Democrats Never Met A Communist....

[PoliticalChic]

I never lie.....you're simply a fool.

You always lie, even after your lies have been explained to you.

As has been explained to you repeatedly, Shaw was mocking Eugenicists, he is a satirist by trade.

In his writings he has his own version of Eugenics called Sahvian Eugenics, where the "Superman" is produced by the mating choices of women, NO genocide involved, unless in your perverted mind all women are Black Widows who kill their mates after sex.

Try reading "Man and Superman" instead of being so illiterate! And then try thinking for yourself rather than mindlessly parroting liars you admire for their lies.

You're a moron.

I provided the genocidal maniac explaining it in his own words, and you simple squeeze your eyes shut, cover your ears, and whine "is not, is nooooootttttt! waa waa waa!"

You provided your deliberate misrepresentation of Shaw's satirizing Eugenics, which you have done in the past several times and were corrected every time, yet you still parrot the same lie. You can't pretend to be too stupid to know you are lying after the first time your lie was corrected, so all your continuing lies are premeditated.

Again, if you had ever actually read any of Shaw's literature, you would know there is no genocide in Shavian Eugenics. Women are not Black Widows, and you are a pathological liar.

Originally Posted by wikipedia
Shaw was a proponent of a position now known as "Shavian eugenics", after himself, believing that human beings would naturally tend toward biological improvement, without the need for political intervention.[68][69] He wrote that "the only fundamental and possible Socialism is the socialization of the selective breeding of Man"; the selection of partners "without consideration of rank or wealth" would come about when personal incomes were made equal.[70][71]
He was a critic of the use of force for eugenic purposes, and especially of the racist employment of eugenic logic.[65] At a meeting of the Eugenics Education Society of 3 March 1910 he lampooned parts of the eugenics movement by mockingly suggesting the need to use a "lethal chamber" to solve the problem. Shaw said: "We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living, and to leave living a great many people whom we at present kill. We should have to get rid of all ideas about capital punishment …" This was an example of Shaw satirically employing the reductio ad absurdum argument against the eugenicists' wilder dreams, although many in the press took his words out of their satirical context. Dan Stone wrote: "Either the press believed Shaw to be serious, and vilified him, or recognised the tongue-in-cheek nature of his lecture."[72][73]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sources
(1 = 72, 2 = 73)

1. ^ Stone, Dan (2002). "The Lethal Chamber in Eugenic Thought". Breeding superman: Nietzsche, race and eugenics in Edwardian and interwar Britain. Liverpool, England: Liverpool University Press. p. 127. ISBN 9780853239970. "Either the press believed Shaw to be serious, and vilified him, or recognised the tongue-in-cheek nature of his lecture … only The Globe and the Evening News also recognised it as a skit on the dreams of the eugenicists."
2. ^ Searle (1976: 92): "This was widely felt to be a joke in the worst possible taste".

You are truly an imbecile....but, I suppose you're tired of hearing that from everybody.


"...George Bernard Shaw, the celebrated progressive playwright defended Hitler, advocated killing those who can’t justify their existence and called for the development of lethal gas 10 years before the national socialists in Germany did exactly that.


George Bernard Shaw, “ I don’t want to punish anybody, but there are an extraordinary number of people who I might want to kill…I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board just as he might come before the income tax commissioner and say every 5 years or every 7 years…just put them there and say , ‘Sir or madam will you be kind enough to justify your existence…if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little bit more then clearly we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive. Because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very much use to yourself.’


Shaw wrote, “ I appeal to the chemists to discover a humane gas that will kill instantly and painlessly. In short- a gentlemanly gas deadly by all means, but humane, not cruel.”


Interviewed on Germany Shaw declared:

“Germany’s contention of ‘race pollution’ was ‘despicably unscientific.’” But he said he “appreciated” Hitler’s political sagacity and the courage with which he has rescued Germany from the gutter,, and placed her once more at the head of Central Europe.”


( SOURCE: GEORGE BERNARD SHAW Approaches His 82d Birthday Anemic But Still Vociferously Aware of His OwnJJnique. Significance, Galveston Daily News: 7/24/1938)

You just can't stop yourself from lying even in the face of the truth. You are a true sociopath!

I get it, you moron.

Your argument is, 'he said it, but he didn't mean it."



BTW...,.when I said you were an imbecile?

I meant it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What underlies Progressive love of Communism is that they share a deep hatred for humanity. They HATE people! Hate them with a passion that explains why these Progressive Utopias always end in mass graves.

Look at the deep HATRED Progressive have for school kids. Progressives have organized an educational system that destroys the vast majority of the young minds they're entrusted: 40% of minorities drop out and 5 of 6 who "Graduate" are functional illiterates. What motivates the creators of that educational system, love, love of learning?

No! It's a deep seated frothing hatred and believes the high and best use of people is either slavery or fertilizer.

That's why Progressives Love and Idolize their Communist forefathers Mao and Stalin, they did Progressivism right

"What underlies Progressive love of Communism is that they share a deep hatred for humanity."


It is a political philosophy that responds to the fact that it is reponsible for the slaughter of untold millions of human beings with the axiom " you can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs."

 

[regent]

From the innocent looking paper boy to the corner grocer, it now sounds like most of the country is communist, and if so, how could people not meet them. They are all over. If America would only pass a law forcing those suspected of communism to wear a symbol on their clothing how much safer we would be.

According to PoliticalChic and her subaltern CrusaderFrank such a symbol isn't necessary. All Democrats, all progressives, all liberals, all gays/lesbians, all non Christian, in fact all American citizens who do not subscribe to the far right ideology those on the Crazy New Right hold dear, are Communists.

Dude, what else can we say when there's no difference between the ideas you spew here daily and those embraced by CPUSA?

And what are those ideas that I spew daily that are communistic?

 

[edthecynic]

You always lie, even after your lies have been explained to you.

As has been explained to you repeatedly, Shaw was mocking Eugenicists, he is a satirist by trade.

In his writings he has his own version of Eugenics called Sahvian Eugenics, where the "Superman" is produced by the mating choices of women, NO genocide involved, unless in your perverted mind all women are Black Widows who kill their mates after sex.

Try reading "Man and Superman" instead of being so illiterate! And then try thinking for yourself rather than mindlessly parroting liars you admire for their lies.

You're a moron.

I provided the genocidal maniac explaining it in his own words, and you simple squeeze your eyes shut, cover your ears, and whine "is not, is nooooootttttt! waa waa waa!"

You provided your deliberate misrepresentation of Shaw's satirizing Eugenics, which you have done in the past several times and were corrected every time, yet you still parrot the same lie. You can't pretend to be too stupid to know you are lying after the first time your lie was corrected, so all your continuing lies are premeditated.

Again, if you had ever actually read any of Shaw's literature, you would know there is no genocide in Shavian Eugenics. Women are not Black Widows, and you are a pathological liar.

Originally Posted by wikipedia
Shaw was a proponent of a position now known as "Shavian eugenics", after himself, believing that human beings would naturally tend toward biological improvement, without the need for political intervention.[68][69] He wrote that "the only fundamental and possible Socialism is the socialization of the selective breeding of Man"; the selection of partners "without consideration of rank or wealth" would come about when personal incomes were made equal.[70][71]
He was a critic of the use of force for eugenic purposes, and especially of the racist employment of eugenic logic.[65] At a meeting of the Eugenics Education Society of 3 March 1910 he lampooned parts of the eugenics movement by mockingly suggesting the need to use a "lethal chamber" to solve the problem. Shaw said: "We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living, and to leave living a great many people whom we at present kill. We should have to get rid of all ideas about capital punishment …" This was an example of Shaw satirically employing the reductio ad absurdum argument against the eugenicists' wilder dreams, although many in the press took his words out of their satirical context. Dan Stone wrote: "Either the press believed Shaw to be serious, and vilified him, or recognised the tongue-in-cheek nature of his lecture."[72][73]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sources
(1 = 72, 2 = 73)

1. ^ Stone, Dan (2002). "The Lethal Chamber in Eugenic Thought". Breeding superman: Nietzsche, race and eugenics in Edwardian and interwar Britain. Liverpool, England: Liverpool University Press. p. 127. ISBN 9780853239970. "Either the press believed Shaw to be serious, and vilified him, or recognised the tongue-in-cheek nature of his lecture … only The Globe and the Evening News also recognised it as a skit on the dreams of the eugenicists."
2. ^ Searle (1976: 92): "This was widely felt to be a joke in the worst possible taste".

You are truly an imbecile....but, I suppose you're tired of hearing that from everybody.


"...George Bernard Shaw, the celebrated progressive playwright defended Hitler, advocated killing those who can’t justify their existence and called for the development of lethal gas 10 years before the national socialists in Germany did exactly that.


George Bernard Shaw, “ I don’t want to punish anybody, but there are an extraordinary number of people who I might want to kill…I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board just as he might come before the income tax commissioner and say every 5 years or every 7 years…just put them there and say , ‘Sir or madam will you be kind enough to justify your existence…if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little bit more then clearly we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive. Because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very much use to yourself.’


Shaw wrote, “ I appeal to the chemists to discover a humane gas that will kill instantly and painlessly. In short- a gentlemanly gas deadly by all means, but humane, not cruel.”


Interviewed on Germany Shaw declared:

“Germany’s contention of ‘race pollution’ was ‘despicably unscientific.’” But he said he “appreciated” Hitler’s political sagacity and the courage with which he has rescued Germany from the gutter,, and placed her once more at the head of Central Europe.”


( SOURCE: GEORGE BERNARD SHAW Approaches His 82d Birthday Anemic But Still Vociferously Aware of His OwnJJnique. Significance, Galveston Daily News: 7/24/1938)

You just can't stop yourself from lying even in the face of the truth. You are a true sociopath!

I get it, you moron.

Your argument is, 'he said it, but he didn't mean it."



BTW...,.when I said you were an imbecile?

I meant it.

No, as anyone familiar with Shaw's literature, he meant it as SATIRE. As his plays clearly show to those who have taken the time to read them, he absolutely opposed any state involvement in Eugenics and mocked them at every opportunity. He argued his own brand of Eugenics which he called "Shavian Eugenics" where tomorrow's "Superman" would be produced by the choice in a mate that women make. His advice was "to let people choose their mates for themselves, and trust to nature to make a good result." How anyone but the most pathological liar can twist that into "genocide," as you dishonestly did, is beyond excuse.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

From the innocent looking paper boy to the corner grocer, it now sounds like most of the country is communist, and if so, how could people not meet them. They are all over. If America would only pass a law forcing those suspected of communism to wear a symbol on their clothing how much safer we would be.

According to PoliticalChic and her subaltern CrusaderFrank such a symbol isn't necessary. All Democrats, all progressives, all liberals, all gays/lesbians, all non Christian, in fact all American citizens who do not subscribe to the far right ideology those on the Crazy New Right hold dear, are Communists.

Dude, what else can we say when there's no difference between the ideas you spew here daily and those embraced by CPUSA?

And what are those ideas that I spew daily that are communistic?

You may be spewing Communism if you believe that mankind is altering the Climate

You may be spewing Communism if you believe we can correct "income inequality" Hell, if you even believe that "Income inequality" is a "Problem" to be "Solved"

 

[regent]

From the innocent looking paper boy to the corner grocer, it now sounds like most of the country is communist, and if so, how could people not meet them. They are all over. If America would only pass a law forcing those suspected of communism to wear a symbol on their clothing how much safer we would be.

According to PoliticalChic and her subaltern CrusaderFrank such a symbol isn't necessary. All Democrats, all progressives, all liberals, all gays/lesbians, all non Christian, in fact all American citizens who do not subscribe to the far right ideology those on the Crazy New Right hold dear, are Communists.

Dude, what else can we say when there's no difference between the ideas you spew here daily and those embraced by CPUSA?

And what are those ideas that I spew daily that are communistic?

You may be spewing Communism if you believe that mankind is altering the Climate

Now I'm confused, have you now backed off from spewing to "may be" spewing?
If so, can people have ideas you don't approve of and not be a communist?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You're a moron.

I provided the genocidal maniac explaining it in his own words, and you simple squeeze your eyes shut, cover your ears, and whine "is not, is nooooootttttt! waa waa waa!"

You provided your deliberate misrepresentation of Shaw's satirizing Eugenics, which you have done in the past several times and were corrected every time, yet you still parrot the same lie. You can't pretend to be too stupid to know you are lying after the first time your lie was corrected, so all your continuing lies are premeditated.

Again, if you had ever actually read any of Shaw's literature, you would know there is no genocide in Shavian Eugenics. Women are not Black Widows, and you are a pathological liar.

Originally Posted by wikipedia
Shaw was a proponent of a position now known as "Shavian eugenics", after himself, believing that human beings would naturally tend toward biological improvement, without the need for political intervention.[68][69] He wrote that "the only fundamental and possible Socialism is the socialization of the selective breeding of Man"; the selection of partners "without consideration of rank or wealth" would come about when personal incomes were made equal.[70][71]
He was a critic of the use of force for eugenic purposes, and especially of the racist employment of eugenic logic.[65] At a meeting of the Eugenics Education Society of 3 March 1910 he lampooned parts of the eugenics movement by mockingly suggesting the need to use a "lethal chamber" to solve the problem. Shaw said: "We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living, and to leave living a great many people whom we at present kill. We should have to get rid of all ideas about capital punishment …" This was an example of Shaw satirically employing the reductio ad absurdum argument against the eugenicists' wilder dreams, although many in the press took his words out of their satirical context. Dan Stone wrote: "Either the press believed Shaw to be serious, and vilified him, or recognised the tongue-in-cheek nature of his lecture."[72][73]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sources
(1 = 72, 2 = 73)

1. ^ Stone, Dan (2002). "The Lethal Chamber in Eugenic Thought". Breeding superman: Nietzsche, race and eugenics in Edwardian and interwar Britain. Liverpool, England: Liverpool University Press. p. 127. ISBN 9780853239970. "Either the press believed Shaw to be serious, and vilified him, or recognised the tongue-in-cheek nature of his lecture … only The Globe and the Evening News also recognised it as a skit on the dreams of the eugenicists."
2. ^ Searle (1976: 92): "This was widely felt to be a joke in the worst possible taste".

You are truly an imbecile....but, I suppose you're tired of hearing that from everybody.


"...George Bernard Shaw, the celebrated progressive playwright defended Hitler, advocated killing those who can’t justify their existence and called for the development of lethal gas 10 years before the national socialists in Germany did exactly that.


George Bernard Shaw, “ I don’t want to punish anybody, but there are an extraordinary number of people who I might want to kill…I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board just as he might come before the income tax commissioner and say every 5 years or every 7 years…just put them there and say , ‘Sir or madam will you be kind enough to justify your existence…if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little bit more then clearly we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive. Because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very much use to yourself.’


Shaw wrote, “ I appeal to the chemists to discover a humane gas that will kill instantly and painlessly. In short- a gentlemanly gas deadly by all means, but humane, not cruel.”


Interviewed on Germany Shaw declared:

“Germany’s contention of ‘race pollution’ was ‘despicably unscientific.’” But he said he “appreciated” Hitler’s political sagacity and the courage with which he has rescued Germany from the gutter,, and placed her once more at the head of Central Europe.”


( SOURCE: GEORGE BERNARD SHAW Approaches His 82d Birthday Anemic But Still Vociferously Aware of His OwnJJnique. Significance, Galveston Daily News: 7/24/1938)

You just can't stop yourself from lying even in the face of the truth. You are a true sociopath!

I get it, you moron.

Your argument is, 'he said it, but he didn't mean it."



BTW...,.when I said you were an imbecile?

I meant it.

No, as anyone familiar with Shaw's literature, he meant it as SATIRE. As his plays clearly show to those who have taken the time to read them, he absolutely opposed any state involvement in Eugenics and mocked them at every opportunity. He argued his own brand of Eugenics which he called "Shavian Eugenics" where tomorrow's "Superman" would be produced by the choice in a mate that women make. His advice was "to let people choose their mates for themselves, and trust to nature to make a good result." How anyone but the most pathological liar can twist that into "genocide," as you dishonestly did, is beyond excuse.

"...he meant it as SATIRE..."
No he didn't, you imbecile.

 

[edthecynic]

You provided your deliberate misrepresentation of Shaw's satirizing Eugenics, which you have done in the past several times and were corrected every time, yet you still parrot the same lie. You can't pretend to be too stupid to know you are lying after the first time your lie was corrected, so all your continuing lies are premeditated.

Again, if you had ever actually read any of Shaw's literature, you would know there is no genocide in Shavian Eugenics. Women are not Black Widows, and you are a pathological liar.

Originally Posted by wikipedia
Shaw was a proponent of a position now known as "Shavian eugenics", after himself, believing that human beings would naturally tend toward biological improvement, without the need for political intervention.[68][69] He wrote that "the only fundamental and possible Socialism is the socialization of the selective breeding of Man"; the selection of partners "without consideration of rank or wealth" would come about when personal incomes were made equal.[70][71]
He was a critic of the use of force for eugenic purposes, and especially of the racist employment of eugenic logic.[65] At a meeting of the Eugenics Education Society of 3 March 1910 he lampooned parts of the eugenics movement by mockingly suggesting the need to use a "lethal chamber" to solve the problem. Shaw said: "We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living, and to leave living a great many people whom we at present kill. We should have to get rid of all ideas about capital punishment …" This was an example of Shaw satirically employing the reductio ad absurdum argument against the eugenicists' wilder dreams, although many in the press took his words out of their satirical context. Dan Stone wrote: "Either the press believed Shaw to be serious, and vilified him, or recognised the tongue-in-cheek nature of his lecture."[72][73]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sources
(1 = 72, 2 = 73)

1. ^ Stone, Dan (2002). "The Lethal Chamber in Eugenic Thought". Breeding superman: Nietzsche, race and eugenics in Edwardian and interwar Britain. Liverpool, England: Liverpool University Press. p. 127. ISBN 9780853239970. "Either the press believed Shaw to be serious, and vilified him, or recognised the tongue-in-cheek nature of his lecture … only The Globe and the Evening News also recognised it as a skit on the dreams of the eugenicists."
2. ^ Searle (1976: 92): "This was widely felt to be a joke in the worst possible taste".

You are truly an imbecile....but, I suppose you're tired of hearing that from everybody.


"...George Bernard Shaw, the celebrated progressive playwright defended Hitler, advocated killing those who can’t justify their existence and called for the development of lethal gas 10 years before the national socialists in Germany did exactly that.


George Bernard Shaw, “ I don’t want to punish anybody, but there are an extraordinary number of people who I might want to kill…I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board just as he might come before the income tax commissioner and say every 5 years or every 7 years…just put them there and say , ‘Sir or madam will you be kind enough to justify your existence…if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little bit more then clearly we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive. Because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very much use to yourself.’


Shaw wrote, “ I appeal to the chemists to discover a humane gas that will kill instantly and painlessly. In short- a gentlemanly gas deadly by all means, but humane, not cruel.”


Interviewed on Germany Shaw declared:

“Germany’s contention of ‘race pollution’ was ‘despicably unscientific.’” But he said he “appreciated” Hitler’s political sagacity and the courage with which he has rescued Germany from the gutter,, and placed her once more at the head of Central Europe.”


( SOURCE: GEORGE BERNARD SHAW Approaches His 82d Birthday Anemic But Still Vociferously Aware of His OwnJJnique. Significance, Galveston Daily News: 7/24/1938)

You just can't stop yourself from lying even in the face of the truth. You are a true sociopath!

I get it, you moron.

Your argument is, 'he said it, but he didn't mean it."



BTW...,.when I said you were an imbecile?

I meant it.

No, as anyone familiar with Shaw's literature, he meant it as SATIRE. As his plays clearly show to those who have taken the time to read them, he absolutely opposed any state involvement in Eugenics and mocked them at every opportunity. He argued his own brand of Eugenics which he called "Shavian Eugenics" where tomorrow's "Superman" would be produced by the choice in a mate that women make. His advice was "to let people choose their mates for themselves, and trust to nature to make a good result." How anyone but the most pathological liar can twist that into "genocide," as you dishonestly did, is beyond excuse.

"...he meant it as SATIRE..."
No he didn't, you imbecile.

Yes he did, you liar.

 

[regent]

From the innocent looking paper boy to the corner grocer, it now sounds like most of the country is communist, and if so, how could people not meet them. They are all over. If America would only pass a law forcing those suspected of communism to wear a symbol on their clothing how much safer we would be.

According to PoliticalChic and her subaltern CrusaderFrank such a symbol isn't necessary. All Democrats, all progressives, all liberals, all gays/lesbians, all non Christian, in fact all American citizens who do not subscribe to the far right ideology those on the Crazy New Right hold dear, are Communists.

Dude, what else can we say when there's no difference between the ideas you spew here daily and those embraced by CPUSA?

And what are those ideas that I spew daily that are communistic?

You may be spewing Communism if you believe that mankind is altering the Climate

You may be spewing Communism if you believe we can correct "income inequality" Hell, if you even believe that "Income inequality" is a "Problem" to be "Solved"

How about if you take a university class on communism? Would that be a kiss of death?

 

[PoliticalChic]

From the innocent looking paper boy to the corner grocer, it now sounds like most of the country is communist, and if so, how could people not meet them. They are all over. If America would only pass a law forcing those suspected of communism to wear a symbol on their clothing how much safer we would be.

According to PoliticalChic and her subaltern CrusaderFrank such a symbol isn't necessary. All Democrats, all progressives, all liberals, all gays/lesbians, all non Christian, in fact all American citizens who do not subscribe to the far right ideology those on the Crazy New Right hold dear, are Communists.

Dude, what else can we say when there's no difference between the ideas you spew here daily and those embraced by CPUSA?

And what are those ideas that I spew daily that are communistic?

You may be spewing Communism if you believe that mankind is altering the Climate

You may be spewing Communism if you believe we can correct "income inequality" Hell, if you even believe that "Income inequality" is a "Problem" to be "Solved"

How about if you take a university class on communism? Would that be a kiss of death?

How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.

......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....




1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.


2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.


3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.


4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.


6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.


7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.


8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."


9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."


10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.


13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce


Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?
Oh...right...you have to ask your "historians" if it would be alright for you to think.



I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals


You might take a look at this one, too.

10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.


"Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains Inheritance And Wall Street FDL News Desk



And this:
"Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too. Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately."
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.

They didn't call it ObamaCare....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

According to PoliticalChic and her subaltern CrusaderFrank such a symbol isn't necessary. All Democrats, all progressives, all liberals, all gays/lesbians, all non Christian, in fact all American citizens who do not subscribe to the far right ideology those on the Crazy New Right hold dear, are Communists.

Dude, what else can we say when there's no difference between the ideas you spew here daily and those embraced by CPUSA?

And what are those ideas that I spew daily that are communistic?

You may be spewing Communism if you believe that mankind is altering the Climate

You may be spewing Communism if you believe we can correct "income inequality" Hell, if you even believe that "Income inequality" is a "Problem" to be "Solved"

How about if you take a university class on communism? Would that be a kiss of death?

How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.

......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....




1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.


2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.


3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.


4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.


6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.


7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.


8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."


9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."


10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.


13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce


Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?
Oh...right...you have to ask your "historians" if it would be alright for you to think.



I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals


You might take a look at this one, too.

10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.


"Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains Inheritance And Wall Street FDL News Desk



And this:
"Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too. Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917 (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately."
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.

They didn't call it ObamaCare....

It matches PERFECTLY with the daily Progressive Talking Points

 

[Moonglow]

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

Damn that Bush and his association with the porn industry in the USA, I bet he has been a pinko commie since Harvard, or maybe Yale...

 

[danielpalos]

....that they didn't adore.



"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
So saith the American philosopher George Santayana.

No where is that more clearly illustrated than in the beliefs and actions of American Liberals/Progressives/Democrats.

As this thread will so demonstrate.




1. Communism, a political philosophy born of slaughter, bloodshed, genocide and oppression. Beyond evil, it's failures in economics and governance are well documented. So....who would endeavor to repeat it?
Answer: Liberals/Progressives/Democrats

2. A brief history of it's home-base, mother Russia, includes 9 million killed in the civil war, 1917-1922; Stalin's regime, 1924-1953, over 20 million slaughtered; (Twentieth Century Atlas - Death Tolls

Add in the communist spin-offs in China, Cambodia, Cuba, Viet Nam, etc., and the number goes well beyond 100 million mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, lives counted as less important than the victory of communism.
And this is the hallmark of every totalist view, communism, Nazism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....the life of the individual may never be considered, only the collective, the state, the "general will" is paramount.




3. Under the auspices of Franklin Roosevelt, the United States drew closer, and embraced, the Communist regime of Joseph Stalin. FDR Democrats covered for, ignored, and made excuses for massacres, genocide, government instituted famines and lies of every variety. The same view of communism has persisted 'til this very day among Democrat elites and leaders.

a. When one of the many communist agents in his administration was identified, Alger Hiss, President Roosevelt promoted him.

b. January 25th, 1950 Alger Hiss sentenced for perjury for denying he was a Soviet spy
Dean Acheson, Truman’s Sec’y of State, said: “I do not intend to turn my back on Alger
Hiss.”

4. One would be hard pressed to find any request by Joseph Stalin that did not find a willing response from FDR, from Lend-Lease to the direction of Allied military operations, and refusal to accept the surrender of Germany.

Just maybe, the Kravchenko case might be one time FDR hesitated to fulfill Stalin's commands.....

Roosevelt regularly lied to the American public about Russia having the same values as the United States, and censored any news to the contrary. Victor Kravchenko told the truth about Stalin's Russia.

a. Victor Kravchenko was one of the first and most influential Soviet defectors to the United States, who had written "I Chose Freedom," a searing account of life under Stalin, denouncing the Stalin regime for failure to grant political and civil liberties to the Russian people.
"The Anti-Communist Manifestos: Four Books That Shaped the Cold War," John Fleming, p. 182-183

b. Kravchenko wanted to shatter those illusions. His defection was front-page news and prompted debate at the highest levels of government, up to and including President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Stalin demanded that he be turned over as a traitor--an automatic death sentence.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover urged FDR to let him stay.
On April 13, 1945, the day after Roosevelt died, Kravchenko received notice that his application for asylum had been granted.
Searching for Tato - LA Times



Perhaps Roosevelt was ambivalent about sending Kravchenko back to the tender mercies of Uncle Joe, as Kravchenko was head-line news throughout the nation....and only after Roosevelt's death did Kravchenko receive notice of asylum.


Had Roosevelt lived.....who knows....

Some on the left are glad, the right had to practice their Communism, in Cuba.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....that they didn't adore.



"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
So saith the American philosopher George Santayana.

No where is that more clearly illustrated than in the beliefs and actions of American Liberals/Progressives/Democrats.

As this thread will so demonstrate.




1. Communism, a political philosophy born of slaughter, bloodshed, genocide and oppression. Beyond evil, it's failures in economics and governance are well documented. So....who would endeavor to repeat it?
Answer: Liberals/Progressives/Democrats

2. A brief history of it's home-base, mother Russia, includes 9 million killed in the civil war, 1917-1922; Stalin's regime, 1924-1953, over 20 million slaughtered; (Twentieth Century Atlas - Death Tolls

Add in the communist spin-offs in China, Cambodia, Cuba, Viet Nam, etc., and the number goes well beyond 100 million mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, lives counted as less important than the victory of communism.
And this is the hallmark of every totalist view, communism, Nazism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....the life of the individual may never be considered, only the collective, the state, the "general will" is paramount.




3. Under the auspices of Franklin Roosevelt, the United States drew closer, and embraced, the Communist regime of Joseph Stalin. FDR Democrats covered for, ignored, and made excuses for massacres, genocide, government instituted famines and lies of every variety. The same view of communism has persisted 'til this very day among Democrat elites and leaders.

a. When one of the many communist agents in his administration was identified, Alger Hiss, President Roosevelt promoted him.

b. January 25th, 1950 Alger Hiss sentenced for perjury for denying he was a Soviet spy
Dean Acheson, Truman’s Sec’y of State, said: “I do not intend to turn my back on Alger
Hiss.”

4. One would be hard pressed to find any request by Joseph Stalin that did not find a willing response from FDR, from Lend-Lease to the direction of Allied military operations, and refusal to accept the surrender of Germany.

Just maybe, the Kravchenko case might be one time FDR hesitated to fulfill Stalin's commands.....

Roosevelt regularly lied to the American public about Russia having the same values as the United States, and censored any news to the contrary. Victor Kravchenko told the truth about Stalin's Russia.

a. Victor Kravchenko was one of the first and most influential Soviet defectors to the United States, who had written "I Chose Freedom," a searing account of life under Stalin, denouncing the Stalin regime for failure to grant political and civil liberties to the Russian people.
"The Anti-Communist Manifestos: Four Books That Shaped the Cold War," John Fleming, p. 182-183

b. Kravchenko wanted to shatter those illusions. His defection was front-page news and prompted debate at the highest levels of government, up to and including President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Stalin demanded that he be turned over as a traitor--an automatic death sentence.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover urged FDR to let him stay.
On April 13, 1945, the day after Roosevelt died, Kravchenko received notice that his application for asylum had been granted.
Searching for Tato - LA Times



Perhaps Roosevelt was ambivalent about sending Kravchenko back to the tender mercies of Uncle Joe, as Kravchenko was head-line news throughout the nation....and only after Roosevelt's death did Kravchenko receive notice of asylum.


Had Roosevelt lived.....who knows....

Some on the left are glad, the right had to practice their Communism, in Cuba.

Welcome to the board.

Perhaps you might take a moment to flesh out your post with some detail.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

Damn that Bush and his association with the porn industry in the USA, I bet he has been a pinko commie since Harvard, or maybe Yale...

So....you can't find any way to deny that the aims of the communist party are essentially those of the Democrat Party?

Excellent.

 

[danielpalos]

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

Damn that Bush and his association with the porn industry in the USA, I bet he has been a pinko commie since Harvard, or maybe Yale...

So....you can't find any way to deny that the aims of the communist party are essentially those of the Democrat Party?

Excellent.

It seems the right has more actual practice with Communism, in Cuba.

 

[Ava]

From the innocent looking paper boy to the corner grocer, it now sounds like most of the country is communist, and if so, how could people not meet them. They are all over. If America would only pass a law forcing those suspected of communism to wear a symbol on their clothing how much safer we would be.

According to PoliticalChic and her subaltern CrusaderFrank such a symbol isn't necessary. All Democrats, all progressives, all liberals, all gays/lesbians, all non Christian, in fact all American citizens who do not subscribe to the far right ideology those on the Crazy New Right hold dear, are Communists.

Dude, what else can we say when there's no difference between the ideas you spew here daily and those embraced by CPUSA?

And what are those ideas that I spew daily that are communistic?

You may be spewing Communism if you believe that mankind is altering the Climate

You may be spewing Communism if you believe we can correct "income inequality" Hell, if you even believe that "Income inequality" is a "Problem" to be "Solved"

How about if you take a university class on communism? Would that be a kiss of death?

Pick one and see where you stand:

Comparing Economic Systems
[img src="http://www.ushistory.org/gov/images/00019393.jpg" alt="Karl Marx, co-author of the " border="0" height="199" width="250">

Karl Marx, German philosopher, economist, and revolutionary, laid the ideological groundwork for modern socialism and communism.

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels turned the world upside down.

Until the publication of their 1848 Communist Manifesto, much of the western world followed a course where individuals owned private property, business enterprises, and the profits that resulted from wise investments. Marx and Engels pointed out the uneven distribution of wealth in the capitalist world and predicted a worldwide popular uprising to distribute wealth evenly. Ever since, nations have wrestled with which direction to turn their economies.

Capitalism

• Capitalism is based on private ownership of the means of production and on individual economic freedom. Most of the means of production, such as factories and businesses, are owned by private individuals and not by the government. Private owners make decisions about what and when to produce and how much products should cost. Other characteristics of capitalism include the following:
• Free competition. The basic rule of capitalism is that people should compete freely without interference from government or any other outside force. Capitalism assumes that the most deserving person will usually win. In theory, prices will be kept as low as possible because consumers will seek the best product for the least amount of money.
  
  
  
  Image from Capitalism Magazine (Capitalism Magazine - Laissez-Faire Capitalism is the Unknown Ideal Used with permission.
• The antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft is one way that the government has tried to promote competition. Supporters of Microsoft say that forcing Microsoft to allow companies to bundle arch-rival Netscape's web browser with Microsoft Windows is not unlike making Coca-Cola include a can of Pepsi in each six-pack it sells.
• Supply and demand. In a capitalist system prices are determined by how many products there are and how many people want them. When supplies increase, prices tend to drop. If prices drop, demand usually increases until supplies run out. Then prices will rise once more, but only as long as demand is high. These laws of supply and demand work in a cycle to control prices and keep them from getting too high or too low.

Communism
Karl Marx, the 19th century father of communism, was outraged by the growing gap between rich and poor. He saw capitalism as an outmoded economic system that exploited workers, which would eventually rise against the rich because the poor were so unfairly treated. Marx thought that the economic system of communism would replace capitalism. Communism is based on principles meant to correct the problems caused by capitalism.

The most important principle of communism is that no private ownership of property should be allowed. Marx believed that private ownership encouraged greed and motivated people to knock out the competition, no matter what the consequences. Property should be shared, and the people should ultimately control the economy. The government should exercise the control in the name of the people, at least in the transition between capitalism and communism. The goals are to eliminate the gap between the rich and poor and bring about economic equality.

Socialism
Socialism, like communism, calls for putting the major means of production in the hands of the people, either directly or through the government. Socialism also believes that wealth and income should be shared more equally among people. Socialists differ from communists in that they do not believe that the workers will overthrow capitalists suddenly and violently. Nor do they believe that all private property should be eliminated. Their main goal is to narrow, not totally eliminate, the gap between the rich and the poor. The government, they say, has a responsibility to redistribute wealth to make society more fair and just.

There is no purely capitalist or communist economy in the world today. The capitalist United States has a Social Security system and a government-owned postal service. Communist China now allows its citizens to keep some of the profits they earn. These categories are models designed to shed greater light on differing economic systems.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

Damn that Bush and his association with the porn industry in the USA, I bet he has been a pinko commie since Harvard, or maybe Yale...

So....you can't find any way to deny that the aims of the communist party are essentially those of the Democrat Party?

Excellent.

It seems the right has more actual practice with Communism, in Cuba.

Still no details?

So....basically you're simply another Liberal/Progressive/Democrat drone?



It's after 10 am....isn't it time for you to go get your head re-filled?

 

[Moonglow]

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

Damn that Bush and his association with the porn industry in the USA, I bet he has been a pinko commie since Harvard, or maybe Yale...

So....you can't find any way to deny that the aims of the communist party are essentially those of the Democrat Party?

Excellent.

But Bush was a repub and yet allowed porn to flourish and become mainstream in the US....

 

[Moonglow]

Please elaborate on Govt. controlled media stations that put out false propaganda..or are controlled by one party..