Did Obama Watch While They Fought for their Lives?

[American_Jihad]

So...has the question been answered yet?
Did he watch while they fought for their lives?

 

[Obamanation]

haha!!!

 

[Obamanation]

pass the peanuts Joe!

 

[idb]

So which is it...was he sleeping or did he get his mates over and make an event of it?

 

[American_Jihad]

So which is it...was he sleeping or did he get his mates over and make an event of it?

Both, and let your imagination run away, it gets worse...

 

[Claudette]

He sure had no problem jetting off to his fundraiser in Vegas.

I doubt he spared a thought for four dead men. Hey. It was all about his re-election and I think it shows pretty clearly that his priorities certainly weren't in Benghazi.

 

[HUGGY]

The ones who care about this country do care....

You do not speak for all or even most of those that care about our country. The OP has an agenda. It is not better security for our foreign service.

There are hundreds of places on the planet that are dangerous for Westerners. We cannot predict with acurracy when and where trouble will take place. We do not know ..even the state department does not know EVERYTHING that goes on. The CIA and the military and even private enterprise are players all over the globe. This fact complicates stability and safety and even can backfire and cause severe resentment in localities where we have no direct influence or friends.

The OP is a fraud. He knows damned well that Benghazi was more complicated an event than can or should be explained in public.

Believe it or not we still have the need for secrecy in foreign relations.

Piss on the OP and piss on Issa and any elected official that does not have the true best interests of the U S in thier hearts.

Actually, Benghazi isn't that complicated at all. Our people were under attack, our idiot president refused to provide assistance, and now 4 Americans are dead. There were military personnel available to provide assistance during that several hour window when something could have been done, but instead NOTHING was done......and that is obama's calll, not anyone elses. And his administration is just as incompetent as he is, and all of this incompetence is tolerated not only by people such as yourself, but the media and liberals in general. What is a complicating factor is that obama helped to rid the country of a leader that has been willing to work with the US and, instead, put into power a radical islamist who is nothing but a dictator who is going around killing his own people. THAT is a complicating factor, and one your king not only allowed to happen, but actively participated in making it happen. obama refused to engage himself in Benghazi because he basically doesn't give a shit about Americans in general. Anyone who trots off to a fundraiser while 4 Americans are under vicious attack and in danger of being killed does not represent American interests. You are either only fooling yourself or you are deliberately trying to paint obama to be someone that he's not. All of those pretty lies he speaks when he is on camera is all for show.....if you take a step back from your extreme ideology and examine what he has actually accomplished, you wil notice that he has done absolutey nothing positive for the US interests...unless you are from Egypt or Iran or China or Iraq or Afghanistan, in which case he's done some good things for you. I would agree with you that there are some things that are...and should aways remain....classified information. Regardless of what the ACLU or anyone else says, the State dept, WH, and DoD should keep some things secret from everyone......to put everything out there only jepordizes American interests.....but to blindly assume that everything obama says and does is truthful simply because he's the prez and has more details than all the rest of us is not only naive, but a dangerous mentality. Those of us who have knowledge of the military can easily recognize Benghazi for what it is......and for what it isn't. For obama it was a political inconvenience during the election so he allowed people to be killed rather that act like a president should and take charge of a dangerous situation, even if it made his foreign policy look bad. That would have been the right thing to do. Instead, he chose to be the selfish coward that he is and ran away to a fundraiser while pretending he knew nothing about it. Had it not been for the fawning liberal media, his run for prez would have been over in 2 days.

As far as me representing everyone who cares about the US....you must be something of a megalomaniac, because I never said anything about representing "everyone". But the fact is that most people who are Americans DO care how obama represents us and, for the last 4 years, he's done a shitty job of it. As for the OP "having an agenda", I think you speak loud and clear for your agenda......yours is to protect and defend obama no matter what he says or does, even if his actions undermine US interests. That would make you a non-US citizen or someone who lives here but hates the US or a jihadist sympathizer. Either way, there will always be those of us who can see things for what they are and will call obama out on his bullshit......I don't care if that makes you mad or hurts your feelings.

"Actually, Benghazi isn't that complicated at all"

And you know this how?

You know why the Ambassador was in Benghazi instead of safely in Trippoli how?

You are just as full of shit as the OP if you cannot answer those two questions.

 

[Mr. H.]

Nevermind that 3am phone call. Obama can't properly handle a 6pm conference.

 

[MarcATL]

Did Obama Watch While They Fought for their Lives?​

By Karin McQuillan
10/26/12


They fought for their lives for seven hours. 9/11/ 2012. Benghazi. The White House watched. No help was sent and they died.

Four Americans died in the jihadi attack on our consulate in Benghazi. Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, two retired SEALS who were working as civilian security specialists in Benghazi, learned that Ambassador Stevens and nine other people at the consulate were under attack and rushed to their defense. The fourth man was Sean Smith, father of three, an Air Force veteran, working for the State Department in Libya.

The White House, the Pentagon, the State Department, and our military monitored the battle in real time starting with the first phone calls directly from Benghazi.

A small military force from Tripoli was dispatched and was able to rescue some personnel hiding in other buildings. Ambassador Stevens remained missing, as did these three men. The fire-fight raged on.

---

Read more: Articles: Did Obama Watch While They Fought for their Lives?

Why isn't this tripe in the Conspiracy section?

 

[American_Jihad]

Did Obama Watch While They Fought for their Lives?​

By Karin McQuillan
10/26/12


They fought for their lives for seven hours. 9/11/ 2012. Benghazi. The White House watched. No help was sent and they died.

Four Americans died in the jihadi attack on our consulate in Benghazi. Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, two retired SEALS who were working as civilian security specialists in Benghazi, learned that Ambassador Stevens and nine other people at the consulate were under attack and rushed to their defense. The fourth man was Sean Smith, father of three, an Air Force veteran, working for the State Department in Libya.

The White House, the Pentagon, the State Department, and our military monitored the battle in real time starting with the first phone calls directly from Benghazi.

A small military force from Tripoli was dispatched and was able to rescue some personnel hiding in other buildings. Ambassador Stevens remained missing, as did these three men. The fire-fight raged on.

---

Read more: Articles: Did Obama Watch While They Fought for their Lives?

Why isn't this tripe in the Conspiracy section?

Because they don't want to look bad when they have to dig it back out when the IMPEACHMENT hearing start...

 

[American_Jihad]

White House to give senators Benghazi documents

2/23/13

WASHINGTON The White House has agreed to give the Senate Intelligence Committee documents related to the attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, a congressional aide told The Associated Press Friday.


Republicans had demanded the documents as a condition of voting on the nomination of John Brennan to be CIA director.


The documents include emails between top national security officials showing the debate within the administration over how to describe the attack and other documents the committee had been asking for, the aide said. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.


The White House has said it has already turned over more than 10,000 pages of Benghazi-related documents, along with witness interviews, staff briefings and hours of testimony.

...

White House to give senators Benghazi documents - CBS News

 

[American_Jihad]

Media Puzzled by Republican Obsession with Murder of 4 Americans​

February 25, 2013
By Daniel Greenfield

The mainstream media, that kindly reservoir of common sense, overseen by the modern embodiments of Henry Fonda and Jimmy Stewart, is very confused and disconcerted by the Republican obsession with Benghazi.

“McCain’s Benghazi Appetite Is Insatiable” complains The Atlantic. Why can’t Senator McCain have a reasonable Benghazi appetite for the non-optimal bumps in the road along the way to Obama’s Second Coronation?

Time Magazine rolls out a piece titled, “Understanding the GOP’s Benghazi Obsession”. Apparently wanting an investigation into the murder of four Americans, after a cover-up, is an obsession. An insatiable lust for facts.

...

Wait… I thought the Arab Spring was sunshine and roses. But we’re supposed to have a conversation about how the Arab Spring unleashed dangerous new forces without talking about Benghazi?

Can we talk about the lies that were used to manipulate us into supporting the Arab Spring then? No. Guess it’s back to Benghazi.

Media Puzzled by Republican Obsession with Murder of 4 Americans

 

[Mr. H.]

Lots of puzzled Libs here too.

 

[American_Jihad]

Brennan Involved in Manufacturing Rice’s Fake Benghazi Talking Points​

February 28, 2013
By Daniel Greenfield

Reason #41 why John Brennan should be the next CIA Director. He’s already expert at cover-ups. Okay, make that not very expert at cover-ups.

Obama’s pick to head the CIA was involved in crafting controversial talking points about last year’s attack in Benghazi, Republicans said Tuesday after viewing intelligence documents.

Lawmakers had vowed to block John Brennan’s nomination unless they got to see internal communications about how to describe the attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. Several said the email chain of several pages, which they’d been seeking for months, doesn’t change how they plan to vote either way.

“Brennan was involved,” Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chairman Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) said after the briefing. “It’s pretty obvious what happened.”

...

Brennan Involved in Manufacturing Rice?s Fake Benghazi Talking Points

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

never happened

next

 

[Obamanation]

Denial is the first stage of acceptance.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Really crazy thread

 

[American_Jihad]

Really crazy thread

Ya, it got that way when you showed up pante waste...

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Poor sniper kook. Posts a conspiracy thread and then calls others names?

 

[American_Jihad]

Poor sniper kook. Posts a conspiracy thread and then calls others names?

I use the salunski rules 5 & 6...