- Thread starter
- #181
No......wrong again...the burden of proof is on the state.You're trying to build a case, all I have to do is break it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No......wrong again...the burden of proof is on the state.You're trying to build a case, all I have to do is break it.
I wasn't asking for the statute just the elements to prevail on the claim. I would have listed them this way:.
1. The crime occurred within my presence or immediate knowledge
AND
2. If the crime is a felony and the perpetrator is attempting to flee then I can chase him to affect the arrest
You do know what the word AND does right?
They have a fantastic defense team....anyone that cannot see that must be as afflicted as ahhmaud was.
Did you even dare to watch defense Attorney Rubin's opening remarks?
The Macs are outstanding citizens and patriots though the media mounted a huge,huge propaganda campaign to demonize them.I'm hoping they get visited by the ghost of Jeffrey Epstein and that he encourages them to do the right thing instead of living out the rest of their existence as worms.
You have little ability to analyze legal matters....you were wrong about Zimmerman and you are wrong about this case.seen all but about the last 5 minutes.
That's why I made that comment.
He's going to end up getting them the death penalty.
and its not even on the table.
You have little ability to analyze legal matters....you were wrong about Zimmerman and you are wrong about this case.
you were wrong about Zimmerman
Do you remember what you said about the Zimmerman case?I was wrong about Zimmerman?
How/when?
Do you remember what you said about the Zimmerman case?
What you are missing is that ahhmaud visited that property at night .......several times....and also in addition and unlike the others he was caught close to Larry English's boat from which thousands of dollars worth of electronic equipment was stolen.I'm listening to the defense attorney in the link you provided.
He keeps saying 'at night'....
Aubrey was shot at 1pm.
mid afternoon.
I have been here much longer than that....though not always active.That was 9 years ago, you've been here less than 18 months.
Remind me, what did I say about the Zimmerman case?
What you are missing is that ahhmaud visited that property at night .......several times....and also in addition and unlike the others he was caught close to Larry English's boat from which thousands of dollars worth of electronic equipment was stolen.
and no proof he was the thief.e was caught close to Larry English's boat from which thousands of dollars worth of electronic equipment was stolen.
I have been here much longer than that....though not always active.
And now they sit accused of murder.They stopped a burglar who happened to be violent.
Essentially that he had no right for self defense.That was 9 years ago, you've been here less than 18 months.
Remind me, what did I say about the Zimmerman case?
I will take the 5th on that.Bud, your ID has only ben active since July 8, 2020.
are you stating you're a sock?
Makes him a suspect.and no proof he was the thief.
The defenseis faced with a tough choice...let them testify?and no proof he was the thief.
Essentially that he had no right for self defense.
Essentially that he had no right for self defense.
They had immediate knowledge and ahhmaud was fleeing.I wasn't asking for the statute just the elements to prevail on the claim. I would have listed them this way:.
1. The crime occurred within my presence or immediate knowledge
AND
2. If the crime is a felony and the perpetrator is attempting to flee then I can chase him to affect the arrest
You do know what the word AND does right?