn't surprise anyone should it...I mean the analogy?
Those hundred and fifty million murdered corpses liberals, "progressives," have left in their wake, a "rewrite"?
You're a sick person.Yep -
& .. they no longer exist...not enough room in the big tent is my guess.