Link?Speaking of Jesus, don't end of days Christians say one of the signs is the anti Christ won't be a natural born citizen? Sure seems like they want the world to end.
Self fulfilling prophecy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Link?Speaking of Jesus, don't end of days Christians say one of the signs is the anti Christ won't be a natural born citizen? Sure seems like they want the world to end.
Self fulfilling prophecy
For what? Look it up and tell me if I'm lying.Link?Speaking of Jesus, don't end of days Christians say one of the signs is the anti Christ won't be a natural born citizen? Sure seems like they want the world to end.
Self fulfilling prophecy
If his father was a non-citizen, by your OP Obama was not eligible. You can't have it both ways.Sorry, injun, but you gave up that issue in 2008.
Really? You don't consider Hawaii one of our United States?
What, not a natural born citizen of Israel?Speaking of Jesus, don't end of days Christians say one of the signs is the anti Christ won't be a natural born citizen?
Did Obama’s Publishers Make a Mistake? Or is it a Cover-Up?Obama was born in Kenya. Said so himself.You gave up the issue by dismissing it in 2008.Really? You don't consider Hawaii one of our United States?
Why? Obama was born in the United States to an American mother. Cruz is a Cuban born in Canada.
Got any "credible" proof?
And SillyBufu runs away, as predicted.For what? Look it up and tell me if I'm lying.Link?Speaking of Jesus, don't end of days Christians say one of the signs is the anti Christ won't be a natural born citizen? Sure seems like they want the world to end.
Self fulfilling prophecy
We constantly have to go fact check your bs. You fact check mine.
And I don't even know what you need a link for.
Google anti christ
Link?Did Obama’s Publishers Make a Mistake? Or is it a Cover-Up?Obama was born in Kenya. Said so himself.You gave up the issue by dismissing it in 2008.
Why? Obama was born in the United States to an American mother. Cruz is a Cuban born in Canada.
Got any "credible" proof?
Well, she admitted making the mistake.
Actually I googled it and it turns out Obama is the anti Christ. He's going to be next secretary general of the UN. One world government Obama rules the planet.Link?Speaking of Jesus, don't end of days Christians say one of the signs is the anti Christ won't be a natural born citizen? Sure seems like they want the world to end.
Self fulfilling prophecy
Link?Did Obama’s Publishers Make a Mistake? Or is it a Cover-Up?Obama was born in Kenya. Said so himself.Why? Obama was born in the United States to an American mother. Cruz is a Cuban born in Canada.
Got any "credible" proof?
Well, she admitted making the mistake.
Link? I just wanted to say it before rabbiHarvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe is now on Lawrence O'Donnell.
Thomas Lee, a professor of constitutional law and international law at Fordham Law School, writes in the Los Angeles Times that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) would not be not be considered a “natural born citizen” under an originalist view of the Constitution.
From the LA Times:
Under either a textualist or a “living Constitution” theory, Cruz is a “natural born Citizen,” eligible to be president; under an originalist view, however, he isn’t. It’s the conservative theory that would exclude the conservative Cruz from presidential eligibility.
To an originalist, a “natural born Citizen” is a person who is a citizen of the United States under “natural” principles of law in 1788. Two such principles were then in play in the U.S. Jus soli — the law of soil — was the principle that a child was subject or citizen of the sovereign who ruled the land or seas on which the child was born. Jus soli was viewed as a part of the common law of England, which was adopted by the American states. Jus sanguinis — the law of blood — held that a child’s citizenship flowed from the parents’ allegiance, regardless of place of birth. This principle was prevalent in continental Europe, and in England it was the basis for an exception to jus soli for children born there to foreign ambassadors.
The principle of jus sanguinis in 1788 applied to patrilineal descent only: A person born in a foreign country was viewed as a “natural born Citizen” of his or her father’s country. However odious it seems today, a child born of a woman whose citizenship was different from her husband’s — much rarer then than today — could not be a “natural born Citizen” of the mother’s country. That idea wasn’t even considered until 1844 in Victorian England.
The upshot is that to an originalist, someone like Cruz — born in a foreign country (and therefore not a natural born citizen of the United States by jus soli) and to a Cuban citizen father (and therefore not a natural born citizen of the United States by jus sanguinis ) — is not eligible to be president.
Read the rest of the article here.
Therefore, Cruz speaks with forked tongue. As much as I can't stand Trump - maybe he has a point.
The irony is deliciousThomas Lee, a professor of constitutional law and international law at Fordham Law School, writes in the Los Angeles Times that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) would not be not be considered a “natural born citizen” under an originalist view of the Constitution.
From the LA Times:
Under either a textualist or a “living Constitution” theory, Cruz is a “natural born Citizen,” eligible to be president; under an originalist view, however, he isn’t. It’s the conservative theory that would exclude the conservative Cruz from presidential eligibility.
To an originalist, a “natural born Citizen” is a person who is a citizen of the United States under “natural” principles of law in 1788. Two such principles were then in play in the U.S. Jus soli — the law of soil — was the principle that a child was subject or citizen of the sovereign who ruled the land or seas on which the child was born. Jus soli was viewed as a part of the common law of England, which was adopted by the American states. Jus sanguinis — the law of blood — held that a child’s citizenship flowed from the parents’ allegiance, regardless of place of birth. This principle was prevalent in continental Europe, and in England it was the basis for an exception to jus soli for children born there to foreign ambassadors.
The principle of jus sanguinis in 1788 applied to patrilineal descent only: A person born in a foreign country was viewed as a “natural born Citizen” of his or her father’s country. However odious it seems today, a child born of a woman whose citizenship was different from her husband’s — much rarer then than today — could not be a “natural born Citizen” of the mother’s country. That idea wasn’t even considered until 1844 in Victorian England.
The upshot is that to an originalist, someone like Cruz — born in a foreign country (and therefore not a natural born citizen of the United States by jus soli) and to a Cuban citizen father (and therefore not a natural born citizen of the United States by jus sanguinis ) — is not eligible to be president.
Read the rest of the article here.
Therefore, Cruz speaks with forked tongue. As much as I can't stand Trump - maybe he has a point.
ummm..... maybe because you-types started bailing on Trump (see Boss's threadCruz's numbers must have jumped, Lakooka has switched from attacking Trump to attacking Cruz
I O BEY!!!!! MEIN FUHRER!!!Actually I googled it and it turns out Obama is the anti Christ. He's going to be next secretary general of the UN. One world government Obama rules the planet.Link?Speaking of Jesus, don't end of days Christians say one of the signs is the anti Christ won't be a natural born citizen? Sure seems like they want the world to end.
Self fulfilling prophecy