Tehon
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2015
- 8,938
- 1,239
- 275
A free, impartial press is essential to democracy. Does anyone think we still have one? NBC 'moderates' a Republican debate with questions essentially of the sort "tell us why you suck so bad that no one should vote for you or anyone in your party." The obama administration is shamelessly going full-on Vietnam with a creeping, hypocritical "boots on the ground" mission in Syria despite all their bloviating to the contrary some months ago, and the 'press' is only hugging his nuts and saying what they are damn well told to say - yet again. A very important piece of the democracy puzzle has been missing for some time, and the potential consequences could be dire indeed.
No, an impartial press is not essential to democracy.
In fact, to say that the press needs to be 'free' and 'impartial' is an oxymoron,
because a free press has the freedom to be as biased as it chooses.
An impartial press helps to create an informed citizenry. People these days do not have or choose not to take the time to research news to discover if they are or aren't being given the unbiased truth. It can be time consuming. True journalism that subscribes to journalistic codes of ethics is a dying breed. We now find ourselves in a media war where the truth is often obscured intentionally. This is definitely a detriment to a democracy.