Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A good, professional-quality DeWalt drill, with a large diameter bit will do that.
But you wouldn't know that, since such tools are only for people who are in useful trades; and not for worthless parasites who proudly boast of having no trade at all.
Making America the envy of the world. That's pretty good, eh?Whelp...get your "well formed militia", stand on that bridge and then come see me.
The Constitution applies to everyone contained in our great country. Not just the select few you decide are worthy.
Tell me, what have conservative implemented in the last four decades that is worthy of discussion?
We allowed the Marxists to take over Hollywood, the media, the universities, the schools because we figured it was someone else's job to fight them.
Now, we are reaping what we have sown.
Maybe you can be the very first winner of the Name That Fascist Policy contest!
The rules are simple. Name one Fascist policy that Donald Trump has put before Congress. Pointing out goofy shit that he's said at press conferences that gives you the willies about the ghost of Hitler doesn't count. This game is limited to actual policies that the president has tried to pass through the house and senate, that PROVE that he is trying to implement Fascist designs on our nation, and you must be able to successfully point out what about those policies proves that Fascism is the philosophy driving them.
Again, pointing out random comments that the president has made, unconnected to any actual policy that he's pushed, that made you feel trepidation, doesn't count.
Will you be the first winner of NAME
THAT
FASCIST
POLICY!?
Find me ONE prominent right winger that has said that the constitution only applies to white heterosexual Christians in the last 40 years. I'll wait.Uh..sorry..but you are describing right wingers. If you are white, heterosexual, and Christian, you're in the club. If you are not...you know that Constitution?...well..we think it doesn't apply to you.
I admit I wouldn't be a fan of this, but you've forgotten two key rules. Number one, where is the policy that he set before the House? I am willing to let this particular rule slide, as you've at least found a conversation where Trump actually goes in depth into policy preferences.Whelp...he said this. And this got little to no play. Yes it was concerning bailouts. But it was the closest to any political figure I've seen saying the government should own part of companies...therefore, controlling the means of production. LOL.
Trump says he would consider government equity stakes in companies seeking bailouts
Trump didn't specify which companies he was referring to but called out those that have bought back stock.www.cnbc.com
I admit I wouldn't be a fan of this, but you've forgotten two key rules. Number one, where is the policy that he set before the House? I am willing to let this particular rule slide, as you've at least found a conversation where Trump actually goes in depth into policy preferences.
The more important oversight, however, is that you've failed to explain how it is that you've boiled the philosophical drive of this preference down to Fascism. Marxism, communism, socialism. . . the ideologies opposite from Fascism share the goal of government control of industry. How do you eliminate these philosophies from being the driver, and, more importantly, how do you disprove the most likely alternative (IMO the most likely explanation period), which is simply that this preference is a pragmatic one, and not based on any particular ideological drive? Honestly, given how all-over-the-map Trump's spitball commentary is, I don't know how anybody could convince themselves that this guy operates according to any ideological framework. His views don't consistently match up with any particular philosophy that I can identify.
I don't know about Trump being the first, and what he's proposing isn't really/necessarily socialism.Owning and controlling the means of production is the central tenant of socialism. No one on the right or the left is proposing this. I brought it up because there are a lot of people on these boards that throw around the "ism" terms without knowing what they mean. The best economies in our world are a mix of capitalism and socialism. One or the other by itself is ruin. Our argument is the percentages.
Trump didn't set this idea before anyone. He blurted it out during a press conference. It was largely ignored as it should have been. But I always smile knowing that the first person to even hint at socialism...was a Republican.
Remember, kids, the liberals' idea of "compromise" is "STFU and do what we tell you to do".No you just supported an ideology that hasn't had a successful policy implementation in almost four decades.
You failed to compromise (past 1994), you failed to learn from your mistakes, and you failed to expel the foaming at the mouth fringe from
invading the party that supposedly carried your belief system. You abandoned your ideology's core principals in the name of
worship and allegiance to a fraud and a charlatan.
Yes, you are reaping what you've sown. Because for the last three decades, all you've sown is hate.
Oh, kinda like you guys and your spurious charges of "racism" and "sexism"?You wouldn't know an "ist" if one ran up to you and said "Hello!".
You right wingers throw these terms around so often, no cares anymore.
No one is afraid..or scared..or confused by them anymore.
People are often bored by things too complex for them to understand.Maybe if you made a useful argument and stop deflecting, people might be interested in responding your scratchings.
And yes, you bore me.
Then you're not paying attention.Whelp...he said this. And this got little to no play. Yes it was concerning bailouts. But it was the closest to any political figure I've seen saying the government should own part of companies...therefore, controlling the means of production. LOL.
Trump says he would consider government equity stakes in companies seeking bailouts
Trump didn't specify which companies he was referring to but called out those that have bought back stock.
Well, I just proved this is an outright lie.Owning and controlling the means of production is the central tenant of socialism. No one on the right or the left is proposing this. I brought it up because there are a lot of people on these boards that throw around the "ism" terms without knowing what they mean. The best economies in our world are a mix of capitalism and socialism. One or the other by itself is ruin. Our argument is the percentages.
Trump didn't set this idea before anyone. He blurted it out during a press conference. It was largely ignored as it should have been. But I always smile knowing that the first person to even hint at socialism...was a Republican.
I'm constantly told that the govenment providing services and a social safety net against the backdrop of an economy of private ownership constitutes an economy with elements of capitalism and socialism. I disagree that government services are an element of socialism. They're simply an element of government.
Yes, but you can't buy votes with other people's money that way.I think there's an important distinction to understand.
A socialistic government program would be one where taxes are collected from some people, to pay for benefits to different people than those who are being made to pay for it. I don't completely dispute the legitimacy of a very limited amount of that, but I think it needs to be clearly understood that just because those who receive these benefits are not paying for them, these benefits are not free at all. Someone else is paying for them than the ones enjoying them.
A truly legitimate government program would be paid for by taxes and fees collected from those who actually enjoy the benefits of that program.
We allowed the Marxists to take over Hollywood, the media, the universities, the schools because we figured it was someone else's job to fight them.
Now, we are reaping what we have sown.
I think there's an important distinction to understand.
A socialistic government program would be one where taxes are collected from some people, to pay for benefits to different people than those who are being made to pay for it. I don't completely dispute the legitimacy of a very limited amount of that, but I think it needs to be clearly understood that just because those who receive these benefits are not paying for them, these benefits are not free at all. Someone else is paying for them than the ones enjoying them.
A truly legitimate government program would be paid for by taxes and fees collected from those who actually enjoy the benefits of that program.
What a crock of shit. Our country was on a fantastic trajectory until China launched a bio attack on us. And while that was going on and people were already stressed out from the subsequent lockdowns, the George Floyd video went viral and was played about a bazillion times to maximize outrage. China opens the floodgates and you blame the guy dealing with the flood.
Agree to a point. We don't try to force our views down everyone's throats or demand compliance with our mindsets. Most conservatives just want to be left the hell alone. Although I think it's one of the best virtues of being "conservative", it's also one of our greatest faults.
The flip side is when the righteous among us finally do get mad we tend to go scorched earth on anything and anyone that dares stand in our way.
Oh dear lord, shove this alt-right, conspiracy theory flaunting horseshit in your flat hat. LOL.
The current administration blew it. What lockdowns were in place before March?..but now??...138K+ dead.
And..so sorry, George Floyd was just the straw that broke said camel's back.
