Democrats need to understand what evidence means

Oh no! A LOAN?

So everyone who bought a house with a mortgage or a car or boat or RV with a loan is now a criminal?

Yea. It’s evidence (technically). Very weak evidence
Anyone who bought a house with a mortgage has a mortgage agreement and they have evidence of payments being made and interest being paid. Biden has none of that. Anyone who claims that is a legitimate loan is simply a prog douchebag who doesn't give a damn if Biden is a criminal. No one could be that stupid.
 
That’s your idea of evidence.

As noted, it’s mischaracterization and speculation.

Joe lent Jim that exact amount of money and here it sure as shit looks like it was paid back.

He also lent $200K and THAT amount was repaid as well
Wrong, moron, it's evidence. You definition of evidence is a smoking gun that proves beyond all doubt in one fell swoop that Biden is guilty. You wouldn't be satisfied unless Biden admitted on television that he was taking bribes. All you proved is that you're a scumbag covering for Biden.
 
Last edited:
There's abundant evidence, moron. There's no evidence of a loan. What's the interest rate? Where is there any evidence of interest being paid? Only certified morons believe that was an actual loan rather than a bribe.
I'm not denying there's evidence of a Chinese company paying Hunter millions for apparently providing no services. So what? Hunter isn't in office. A Chinese company can pay him millions to twirl a sign outside their doors if they wanted to. What I'm saying is that loan isn't evidence of any crime. I'll even go one further and say that money was probably paid with the hopes that he'd use his influence with his father to help their business out. Unfortunately for you cucks it only becomes a crime when you connect those payments to public policy passed by Joe to complete the quid pro quo.
 
When will you have legally admissible evidence and legally admissible testimony?
 
I'm not denying there's evidence of a Chinese company paying Hunter millions for apparently providing no services. So what? Hunter isn't in office. A Chinese company can pay him millions to twirl a sign outside their doors if they wanted to. What I'm saying is that loan isn't evidence of any crime. I'll even go one further and say that money was probably paid with the hopes that he'd use his influence with his father to help their business out. Unfortunately for you cucks it only becomes a crime when you connect those payments to public policy passed by Joe to complete the quid pro quo.
Sorry, turd. That is clearly evidence of a bribe. You have to be fucking stupid that a Chinese company connected to the columnist party is paying Hunter $5 million without expecting anything in return. Furthermore China has gotten plenty from these payments.

‘A sea change’: Biden reverses decades of Chinese trade policy
 
Sorry, turd. That is clearly evidence of a bribe. You have to be fucking stupid that a Chinese company connected to the columnist party is paying Hunter $5 million without expecting anything in return. Furthermore China has gotten plenty from these payments.

‘A sea change’: Biden reverses decades of Chinese trade policy
And see this is where your "evidence" starts to break down. You have a Chinese company paying millions to Hunter which in and of itself isn't illegal and then a lot of innuendo which isn't evidence. You are and always will be the fail whites.
 
And see this is where your "evidence" starts to break down. You have a Chinese company paying millions to Hunter which in and of itself isn't illegal and then a lot of innuendo which isn't evidence. You are and always will be the fail whites.
It's not innuendo, moron. It's a list of things Biden did that benefit the Chinese. Paying anyone isn't necessarily against the law, but when they are politicians who are getting paid only because they make the government do things the benefit the people who are paying them, it's a crime, and Biden clearly did that.
 
It's not innuendo, moron. It's a list of things Biden did that benefit the Chinese.
The article you linked to says his policies will hurt the Chinese. If you have more than innuendo then what specifically are you referring to?
Paying anyone isn't necessarily against the law, but when they are politicians who are getting paid only because they make the government do things the benefit the people who are paying them, it's a crime, and Biden clearly did that.
Hunter is not a politician you dumb Bingo. 😄 You haven't caught on yet that Republicans keep talking about the Biden family to confuse you? Every member of the Biden family is allowed to get paid millions from foreign companies to do dick except the one holding public office.
 
The article you linked to says his policies will hurt the Chinese. If you have more than innuendo then what specifically are you referring to?

Hunter is not a politician you dumb Bingo. 😄 You haven't caught on yet that Republicans keep talking about the Biden family to confuse you? Every member of the Biden family is allowed to get paid millions from foreign companies to do dick except the one holding public office.
What you don't seem to get is that this investigation is about Joe Biden, not Hunter. The later was just the middleman. Your next claim is also false. Juries have convicted politicians of taking bribes when only their family members were paid. The fact that you believe that's OK only shows what a douchebag you are.
 
What you don't seem to get is that this investigation is about Joe Biden, not Hunter. The later was just the middleman. Your next claim is also false. Juries have convicted politicians of taking bribes when only their family members were paid. The fact that you believe that's OK only shows what a douchebag you are.
Which politican and which case? Your inability to provide me with any specifics only shows how full of shit you are.
 
What you don't seem to get is that this investigation is about Joe Biden, not Hunter. The later was just the middleman. Your next claim is also false. Juries have convicted politicians of taking bribes when only their family members were paid. The fact that you believe that's OK only shows what a douchebag you are.
Middleman to WHAT exactly.
 
This thread hasn't aged well. The Trump cult losers had no evidence in August, and they still have no evidence. All of them are proudly lying for fascism, and they all know it. They don't care. The cult orders them to lie, so they lie. The cult is their life. Without the cult, they are nothing.

Hell awaits every Trump cultist. A person can't serve the Lord of Lies as devoutly as they do and not face consequences for it.
 
How fucking stupid are you? The middleman between the briber and the bribee, dumbass.
You just demonstrated that there was no evidence of the third part of that supposed transaction.

Joe Biden was not part of any of this
 
Why doesn’t Joe clear it all up by showing his check (or checks) back to his brother, repaying the loan?
 
Why doesn’t Joe clear it all up by showing his check (or checks) back to his brother, repaying the loan?
It’s a matter of record and has “loan repayment” in the subject line.

But yeah… keep asking for that which has been provided Rand pretend it hasn’t
 
You just demonstrated that there was no evidence of the third part of that supposed transaction.

Joe Biden was not part of any of this
Sorry, turd, but he clearly was. Joe Biden is the product that Hunter Biden was selling to China. Biden family members wrote two checks to Joe they obtained from Chinese funds. You have to b e deliberately blind not to see that.
 
Sorry, turd, but he clearly was. Joe Biden is the product that Hunter Biden was selling to China. Biden family members wrote two checks to Joe they obtained from Chinese funds. You have to b e deliberately blind not to see that.
You’re talking about the repayment of loans as if there’s something nefarious about that

Just stupid
 
You’re talking about the repayment of loans as if there’s something nefarious about that

Just stupid
Anyone who believes those actually loans is terminally gullible. Progs behave as if we are required to believe their delusions.
 
Anyone who believes those actually loans is terminally gullible. Progs behave as if we are required to believe their delusions.
And what makes you think they were not loans?

Ya just want to believe differently?

There’s a record of that exact amount of money being given to Jim and a record of it being paid back to Joe.

Sure sounds like a loan. The fact that the checks to Joe had “loan repayment “ written on them kinda seals that deal
 

Forum List

Back
Top