Creationists

[Youwerecreated]

You do realize that museums, research/teaching universities, private collectors, etc., have amassed huge collections of fosill and skeletal remains of dinosaurs. The fact of these fosill skeletons is not the conspiracy you believe it to be.

Do you understand many of the complete skeletons in museums are plaster ? Many of the creatures in museums were designed from a few fossil fragments.

We were talking about whales having legs.

You do understand that a complete fosill assembly of a large dinosaur could weigh many, many tons? The recovered fosillized bibles are extremely valuable for research.

Some fosill skeletons are assembled from virtually complete remains, others are not.

How did Ken Ham create the plaster images of dinosaurs (the dinosaurs co-habitating with humans... chuckle), for his silly creation museum?

Some are made from complete skeleton remains but many are not that is the problem Hollie.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Look at them trying to explain this whale graveyard.

Whale Fossils Found Atop Chilean Desert Hill Called a ‘Very Unusual Situation’ | TheBlaze.com

 

[Hollie]

Do you understand many of the complete skeletons in museums are plaster ? Many of the creatures in museums were designed from a few fossil fragments.

We were talking about whales having legs.

You do understand that a complete fosill assembly of a large dinosaur could weigh many, many tons? The recovered fosillized bibles are extremely valuable for research.

Some fosill skeletons are assembled from virtually complete remains, others are not.

How did Ken Ham create the plaster images of dinosaurs (the dinosaurs co-habitating with humans... chuckle), for his silly creation museum?

Some are made from complete skeleton remains but many are not that is the problem Hollie.

That is really not a problem. A single, complete fosill (and they do exist), dating back 65 million years is an obvious problem for you. And yes, you can sidestep and deny the dating methods at your leisure. The dating methods that science uses all have a plus or minus value to them. The point is, if those methods have an accuracy of plus or minus 10%, that is hardly relevant when we are dealing with geologic time scales of tens of millions of years.

And Ken Ham and his dinosaurs? How did Ken know what they looked like if the bibles don't record their existence?

 

[Youwerecreated]

You do understand that a complete fosill assembly of a large dinosaur could weigh many, many tons? The recovered fosillized bibles are extremely valuable for research.

Some fosill skeletons are assembled from virtually complete remains, others are not.

How did Ken Ham create the plaster images of dinosaurs (the dinosaurs co-habitating with humans... chuckle), for his silly creation museum?

Some are made from complete skeleton remains but many are not that is the problem Hollie.

That is really not a problem. A single, complete fosill (and they do exist), dating back 65 million years is an obvious problem for you. And yes, you can sidestep and deny the dating methods at your leisure. The dating methods that science uses all have a plus or minus value to them. The point is, if those methods have an accuracy of plus or minus 10%, that is hardly relevant when we are dealing with geologic time scales of tens of millions of years.

And Ken Ham and his dinosaurs? How did Ken know what they looked like if the bibles don't record their existence?

Yeah it is,because you are depending on imagination to design the creatures.

 

[Hollie]

Look at them trying to explain this whale graveyard.

Whale Fossils Found Atop Chilean Desert Hill Called a ‘Very Unusual Situation’ | TheBlaze.com

I have personal knowledge that this is a conspiracy. Ken Ham and his associates buried those skeletal remains under cover of darkness.

Either that or the whales fell off the back of the Ark and drowned.

 

[Youwerecreated]

You do understand that a complete fosill assembly of a large dinosaur could weigh many, many tons? The recovered fosillized bibles are extremely valuable for research.

Some fosill skeletons are assembled from virtually complete remains, others are not.

How did Ken Ham create the plaster images of dinosaurs (the dinosaurs co-habitating with humans... chuckle), for his silly creation museum?

Some are made from complete skeleton remains but many are not that is the problem Hollie.

That is really not a problem. A single, complete fosill (and they do exist), dating back 65 million years is an obvious problem for you. And yes, you can sidestep and deny the dating methods at your leisure. The dating methods that science uses all have a plus or minus value to them. The point is, if those methods have an accuracy of plus or minus 10%, that is hardly relevant when we are dealing with geologic time scales of tens of millions of years.

And Ken Ham and his dinosaurs? How did Ken know what they looked like if the bibles don't record their existence?

A global flood explains ocean fossils found world wide inland,it also explains what may have caused plate tectonics.

 

[Hollie]

Some are made from complete skeleton remains but many are not that is the problem Hollie.

That is really not a problem. A single, complete fosill (and they do exist), dating back 65 million years is an obvious problem for you. And yes, you can sidestep and deny the dating methods at your leisure. The dating methods that science uses all have a plus or minus value to them. The point is, if those methods have an accuracy of plus or minus 10%, that is hardly relevant when we are dealing with geologic time scales of tens of millions of years.

And Ken Ham and his dinosaurs? How did Ken know what they looked like if the bibles don't record their existence?

Yeah it is,because you are depending on imagination to design the creatures.

Why would anyone need to imaginatively design the dinosaurs when we have examples of complete dinosaurs?

Conspiracy theories aren't going to help you here.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Look at them trying to explain this whale graveyard.

Whale Fossils Found Atop Chilean Desert Hill Called a ‘Very Unusual Situation’ | TheBlaze.com

I have personal knowledge that this is a conspiracy. Ken Ham and his associates buried those skeletal remains under cover of darkness.

Either that or the whales fell off the back of the Ark and drowned.

It's not just ken ham, your side is baffled by many of these findings creationist are not baffled by these findings they predicted this in their model because of the global flood.

 

[Hollie]

Some are made from complete skeleton remains but many are not that is the problem Hollie.

That is really not a problem. A single, complete fosill (and they do exist), dating back 65 million years is an obvious problem for you. And yes, you can sidestep and deny the dating methods at your leisure. The dating methods that science uses all have a plus or minus value to them. The point is, if those methods have an accuracy of plus or minus 10%, that is hardly relevant when we are dealing with geologic time scales of tens of millions of years.

And Ken Ham and his dinosaurs? How did Ken know what they looked like if the bibles don't record their existence?

A global flood explains ocean fossils found world wide inland,it also explains what may have caused plate tectonics.

There is no evidence of a global flood... except with a lot of creative (false), inventions of supernatural, supermagical interventions by one or more gods.

 

[Hollie]

Look at them trying to explain this whale graveyard.

Whale Fossils Found Atop Chilean Desert Hill Called a ‘Very Unusual Situation’ | TheBlaze.com

I have personal knowledge that this is a conspiracy. Ken Ham and his associates buried those skeletal remains under cover of darkness.

Either that or the whales fell off the back of the Ark and drowned.

It's not just ken ham, your side is baffled by many of these findings creationist are not baffled by these findings they predicted this in their model because of the global flood.

Who, specifically is baffled by "many of these findings". What findings?

 

[Youwerecreated]

That is really not a problem. A single, complete fosill (and they do exist), dating back 65 million years is an obvious problem for you. And yes, you can sidestep and deny the dating methods at your leisure. The dating methods that science uses all have a plus or minus value to them. The point is, if those methods have an accuracy of plus or minus 10%, that is hardly relevant when we are dealing with geologic time scales of tens of millions of years.

And Ken Ham and his dinosaurs? How did Ken know what they looked like if the bibles don't record their existence?

A global flood explains ocean fossils found world wide inland,it also explains what may have caused plate tectonics.

There is no evidence of a global flood... except with a lot of creative (false), inventions of supernatural, supermagical interventions by one or more gods.

What do you think I have been revealing to you ?

Did you know there are areas in the ocean so deep if you were to saw off mount everest and drop it in the ocean there would be a mile of water above it.

 

[Youwerecreated]

I have personal knowledge that this is a conspiracy. Ken Ham and his associates buried those skeletal remains under cover of darkness.

Either that or the whales fell off the back of the Ark and drowned.

It's not just ken ham, your side is baffled by many of these findings creationist are not baffled by these findings they predicted this in their model because of the global flood.

Who, specifically is baffled by "many of these findings". What findings?

How whale grave yards are being found where they are. Did you not read the articles I posted they were not from creationist,these articles were from people of science that see things the way you do.

 

[Hollie]

It's not just ken ham, your side is baffled by many of these findings creationist are not baffled by these findings they predicted this in their model because of the global flood.

Who, specifically is baffled by "many of these findings". What findings?

How whale grave yards are being found where they are. Did you not read the articles I posted they were not from creationist,these articles were from people of science that see things the way you do.

What is within the article that you're having difficulty with?


Problems with a Global Flood Second Edition by Mark Isaak
Copyright © 1998 [Last Update: November 16, 1998

Problems with a Global Flood, 2nd edition

 

[Youwerecreated]

I have personal knowledge that this is a conspiracy. Ken Ham and his associates buried those skeletal remains under cover of darkness.

Either that or the whales fell off the back of the Ark and drowned.

It's not just ken ham, your side is baffled by many of these findings creationist are not baffled by these findings they predicted this in their model because of the global flood.

Who, specifically is baffled by "many of these findings". What findings?

Time for a question Hollie.

How is it fossils of one organism are found in a couple of layers of strata ? because if the organism was buied and died in one layer of strata the rest of the fossil in another layer of strata would not have been preserved. Fossils happen from rapid burial.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Who, specifically is baffled by "many of these findings". What findings?

How whale grave yards are being found where they are. Did you not read the articles I posted they were not from creationist,these articles were from people of science that see things the way you do.

What is within the article that you're having difficulty with?


Problems with a Global Flood Second Edition by Mark Isaak
Copyright © 1998 [Last Update: November 16, 1998

Problems with a Global Flood, 2nd edition

Nonsense,you are avoiding strong evidence for a global flood for what reason ?

 

[Hollie]

It's not just ken ham, your side is baffled by many of these findings creationist are not baffled by these findings they predicted this in their model because of the global flood.

Who, specifically is baffled by "many of these findings". What findings?

Time for a question Hollie.

How is it fossils of one organism are found in a couple of layers of strata ? because if the organism was buied and died in one layer of strata the rest of the fossil in another layer of strata would not have been preserved. Fossils happen from rapid burial.

That's really a silly question and can be answered by studying geology.

In order for this global flood to have occurred, there would need to be the gods to have made if happen. Can you offer evidence for the gods?

 

[Youwerecreated]

Who, specifically is baffled by "many of these findings". What findings?

How whale grave yards are being found where they are. Did you not read the articles I posted they were not from creationist,these articles were from people of science that see things the way you do.

What is within the article that you're having difficulty with?


Problems with a Global Flood Second Edition by Mark Isaak
Copyright © 1998 [Last Update: November 16, 1998

Problems with a Global Flood, 2nd edition

The problem with your article is the assumption that everything that ever lived went on the ark. We admit to micro adaptations within a family that caused the diversity in each family group.

Talk origins misrepresents creationist views.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Hollie how did we come up with so many different breeds in each family group ?

 

[Hollie]

How whale grave yards are being found where they are. Did you not read the articles I posted they were not from creationist,these articles were from people of science that see things the way you do.

What is within the article that you're having difficulty with?


Problems with a Global Flood Second Edition by Mark Isaak
Copyright © 1998 [Last Update: November 16, 1998

Problems with a Global Flood, 2nd edition

The problem with your article is the assumption that everything that ever lived went on the ark. We admit to micro adaptations within a family that caused the diversity in each family group.

Talk origins misrepresents creationist views.

The real issue is that creationist arguments come crashing to the ground under the harsh light of open inquiry.

How Good Are Those Young-Earth Arguments?

A Close Look at Dr. Hovind's List of Young-Earth Arguments and Other Claims by Dave E. Matson Copyright © 1994-2002

How Good are those Young-Earth Arguments: Geologic Column

 

[Hollie]

Hollie how did we come up with so many different breeds in each family group ?

I'm afraid that your lack of knowledge relative to the subject leaves you at a disadvantage.

It's a bit more complicated than screeching "the gods did it."