Conservatives mock ‘Bring Back Our Girls’ hashtag

It is sad, and it is pathetic.

But for another person's ignorance, in this case, Westwall's, I am not responsible.

There is no part of US-American ideology, neither Liberalism nor Conservatism, that contributed to the NAZI holocaust or the mass murders of Russian's by Joseph Stalin or Mao's "Cultural Revolution" or the Armenian genocide at the hands of the Turks one century ago.

People not smart enough to realize that both terms (Liberalism, Conservatism) have changed their meaning over the years, and more importantly, they have different meanings on different continents, don't deserve my pity. But they do earn my scorn.

In Germany, the most Right-Wing party, the one party that is for Capitalism-pure, is the FDP. What do they call themselves?

"Die Liberalen"
"The Liberals"

What Westwall is doing here, under the guise of free speech, is using absolutely gross and disgusting material from another time in our Earth's history (and also on another continent) to impugne a branch of US ideology that has more followers than Conservatism. This technique, one of denunciation by association, was a favorite of the NAZIs.

So, in claiming to be so for free speech (which I support), Westwall willingly got into bed with the Nazis. Heil Westwall!

Ok, it's his right to do that, and I respect that. I never stand in the way of a person who has decided to act stupidly. It's his problem, he will have to deal with the backlash, not me.

It should also be noted that Westwall deliberately derailed this thread, the title for which is:

Conservatives mock ‘Bring Back Our Girls’ hashtag

So, in about 700 posts, we have gone from the OP to ad hominen attacks on the Left by a member, using a graphic photo of genocide to make his point.

I don't need to call Westwall any names. He did it to himself by his very own behavior.

[MENTION=23239]westwall[/MENTION]: just because we have a "right" to say something doesn't mean we should say it. That is where common sense or common decency comes into play with people who have some sanity.

Are you sane?






I have seen enough of your posts to know you are who you claim you are.....but don't you find it even the slightest bit hypocritical, as the Jew I know you are, and respect, to resort to using the very tactics that the Nazi regime did?

It is a favored tactic of totalitarians everywhere, when they are accumulating power, to denigrate those who are a threat to that accumulation, and one of THE most popular tactics is to challenge that threats mental faculties.

From time immemorial, to the present day, those who would RULE others must eliminate any who would challenge them. Progressives are those who would RULE now.

You and Pogo find my referral to that most terrible of times offensive and Pogo went so far as to claim that "those progressives" were long gone. How about a recent progressive then? How about that darling of the progressive movement now, Noam Chomsky?

Did you know that he supported the Khmer rouge in their genocide in Cambodia? Below I have given you multiple links to support that assertion. When the full truth of what those bastards had done surfaced this was his response...

"In the first place, is it proper to attribute deaths from malnutrition and disease to Cambodian authorities?”

Chomsky and the Khmer Rouge ? The Observer | FrontPage Magazine

Does that line of reasoning sound familiar? Does that harken back to a particular dark period of human history? That is one of the very same arguments that Holocaust Deniers
resort to in their defense of the German atrocities, because, as is well known, the vast majority of Jews who died in the camps died of starvation.

Noam Chomsky - Extremist

Khmer Rouge Apologist Noam Chomsky: Unrepentant - Nate Thayer

[MENTION=41527]Pogo[/MENTION], [MENTION=46168]Statistikhengst[/MENTION]


Hey that reminds me, stupid -- you know that new avatar you ordered? It's here --

strawman2.jpg


I went ahead and put the batteries in so he's all ready for your next Two Minutes Hate. :thup:

Yammer yammer yammer H.G. Wells yammer yammer Chomsky yammer yammer...






So, you are real good at insulting the messenger (a progressive tactic), but you can't make a single argument that refutes what I have said. That makes you a........?:lol:
 
So did I. He's pathetic, and needs to really get a life.




Yeah, me too. There are some posts that just beg for them.

Yep...and not to nudge him into reality, but to really wake his stupid ass up.

Reality USMB Republicans refuse to face. Sad really. Sad and pathetic.

People were removed from the Republican National Convention Tuesday after they threw nuts at an African-American CNN camera operator and said, “This is how we feed animals.” - CNN



I couldn't make this stuff up. That's real "reality".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have seen enough of your posts to know you are who you claim you are.....but don't you find it even the slightest bit hypocritical, as the Jew I know you are, and respect, to resort to using the very tactics that the Nazi regime did?

It is a favored tactic of totalitarians everywhere, when they are accumulating power, to denigrate those who are a threat to that accumulation, and one of THE most popular tactics is to challenge that threats mental faculties.

From time immemorial, to the present day, those who would RULE others must eliminate any who would challenge them. Progressives are those who would RULE now.

You and Pogo find my referral to that most terrible of times offensive and Pogo went so far as to claim that "those progressives" were long gone. How about a recent progressive then? How about that darling of the progressive movement now, Noam Chomsky?

Did you know that he supported the Khmer rouge in their genocide in Cambodia? Below I have given you multiple links to support that assertion. When the full truth of what those bastards had done surfaced this was his response...

"In the first place, is it proper to attribute deaths from malnutrition and disease to Cambodian authorities?”

Chomsky and the Khmer Rouge ? The Observer | FrontPage Magazine

Does that line of reasoning sound familiar? Does that harken back to a particular dark period of human history? That is one of the very same arguments that Holocaust Deniers
resort to in their defense of the German atrocities, because, as is well known, the vast majority of Jews who died in the camps died of starvation.

Noam Chomsky - Extremist

Khmer Rouge Apologist Noam Chomsky: Unrepentant - Nate Thayer

[MENTION=41527]Pogo[/MENTION], [MENTION=46168]Statistikhengst[/MENTION]


Hey that reminds me, stupid -- you know that new avatar you ordered? It's here --

strawman2.jpg


I went ahead and put the batteries in so he's all ready for your next Two Minutes Hate. :thup:

Yammer yammer yammer H.G. Wells yammer yammer Chomsky yammer yammer...

So, you are real good at insulting the messenger (a progressive tactic), but you can't make a single argument that refutes what I have said. That makes you a........?:lol:

Good Christ, another wag who thinks politics has something to do with personal argument style... :banghead:

You don't even understand what a strawman is?? Or why it's attached to that particular post?

May I suggest, press your thumb to your wrist and see if there's even a pulse there... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Oh SNAP, veterans get dissed by the GOP

“Our veterans should be above political games,” Cruz said at the Million Vets March on Oct. 13. “Veterans have proven they are not timid. And we will not be timid in calling out anybody that uses the military as pawns,” Palin said at the same event. “We can only be America, home of the free, if we are America, home of the brave.”
So, pardon the forthcoming blue language, where the hell are they now that a $5 billion cut to the food-stamp program has hit thousands of veterans squarely in their wallets?

-------------------------------------------------

Republicans send soldiers off to war and then screw them over when they return. What a "shock".
 
My guy won, not once, but TWICE
passed an UNPRECEDENTED Health Care legislation
Found and killed Bin Laden
Stopped the economy from the free-fall Bush left it under
The economy has been steadily improving
Unemployment has been dropping
The Republicans don't have any plans and are demoralized

And I'M supposed to be "butthurt"?!??

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

laughing_smileface2.gif


You far rightwing KKKlowns are very entertaining. Hilarious even. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Your guy is doing so well you are about to lose the Senate....BECAUSE of the Health Care Legislation ;)
So. what?

Hillary will pick it back up with a WHOPPING DEFEAT to the next RW Republican sap you morans put up in 2016.

:lol:
lol
 
My guy won, not once, but TWICE
passed an UNPRECEDENTED Health Care legislation
Found and killed Bin Laden
Stopped the economy from the free-fall Bush left it under
The economy has been steadily improving
Unemployment has been dropping
The Republicans don't have any plans and are demoralized

And I'M supposed to be "butthurt"?!??

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

laughing_smileface2.gif


You far rightwing KKKlowns are very entertaining. Hilarious even. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Your guy is doing so well you are about to lose the Senate....BECAUSE of the Health Care Legislation ;)
So. what?

Hillary will pick it back up with a WHOPPING DEFEAT to the next RW Republican sap you morans put up in 2016.

:lol:
lol



Yeah, her and Vince Foster, Chris Stevens and Monica Lewinsky. Keep dreaming Nazi
 
I just don't like the selective indignation of these people.

6 weeks ago, give or take, these kidnappers locked 50 school boys in their schoolhouse and burned them alive.

Where was the concern then?

The media refused to cover this genocide because they were afraid of Islamiphobia.





When all else fails the r-wingers play the media-card. That, never fails.

The media card? We have no such thing! You use the media card in tandem with the race card, the bigot card, the misogynist card, and the class warfare card. Royal flush!
 
That's because it's stupid. Hash tags don't free hostages. Action does. The “Bring Back Our Girls” Internet campaign, if you can call it that, is just a way for politicians and Hollywood celebrities to feel good about themselves.

For generation whine Twitter posts are taking action. It is a self affirming way for them to say see I did something! They are the ones who don't get it.
 
Hey that reminds me, stupid -- you know that new avatar you ordered? It's here --

strawman2.jpg


I went ahead and put the batteries in so he's all ready for your next Two Minutes Hate. :thup:

Yammer yammer yammer H.G. Wells yammer yammer Chomsky yammer yammer...

So, you are real good at insulting the messenger (a progressive tactic), but you can't make a single argument that refutes what I have said. That makes you a........?:lol:

Good Christ, another wag who thinks politics has something to do with personal argument style... :banghead:

You don't even understand what a strawman is?? Or why it's attached to that particular post?

May I suggest, press your thumb to your wrist and see if there's even a pulse there... :rolleyes:





When you make an accusation of a strawman argument you're supposed to back it up with facts. And yes, progressives ALWAYS use these tactics....they read some book about it... What was he name of that book again?:eusa_whistle:
 
So, you are real good at insulting the messenger (a progressive tactic), but you can't make a single argument that refutes what I have said. That makes you a........?:lol:

Good Christ, another wag who thinks politics has something to do with personal argument style... :banghead:

You don't even understand what a strawman is?? Or why it's attached to that particular post?

May I suggest, press your thumb to your wrist and see if there's even a pulse there... :rolleyes:


When you make an accusation of a strawman argument you're supposed to back it up with facts. And yes, progressives ALWAYS use these tactics....they read some book about it... What was he name of that book again?:eusa_whistle:

:dunno: Actually your inventing a book is itself a strawman, so congrats on the new baby. I don't know what book you're using but if it's Debate for Dummies methinks you have more than a few pages missing.

It's your point to validate dood. You've presented a cherrypicked police lineup of disparate characters from a completely different era (several eras really) to try to make the case that a political movement of a century ago still exists now, and as a bonus this imaginary ideology, alone among all ideologies, magically retains the same characteristics through time as if cryogenically frozen while everyone else evolves. And then you've unilaterally concluded that this parcel of rogues by definition represents the macrocosm of this imaginary Evil Super Villain cabal, so you can toss Biased Sample in there too, provided we allow that Biased Sample can apply to a group that doesn't exist in the first place.

What your missing pages would have told you: just because you pick out some imaginary band of brothers, send them on an anachronistic retreat and decide all by yourself to hang some facile demon label on them, doesn't make a valid point to anyone but yourself. You've convinced Westwall; everybody else is going :cuckoo:

You're a logical trainwreck here, Doodles. I've seen more credible villains in DC Comics. :eusa_hand:

(/offtopic)
 
Last edited:
I just don't like the selective indignation of these people.

6 weeks ago, give or take, these kidnappers locked 50 school boys in their schoolhouse and burned them alive.

Where was the concern then?

The media refused to cover this genocide because they were afraid of Islamiphobia.

You're right, If only it was some way of informing the public that this happened.

But since informing people doesnt matter why are you telling people about it? It doesnt do anything, right? :lol:

Move those goalposts...:eusa_hand:

JACKASS

:itsok:
 
My guy won, not once, but TWICE
passed an UNPRECEDENTED Health Care legislation
Found and killed Bin Laden
Stopped the economy from the free-fall Bush left it under
The economy has been steadily improving
Unemployment has been dropping
The Republicans don't have any plans and are demoralized

And I'M supposed to be "butthurt"?!??

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

laughing_smileface2.gif


You far rightwing KKKlowns are very entertaining. Hilarious even. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Your guy is doing so well you are about to lose the Senate....BECAUSE of the Health Care Legislation ;)

That's what you think. Obamacare is working and getting better as we speak and by the time the election rolls around Obama's ratings will be up dramatically. Bet on it brother. :D
 
We know Republicans don't care about children in this country. Why would they care about children overseas. Especially black children? Which is why they have no credibility with Benghazi.

Remember, it was the GOP that shouted "let him die" at the GOP presidential debates in Las Vegas.

It was at the Republicans convention where peanuts were thrown with such words as "This is how we feed the animals".

They just cut food stamps for poor children and disabled veterans.

And still, Americans vote them into office. We get what we deserve.






Good job rdean, rep'd you for telling it like it is.
 
This thread is indicative of the pure, unadulterated hatred and vitriol the rabid, far right wing has for not only Obama and his family, but for human decency itself.

*SMH*



They can't help themselves, wing-nuts are full of hatred, jealousy and racism. They are indeed. This thread proves as much.
 
Your guy is doing so well you are about to lose the Senate....BECAUSE of the Health Care Legislation ;)
So. what?

Hillary will pick it back up with a WHOPPING DEFEAT to the next RW Republican sap you morans put up in 2016.

:lol:
lol



Yeah, her and Vince Foster, Chris Stevens and Monica Lewinsky. Keep dreaming Nazi

Marc? Are you seriously on drugs?
See how I can ACCEPT reality and move on?

How come you RW bastards can't do the same?

Historically, the midterms aren't well for the party in power. Furthermore, Democrats aren't motivated to vote in midterms.

I don't like that fact, because it tells me that in 2014, we might get a beating, but I accept it, because that's reality.

However, in the general, historically we come out in full-force, particularly when we have a candidate that motivates us.

Like it or not Hillary is that candidate.

Now a lot of my fellow posters have been laying out facts, numbers, polls and statistics indicating how Hillary would win if she were the candidate. Even against specific GOP opponents.

They've even asked POINT BLANK...how do you GOPers expect to get the 270 votes, not ONE of you RW bastards responded with anything sensible.

Why is that?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top