Convincing argument for 30-rd magazines

[M14 Shooter]

Our anti-gun friends would prefer the criminal have a fair chance by limiting this woman to 5-6 rounds in a shotgun or revolver.
A fair chance at what, they never really say.

 

[Truthmatters]

yeah and the naked woman tell you exactly who this clap trap is aimed at

 

[NYcarbineer]

Keep in mind that M14 does not believe that the convicted criminal should have to undergo a background check before HE buys his machine gun with a 30 round magazine.

 

[RDD_1210]

Still waiting for that convincing argument you promised.

 

[mal]

Still waiting for that convincing argument you promised.

The Convincing Argument is that Criminals are not going to Respect the Limitations on Rounds in Magazines...

Disarming Law Abiding Citizens will not Limit Crime...

It hasn't in Chicago and Detroit and will not ANYWHERE else it is tried.



peace...

 

[RDD_1210]

Still waiting for that convincing argument you promised.

The Convincing Argument is that Criminals are not going to Respect the Limitations on Rounds in Magazines...

Disarming Law Abiding Citizens will not Limit Crime...

It hasn't in Chicago and Detroit and will not ANYWHERE else it is tried.



peace...

Sure it has, you just want to ignore all the countries that have figured out how to do it right. Australia, Japan, Canada, Germany, Switzerland, UK, etc.......all countries that have lower gun violence than our country. Sorry that the facts don't agree with your narrow view.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Keep in mind that M14 does not believe that the convicted criminal should have to undergo a background check before HE buys his machine gun with a 30 round magazine.

Translation:
You have nothing to counter the argument made here.
No surprise.

 

[mal]

Still waiting for that convincing argument you promised.

The Convincing Argument is that Criminals are not going to Respect the Limitations on Rounds in Magazines...

Disarming Law Abiding Citizens will not Limit Crime...

It hasn't in Chicago and Detroit and will not ANYWHERE else it is tried.



peace...

Sure it has, you just want to ignore all the countries that have figured out how to do it right. Australia, Japan, Canada, Germany, Switzerland, UK, etc.......all countries that have lower gun violence than our country. Sorry that the facts don't agree with your narrow view.

Because you say it, doens't make it so...

When you Compare the Areas of our Country with the Strickest Gun Laws, they are the MOST Violent...

Fact.

Compare Texas to Australia.

And then look at the areas where the most Violence happens?... In the DemocRAT Population Centers where Gun Laws are the Strictest.



peace...

 

[OriginalShroom]

yeah and the naked woman tell you exactly who this clap trap is aimed at

Perhaps this may help you...

Georgia woman shoots intruder 5 times | Amarillo Globe-News

LOGANVILLE, Ga. — Authorities say a Loganville woman shot an intruder five times and the man was arrested after he tried fleeing the scene.

Shot five times and was still able to run away.

Suppose he had decided to run towards her instead? He still could have killed her and her children.

Despite what the ignorant gun grabbers think and spout, the bad guy doesn't drop dead when only shot once.

And suppose there had been two of them? She is suppose to divide her bullets up between the both? Three rounds for one, two for the other?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Still waiting for that convincing argument you promised.

The Convincing Argument is that Criminals are not going to Respect the Limitations on Rounds in Magazines...

The argument is obvious, and made plain.
In a situation where you life is on the line, you want every advantage you can have.
The anti-gun loons want to deny you that advantage.

 

[asaratis]

Keep in mind that M14 does not believe that the convicted criminal should have to undergo a background check before HE buys his machine gun with a 30 round magazine.

Criminals get their guns on the black market...no questions ask...just show me the money.

Talk with some sense...maybe someone will listen to you.

 

[RDD_1210]

The Convincing Argument is that Criminals are not going to Respect the Limitations on Rounds in Magazines...

Disarming Law Abiding Citizens will not Limit Crime...

It hasn't in Chicago and Detroit and will not ANYWHERE else it is tried.



peace...

Sure it has, you just want to ignore all the countries that have figured out how to do it right. Australia, Japan, Canada, Germany, Switzerland, UK, etc.......all countries that have lower gun violence than our country. Sorry that the facts don't agree with your narrow view.

Because you say it, doens't make it so...

When you Compare the Areas of our Country with the Strickest Gun Laws, they are the MOST Violent...

Fact.

Compare Texas to Australia.

And then look at the areas where the most Violence happens?... In the DemocRAT Population Centers where Gun Laws are the Strictest.



peace...

Ok I compared Texas to Australia and Australia is much safer. I win. What's your point again?

Oh and learn to spell.....Strickest. LOL.

 

[RDD_1210]

Still waiting for that convincing argument you promised.

The Convincing Argument is that Criminals are not going to Respect the Limitations on Rounds in Magazines...

The argument is obvious, and made plain.
In a situation where you life is on the line, you want every advantage you can have.
The anti-gun loons want to deny you that advantage.

Didn't do Chris Kyle much good. He was trained and armed....where is he now?

Who is the loon again?

 

[OriginalShroom]

The Convincing Argument is that Criminals are not going to Respect the Limitations on Rounds in Magazines...

The argument is obvious, and made plain.
In a situation where you life is on the line, you want every advantage you can have.
The anti-gun loons want to deny you that advantage.

Didn't do Chris Kyle much good. He was trained and armed....where is he now?

Who is the loon again?

Surely you are not so low as to try to score political points off of the death of an American Hero who was killed by another Veteran who is suffering from PTSD. A person that Kyle was trying to help.

Why should I not be surprised? Obama has not even acknowledged that Kyle lived, was a hero, or that he was killed while helping other veterans. Yet he sent Michelle to make political hay at the funeral of a girl that was at his inauguration. A girl killed by gangbangers.

Leftist Gun Grabbers just aren't honest people.

 

[bucs90]

The same argument for 30 round mags can be used against 30 round mags.

99.99999% of the time, in the US, magazine size doesnt matter. It is extremely rare for a home invasion to be done by more than 2-3 people. Police statistics show that it is extremely rare for a gunfight between 2 or 3 individuals last more than 5-10 shots before someone is either dead, or has run away. Modern, urban gunfights in American are very quick, very violent, very SHORT. Look at police gunfights. A magazine change on a 15 round Glock (most commonly carried police pistol) is very rare in a police gunfight. Its usually over after the first few shots.

So, if you are a random US citizen, and have a 30 round mag, and get into a gunfight, it is extremely likely that it'll be over by your 5th or 6th shot.

And the same can be said for a criminal. It is extremely rare that a criminal uses more than 5-10 shots in a crime using a gun. The mass shootings, as bad as they are, are statistically very rare.

We dont live in a domestic war zone (thank God, thank the military, thank the police). Therefore, the need for a 30 round magazine by the common citizen is almost non-existent......HOWEVER, the USE of a 30 round mag, or, the firing of over 10 rounds...by a criminal, is also very rare.

So, banning a 30 round mag will do little to nothing to affect crime, and banning them would do little to nothing to affect personal defense.

30 round mags are a literal non-issue. So, like weed, I say DO NOT ban them, because it's just one more fucking thing our already understaffed and underfunded police have to worry about enforcing.

 

[RDD_1210]

The argument is obvious, and made plain.
In a situation where you life is on the line, you want every advantage you can have.
The anti-gun loons want to deny you that advantage.

Didn't do Chris Kyle much good. He was trained and armed....where is he now?

Who is the loon again?

Surely you are not so low as to try to score political points off of the death of an American Hero who was killed by another Veteran who is suffering from PTSD. A person that Kyle was trying to help.

Why should I not be surprised? Obama has not even acknowledged that Kyle lived, was a hero, or that he was killed while helping other veterans. Yet he sent Michelle to make political hay at the funeral of a girl that was at his inauguration. A girl killed by gangbangers.

Leftist Gun Grabbers just aren't honest people.

He was armed and trained and he still was gunned down. Surely you aren't going to ignore the fact that this would blow a rather large hole in your argument that being armed is the ultimate protection against bad guys and crazy people.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Keep in mind that M14 does not believe that the convicted criminal should have to undergo a background check before HE buys his machine gun with a 30 round magazine.

Translation:
You have nothing to counter the argument made here.
No surprise.

Your argument was that someone who opposes the legal sale of 30 round magazines wants the criminal to have an advantage.

You yourself want the criminal to have an advantage by making it as easy for him to buy a weapon AND a hi-capacity magazine as you or I would.

You want the criminal to have easy access to the weapons he uses for his crimes. You're more guilty of wanting to disadvantage the citizen vs. the criminal than ANYONE.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Keep in mind that M14 does not believe that the convicted criminal should have to undergo a background check before HE buys his machine gun with a 30 round magazine.

Criminals get their guns on the black market...no questions ask...just show me the money.

Talk with some sense...maybe someone will listen to you.

Well then the woman in the OP can go get her hi-cap magazine on the black market.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Keep in mind that M14 does not believe that the convicted criminal should have to undergo a background check before HE buys his machine gun with a 30 round magazine.

Criminals get their guns on the black market...no questions ask...just show me the money.

Talk with some sense...maybe someone will listen to you.

The fact that people can and do run stop signs is not an argument for eliminating stop signs.

The fact that people have molested children at daycare centers is not an argument for eliminating background checks for daycare center job applicants.

 

[OriginalShroom]

Didn't do Chris Kyle much good. He was trained and armed....where is he now?

Who is the loon again?

Surely you are not so low as to try to score political points off of the death of an American Hero who was killed by another Veteran who is suffering from PTSD. A person that Kyle was trying to help.

Why should I not be surprised? Obama has not even acknowledged that Kyle lived, was a hero, or that he was killed while helping other veterans. Yet he sent Michelle to make political hay at the funeral of a girl that was at his inauguration. A girl killed by gangbangers.

Leftist Gun Grabbers just aren't honest people.

He was armed and trained and he still was gunned down. Surely you aren't going to ignore the fact that this would blow a rather large hole in your argument that being armed is the ultimate protection against bad guys and crazy people.

if you can show where I ever said that simply by owning a gun it made me invincible to being harmed by another person, you just may have a point.

But I have never claimed that, nor has anyone else that I know of. So either you are simply mistaken in what you have thought we have been saying, or you are simply a liar who is building strawmen and false statements and claims because you have nothing on your side to truly support your position.