Democrat Discourse…

Both sides claim they hate abhorrent behavior one second then literally practice it the next, justifying it with the old "(s)he did it first" go-to excuse that small children use. If you think the behavior is abhorrent then don't do it, plain and simple. The more disgusting the means, the harder it is to justify the ends.


"Both sides claim they hate abhorrent behavior one second then literally practice it the next.."


If there was an element of truth in your post, you'd have given the sort of copious list of infractions on the Right as I have provided as evidence of the savagery of the Left.


But you didn't.

You couldn't.


The obvious conclusion is that the posts indicting one side, the Left, is correct.
 
Both sides claim they hate abhorrent behavior one second then literally practice it the next, justifying it with the old "(s)he did it first" go-to excuse that small children use. If you think the behavior is abhorrent then don't do it, plain and simple. The more disgusting the means, the harder it is to justify the ends.


"Both sides claim they hate abhorrent behavior one second then literally practice it the next.."


If there was an element of truth in your post, you'd have given the sort of copious list of infractions on the Right as I have provided as evidence of the savagery of the Left.


But you didn't.

You couldn't.


The obvious conclusion is that the posts indicting one side, the Left, is correct.
You're not wrong about the left at all, but just look at the president. Saying he'll pay legal bills for people who punch protesters? Calling representatives low IQ people. Demonizing private business for how they conduct their business. Both sides engage in the same types of rhetoric. The right has their biased, high energy and idiotic media arms, they're just not as plentiful as the left's.

It extend to policies and such as well. Elements of both sides will say it's wrong for a baker not to do a cake for a gay wedding but perfectly fine to kick Sarah Sanders out of a restaurant, and vice versa. The parties will pass policies that they demonized the other side for doing, most notably the 1.4 trillion spending bill after 8 years of chastising Obama/democrats for spending too much.

What's more frightening about the left, and this is where i'm sure we'll agree, is the direct assault on free speech. Two major examples:

1. What's pretty constant is that left-wing activists will stifle free speech at any opportunity. They'll disrupt events and scream over anyone who wants to just talk. You can see it at places when people like Ben Shapiro and Dave Rubin go to talk on campuses or public places, etc.
2. Hate speech laws. Any law that would make it illegal to say anything short of a direct call for violence/assault is an offense against free speech. As disgusting as i'd find it for anyone to walk around shouting "black people are monkeys" or something like that, they have the right to say it... and along with it, deserve any peaceful negative ramifications that come from it.
 
Both sides claim they hate abhorrent behavior one second then literally practice it the next, justifying it with the old "(s)he did it first" go-to excuse that small children use. If you think the behavior is abhorrent then don't do it, plain and simple. The more disgusting the means, the harder it is to justify the ends.


"Both sides claim they hate abhorrent behavior one second then literally practice it the next.."


If there was an element of truth in your post, you'd have given the sort of copious list of infractions on the Right as I have provided as evidence of the savagery of the Left.


But you didn't.

You couldn't.


The obvious conclusion is that the posts indicting one side, the Left, is correct.
You're not wrong about the left at all, but just look at the president. Saying he'll pay legal bills for people who punch protesters? Calling representatives low IQ people. Demonizing private business for how they conduct their business. Both sides engage in the same types of rhetoric. The right has their biased, high energy and idiotic media arms, they're just not as plentiful as the left's.

It extend to policies and such as well. Elements of both sides will say it's wrong for a baker not to do a cake for a gay wedding but perfectly fine to kick Sarah Sanders out of a restaurant, and vice versa. The parties will pass policies that they demonized the other side for doing, most notably the 1.4 trillion spending bill after 8 years of chastising Obama/democrats for spending too much.

What's more frightening about the left, and this is where i'm sure we'll agree, is the direct assault on free speech. Two major examples:

1. What's pretty constant is that left-wing activists will stifle free speech at any opportunity. They'll disrupt events and scream over anyone who wants to just talk. You can see it at places when people like Ben Shapiro and Dave Rubin go to talk on campuses or public places, etc.
2. Hate speech laws. Any law that would make it illegal to say anything short of a direct call for violence/assault is an offense against free speech. As disgusting as i'd find it for anyone to walk around shouting "black people are monkeys" or something like that, they have the right to say it... and along with it, deserve any peaceful negative ramifications that come from it.


"You're not wrong about the left at all, but just look at the president. Saying he'll pay legal bills for people who punch protesters?"

You're spot on with this observation.


But, my complaint remains correct:

If there was an element of truth in your post, you'd have given the sort of copious list of infractions on the Right as I have provided as evidence of the savagery of the Left.


But you didn't.

You couldn't.



Violence is the essence of Leftism....going back to Sorel....

"Georges Eugène Sorel (2 November 1847 in Cherbourg – 29 August 1922 in Boulogne-sur-Seine) was a French philosopher and theorist of revolutionary syndicalism. His notion of the power of myth in people's lives inspired Marxists and Fascists, it is, together with his defense of violence, the contribution for which he is most often remembered."
Georges Sorel - Wikipedia



May I also point out the Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.
 
Both sides claim they hate abhorrent behavior one second then literally practice it the next, justifying it with the old "(s)he did it first" go-to excuse that small children use. If you think the behavior is abhorrent then don't do it, plain and simple. The more disgusting the means, the harder it is to justify the ends.


"Both sides claim they hate abhorrent behavior one second then literally practice it the next.."


If there was an element of truth in your post, you'd have given the sort of copious list of infractions on the Right as I have provided as evidence of the savagery of the Left.


But you didn't.

You couldn't.


The obvious conclusion is that the posts indicting one side, the Left, is correct.
You're not wrong about the left at all, but just look at the president. Saying he'll pay legal bills for people who punch protesters? Calling representatives low IQ people. Demonizing private business for how they conduct their business. Both sides engage in the same types of rhetoric. The right has their biased, high energy and idiotic media arms, they're just not as plentiful as the left's.

It extend to policies and such as well. Elements of both sides will say it's wrong for a baker not to do a cake for a gay wedding but perfectly fine to kick Sarah Sanders out of a restaurant, and vice versa. The parties will pass policies that they demonized the other side for doing, most notably the 1.4 trillion spending bill after 8 years of chastising Obama/democrats for spending too much.

What's more frightening about the left, and this is where i'm sure we'll agree, is the direct assault on free speech. Two major examples:

1. What's pretty constant is that left-wing activists will stifle free speech at any opportunity. They'll disrupt events and scream over anyone who wants to just talk. You can see it at places when people like Ben Shapiro and Dave Rubin go to talk on campuses or public places, etc.
2. Hate speech laws. Any law that would make it illegal to say anything short of a direct call for violence/assault is an offense against free speech. As disgusting as i'd find it for anyone to walk around shouting "black people are monkeys" or something like that, they have the right to say it... and along with it, deserve any peaceful negative ramifications that come from it.



"What's more frightening about the left, and this is where i'm sure we'll agree, is the direct assault on free speech."


I certainly agree.

If you have not seen it, this, from a real Liberal:

414aX-0cJUL._SX330_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 
9. “…Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., issued a clarion call to Democrats outraged at the policies of the Trump administration: It's time for mob action. In the wake of mobs targeting Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen and Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, Waters explained: "God is on our side! On the side of the children ... Let's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere."

[The Democrat favorite,] Waters has always been a fan of mob action. She infamously touted the violent and brutal 1992 Los Angeles riots, which did approximately $1 billion in property damage and ended with 63 people dead. Waters called the events a "rebellion," labeling them a "spontaneous reaction to a lot of injustice and a lot of alienation and frustration."

No civil society can humor such overtures to mob action and remain civil for long.”
Ben Shapiro - The Rise of the Mob





Gustave Le Bon, in his groundbreaking 1896 book, “The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind,” was the first to identify the phenomenon of mass psychology. Both Hitler and Mussolini used his book to understand how to incite a mob.



Inciting the mob is the basis for Liberal/Democrat power.
Nothing new......
Before the Republicans enforced liberty, the Democrats controlled the South via the lynch mob......
 
10. "In the last few weeks, the violent rhetoric crossed a fever line. CNN personality Kathy Griffin posed deadpan holding a severed and bloody head resembling Donald Trump; on television the next day, she tearfully denounced the many “old white men” who have supposedly bullied her. New York’s venerable Shakespeare in the Park is currently performing a modern-dress version of Julius Caesar, in which a Trump-qua-Caesar character is murdered every night in a particularly bloody and graphic staging.


Following the shooting [of Republican Congressmen], liberal Twitter erupted in cynical snark. Op-ed writer Malcolm Harris wondered if the shooter could plead self-defense, in the event he had a pre-existing condition.


Sonia Gupta, a Louisiana former prosecutor, counseled her followers not to be too sad about the wounding of Representative Steve Scalise, because “he’s a racist piece of shit and hateful bigot.”



Trump’s opponents in the media, academia, and politics can pretend that their calls for radical action were meant metaphorically or in a nonviolent sense. But they are the ones who opened this box of fear, panic, and rage. Let them take responsibility for the climate that now exists."
Incitement to Violence



Take responsibility?????

Not in the 'Liberal Rule Book.'
 
Democrat Discourse.....right out of the jungle.


11. “DAYTON, Minn. -- Vice President Joe Biden has told Democrats at a Minnesota fundraiser that he'll "strangle" members of the GOP who complain about the federal budget. According to a pool report from Tuesday's event in Dayton, Biden was telling the crowd that Democrats know how to balance the budget. He said, "If I hear one more Republican tell me about balancing the budget, I am going to strangle them."

Biden Says He'll 'Strangle' Republicans





10:10 organization advocates blowing up any opponents who don’ t believe in global warming:










“… according to the Scranton Times, Kanjorski said this about Florida's new Republican Governor Rick Scott on October 23:

"That Scott down there that's running for governor of Florida," Mr. Kanjorski said. "Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him.” Paul Kanjorski Pleads For Civility After Calling For Rick Scott To Be Shot | HuffPost


“Trump’s opponents in the media, academia, and politics can pretend that their calls for radical action were meant metaphorically or in a nonviolent sense. But they are the ones who opened this box of fear, panic, and rage. Let them take responsibility for the climate that now exists."
Incitement to Violence
 
12. Democrats....the party of incitement, of violence, of savagery.....


“Democratic lawmaker accused of suggesting violence against Trump(CNN)Democratic congressman Tom Suozzi is facing criticism after comments he made last week were interpreted as a suggestion of violence against President Donald Trump.

Suozzi, a first-term congressman from New York, made the comments during a town hall in Huntington, New York, on March 12.

After being asked by a constituent about what consequences Trump would face if he broke laws, Suozzi replied that "it's really a matter of putting public pressure on the President and making it public."

"This is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly, because you know, what if the President was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?" Suozzi continued.

A member of the crowd asked what the Second Amendment was, to which Suozzi replied, "The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms. That's why we have it." Democratic lawmaker accused of suggesting violence against Trump - CNNPolitics






On the other hand, we've learned from Mueller and the FBI what happens to Democrats who break the law......

.....they get immunity.
 
…or Brownshirt behavior?



The events of the week have, yet again, revealed the true nature of our ersatz Fascists….known colloquially as Democrats/Liberals. As the well-known adage says, to know what the Left is guilty of, note what they claim about the other side.

Yup….they love calling the right Nazis and Fascists.



Let’s check:

1.“While we've been hearing for weeks about President Trump's supposedly Nazi-esque border policy, [Democrat Maxine] Waters’ preferred tactic has actually been frequently used by fascist groups in order to intimidate others into silence.

2.Here’s a quote from Richard Evans’ magisterial work on the rise of the Nazis, The Coming Of The Third Reich, considering the treatment of Social Democrat Reichstag deputy Otto Buchwitz in Silesia:

Brownshirts occupied the seats at his meetings, shouted insults at him, and on one occasion fired a shot at him, causing mass panic amongst his listeners and leading to a brawl in which more shots were fired by both stormtroopers and Reichsbanner men. Several Nazis and Social Democrats had to be taken to hospital, and not a single table or chair in the hall was left intact.

After this, gangs of eight to ten Nazi stormtroopers harassed Buchwitz outside his house when he left for work in the morning, twenty or more crowded round him when he came back to his office after lunch, and between one and two hundred hassled him on the way home, singing a specially composed song with the words "When the revolvers are shot, Buchwitz’ll cop the lot!" Nazi demonstrations always halted outside his house, chanting "Death to Buchwitz!" Maxine Waters' Harassment Policy Is About To Make The United States A Hell Of A Lot Worse




3. “Washington (CNN) Rep. Maxine Waters called on her supporters to publicly confront and harass members of the Trump administration in response to the "zero tolerance" policy that led to the separation of families at the border.

"Let's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere.” Maxine Waters encourages supporters to harass Trump administration officials - CNNPolitics




But perhaps we should understand these latter-day Brownshirts…..they certainly can’t win any debate via logic, reason, or experience.


Can a ‘Reichstag Fire’ be far behind???

Excellent comparison.

History is about to repeat. Where have been all the Vigilant scholars whose lives they dedicated to warning us? It is about the cycle of repression, the radicalized liberal movements to throw it off and the resulting cry of the people for first, nationalism and soon after, totalitarianism to turn back the tide.

However I do not believe the totalitarianism in the form or extreme nationalism gone far right will manifest on the American Left. I believe the Left will push the Right to authoritarianism in order to defend against the modern radical cultural reformation movement. The Left has pushed and shoved the world into places its people never imagined going let alone accepting. Now people the world over are clamoring for a rollback to more traditional values, laws and political policies. What else can turn back the tide of socialist Red rising other than a tyrant we will beg to take up the mantle unless history's cycle is somehow refused?




"I believe the Left will push the Right to authoritarianism in order to defend against the modern radical cultural reformation movement."

It appears that, for the second time, the Left, the Democrats, will force a civil war.

They've been in an awful mood since the Republicans pried their slaves away from them.




"31% Think U.S. Civil War Likely Soon
Most voters fear that political violence is coming from opponents of the president’s policies,...

Thirty-one percent (31%) of Likely U.S. Voters say it’s likely that the United States will experience a second civil war sometime in the next five years, with 11% who say it’s Very Likely.

...59% of all voters are concerned that those opposed to President Trump’s policies will resort to violence, with 33% who are Very Concerned."
31% Think U.S. Civil War Likely Soon - Rasmussen Reports®
 
"Maddow: Democratic Base Expects Its Leaders to ‘All but Lay Their Bodies on the Line’ to Stop Trump SCOTUS Pick

"I do think that the Democratic base is going to want them to fight that hard, to really try to save the Court or die trying."

Maddow: Democratic Base Expects Its Leaders to 'All but Lay Their Bodies on the Line' to Stop Trump SCOTUS Pick -




Trump’s opponents in the media, academia, and politics can pretend that their calls for radical action were meant metaphorically or in a nonviolent sense. But they are the ones who opened this box of fear, panic, and rage. Let them take responsibility for the climate that now exists."
Incitement to Violence




The Democrat faithful are well-known not to be well-balanced....If any need a lesson as to where this Democrat Liberal frenzy leads, I suggest a look at James Hodgkinson....and Jared Lee Loughner ....they got the message, loud and clear.




 
Last edited:
"The Kentucky senator [Rand Paul] also is involved in criminal and civil litigation against his neighbor, Rene Boucher. In November, Boucher tackled the senator while he was mowing the lawn of his Bowling Green home.

Boucher claimed he "had enough" of Paul's unsightly tree branches, sticks and leaves that were piled up along the property line, and he has consistently denied that the attack was politically motivated.

Boucher is a registered Democrat, ..."
Man allegedly threatens to chop up Rand Paul and his family with an ax


Just a coincidence.....



"This marks one of several threats and attacks Paul has had in the last year. More than a year ago, Paul was on the baseball diamond when [Bernie Sanders campaign worker] James Hodgkinson opened fire and shot several congressional staffers as well as Rep. Steve Scalise, a Louisianna Republican. "
Ibid.
 
"The Kentucky senator [Rand Paul] also is involved in criminal and civil litigation against his neighbor, Rene Boucher. In November, Boucher tackled the senator while he was mowing the lawn of his Bowling Green home.

Boucher claimed he "had enough" of Paul's unsightly tree branches, sticks and leaves that were piled up along the property line, and he has consistently denied that the attack was politically motivated.

Boucher is a registered Democrat, ..."
Man allegedly threatens to chop up Rand Paul and his family with an ax


Just a coincidence.....



"This marks one of several threats and attacks Paul has had in the last year. More than a year ago, Paul was on the baseball diamond when [Bernie Sanders campaign worker] James Hodgkinson opened fire and shot several congressional staffers as well as Rep. Steve Scalise, a Louisianna Republican. "
Ibid.
Yet Milo Yiannopoulos can freely call for mobs to shoot journalists.
 
"'...WaPo Columnist: Huckabee Sanders Deserves 'Life Sentence' of Harassment

[HamasNBC] contributor Jennifer Rubin believes that White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders had it coming when she walked into Red Hen restaurant last month. She "wouldn't have served her either." Rubin shared her unpopular opinion on Sunday's AM Joy. Sanders, Rubin added, "has no right to live a life of no fuss, no muss" because she and the entire Trump administration have waged a war on the press.

...Rubin urged protesters to gang up on Sanders when possible."
'Conservative' WaPo Columnist Suggests a More 'Effective' Way to Harass Huckabee Sanders


mrz070218dAPR20180702064507.jpg
 
"Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe cautioned Democrats who are looking to impeach President Trump if the party takes back the House of Representatives, telling CNN on Tuesday, ...

"If you’re going to shoot him, you have to shoot to kill"
Harvard's Tribe on CNN: To impeach Trump, 'you have to shoot to kill'



Trump’s opponents in the media, academia, and politics can pretend that their calls for radical action were meant metaphorically or in a nonviolent sense. But they are the ones who opened this box of fear, panic, and rage. Let them take responsibility for the climate that now exists."
Incitement to Violence




The Democrat faithful are well-known not to be well-balanced....If any need a lesson as to where this Democrat Liberal frenzy leads, I suggest a look at James Hodgkinson....and Jared Lee Loughner ....they get the message, loud and clear.

 
"SHOCK VIDEO: MEMBER OF RIGHT-WING GROUP FACES BRUTAL BEATING

This display of political violence follows a disturbing trend of Trump supporters and conservatives in general facing harassment and intimidation in public. (RELATED: Since Trump’s Election, Violence Against His Supporters Has Become Routine)

California Democrat Maxine Waters told a crowd in June, “If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station — you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. Tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere!” (RELATED: Top Democrats Run From Maxine Waters’ Calls For Harassing Trump Officials)"
SHOCK VIDEO: Member Of Right-Wing Group Faces Brutal Beating
 
"Denver Post Runs Letter to Editor Suggesting Trump Should Be Executed

...Soviet spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who passed atomic bomb secrets to Moscow, were executed for "far less."

"The mere fact the Denver Post would publish a letter to the editor with this type of language speaks to both the increasingly violent tone of liberals in Colorado politics and the desperation of the Post for readership," said Kelly Maher, executive director of Compass Colorado.

"This trend of violent language in Colorado is deeply concerning," ..."
Denver Post Runs Letter to Editor Suggesting Trump Should Be Executed




"...the increasingly violent tone of liberals..."

Liberals.....or Nazis?

So difficult to tell the difference these days.


 

Forum List

Back
Top