Democrats do not care if their party people violate the law

RetiredGySgt

Diamond Member
May 6, 2007
56,067
18,155
2,260
North Carolina
It is real simple. Democrats do not care when a Democrat breaks the law. So many examples. That Louisiana Representative caught red handed with 100000 dollars in bribe money in his freezer and caught ordering national Guard troops to move his personal possessions during Katrina? Pelosi stated for the record she would have made him the leader of a high level committee if the FBI would just drop the charges. Holder and fast and furious? Nothing done. The Mayor of Chicago? Nothing done. Hillary Clinton, demands that nothing be done. The democrats on this board are all in favor of protecting any democrat caught breaking the law with any excuse or any lie they can make up.
 
It is real simple. Democrats do not care when a Democrat breaks the law. So many examples. That Louisiana Representative caught red handed with 100000 dollars in bribe money in his freezer and caught ordering national Guard troops to move his personal possessions during Katrina? Pelosi stated for the record she would have made him the leader of a high level committee if the FBI would just drop the charges. Holder and fast and furious? Nothing done. The Mayor of Chicago? Nothing done. Hillary Clinton, demands that nothing be done. The democrats on this board are all in favor of protecting any democrat caught breaking the law with any excuse or any lie they can make up.
What's real simple is this thread's premise fails as a hasty generalization fallacy.
 
It is real simple. Democrats do not care when a Democrat breaks the law. So many examples. That Louisiana Representative caught red handed with 100000 dollars in bribe money in his freezer and caught ordering national Guard troops to move his personal possessions during Katrina? Pelosi stated for the record she would have made him the leader of a high level committee if the FBI would just drop the charges.

And back in reality, Pelosi -- the minority leader, who was thus not capable of appointing anyone -- requested Jefferson step down .The Republican majority could have voted and made it so. The Republican majority instead refused to do so, effectively choosing to keep Jefferson in congress.

So, why did you tell that lie?

Holder and fast and furious? Nothing done.

Because no law was broken. You lying about stuff doesn't make us hypocrites, it just makes you a liar.

The Mayor of Chicago? Nothing done. Hillary Clinton, demands that nothing be done. The democrats on this board are all in favor of protecting any democrat caught breaking the law with any excuse or any lie they can make up.

Oh, I get it. This weeping act is just you getting your excuses for losing in place. Enjoy sucking on losing, bitch.
 
It is real simple. Democrats do not care when a Democrat breaks the law. So many examples. That Louisiana Representative caught red handed with 100000 dollars in bribe money in his freezer and caught ordering national Guard troops to move his personal possessions during Katrina? Pelosi stated for the record she would have made him the leader of a high level committee if the FBI would just drop the charges. Holder and fast and furious? Nothing done. The Mayor of Chicago? Nothing done. Hillary Clinton, demands that nothing be done. The democrats on this board are all in favor of protecting any democrat caught breaking the law with any excuse or any lie they can make up.
s
In the United States more mass shootings are committed by liberals than islamics.
Want to prove that with political registration? Nah, did not think so.

Here's one: 42 terror killings by Muslims in five years and several times that by freeky righties.

You are mentally ill, kid, and all the Board knows it.

Southern rural Ohio? Probably rednecks

I said the last five years: 42 murders by Muslim terrorists and several times that by right wing kooks. You know it and I know it. Run along.


Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

I said the last five years: 42 murders by Muslim terrorists and several times that by right wing kooks. You know it and I know it. Run along.


Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

You mean the left over of clinton's watch.......when he didn't take the attacks on the first World Trade center bombing, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole or the Kobar Towers...and refused to take osama........and then left the mess for Bush to deal with.....
Nah, it was on Bush's watch, his fault. Then the dope invaded Iraq and made the whole mess as bad as it was, YUUUGE.

Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

You mean the left over of clinton's watch.......when he didn't take the attacks on the first World Trade center bombing, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole or the Kobar Towers...and refused to take osama........and then left the mess for Bush to deal with.....
Nah, it was on Bush's watch, his fault. Then the dope invaded Iraq and made the whole mess as bad as it was, YUUUGE.


Nope...Clinton ignored the problem for 8 years....and got out of office before they knocked the towers down......and Iraq was only a mess because of the left wing regressive 5th column attacking the war effort from the start......then the twit Obama pulled us out before the country was under countrol......the way we stayed in Europe, Okinawa, Japan, The Phillipines, ITaly, South Korea........Iraq and Afghanistan are the only countries we left before they were stable...all at the direction of left wing regressives........

Look what they did for Libya and Syria....

Case made.....
Your beta male logic is weak, weak, weak.

Bush so screwed our country: he should not have invaded, then he could not get a workable SOFA and did not have the balls to pull out so passed onto Obama, who also unable to get a good SOFA had the balls to pull us out.

Your beta male revisionism is weak, weak, weak.

In the United States more mass shootings are committed by liberals than islamics.
Want to prove that with political registration? Nah, did not think so.

Here's one: 42 terror killings by Muslims in five years and several times that by freeky righties.

You are mentally ill, kid, and all the Board knows it.

So please share the couple hundred "TERRORIST" killings by "freeky" righties.
Southern rural Ohio? Probably rednecks

Rednecks some of the very best people in the world! Hearts of gold and will drop anything to help anyone.
That has been many times on the Board, as you may know. If you do, you don't get "just once more," you get fuck you. If you don't know, go research it because you sound like a beta human, so research is something you might do well.

Are you the "wall of silence", clown? The wall of silence passed by a Republican Congress? The wall of silence that could have been rectified with an EO.

It is real simple. Democrats do not care when a Democrat breaks the law. So many examples. That Louisiana Representative caught red handed with 100000 dollars in bribe money in his freezer and caught ordering national Guard troops to move his personal possessions during Katrina? Pelosi stated for the record she would have made him the leader of a high level committee if the FBI would just drop the charges. Holder and fast and furious? Nothing done. The Mayor of Chicago? Nothing done. Hillary Clinton, demands that nothing be done. The democrats on this board are all in favor of protecting any democrat caught breaking the law with any excuse or any lie they can make up.

As demonstrated by the Democrat presidential nominee frontrunner, crimes, felonies, convictions are well-known RESUME ENHANCEMENTS. Manslaughter would be one of the most conspicuous examples.
 
power over all.....they could care less that bill clinton is a rapist and super sexual predator...and that his wife aided and abetted his crimes against women....just so she could keep her political career......democrats routinely avoid paying their taxes....and get a pass.....the racism of the democrat party is legendary....and they get a pass...

Increasing government power is all they want, and they will allow anything that helps them achieve it.
 
It is real simple. Democrats do not care when a Democrat breaks the law. So many examples. That Louisiana Representative caught red handed with 100000 dollars in bribe money in his freezer and caught ordering national Guard troops to move his personal possessions during Katrina? Pelosi stated for the record she would have made him the leader of a high level committee if the FBI would just drop the charges. Holder and fast and furious? Nothing done. The Mayor of Chicago? Nothing done. Hillary Clinton, demands that nothing be done. The democrats on this board are all in favor of protecting any democrat caught breaking the law with any excuse or any lie they can make up.
What's real simple is this thread's premise fails as a hasty generalization fallacy.
Pelosi's husband, Clinton's and obama's getting rich in washington is not a generalization my friend.
 
It is real simple. Democrats do not care when a Democrat breaks the law. So many examples. That Louisiana Representative caught red handed with 100000 dollars in bribe money in his freezer and caught ordering national Guard troops to move his personal possessions during Katrina? Pelosi stated for the record she would have made him the leader of a high level committee if the FBI would just drop the charges.

And back in reality, Pelosi -- the minority leader, who was thus not capable of appointing anyone -- requested Jefferson step down .The Republican majority could have voted and made it so. The Republican majority instead refused to do so, effectively choosing to keep Jefferson in congress.

So, why did you tell that lie?

Holder and fast and furious? Nothing done.

Because no law was broken. You lying about stuff doesn't make us hypocrites, it just makes you a liar.

The Mayor of Chicago? Nothing done. Hillary Clinton, demands that nothing be done. The democrats on this board are all in favor of protecting any democrat caught breaking the law with any excuse or any lie they can make up.

Oh, I get it. This weeping act is just you getting your excuses for losing in place. Enjoy sucking on losing, bitch.
ya, it must really suck having to defend all these lies against democrats
 
It is real simple. Democrats do not care when a Democrat breaks the law. So many examples. That Louisiana Representative caught red handed with 100000 dollars in bribe money in his freezer and caught ordering national Guard troops to move his personal possessions during Katrina? Pelosi stated for the record she would have made him the leader of a high level committee if the FBI would just drop the charges. Holder and fast and furious? Nothing done. The Mayor of Chicago? Nothing done. Hillary Clinton, demands that nothing be done. The democrats on this board are all in favor of protecting any democrat caught breaking the law with any excuse or any lie they can make up.
s
In the United States more mass shootings are committed by liberals than islamics.
Want to prove that with political registration? Nah, did not think so.

Here's one: 42 terror killings by Muslims in five years and several times that by freeky righties.

You are mentally ill, kid, and all the Board knows it.

Southern rural Ohio? Probably rednecks

I said the last five years: 42 murders by Muslim terrorists and several times that by right wing kooks. You know it and I know it. Run along.


Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

I said the last five years: 42 murders by Muslim terrorists and several times that by right wing kooks. You know it and I know it. Run along.


Yes...I know......by limiting it to the last 5 years you can lie.......3,000 is a lot more than any mass shooting by the one or two right wingers you can find........
Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

You mean the left over of clinton's watch.......when he didn't take the attacks on the first World Trade center bombing, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole or the Kobar Towers...and refused to take osama........and then left the mess for Bush to deal with.....
Nah, it was on Bush's watch, his fault. Then the dope invaded Iraq and made the whole mess as bad as it was, YUUUGE.

Yup, 3000 on Bush's watch. How many on Obama's?

You mean the left over of clinton's watch.......when he didn't take the attacks on the first World Trade center bombing, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole or the Kobar Towers...and refused to take osama........and then left the mess for Bush to deal with.....
Nah, it was on Bush's watch, his fault. Then the dope invaded Iraq and made the whole mess as bad as it was, YUUUGE.


Nope...Clinton ignored the problem for 8 years....and got out of office before they knocked the towers down......and Iraq was only a mess because of the left wing regressive 5th column attacking the war effort from the start......then the twit Obama pulled us out before the country was under countrol......the way we stayed in Europe, Okinawa, Japan, The Phillipines, ITaly, South Korea........Iraq and Afghanistan are the only countries we left before they were stable...all at the direction of left wing regressives........

Look what they did for Libya and Syria....

Case made.....
Your beta male logic is weak, weak, weak.

Bush so screwed our country: he should not have invaded, then he could not get a workable SOFA and did not have the balls to pull out so passed onto Obama, who also unable to get a good SOFA had the balls to pull us out.

Your beta male revisionism is weak, weak, weak.

In the United States more mass shootings are committed by liberals than islamics.
Want to prove that with political registration? Nah, did not think so.

Here's one: 42 terror killings by Muslims in five years and several times that by freeky righties.

You are mentally ill, kid, and all the Board knows it.

So please share the couple hundred "TERRORIST" killings by "freeky" righties.
Southern rural Ohio? Probably rednecks

Rednecks some of the very best people in the world! Hearts of gold and will drop anything to help anyone.
That has been many times on the Board, as you may know. If you do, you don't get "just once more," you get fuck you. If you don't know, go research it because you sound like a beta human, so research is something you might do well.

Are you the "wall of silence", clown? The wall of silence passed by a Republican Congress? The wall of silence that could have been rectified with an EO.

It is real simple. Democrats do not care when a Democrat breaks the law. So many examples. That Louisiana Representative caught red handed with 100000 dollars in bribe money in his freezer and caught ordering national Guard troops to move his personal possessions during Katrina? Pelosi stated for the record she would have made him the leader of a high level committee if the FBI would just drop the charges. Holder and fast and furious? Nothing done. The Mayor of Chicago? Nothing done. Hillary Clinton, demands that nothing be done. The democrats on this board are all in favor of protecting any democrat caught breaking the law with any excuse or any lie they can make up.
As demonstrated by the Democrat presidential nominee frontrunner, crimes, felonies, convictions are well-known RESUME ENHANCEMENTS. Manslaughter would be one of the most conspicuous examples.
IOW, darkle sparkle, your glow is dimming. Who you have an opinion? No one cares.
 

Forum List

Back
Top