Did Command Sergeant Major Walz serve during wartime?

Yes, he administratively lost the rank on retirement because he had not completed his courses yet.

He did not get demoted while serving. He did not get demoted for anything dishonorable. He was administratively demoted, upon retirement.
So, he didn't serve in wartime as a CSM, nor was he ever in a combat theater as he claimed multiple times.

That's STOLEN VALOR!
 
He still had time to fulfill the course(s), but he resigned earlier than anticipated.... that's it.

Your lying, is shameful.
The shameful one is you, shitting on the real people who went in to harms way while the chickenshit you are defending, fled instead.
 
He still had time to fulfill the course(s), but he resigned earlier than anticipated.... that's it.

Your lying, is shameful.
Yeah he didn’t fullfill his obligations and was demoted

It’s weird you are agreeing with me but still arguing
 
Correct it was very weird of tampon timmy to pretend he used weapons in a war
It's weird for you to pretend that's what he said when we have video that clearly shows him saying he carried weapons in war, not used weapons in war. Dipshit MAGAt media is either too stupid or too hard of hearing to get the quote right and like a Simp and moron you don't ever question them.
 
It's weird for you to pretend that's what he said when we have video that clearly shows him saying he carried weapons in war, not used weapons in war. Dipshit MAGAt media is either too stupid or too hard of hearing to get the quote right and like a Simp and moron you don't ever question them.
🥨 🥨 🥨

:itsok:
 
“Weapons i used in war…”

Is what tampon timmy said

Your quote is a LIE.

He was talking about the weapons used in war, that he carried when deployed to Vicenza, and the weapons he had trained other soldiers to use. THOSE WEAPONS were designed and meant to kill, lots of the enemy, in war....on the battlefield.
Did Walz shoot Italians?
He didn't say he used it on a battle field, why lie about that...?? He was talking about weapons, that are designed to kill the enemy....of which he has carried and trained others on, that are used in War on the battlefield.

Don't you think you are being petty and ridiculous yet? All for what? To try to harm Walz for political purpose?
 
Last edited:
So supporting war roles don't count, eh? Being deployed in a wartime mission doesn't count eh?

Boy oh boy, you Trumpers, along with your master, have thrown truth, to the ground!
What is a "wartime mission"?
 
Attacks are accusing Walz of feigning a record in active combat: "[Walz] said - and he was making a point about gun control - he said, ‘we shouldn't allow weapons that I used in war, to be on America's streets.' "Well, I wonder (said JD Vance), Tim Walz, when you ever in war?"

Vance has been exposed actually misquoting Walz in one of his screeds.

In the clip Vance was referencing, Walz says that he "carried" weapons in war, not "used." Given that Operation Enduring Freedom was a part of the post-9/11 War on Terror, and that Walz was deployed to Italy under it - and likely had a service weapon - the claim that he is engaging in "stolen valor" holds little water.

Vance spoke on Wednesday as if he served more honorably than Walz, noting that he went to Iraq "I did it, I did what they asked me to do and I did it honorably," he said The senator was deployed for six months in Iraq as a combat correspondent in 2005 as part of the Marines' Public Affairs office. He - like Walz - never engaged in active combat and has stated that he was "lucky to escape any real fighting," during his deployment.
---

View attachment 992096

"Though Walz did achieve the rank of command sergeant major, it was a provisional rank until he completed required coursework for senior leaders, National Guard officials said. He did not do so by the time he departed the military and his retirement rank reverted to master sergeant on May 15, 2005, officials said."

The people-of-the-cult need to stop disrespecting military men and women in order to go after Walz


View attachment 992099
/——/
1723206588243.png
 
Your quote is a LIE.

He was talking about the weapons used in war, that he carried when deployed to Vicenza, and the weapons he had trained other soldiers to use. THOSE WEAPONS were designed and meant to kill, lots of the enemy, in war....on the battlefield.

He didn't say he used it on a battle field, why lie about that...?? He was talking about weapons, that are designed to kill the enemy....of which he has carried and trained others on, that are used in War on the battlefield.

Don't you think you are being petty and ridiculous yet? All for what? To try to harm Walz for political purpose?
He said weapons he used in war….it’s true what he said was a lie.
 

Forum List

Back
Top