I suspect what confuses the fundies is that their anti-science agenda has no credibility as it is only intended to appeal to those with a predefined agenda toward supernaturalism. As we see with the entirety of the Christian creationist agenda, there is never any positive assertion or peer reviewed weight of evidence for the gawds. Instead, appeals to fear, ignorance and doubt are the methodology.that where you are wrong as always I've answerd these and many more of your non questions.your words? nobody runs from your words!
besides you base your words on creationist sites and the bible thus making your words specious speculation based on a false premise.
do you buy that hubris by the bottle?
You have yet to have a rebuttal to the earth being a closed system nor provide one for our universe (Space) as you called it being an open system. How do you know when we can't see far enough out in to space ?
You have not had any kind of rebuttal that was not based in conjecture for the origins of life or the left and right handed amino acids bonding to for proteins ?
Why don't you start by showing I am or could be wrong. The science community know these problems but yet you blame it on creationist Paranoia will destroy you.
you will not accept the answers .
Paranoia? that's your problem not mine
The fawning that occurs over the silliness of Meyers is one more example. He has literally plumbed the depths of the foul smelling Christian creationist barrel to beg, borrow and steal every goofy Christian creationist argument intended to cast doubt on science while never making a positive case for the gawds. Meyer is the latest, perfect example of the hopelessness of the Christian creationist snake oil salesman.