Did anyone watch the McMichaels trial today?

[Godboy]

Clearly it was, and clearly that was their intention, which is what really matters. Then one of the hillbilly racists jumped out of the truck and pointed a shotgun at him. This is all on video. That's why they are charged with murder. You aren't going to stack turds in just the right configuration to change the facts. So you can stop trying.

Stop saying his path was blocked. Its not true and all it does is waste our time.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Stop saying his path was blocked.

Again, it was. And even if you think it wasn't, that was, of course, their intent. So you can stop wasting your time, now. When even the desperate, false things you are saying are granted to you, yet you are STILL wrong, that should give you some idea of how wrong you are.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

It was for his own protection against a criminal he was following.

What made him a criminal? The fact that he was black and being chased by 3 white racist, rednecks.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Because he was breaking into houses. Also "following" is more accurate, since they never tried to actually grab him.

Give us a police report of the houses he had broken into.

 

[Persuader]

That's a deflection, please answer my question and then I'd be happy to answer yours (but the answer is no)

Why not it is posted on this thread?

Not sure what your question isl?

 

[Winco]

Why, because they dispatched another one of these Negro thugs that attacked them?

Which one is the 'gunman' and which one is the one 'being attacked'?
It's pretty clear.

Bottom Line, Aubrey sucked at disarming a gunman.
Let's not PRETEND that McMichael, the gunman, is innocent.
The gunman is the attacker, clearly McMichael had the gun.
Aubrey tried to disarm his attacker.
It didn't work and Aubrey is dead.
McMichael stalked and attacked him, and those actions have consequences.

 

[SavannahMann]

Stop saying his path was blocked. Its not true and all it does is waste our time.

So you are saying that people who are attacked have a duty to retreat.

 

[B. Kidd]

So you are saying that people who are attacked have a duty to retreat.

G-boy is so off kilter in this equation, he just cannot admit it!

 

[DudleySmith]

My observations.....the Judge seems rather decent....not all that biased.....but he will support the State any chance he gets.

Unable to see the jury thus unable to make any observations there.

I think the prosecutor is ineffective....quite lame in fact.

Great defense team....I think this trial may turn out better than I thought.

1st day of trial wraps up in Ahmaud Arbery murder case after controversy over jury

The murder trial of three white Georgia men charged in the 2020 killing of Ahmaud Arbery is set to begin with opening statements on Friday.

abcnews.go.com

The set up of the courtroom was too small....in fact ridiculous...not enogh room in the jury box for all the jurors.

The technical problems with the videos etc. was constant and pathetic.

The prosecution presented no evidence of anything.......just a unbelievable narrative that even the judge seemed uncomfortable with.

The defense team did a fantastic job of laying out what really transpired that day.

For me now the only question mark is the jury...are they honest and courageous as was the zimmerman jury?

If the jury says not guilty there will be a big problem for the lone black juror....all the thugs will know how she voted....thus one can hardly blame her if she votes guilty.

They don't want the public at large to see this trial, hence the convenient 'technical difficulties'; same with the Rittenhosue trial when the prosecution claimed they couldn't get their videos to work. They want people to get bored and tune out.

 

[DudleySmith]

3 armed men chase down an unarmed man and kill him?

What 'fact' am I missing?

They were on a public road. And, the Darwin Award winning halfwit attacked them, not the other way around.

 

[Coyote]

So you are saying that people who are attacked have a duty to retreat.

Only if they are black.

 

[Coyote]

He wasnt in danger until the moment he tried to forcefully take a shotgun from a stranger. He deserves to be dead for that act.

Is that why McMicheals shouted “stop or I’ll shoot your fucking head off!”…his way of letting Arbery know he “wasn’t in danger”?

 

[Winco]

They were on a public road. And, the Darwin Award winning halfwit attacked them, not the other way around.

Gunman = Attacker.
Gun being pointed at you = Under Attack.
Self Defense = Defending yourself against an Attacker.

Why is this difficult for you to understand.

 

[Godboy]

Again, it was. And even if you think it wasn't, that was, of course, their intent. So you can stop wasting your time, now. When even the desperate, false things you are saying are granted to you, yet you are STILL wrong, that should give you some idea of how wrong you are.

Youre a fucking idiot. Not sure why you are trying to redfine this basic word, but you are 1 dishonest post away from me putting you on ignore permanently.

 

[Godboy]

So you are saying that people who are attacked have a duty to retreat.

Nope.

 

[Godboy]

Is that why McMicheals shouted “stop or I’ll shoot your fucking head off!”…his way of letting Arbery know he “wasn’t in danger”?

You think he should have fired without a warning? Thats a tougher stance than i would take.

 

[Coyote]

You think he should have fired without a warning? Thats a tougher stance than i would take.

Why fire?

 

[B. Kidd]

Why fire?

Why have it in his hands to begin with!!
G-boy is slurping 'the stupid' in this incident.

 

[Muhammed]

Stop saying his path was blocked. Its not true and all it does is waste our time.

Notice that the anti-white racist moronic moonbats in the USMB forum never link to any video of the McMichaels blocking Arbery's path.

I think some of them may not have access to the video of the incident because they are trolls posting from prison.

 

[Godboy]

Why fire?

Um, because a suspected criminal tried to take his shotgun. Why the fuck do you think he shot him?