Did Barr order Mueller to end the investigation?

[Lakhota]

TRUMP ERUPTS: MUELLER ‘SHOULD NOT TESTIFY’

What is Trump afraid of? Facts? Truth?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We don't know. I look forward to Mueller answering that question under oath. What do you think?

Did Barr shutter the Mueller probe?

Yes, I think that he did. I hope he gets asked.

 

[Lakhota]

Why hasn't Barr released it to Congress?

Because by law, he's not allowed to.

What law?

The court ruling that all grand jury hearings remain secret. You can't give information like that to any Congress critter.

Now, cite the historical precedents for courts ruling to release grand jury testimony. There are several. Plus, Barr redacted more than just grand jury testimony. Barr also withheld all of the supporting evidence for the Mueller report.

Supporting evidence like what? If it's redacted, how did you see it?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

 

[Ambivalent1]

Because by law, he's not allowed to.

What law?

The court ruling that all grand jury hearings remain secret. You can't give information like that to any Congress critter.

Now, cite the historical precedents for courts ruling to release grand jury testimony. There are several. Plus, Barr redacted more than just grand jury testimony. Barr also withheld all of the supporting evidence for the Mueller report.

Supporting evidence like what? If it's redacted, how did you see it?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

You people just make shit up as you go, you are seriously mentally ill. Only the Leftwing rags are still trumpeting this crap. Nadler is a kook like you, nothing more. You just keep moving the goalposts every time you don't get your way.

 

[Oddball]

We don't know. I look forward to Mueller answering that question under oath. What do you think?

Did Barr shutter the Mueller probe?

 

[Lakhota]

What law?

The court ruling that all grand jury hearings remain secret. You can't give information like that to any Congress critter.

Now, cite the historical precedents for courts ruling to release grand jury testimony. There are several. Plus, Barr redacted more than just grand jury testimony. Barr also withheld all of the supporting evidence for the Mueller report.

Supporting evidence like what? If it's redacted, how did you see it?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

You people just make shit up as you go, you are seriously mentally ill. Only the Leftwing rags are still trumpeting this crap. Nadler is a kook like you, nothing more. You just keep moving the goalposts every time you don't get your way.

What is made up? What goalposts have been moved? Please cite "credible" sources. The House is simply trying to get information it is entitled to under the Constitution. You know - OVERSIGHT.

Checks And Balances Tested As White House Resists Congressional Oversight

 

[Lakhota]

Some facts to consider:

 

[Oddball]

Some facts to consider:

 

[Ambivalent1]

The court ruling that all grand jury hearings remain secret. You can't give information like that to any Congress critter.

Now, cite the historical precedents for courts ruling to release grand jury testimony. There are several. Plus, Barr redacted more than just grand jury testimony. Barr also withheld all of the supporting evidence for the Mueller report.

Supporting evidence like what? If it's redacted, how did you see it?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

You people just make shit up as you go, you are seriously mentally ill. Only the Leftwing rags are still trumpeting this crap. Nadler is a kook like you, nothing more. You just keep moving the goalposts every time you don't get your way.

What is made up? What goalposts have been moved? Please cite "credible" sources. The House is simply trying to get information it is entitled to under the Constitution. You know - OVERSIGHT.

Checks And Balances Tested As White House Resists Congressional Oversight

OOOPS, no collusion....now we want obstruction....Nadler knows he'll never get to whole report, it would break the law. He's counting on stupid people like you to carry the water to keep it going. Mueller already told you he found no crimes that the Prez had committed.

 

[Lakhota]

Now, cite the historical precedents for courts ruling to release grand jury testimony. There are several. Plus, Barr redacted more than just grand jury testimony. Barr also withheld all of the supporting evidence for the Mueller report.

Supporting evidence like what? If it's redacted, how did you see it?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

You people just make shit up as you go, you are seriously mentally ill. Only the Leftwing rags are still trumpeting this crap. Nadler is a kook like you, nothing more. You just keep moving the goalposts every time you don't get your way.

What is made up? What goalposts have been moved? Please cite "credible" sources. The House is simply trying to get information it is entitled to under the Constitution. You know - OVERSIGHT.

Checks And Balances Tested As White House Resists Congressional Oversight

OOOPS, no collusion....now we want obstruction....Nadler knows he'll never get to whole report, it would break the law. He's counting on stupid people like you to carry the water to keep it going. Mueller already told you he found no crimes that the Prez had committed.

Why would it break the law? There are many precedents for releasing grand jury testimony. What about all the other stuff Barr is withholding?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Because by law, he's not allowed to.

What law?

The court ruling that all grand jury hearings remain secret. You can't give information like that to any Congress critter.

Now, cite the historical precedents for courts ruling to release grand jury testimony. There are several. Plus, Barr redacted more than just grand jury testimony. Barr also withheld all of the supporting evidence for the Mueller report.

Supporting evidence like what? If it's redacted, how did you see it?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

This link is two weeks old. Nothing new with the snowflakes.

 

[Ambivalent1]

Supporting evidence like what? If it's redacted, how did you see it?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

You people just make shit up as you go, you are seriously mentally ill. Only the Leftwing rags are still trumpeting this crap. Nadler is a kook like you, nothing more. You just keep moving the goalposts every time you don't get your way.

What is made up? What goalposts have been moved? Please cite "credible" sources. The House is simply trying to get information it is entitled to under the Constitution. You know - OVERSIGHT.

Checks And Balances Tested As White House Resists Congressional Oversight

OOOPS, no collusion....now we want obstruction....Nadler knows he'll never get to whole report, it would break the law. He's counting on stupid people like you to carry the water to keep it going. Mueller already told you he found no crimes that the Prez had committed.

Why would it break the law? There are many precedents for releasing grand jury testimony. What about all the other stuff Barr is withholding?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

Nope, it's illegal. Grand Jury testimony is protected. Sorry. You don't that Barr is with holding, you're grasping at straws. In his report Mueller said TWICE he fond no crimes committed by rump. Sorry man.

 

[Lakhota]

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

You people just make shit up as you go, you are seriously mentally ill. Only the Leftwing rags are still trumpeting this crap. Nadler is a kook like you, nothing more. You just keep moving the goalposts every time you don't get your way.

What is made up? What goalposts have been moved? Please cite "credible" sources. The House is simply trying to get information it is entitled to under the Constitution. You know - OVERSIGHT.

Checks And Balances Tested As White House Resists Congressional Oversight

OOOPS, no collusion....now we want obstruction....Nadler knows he'll never get to whole report, it would break the law. He's counting on stupid people like you to carry the water to keep it going. Mueller already told you he found no crimes that the Prez had committed.

Why would it break the law? There are many precedents for releasing grand jury testimony. What about all the other stuff Barr is withholding?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

Nope, it's illegal. Grand Jury testimony is protected. Sorry. You don't that Barr is with holding, you're grasping at straws. In his report Mueller said TWICE he fond no crimes committed by rump. Sorry man.

Did Mueller exonerate Trump on obstruction of justice? I must have missed that.

 

[Lakhota]

What law?

The court ruling that all grand jury hearings remain secret. You can't give information like that to any Congress critter.

Now, cite the historical precedents for courts ruling to release grand jury testimony. There are several. Plus, Barr redacted more than just grand jury testimony. Barr also withheld all of the supporting evidence for the Mueller report.

Supporting evidence like what? If it's redacted, how did you see it?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

This link is two weeks old. Nothing new with the snowflakes.

In other words - you have nothing. Thanks for playing.

 

[Ambivalent1]

You people just make shit up as you go, you are seriously mentally ill. Only the Leftwing rags are still trumpeting this crap. Nadler is a kook like you, nothing more. You just keep moving the goalposts every time you don't get your way.

What is made up? What goalposts have been moved? Please cite "credible" sources. The House is simply trying to get information it is entitled to under the Constitution. You know - OVERSIGHT.

Checks And Balances Tested As White House Resists Congressional Oversight

OOOPS, no collusion....now we want obstruction....Nadler knows he'll never get to whole report, it would break the law. He's counting on stupid people like you to carry the water to keep it going. Mueller already told you he found no crimes that the Prez had committed.

Why would it break the law? There are many precedents for releasing grand jury testimony. What about all the other stuff Barr is withholding?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

Nope, it's illegal. Grand Jury testimony is protected. Sorry. You don't that Barr is with holding, you're grasping at straws. In his report Mueller said TWICE he fond no crimes committed by rump. Sorry man.

Did Mueller exonerate Trump on obstruction of justice? I must have missed that.

Did Mueller say he found no crimes committed by the Prez?

 

[Aponi]

We don't know. I look forward to Mueller answering that question under oath. What do you think?

Did Barr shutter the Mueller probe?

I think it will be like going to the bathroom for you.
Every time you look down your disappointed and thats how it will go with mueller answering your question

 

[Ambivalent1]

You people just make shit up as you go, you are seriously mentally ill. Only the Leftwing rags are still trumpeting this crap. Nadler is a kook like you, nothing more. You just keep moving the goalposts every time you don't get your way.

What is made up? What goalposts have been moved? Please cite "credible" sources. The House is simply trying to get information it is entitled to under the Constitution. You know - OVERSIGHT.

Checks And Balances Tested As White House Resists Congressional Oversight

OOOPS, no collusion....now we want obstruction....Nadler knows he'll never get to whole report, it would break the law. He's counting on stupid people like you to carry the water to keep it going. Mueller already told you he found no crimes that the Prez had committed.

Why would it break the law? There are many precedents for releasing grand jury testimony. What about all the other stuff Barr is withholding?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

Mueller found no crimes, his words, not mine.
Nope, it's illegal. Grand Jury testimony is protected. Sorry. You don't that Barr is with holding, you're grasping at straws. In his report Mueller said TWICE he fond no crimes committed by rump. Sorry man.

Did Mueller exonerate Trump on obstruction of justice? I must have missed that.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

TRUMP ERUPTS: MUELLER ‘SHOULD NOT TESTIFY’

What is Trump afraid of? Facts? Truth?

Nothing to be afraid of because both the Muller report and the AG summary are out there. Now the Democrats are going to try and stretch this out for as long as possible, wasting American tax dollars, wasting their time that we are paying for only for the reason of politics.

Democrats don't care about anything but power, and they are scared to death of what Barr might investigate in Spygate, and even more frightened in what he might find. In their desperation, they are going to try something.....anything to stop Trump and Barr from finding the truth behind the dossier, the FISA court application, and who started this and when.

 

[Ambivalent1]

You people just make shit up as you go, you are seriously mentally ill. Only the Leftwing rags are still trumpeting this crap. Nadler is a kook like you, nothing more. You just keep moving the goalposts every time you don't get your way.

What is made up? What goalposts have been moved? Please cite "credible" sources. The House is simply trying to get information it is entitled to under the Constitution. You know - OVERSIGHT.

Checks And Balances Tested As White House Resists Congressional Oversight

OOOPS, no collusion....now we want obstruction....Nadler knows he'll never get to whole report, it would break the law. He's counting on stupid people like you to carry the water to keep it going. Mueller already told you he found no crimes that the Prez had committed.

Why would it break the law? There are many precedents for releasing grand jury testimony. What about all the other stuff Barr is withholding?

It has been WIDELY reported that Barr did not release the supporting evidence. Why do you think Nadler is also subpoenaing the underlying evidence? Those are separate documents from the 448-page Mueller report. In fact, the underlying evidence that Barr withheld may be hundreds or even thousands of pages. Try to keep up.

House Democrats subpoena the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence

Nope, it's illegal. Grand Jury testimony is protected. Sorry. You don't that Barr is with holding, you're grasping at straws. In his report Mueller said TWICE he fond no crimes committed by rump. Sorry man.

Did Mueller exonerate Trump on obstruction of justice? I must have missed that.

No crimes son.
Prosecutor don't "exonerate" people.

"Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him"

 

[Aponi]

We don't know. I look forward to Mueller answering that question under oath. What do you think?

Did Barr shutter the Mueller probe?

Did obama tell clinton to lie about bengazi
Did obama have sex with men in the bath house
Did mueller lie
Did clinton tell her stooges to beat thier phones with a hammer delete her e mails and wipe her server