Despite Kavanaugh confirmation, House majority will flip to Democrats

My odd analysis is based on Hillarys predicted landslide and 93% chance of victory.

You are clearly lacking the necessary reason and logic skills for this discussion.

You are dismissed for the fool you are...
Said analysis was not based on bumper stickers.
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
My odd analysis is based on Hillarys predicted landslide and 93% chance of victory.

You are clearly lacking the necessary reason and logic skills for this discussion.

You are dismissed for the fool you are...
Said analysis was not based on bumper stickers.
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
False. The 93% forecast was based on several factors, not only polls.
:dig:

Keep going loser.
By the way, you now switched from bumper stickers to polls.
But previously you said that your scarlet letter hypothesis referred to public displays.
You are better than me at proving you’re confused.
A poll is a display of....wait for it....

PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR A GIVEN CANDIDATE.


It amazes me how stupid some of you people are.

And it is clear that I am indeed better than you, at using my brain.
 
Real Clear Politics shows a lean to the Democrats, but many or most of the polls they rely on are little more than propaganda wings of the Democrat/Socialist Party.

Except when they show Trump over 50%, right?
_________

As I believe I have pointed out to your Dumb-Ass before, Rasmussen was one of the most reliable polls in the 2016 Elections, so I rely on it almost exclusively. It shows Trump with a 51% favorability rating on its last poll. Real Clear Politics relys mostly on OTHER POLLS, as I said.

Reading comprehension is your friend. Embrace it.
Rasmussen predicted a 2% popular vote victory for Hillary Clinton. Are you saying that Donald Trump was full of shit when he said he won the popular vote because illegals voted?
_____________________________

These Pollsters Got The Election Right, According To RCP

"The second most accurate poll according to the report was the national Rasmussen poll of likely voters."
Rasmussen is afraid of making Congress polls though.
________________

And so I only quote him for the Daily Presidential Poll. Probably not afraid; probably doesn't have the funding to do it like it is supposed to be done. I doubt CNN spends much money on their polls---they just sell their politics.

I am trying to discuss respectfully, but you are unresponsive to my points. Are you a turd?

What do you say about my numbers from the Cook Political Poll. Are you running from that?
 
Real Clear Politics shows a lean to the Democrats, but many or most of the polls they rely on are little more than propaganda wings of the Democrat/Socialist Party.

Except when they show Trump over 50%, right?
_________

As I believe I have pointed out to your Dumb-Ass before, Rasmussen was one of the most reliable polls in the 2016 Elections, so I rely on it almost exclusively. It shows Trump with a 51% favorability rating on its last poll. Real Clear Politics relys mostly on OTHER POLLS, as I said.

Reading comprehension is your friend. Embrace it.
Rasmussen predicted a 2% popular vote victory for Hillary Clinton. Are you saying that Donald Trump was full of shit when he said he won the popular vote because illegals voted?
_____________________________

These Pollsters Got The Election Right, According To RCP

"The second most accurate poll according to the report was the national Rasmussen poll of likely voters."
Rasmussen is afraid of making Congress polls though.
Because of the massive party changes going on.

Even the 2 point advantage for Democrats in voting enthusiasm means nothing because of the walkaway movement.

Many Democrats are literally going to vote red across the ballot this November.
 
If they do its because the state courts undid the gerrymandering that the elected reps setup. I'm not sure if gerrymandering is legal or not, or to what degree. Its done all over, so why are some states' districts subject to State Supreme Court demands??

Only the ones in the South and a few big cities. The Democrats enjoy many many race based districts which are drawn so that only blacks can be elected. When hurricanes wiped out Louisiana's population the courts ordered that white areas be consolidated and the districts redrawn to give blacks an extra seat. There is some rule or law or principle that blacks can only be represented by blacks.
Its why you have Sheila Jackson "why cant the mars rover visit the Apollo landing site" Lee and Hank "Guam is going to tip over" Lee.
The Voting Rights Act applies for the most part ONLY to Republican areas.

Nice having the government chose your representatives isnt it?
 
Said analysis was not based on bumper stickers.
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
Said analysis was not based on bumper stickers.
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
False. The 93% forecast was based on several factors, not only polls.
:dig:

Keep going loser.
By the way, you now switched from bumper stickers to polls.
But previously you said that your scarlet letter hypothesis referred to public displays.
You are better than me at proving you’re confused.
A poll is a display of....wait for it....

PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR A GIVEN CANDIDATE.


It amazes me how stupid some of you people are.

And it is clear that I am indeed better than you, at using my brain.
When people respond to polls, their answers are anonymous. Not public. I think being silent is your best choice.
 
Said analysis was not based on bumper stickers.
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
Said analysis was not based on bumper stickers.
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
False. The 93% forecast was based on several factors, not only polls.
:dig:

Keep going loser.
By the way, you now switched from bumper stickers to polls.
But previously you said that your scarlet letter hypothesis referred to public displays.
You are better than me at proving you’re confused.
A poll is a display of....wait for it....

PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR A GIVEN CANDIDATE.


It amazes me how stupid some of you people are.

And it is clear that I am indeed better than you, at using my brain.
And of course, we go back to square one.
If Republicans are afraid of being labeled, why are they responding to Senate polls?
 
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
False. The 93% forecast was based on several factors, not only polls.
:dig:

Keep going loser.
By the way, you now switched from bumper stickers to polls.
But previously you said that your scarlet letter hypothesis referred to public displays.
You are better than me at proving you’re confused.
A poll is a display of....wait for it....

PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR A GIVEN CANDIDATE.


It amazes me how stupid some of you people are.

And it is clear that I am indeed better than you, at using my brain.
When people respond to polls, their answers are anonymous. Not public. I think being silent is your best choice.
You are trying so hard. You're like the little train that could.
 
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
False. The 93% forecast was based on several factors, not only polls.
:dig:

Keep going loser.
By the way, you now switched from bumper stickers to polls.
But previously you said that your scarlet letter hypothesis referred to public displays.
You are better than me at proving you’re confused.
A poll is a display of....wait for it....

PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR A GIVEN CANDIDATE.


It amazes me how stupid some of you people are.

And it is clear that I am indeed better than you, at using my brain.
And of course, we go back to square one.
If Republicans are afraid of being labeled, why are they responding to Senate polls?
You are too stupid to form a decent argument. The GOP is under sampled time after time and why is that? Enthusiasm based on public support. A so called measurable metric that pollsters use to weight their polls. Incorrectly weight them over and over and over.

This conversation can drift all over the place if you like but the fact remains that you have yet to work your way out of the wet paper bag yet and trying to debate me is a futile effort. You are out of your league.

Spin spin spin. I schooled you right from the start
 
The House map favors the Democrats and it's likely they will win it but the way Democrats acted during the Kavanaugh hearings has given the Republicans at least a chance to keep it.
 
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
It was based on POLLS that were faulty stupidfuck. How many times or ways do I have to explain this to you?
False. The 93% forecast was based on several factors, not only polls.
:dig:

Keep going loser.
By the way, you now switched from bumper stickers to polls.
But previously you said that your scarlet letter hypothesis referred to public displays.
You are better than me at proving you’re confused.
A poll is a display of....wait for it....

PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR A GIVEN CANDIDATE.


It amazes me how stupid some of you people are.

And it is clear that I am indeed better than you, at using my brain.
When people respond to polls, their answers are anonymous. Not public. I think being silent is your best choice.
Then be silent.
 
False. The 93% forecast was based on several factors, not only polls.
:dig:

Keep going loser.
By the way, you now switched from bumper stickers to polls.
But previously you said that your scarlet letter hypothesis referred to public displays.
You are better than me at proving you’re confused.
A poll is a display of....wait for it....

PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR A GIVEN CANDIDATE.


It amazes me how stupid some of you people are.

And it is clear that I am indeed better than you, at using my brain.
When people respond to polls, their answers are anonymous. Not public. I think being silent is your best choice.
You are trying so hard. You're like the little train that could.
Couldn’t
 
After watching weeks of the Democrats' ugly, scorched-earth politics of personal destruction against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, fed-up Republican voters may be ready to deliver a chastisement of biblical proportions on election day.

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, for one, seems to think so. GOP May Deliver a Chastisement of Biblical Proportions in November
It is awesome that milquetoast Republicans are becoming optimistic and fired up.

We are going to destroy this so called "blue wave" and destroy the modern Democratic party in the process.

Lindsay Graham even said that he is going to go on the trail and campaign in purple and red districts.
 
False. The 93% forecast was based on several factors, not only polls.
:dig:

Keep going loser.
By the way, you now switched from bumper stickers to polls.
But previously you said that your scarlet letter hypothesis referred to public displays.
You are better than me at proving you’re confused.
A poll is a display of....wait for it....

PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR A GIVEN CANDIDATE.


It amazes me how stupid some of you people are.

And it is clear that I am indeed better than you, at using my brain.
And of course, we go back to square one.
If Republicans are afraid of being labeled, why are they responding to Senate polls?
You are too stupid to form a decent argument. The GOP is under sampled time after time and why is that? Enthusiasm based on public support. A so called measurable metric that pollsters use to weight their polls. Incorrectly weight them over and over and over.

This conversation can drift all over the place if you like but the fact remains that you have yet to work your way out of the wet paper bag yet and trying to debate me is a futile effort. You are out of your league.

Spin spin spin. I schooled you right from the start
Not bumper stickers, and not “over and over”.
 

Forum List

Back
Top