Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If congress has the votes, they can charge the president with abuse of power for getting to eat two scoops of ice cream when everyone else only got one scoop in an impeachment trial. That is a fact Jacklyn!You can't charge a President with Obstruction of Justice or Obstruction of an Official Investigation while the President is seated.....
BUT YOU CAN charge them with Obstruction of Justice or Abuse of Power in an Impeachment and impeachment trial..... that's a FACT, JACK!
Good fucking luck with that LIB wet dream.Rather than having to make all the board members read law books, just impeach Trump.
If any president qualifies for impeachment and removal it is Trump. Why do we tolerate such a president, when we don't have to? If America lasts until the next election we have to elect those Congressmen that will vote impeach and removal.
Dershowitz: ‘You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction for Exercising His Constitutional Power’
Please quote from the Constitution where it authorizes a president to obstruct justice and break the law.
I'm charging Trump with "STUPID" in his decision in Israel that the world condemns AND ot how stupid was he in not listening to Obama about not taking Flynn on?You can't charge a President with Obstruction of Justice or Obstruction of an Official Investigation while the President is seated.....
BUT YOU CAN charge them with Obstruction of Justice or Abuse of Power in an Impeachment and impeachment trial..... that's a FACT, JACK!
Again for the TRULY SLOW AND STUPID, a President has sole and absolute power to fire ANY appointee for ANY reason and there is not a single instance of that not being true Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anybody.
He does not, as he can be punished for doing it as part of a crime. That's a fact.
And Dershowitz wasn't referring to firing Comey, but rather to Trump giving his opinion of the investigation to Comey and exerting influence upon it.
That's like saying it's illegal to eat a hamburger if you do it "as part of a crime." Eating hamburgers is legal, whether you do it while robbing a bank or having lunch with your kids. Firing Comey was entirely legal, and there was no crime involved.
I know you're not bright enough or sane enough to understand this, you hack... but there are a lot of laws where whether something is legal or not turns on intent.
employment law says you can be fired for any reason or no reason at all, but not for an illegal reason.
now be quiet since you have no clue about these things
Speaking of hacks, what you can't seem to comprehend is that intent only matters when someone has broken a law. Firing Comey doesn't break any laws, so intent is irrelevant. My intent when eating a hamburger doesn't matter because it's inherently legal. It only matters if I do something illegal, like running you over with my car.
I just love all these legal beagels who don't know jack shit about the most basic legal facts.
Dershowitz: ‘You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction for Exercising His Constitutional Power’
Please quote from the Constitution where it authorizes a president to obstruct justice and break the law.
Article II, Section III
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
Again for the TRULY SLOW AND STUPID, a President has sole and absolute power to fire ANY appointee for ANY reason and there is not a single instance of that not being true Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anybody.
He does not, as he can be punished for doing it as part of a crime. That's a fact.
And Dershowitz wasn't referring to firing Comey, but rather to Trump giving his opinion of the investigation to Comey and exerting influence upon it.
That's like saying it's illegal to eat a hamburger if you do it "as part of a crime." Eating hamburgers is legal, whether you do it while robbing a bank or having lunch with your kids. Firing Comey was entirely legal, and there was no crime involved.
I know you're not bright enough or sane enough to understand this, you hack... but there are a lot of laws where whether something is legal or not turns on intent.
employment law says you can be fired for any reason or no reason at all, but not for an illegal reason.
now be quiet since you have no clue about these things
Speaking of hacks, what you can't seem to comprehend is that intent only matters when someone has broken a law. Firing Comey doesn't break any laws, so intent is irrelevant. My intent when eating a hamburger doesn't matter because it's inherently legal. It only matters if I do something illegal, like running you over with my car.
I just love all these legal beagels who don't know jack shit about the most basic legal facts.
Except you don't know what you're talking about.
It is not hackish to point that out to your ignorant ass
The LIBs have been frantically trying to get rid of Trump before Ruth crooks and or Kennedy retires.Remember the last president who tried to impeded an investigation of his administration and it cost him his presidency. The president certainly has the power to shutdown any investigation but he will have to deal with the political fallout.No it isn't Trump can fire an appointee for ANY reason. ANY reason means just that and no Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anyone so don't try that lie.Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.
Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.
But Nixon was. And Trump cannot impede an investigation.
Look fool, you can do all the bellowing you want, but this investigation s is continuing and apparently Mueller has evidence that shows him he can continue. You don't have that information therefore you really have nothing to say.
Actiually, he can impede an investigation conducted by his own justice department. That's one of his functions as the country's chief law enforcement officer
He does not, as he can be punished for doing it as part of a crime. That's a fact.
And Dershowitz wasn't referring to firing Comey, but rather to Trump giving his opinion of the investigation to Comey and exerting influence upon it.
That's like saying it's illegal to eat a hamburger if you do it "as part of a crime." Eating hamburgers is legal, whether you do it while robbing a bank or having lunch with your kids. Firing Comey was entirely legal, and there was no crime involved.
I know you're not bright enough or sane enough to understand this, you hack... but there are a lot of laws where whether something is legal or not turns on intent.
employment law says you can be fired for any reason or no reason at all, but not for an illegal reason.
now be quiet since you have no clue about these things
Speaking of hacks, what you can't seem to comprehend is that intent only matters when someone has broken a law. Firing Comey doesn't break any laws, so intent is irrelevant. My intent when eating a hamburger doesn't matter because it's inherently legal. It only matters if I do something illegal, like running you over with my car.
I just love all these legal beagels who don't know jack shit about the most basic legal facts.
Except you don't know what you're talking about.
It is not hackish to point that out to your ignorant ass
If that were true, you could prove I was wrong, but you can't. You claim to be a lawyer, don't you?
Talk about "hacks."
Name me ONE COUNTRY that "will no longer work with the USA".Policy gets in his way. If he doesn't like someone, he fires them. If he thinks Jerusalem should be the capital of Israel he recognizes it as such. If he feels like pissing off North Korea, he does it. If he feels like saying something that is opposite of what he said last week, he says it. It's that simple. He does what he feels like doing when the urge hits him. If you understand this, you understand Trump and hopefully you understand the problems that poses for the nation. However, Trump's president is not about the nation, it's about Trump.
That may be fine for local consumption. but it's dangerous when the world has to make sense of his illogical behavior. Countries will no longer want to work with the USA, and who can blame them.
This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:
Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.
“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”
Derschowitz has retained at least a modicum of common sense. That's why all the snowflakes in here hate him.Dershowitz is an illustration of how radical lefties of the past seem downright moderate in comparison with today's incoherent crazy and angry democrat party. Dershowitz actually praised President Trump for having the guts to move the capital of Israel to Jerusalem.
The moment Trump murders his wife by all means let us know.And if president killed his wife on the White House lawn with a hundred witnesses, he could shutdown any federal investigation because he's presidentThis is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:
Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.
“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”
he's lost his freaking mind.I rather doubt that would hold up in a Senate impeachment trial. Trump may think he is immune from punishment for his crimes but that's just another one of his delusions.
How the fuck did firing Comey "protect" Trump from being investigated???????Having the power to act does not mean the president can not be held accountable for his actions. If Trump fired Comey because of his poor job performance that is certainly proper but if the reason he fired Comey was to protect himself from criminal charges, that's something quite different.from the articleAgain for the TRULY SLOW AND STUPID, a President has sole and absolute power to fire ANY appointee for ANY reason and there is not a single instance of that not being true Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anybody.
He does not, as he can be punished for doing it as part of a crime. That's a fact.
And Dershowitz wasn't referring to firing Comey, but rather to Trump giving his opinion of the investigation to Comey and exerting influence upon it.Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.
As soon as the articles of impeachment are made public would you mind posting them here? Thanks.You can't charge a President with Obstruction of Justice or Obstruction of an Official Investigation while the President is seated.....
BUT YOU CAN charge them with Obstruction of Justice or Abuse of Power in an Impeachment and impeachment trial..... that's a FACT, JACK!
Now explain how Trump firing Comey "eased" the gorilla on his back.they believe it BECAUSE that is precisely what Trump SAID it would do...it would ease the gorilla on his back...How the fuck would anyone in their right mind imagine that by firing Comey Trump believed that would put an end to any investigation/s?Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.Clinton was impeached for obstructing justice, so now why all of a sudden can't Trump be charged with it?
"..... in Comey’s case, however, becomes legally problematic if it is done with the intent of circumventing an investigation.
“If shown that Trump removed Comey to avoid being investigated? Yes impeachable: abuse of power, corruption, undermines rule of law,” Harvard University law professor Noah Feldman tweeted Friday.
The questions about Trump’s motives are being fueled, increasingly, by his own words in interviews and on Twitter."
Trump’s own words add fuel to questions about the legality of firing Comey
It like claiming someone who is afraid of the cops showing up to arrest him would burn his ID so the cops wouldn't find out who he was.
Some of you have the mental maturity of four year olds.
He said it, TWICE to Lester Holt, and to the Russians he met with in the Oval office less than 24 hours after he fired Comey...
I'm charging Trump with "STUPID" in his decision in Israel that the world condemns AND ot how stupid was he in not listening to Obama about not taking Flynn on?You can't charge a President with Obstruction of Justice or Obstruction of an Official Investigation while the President is seated.....
BUT YOU CAN charge them with Obstruction of Justice or Abuse of Power in an Impeachment and impeachment trial..... that's a FACT, JACK!
Now explain how Trump firing Comey "eased" the gorilla on his back.they believe it BECAUSE that is precisely what Trump SAID it would do...it would ease the gorilla on his back...How the fuck would anyone in their right mind imagine that by firing Comey Trump believed that would put an end to any investigation/s?Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.Clinton was impeached for obstructing justice, so now why all of a sudden can't Trump be charged with it?
"..... in Comey’s case, however, becomes legally problematic if it is done with the intent of circumventing an investigation.
“If shown that Trump removed Comey to avoid being investigated? Yes impeachable: abuse of power, corruption, undermines rule of law,” Harvard University law professor Noah Feldman tweeted Friday.
The questions about Trump’s motives are being fueled, increasingly, by his own words in interviews and on Twitter."
Trump’s own words add fuel to questions about the legality of firing Comey
It like claiming someone who is afraid of the cops showing up to arrest him would burn his ID so the cops wouldn't find out who he was.
Some of you have the mental maturity of four year olds.
He said it, TWICE to Lester Holt, and to the Russians he met with in the Oval office less than 24 hours after he fired Comey...
If anything the gorilla got bigger.
I guess that must mean Trump really IS as stupid as you claim he is right?
