Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And if only you had a shred of evidence to show that any one of them is not true. Wouldn't that be great ?Here is what you can learn from the Globe:
- Everybody's marriage is falling apart
- View attachment 59415
![]()
![]()
- Everybody is dying
![]()
![]()
![]()
- And everybody is gay
![]()
![]()
Is anyone here who has ever read any of Protectionists threads surprised that the Globe is his source of information? Anyone?
And if only you had a shred of evidence to show that any one of them is not true. Wouldn't that be great ?Here is what you can learn from the Globe:
- Everybody's marriage is falling apart
- View attachment 59415
![]()
![]()
- Everybody is dying
![]()
![]()
![]()
- And everybody is gay
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sorry you don't get to use question marks either, until YOU also answer my questions. Let me know when you're ready for that Mr Dodge.Yo, protectionist
Have you used the Globe as a source often in the past? If so, can you point me toward a thread or post where you have done so?
Or....is this the first time you've decided to begin a thread based on a Globe headline?
Honesty, ya old dummy, is the best policy.
Do you think all of those are true?
And if only you had a shred of evidence to show that any one of them is not true. Wouldn't that be great ?Here is what you can learn from the Globe:
- Everybody's marriage is falling apart
- View attachment 59415
![]()
![]()
- Everybody is dying
![]()
![]()
![]()
- And everybody is gay
![]()
![]()
![]()
Do you think all of those are true?
Sorry you don't get to use question marks either, until YOU also answer my questions. Let me know when you're ready for that Mr Dodge.Yo, protectionist
Have you used the Globe as a source often in the past? If so, can you point me toward a thread or post where you have done so?
Or....is this the first time you've decided to begin a thread based on a Globe headline?
Honesty, ya old dummy, is the best policy.
The past tense part of it. Jesus, how much of a fucking retard are you? Seriously, time after time the Globe has been shown to be nothing more than a grocery store aisle freak show and you keep defending them. Obviously they have a credibility problem, it's a thing now. So, prove they have some sort of track record that separates them from the other tabloids.
NO!! The BURDEN OF PROOF is on YOU, the accuser. YOU PROVE that the Globe is "nothing more than a grocery store aisle freak show". You've had a ton of time in this thread to do that, against repeated challenges from me, and you haven't shown ANYTHING to base your accusations on.
If this was a courtroom, you'd be laughed out of it. Note: "Obviously" doesn't cut it. Neither does "Seriously, time after time"
These are nothing more than empty, hollow, ad hominem attacks, with no substance whatsoever.![]()
I do enjoy watching a good 'double down' from time to time. Too funny.
Yeah ? Where ? Post # please.I answered your question. Are you too faggot to read it?
Yeah ? Where ? Post # please.I answered your question. Are you too faggot to read it?
Yeah ? Well I've been kind of busy here, so maybe I just accidently missed it. So where is it ? If you answered it, you should have no trouble in telling me where, right ?Hey dumbshit, I did answer you. Maybe you should rely on sources with less pictures.(especially when your credibility is on the rocks right now)
PS - just a reminder >> you now have 2 questions There'a also this one >> "Here's a DIRECT question for you. How about the New York Times ? You believe in them ? (among others) And don't me that "multiple" crap again. You've already worn that dodge out."
Yeah, I guess I must have. Any reason you're not showing the Post # now ?I listed a dozen print news sources which I consider reliable. You missed that post?