“Declare the Rightful Winner or…Have a New Election” – President Trump on the FBI Covering Up Hunter’s Laptop and Altering 2020 Election

Not since the BLM people were allowed to riot, arson, murder their way through town. You let that happen and now you expect me to be upset some people walked through the fucking capital? Who gives a shit.
The BLM was not rioting, it was late night gangster wannabes and criminals, super duper. Anyone who says there was election fraud after that has been totally disproven is a semi fascist anti American liar or an incredible dupe like you.
 
Yes dumb ass it is, do your own digging, you may begin with "the presidential records act!" You fuckers are literally impossibly stupid hate filled intellectual abortions..... :fu:

Hey Brain Dead Ninja..................while the president DOES have the ability to classify and declassify things basically at will, there DOES have to be some follow through with classification/declassification.

Here's some light reading for you if you can comprehend it...........


One key point is that presidential declassification power does not continue once a president is out of office.

"While it is true that the president can classify and declassify at will, the same is obviously not true of a former president, who ceases to be commander in chief as soon as he leaves office," Aftergood said in an Aug. 11 interview.

Could Trump argue that he declassified certain documents in private, while president? That is not how the system is designed to work.

"Merely proclaiming a document or group of documents declassified and doing nothing more would not suffice," Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who works on national security cases, told PolitiFact.

Follow-through is required.

"He had to identify the specific documents he was declassifying, he needed to memorialize the order in writing for bureaucratic and historical purposes, and he needed to have staff physically modify the classification markings on the documents themselves," Moss said. "Until that was done, the documents, per the security classification procedures, still have to be handled, transmitted and stored as if they were classified."

Tom Blanton, director of the National Security Archive at George Washington University, agreed.

"If the documents are still marked classified 18 months after their removal from the White House," Blanton told PolitiFact, "then Trump was too busy to order them declassified at the time."
 
Not since the BLM people were allowed to riot, arson, murder their way through town. You let that happen and now you expect me to be upset some people walked through the fucking capital? Who gives a shit.
So, it is ok for your side to riot and tries to hang the VP but if BLM does it, then it is a crime? :auiqs.jpg:
 
Trump is not below the law... as much as you hate him he is still protected by the bill of rights and our constitution....
He lives under the law like the rest of us.

Since when do conservatives care about the constitution and bill of rights? It’s always “support the police” and never “support the fourth amendment”. Conservatives have decided to trade constitutional protections for a modicum of public safety.
 
He lives under the law like the rest of us.

Since when do conservatives care about the constitution and bill of rights? It’s always “support the police” and never “support the fourth amendment”. Conservatives have decided to trade constitutional protections for a modicum of public safety.
No one is below the law in America we all enjoy the same rights... so if you support using the law to go after politicians you hate move to China....
 
He lives under the law like the rest of us.

Since when do conservatives care about the constitution and bill of rights? It’s always “support the police” and never “support the fourth amendment”. Conservatives have decided to trade constitutional protections for a modicum of public safety.
why do you think you can’t support the police and the fourth amendment? it’s not a one or the other choice

you demafacist just want to toss them both in favor of your brownshirts
 
Hey Brain Dead Ninja..................while the president DOES have the ability to classify and declassify things basically at will, there DOES have to be some follow through with classification/declassification.

Here's some light reading for you if you can comprehend it...........


One key point is that presidential declassification power does not continue once a president is out of office.

"While it is true that the president can classify and declassify at will, the same is obviously not true of a former president, who ceases to be commander in chief as soon as he leaves office," Aftergood said in an Aug. 11 interview.

Could Trump argue that he declassified certain documents in private, while president? That is not how the system is designed to work.

"Merely proclaiming a document or group of documents declassified and doing nothing more would not suffice," Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who works on national security cases, told PolitiFact.

Follow-through is required.

"He had to identify the specific documents he was declassifying, he needed to memorialize the order in writing for bureaucratic and historical purposes, and he needed to have staff physically modify the classification markings on the documents themselves," Moss said. "Until that was done, the documents, per the security classification procedures, still have to be handled, transmitted and stored as if they were classified."

Tom Blanton, director of the National Security Archive at George Washington University, agreed.

"If the documents are still marked classified 18 months after their removal from the White House," Blanton told PolitiFact, "then Trump was too busy to order them declassified at the time."
Bold type makes nothing true. Now you know.
 
Do you just string words together somehow hoping that they will make sense? In case you didn't know, if someone is ABOVE the law, then the law doesn't apply to them since they are higher authority than the law (hence the term "above the law").

If someone is below the law, or under the law, the law applies to them, just like it does to everyone else, as the law is a higher authority than the person. So yes, Trump is below the law, as the laws of this country apply to him, just like they apply to everyone else. If you believe that the president is somehow above the law, then look no further than Nixon and what happened to him. Nixon thought that he was above the law and it didn't apply to him, but found out that he was wrong.
Did I say "under the Law"?.... no I said below the law as in not worthy of constitutional protections like the 4th amendment.... Trump is not above the law like Hillary is but he is not below the law either... the FBI now has over 20 whistle blowers and they are not holding back....
 
Did I say "under the Law"?.... no I said below the law as in not worthy of constitutional protections like the 4th amendment.... Trump is not above the law like Hillary is but he is not below the law either... the FBI now has over 20 whistle blowers and they are not holding back....

Hillary testified under oath

Why won’t Trump?
 
No one is below the law in America we all enjoy the same rights... so if you support using the law to go after politicians you hate move to China....
It’s the conservative Supreme Court that is sacrificing our rights to the gods of law enforcement and it’s conservatives who are silent about it.

Of course rich elitists like Trump never will have their rights sacrificed.

But wait, wasn’t Trump’s campaign based on using the law to go after politicians they hated?
 
every freedom loving American fears that in the Xiden Regime.
Do those “freedom loving” Americans think they have the freedom to cheat on their taxes or beat Capitol Police officers? Maybe they think they have the freedom to phone in death threats to school boards or election officials? Certainly they don’t think they have the freedom to take national defense information and keep it in their closets.
 
Do those “freedom loving” Americans think they have the freedom to cheat on their taxes or beat Capitol Police officers? Maybe they think they have the freedom to phone in death threats to school boards or election officials? Certainly they don’t think they have the freedom to take national defense information and keep it in their closets.
parents are safe to question dem policies that allowed their child to be raped at school in the demafasict xiden regime…if they do they are labeled terrorist
 
It’s the conservative Supreme Court that is sacrificing our rights to the gods of law enforcement and it’s conservatives who are silent about it.

Of course rich elitists like Trump never will have their rights sacrificed.

But wait, wasn’t Trump’s campaign based on using the law to go after politicians they hated?
The supreme court is a reflection of the people... they are appointed by the president and approved by an elected body.....

Trump came in swinging for the people... to make the lives of average Americans better and he achieved that especially in the inner city.... he is not an elitist....

Trump's campaign was about law and order and enforcing laws fairly.... something we still need to fix... and we are off the a good start with the firing of the first of many FBI agents.....

over 20 FBI whistle blowers are not holding back....
 
why do you think you can’t support the police and the fourth amendment? it’s not a one or the other choice

you demafacist just want to toss them both in favor of your brownshirts
You can’t support the police violating the fourth amendment. Like in the case of Breonna Taylor.

If you support the police, you can’t attack them when they act in accordance with the fourth amendment. Like in the case of Donald Trump.

The answer to this discrepancy is that they don’t support the police or the fourth amendment. They only support their political goals.
 
The supreme court is a reflection of the people... they are appointed by the president and approved by an elected body.....

Trump came in swinging for the people... to make the lives of average Americans better and he achieved that especially in the inner city.... he is not an elitist....

Trump's campaign was about law and order and enforcing laws fairly.... something we still need to fix... and we are off the a good start with the firing of the first of many FBI agents.....

over 20 FBI whistle blowers are not holding back....
SCOTUS was never supposed to reflect the people but if you’re right, that this SCOTUS reflects Trump supporters, then it demonstrates that Trump supporters don’t care about the bill of the rights.

Trump was not about law and order exercised fairly. Not by a long shot.

It was about winning. Nothing more. Nothing less.
 
You can’t support the police violating the fourth amendment. Like in the case of Breonna Taylor.

If you support the police, you can’t attack them when they act in accordance with the fourth amendment. Like in the case of Donald Trump.

The answer to this discrepancy is that they don’t support the police or the fourth amendment. They only support their political goals.
they had a warrant in that case

i agree yin can’t support govt violating the fourth.

Brownshirts that make up the paramilitary wing of the demafasict party supporting spiting on cops, shooting cops…and they don’t support the 4th amendment, as they thing they are entitled to go into a private home and take someone personal attorney client priv document
 

Forum List

Back
Top