Democrats threaten Catholic Church for denying Biden Communion

[Penelope]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Did the Catholic church deny communion to the Nazis for their National Socialist genocide? I don't think so. That is why they did not come out publicly against the Holocaust. They knew that their church would be burned to the ground and all of them shot.

But facing all of the Left wing governments in the world, I think they have similar concerns with the far Left over coming out against yet another Left wing Holocaust of abortion.

My guess is that they will cave like they did in the 1940s.

The Catholic Church was largely persecuted in Nazi Germany.

Perhaps they didn’t do enough at the beginning. So they should make the same mistake with the Biden Regime? When people and institutions stand up to authoritarian governments, shouldn’t it be applauded?

If only they stood up to tramp, but the evangelical you know who they are, all political.

 

[hadit]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Do you blame them.

I was never asked my name when I received the host. For all they care I could of been a serial killer that tortured many children before I killed them.

Maybe they should have. The priest who took your confession could have told them to deny you until you did penance. In this case, however, Quid Pro is a well known person who deliberately and steadfastly refuses to follow Church doctrine and has voted for and supported legislation that the Church disagrees with. There is no good reason why he should be allowed to participate.

I disagree, it a civil issue and like I said everyone knows him, me no one knows me.

That is the point, everyone knows him and knows that he does not abide by the Church's precepts. Therefore there is no reason why they should allow him to participate. Would Planned Parenthood allow Cindy Hyde-Smith, for example, to work at an abortion mill or sit in on board meetings? They would allow an anonymous pro-lifer who disagreed with them but not enough to refuse a paycheck.

IOW, with great privilege and fame come great responsibility. Quid Pro simply can't get away with things that an anonymous person can get away with. OTOH, he's been living in the lap of luxury and exercising great power over the lives of Americans for decades. I see no reason why an organization should allow someone to participate in activities with them who vehemently disagrees with a central tenet of the group.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Do you blame them.

I was never asked my name when I received the host. For all they care I could of been a serial killer that tortured many children before I killed them.

Maybe they should have. The priest who took your confession could have told them to deny you until you did penance. In this case, however, Quid Pro is a well known person who deliberately and steadfastly refuses to follow Church doctrine and has voted for and supported legislation that the Church disagrees with. There is no good reason why he should be allowed to participate.

I disagree, it a civil issue and like I said everyone knows him, me no one knows me.

That is the point, everyone knows him and knows that he does not abide by the Church's precepts. Therefore there is no reason why they should allow him to participate. Would Planned Parenthood allow Cindy Hyde-Smith, for example, to work at an abortion mill or sit in on board meetings? They would allow an anonymous pro-lifer who disagreed with them but not enough to refuse a paycheck.

IOW, with great privilege and fame come great responsibility. Quid Pro simply can't get away with things that an anonymous person can get away with. OTOH, he's been living in the lap of luxury and exercising great power over the lives of Americans for decades. I see no reason why an organization should allow someone to participate in activities with them who vehemently disagrees with a central tenet of the group.

Actually Pedo Joe is the perfect Catholic by left definition....he likes the little ones.

Ooof

 

[theHawk]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Did the Catholic church deny communion to the Nazis for their National Socialist genocide? I don't think so. That is why they did not come out publicly against the Holocaust. They knew that their church would be burned to the ground and all of them shot.

But facing all of the Left wing governments in the world, I think they have similar concerns with the far Left over coming out against yet another Left wing Holocaust of abortion.

My guess is that they will cave like they did in the 1940s.

The Catholic Church was largely persecuted in Nazi Germany.

Perhaps they didn’t do enough at the beginning. So they should make the same mistake with the Biden Regime? When people and institutions stand up to authoritarian governments, shouldn’t it be applauded?

If only they stood up to tramp, but the evangelical you know who they are, all political.

Stand up to “tramp”?
Stand up to what?

 

[Penelope]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Did the Catholic church deny communion to the Nazis for their National Socialist genocide? I don't think so. That is why they did not come out publicly against the Holocaust. They knew that their church would be burned to the ground and all of them shot.

But facing all of the Left wing governments in the world, I think they have similar concerns with the far Left over coming out against yet another Left wing Holocaust of abortion.

My guess is that they will cave like they did in the 1940s.

The Catholic Church was largely persecuted in Nazi Germany.

Perhaps they didn’t do enough at the beginning. So they should make the same mistake with the Biden Regime? When people and institutions stand up to authoritarian governments, shouldn’t it be applauded?

If only they stood up to tramp, but the evangelical you know who they are, all political.

Stand up to “tramp”?
Stand up to what?

His fakeness of Christianity and his AG. They were both pro the death sentence.

 

[Penelope]

Biden isn't too worried about it, it will never happen.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Did the Catholic church deny communion to the Nazis for their National Socialist genocide? I don't think so. That is why they did not come out publicly against the Holocaust. They knew that their church would be burned to the ground and all of them shot.

But facing all of the Left wing governments in the world, I think they have similar concerns with the far Left over coming out against yet another Left wing Holocaust of abortion.

My guess is that they will cave like they did in the 1940s.

The Catholic Church was largely persecuted in Nazi Germany.

Perhaps they didn’t do enough at the beginning. So they should make the same mistake with the Biden Regime? When people and institutions stand up to authoritarian governments, shouldn’t it be applauded?

If only they stood up to tramp, but the evangelical you know who they are, all political.

Stand up to “tramp”?
Stand up to what?

His fakeness of religion and his AG.

What you really know about religion would fit in a thimble

 

[BS Filter]

They should be stripped of that anyway. The church as an entity.
I believe orgs like Catholic Charities and the Sisters of Mercy will be OK.

Legally separating them from Bishop's oversight might be a positive. They could still have charitable status.

I'd prefer it if religious organizations did not offer "official" pronouncements on political issues. If an individual bishop wants to run his (and read his) diocese the way he sees fit, so be it.

Abortion isn't a political issue. The church has had prohibitions against murder since the time of Christ. Other religions have had it for much longer.

abortion is a political issue, it should fall under civil rights.

What about the rights of the child?

 

[Wyatt earp]

They should be stripped of that anyway. The church as an entity.
I believe orgs like Catholic Charities and the Sisters of Mercy will be OK.

Can't tax religion, it's unconstitutional. It violates the First Amendment, sorry.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

Hypothetically? It would pose an undue burden on new religions, favoring established well off denominations of Protestantism, Judaism, and Catholicism .. . . which would, by default, amount to the state sanctioning those as establishment religions.

Taxing religion interferes with the "free exercise thereof." Sorry godless atheist. . . YOU ARE SHIT OUT OF LUCK.

Wow, you have that backwards!

The tax laws exempt religions from paying taxes. Therefore, the tax law is a law which 'Respects establishments of Religions'. The exemption should be removed from the tax laws, then religious organizations would have to pay taxes like everyone else.

Making religious organizations pay taxes would in no way prohibit the free exercise of that religion.

Sorry, voodoo man, your argument is BULLSHIT!!!

It violates the separation of church and state

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

They should be stripped of that anyway. The church as an entity.
I believe orgs like Catholic Charities and the Sisters of Mercy will be OK.

Legally separating them from Bishop's oversight might be a positive. They could still have charitable status.

I'd prefer it if religious organizations did not offer "official" pronouncements on political issues. If an individual bishop wants to run his (and read his) diocese the way he sees fit, so be it.

Abortion isn't a political issue. The church has had prohibitions against murder since the time of Christ. Other religions have had it for much longer.

abortion is a political issue, it should fall under civil rights.

What about the rights of the child?

At the moment of conception, it's not a child. It's a zygote.
And as always, I find your concern for the "child" to be amusing.
Because we both know if it's carried to term, once that child falls out of the mother, you won't
give two hoots about what happens to it. Take away its healthcare, take away
the mother's access to to any services like foodstamps or other programs if needed,
and defund the child's access to public education.

Sure. The child has rights. But first, we're gonna put our boot on the mother to shove her into a ditch
while she gives birth, then we're gonna let the kid climb out of that ditch on its own.

 

[Richard-H]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Do you blame them.

I was never asked my name when I received the host. For all they care I could of been a serial killer that tortured many children before I killed them.

Maybe they should have. The priest who took your confession could have told them to deny you until you did penance. In this case, however, Quid Pro is a well known person who deliberately and steadfastly refuses to follow Church doctrine and has voted for and supported legislation that the Church disagrees with. There is no good reason why he should be allowed to participate.

Give unto Ceaser what is Ceaser, and

They should be stripped of that anyway. The church as an entity.
I believe orgs like Catholic Charities and the Sisters of Mercy will be OK.

Can't tax religion, it's unconstitutional. It violates the First Amendment, sorry.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

Hypothetically? It would pose an undue burden on new religions, favoring established well off denominations of Protestantism, Judaism, and Catholicism .. . . which would, by default, amount to the state sanctioning those as establishment religions.

Taxing religion interferes with the "free exercise thereof." Sorry godless atheist. . . YOU ARE SHIT OUT OF LUCK.

Wow, you have that backwards!

The tax laws exempt religions from paying taxes. Therefore, the tax law is a law which 'Respects establishments of Religions'. The exemption should be removed from the tax laws, then religious organizations would have to pay taxes like everyone else.

Making religious organizations pay taxes would in no way prohibit the free exercise of that religion.

Sorry, voodoo man, your argument is BULLSHIT!!!

It violates the separation of church and state

Where in the Constitution does it specifically say that there is a separation of Church and State?

That's a principal, not a law.

The Constitution says: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of Religion".

The Tax code is a law that respects establishments of religion. It violates the first amendment.

 

[Wyatt earp]

They should be stripped of that anyway. The church as an entity.
I believe orgs like Catholic Charities and the Sisters of Mercy will be OK.

Legally separating them from Bishop's oversight might be a positive. They could still have charitable status.

I'd prefer it if religious organizations did not offer "official" pronouncements on political issues. If an individual bishop wants to run his (and read his) diocese the way he sees fit, so be it.

Abortion isn't a political issue. The church has had prohibitions against murder since the time of Christ. Other religions have had it for much longer.

abortion is a political issue, it should fall under civil rights.

What about the rights of the child?

At the moment of conception, it's not a child. It's a zygote.
And as always, I find your concern for the "child" to be amusing.
Because we both know if it's carried to term, once that child falls out of the mother, you won't
give two hoots about what happens to it. Take away its healthcare, take away
the mother's access to to any services like foodstamps or other programs if needed,
and defund the child's access to public education.

Sure. The child has rights. But first, we're gonna put our boot on the mother to shove her into a ditch
while she gives birth, then we're gonna let the kid climb out of that ditch on its own.

Why would the child be our responsibility?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Do you blame them.

I was never asked my name when I received the host. For all they care I could of been a serial killer that tortured many children before I killed them.

Maybe they should have. The priest who took your confession could have told them to deny you until you did penance. In this case, however, Quid Pro is a well known person who deliberately and steadfastly refuses to follow Church doctrine and has voted for and supported legislation that the Church disagrees with. There is no good reason why he should be allowed to participate.

Give unto Ceaser what is Ceaser, and

They should be stripped of that anyway. The church as an entity.
I believe orgs like Catholic Charities and the Sisters of Mercy will be OK.

Can't tax religion, it's unconstitutional. It violates the First Amendment, sorry.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

Hypothetically? It would pose an undue burden on new religions, favoring established well off denominations of Protestantism, Judaism, and Catholicism .. . . which would, by default, amount to the state sanctioning those as establishment religions.

Taxing religion interferes with the "free exercise thereof." Sorry godless atheist. . . YOU ARE SHIT OUT OF LUCK.

Wow, you have that backwards!

The tax laws exempt religions from paying taxes. Therefore, the tax law is a law which 'Respects establishments of Religions'. The exemption should be removed from the tax laws, then religious organizations would have to pay taxes like everyone else.

Making religious organizations pay taxes would in no way prohibit the free exercise of that religion.

Sorry, voodoo man, your argument is BULLSHIT!!!

It violates the separation of church and state

Where in the Constitution does it specifically say that there is a separation of Church and State?

That's a principal, not a law.

The Constitution says: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of Religion".

The Tax code is a law that respects establishments of religion. It violates the first amendment.

It's a precedent the supreme Court ruled on it many times

 

[Magnus]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Do you blame them.

I was never asked my name when I received the host. For all they care I could of been a serial killer that tortured many children before I killed them.

Maybe they should have. The priest who took your confession could have told them to deny you until you did penance. In this case, however, Quid Pro is a well known person who deliberately and steadfastly refuses to follow Church doctrine and has voted for and supported legislation that the Church disagrees with. There is no good reason why he should be allowed to participate.

I disagree, it a civil issue and like I said everyone knows him, me no one knows me.

That is the point, everyone knows him and knows that he does not abide by the Church's precepts. Therefore there is no reason why they should allow him to participate. Would Planned Parenthood allow Cindy Hyde-Smith, for example, to work at an abortion mill or sit in on board meetings? They would allow an anonymous pro-lifer who disagreed with them but not enough to refuse a paycheck.

IOW, with great privilege and fame come great responsibility. Quid Pro simply can't get away with things that an anonymous person can get away with. OTOH, he's been living in the lap of luxury and exercising great power over the lives of Americans for decades. I see no reason why an organization should allow someone to participate in activities with them who vehemently disagrees with a central tenet of the group.

Actually Pedo Joe is the perfect Catholic by left definition....he likes the little ones.

Ooof

Talking about pedos...when did your orange douche-bag stop molesting his daughter?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

They should be stripped of that anyway. The church as an entity.
I believe orgs like Catholic Charities and the Sisters of Mercy will be OK.

Legally separating them from Bishop's oversight might be a positive. They could still have charitable status.

I'd prefer it if religious organizations did not offer "official" pronouncements on political issues. If an individual bishop wants to run his (and read his) diocese the way he sees fit, so be it.

Abortion isn't a political issue. The church has had prohibitions against murder since the time of Christ. Other religions have had it for much longer.

abortion is a political issue, it should fall under civil rights.

What about the rights of the child?

At the moment of conception, it's not a child. It's a zygote.
And as always, I find your concern for the "child" to be amusing.
Because we both know if it's carried to term, once that child falls out of the mother, you won't
give two hoots about what happens to it. Take away its healthcare, take away
the mother's access to to any services like foodstamps or other programs if needed,
and defund the child's access to public education.

Sure. The child has rights. But first, we're gonna put our boot on the mother to shove her into a ditch
while she gives birth, then we're gonna let the kid climb out of that ditch on its own.

Why would the child be our responsibility?

Why would the mother's right to seek an abortion be any of your concern? Why do you feel the need to control her right to it?
You just asked "What about the rights of the child". Well, at the moment of conception..it isn't a child.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Separation of Church and State?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Do you blame them.

I was never asked my name when I received the host. For all they care I could of been a serial killer that tortured many children before I killed them.

Maybe they should have. The priest who took your confession could have told them to deny you until you did penance. In this case, however, Quid Pro is a well known person who deliberately and steadfastly refuses to follow Church doctrine and has voted for and supported legislation that the Church disagrees with. There is no good reason why he should be allowed to participate.

I disagree, it a civil issue and like I said everyone knows him, me no one knows me.

That is the point, everyone knows him and knows that he does not abide by the Church's precepts. Therefore there is no reason why they should allow him to participate. Would Planned Parenthood allow Cindy Hyde-Smith, for example, to work at an abortion mill or sit in on board meetings? They would allow an anonymous pro-lifer who disagreed with them but not enough to refuse a paycheck.

IOW, with great privilege and fame come great responsibility. Quid Pro simply can't get away with things that an anonymous person can get away with. OTOH, he's been living in the lap of luxury and exercising great power over the lives of Americans for decades. I see no reason why an organization should allow someone to participate in activities with them who vehemently disagrees with a central tenet of the group.

Actually Pedo Joe is the perfect Catholic by left definition....he likes the little ones.

Ooof

Talking about pedos...when did your orange douche-bag stop molesting his daughter?

Provide proof he did, shitstain. if not sit the fuck down.

Listen, Chump.....now you're just being ridiculous

 

[JustAGuy1]

Democrats to declare war on the Catholic Church for following their own doctrine and holding politicians accountable for their public policies.

That’s sure to go over well with Hispanic voters.

House Democrat Suggests Stripping Catholic Church Of Tax-Exempt Status If Biden Denied Communion | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Did the Catholic church deny communion to the Nazis for their National Socialist genocide? I don't think so. That is why they did not come out publicly against the Holocaust. They knew that their church would be burned to the ground and all of them shot.

But facing all of the Left wing governments in the world, I think they have similar concerns with the far Left over coming out against yet another Left wing Holocaust of abortion.

My guess is that they will cave like they did in the 1940s.

Forget about the Catholic church and the Nazis...how about the Catholic church and its own priests who were guilty of child molestations?

In practically every country that has the Catholic church, there were priests who were known to the hierarchy of being guilty of molesting children. And what was their punishment? Most of them were quietly transferred to another parish to continue their molestations. Hardly any were punished.

And this is the entity that is now sitting on judgment over Catholic Democrats? Talk about hypocrisy. And the church wonders why people are leaving in droves.

Public educators are far more likely to molest children.

But silence from the all to holy left.

Do you have any proof that the Left covers up public educators molesting of kids or are you just talking out of the you-know-what?

I never said anyone covered it up. I stated a fact. I'll remind you the Church abuse was perpetuated by homosexuals hiding within the Church.

Explan this....

Sexual harassment in education in the United States - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

What is it you want me to explain? My initial point was that the Catholic church has a history of covering up children molestations of the clergy and yet, they have the gall to sit to deny holy communion for elected officials who are doing their sworn duty. You jumped in with the claim that the left is silent on child molestations from public educators.

When I challenge you to prove it, you put a link from wiki that proves no such thing. So, what is it you want me to explain?

Listen up you leftist fuckwit I've posted I was livid at the cover-up, still am but don't you for one moment think it's a Catholic Church issue...it's an issue across-the-board.

Own your own fucking side then you'll have standing

LOL. Another moron who gets hysterical when challenged to prove her wild accusations.

My bad for giving you credit and responding to your nonsense. Now, get lost.

I'm not hysterical you dumb downed left loon

You came, I saw your ignorance on the topic.

Now you get lost Minuscule. Cripes you loons are fucking stupid... it's why you're losers

By the way I provided a link...you just blabbered....and ya know what? Stay away from children

Tone down the hysterics, moron. That may impress the wing-nuts you hang out with but here it is just tiresome,

Next time, think before posting. Because I will challenge you and no fake hysterical outbursts are going to scare me. Get it? Now get lost, punk. Don't waste my time.

Go fuck yourself. I'm weary of you left loons trying to mouth off and trying to be condescending without one of iota of proof? Do your own research and cease relying on the MS

Understand that asshole. Understand? You're nothing, learn it then live it. Got it?

LOL. Poor trumpturd. Tried to pass off a link and got caught. Keep getting hysterical. Still does not change the fact that you got called out.

I never got caught, you just blabbered.

You're worthless and weak. Go talk to "dick" about gay priests....you seem infactuated over them.....why? Lol

Actually, you are the one here defending molesting kids. Looks like I rattled some skeletons in your closet. Go get help, child molester. Your kind makes me sick.

No I'm stupid fuck. Now you're just being ridiculous trying to save yourself

Minuscule retreats trying to think of some different angle.

This is fun

Yes, you are a stupid fuck. Thanks for acknowledging. You also seem to be a child molester. Once again, get help.

Fairly big no no chump.

 

[Wyatt earp]

They should be stripped of that anyway. The church as an entity.
I believe orgs like Catholic Charities and the Sisters of Mercy will be OK.

Legally separating them from Bishop's oversight might be a positive. They could still have charitable status.

I'd prefer it if religious organizations did not offer "official" pronouncements on political issues. If an individual bishop wants to run his (and read his) diocese the way he sees fit, so be it.

Abortion isn't a political issue. The church has had prohibitions against murder since the time of Christ. Other religions have had it for much longer.

abortion is a political issue, it should fall under civil rights.

What about the rights of the child?

At the moment of conception, it's not a child. It's a zygote.
And as always, I find your concern for the "child" to be amusing.
Because we both know if it's carried to term, once that child falls out of the mother, you won't
give two hoots about what happens to it. Take away its healthcare, take away
the mother's access to to any services like foodstamps or other programs if needed,
and defund the child's access to public education.

Sure. The child has rights. But first, we're gonna put our boot on the mother to shove her into a ditch
while she gives birth, then we're gonna let the kid climb out of that ditch on its own.

Why would the child be our responsibility?

Why would the mother's right to seek an abortion be any of your concern? Why do you feel the need to control her right to it?
You just asked "What about the rights of the child". Well, at the moment of conception..it isn't a child.

Murder is murder

 

[mdk]

Yeah, if we could stop accusing members of the forum of pedophilia in this thread that would be just dandy. Please get on topic and cut the nonsense.