Did Trump and Stormy Daniels Have Sex?

[candycorn]

Simple question...did they have sex? What is the White House's official position on that one basic question?

I would bet than none of the Trumpanzees (like that term) can answer without the requisite "I don't care", "What does it matter", etc...

Trump doesn't seem to know, Rudy seems to say yes, Sarah Huckabee Sanders is mum on the topic....

Anyone of the Trump supporters want to tackle this?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

I didn't vote for Trump and I seriously don't care.

 

[Sunni Man]

Why should anybody care?? ....

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I didn't vote for Trump and I seriously don't care.

I voted for Trump and I seriously don't care.

Bipartisanship, eh?

 

[Camp]

How many guys were in on 'da pardy? Is Donnie kind of a hidden gay?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Why should anybody care?? ....

Exactly. It happened over a decade ago.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Probably. After all, he WAS a dim back in those days.

 

[MaryL]

Simple question...did they have sex? What is the White House's official position on that one basic question?

I would bet than none of the Trumpanzees (like that term) can answer without the requisite "I don't care", "What does it matter", etc...

Trump doesn't seem to know, Rudy seems to say yes, Sarah Huckabee Sanders is mum on the topic....

Anyone of the Trump supporters want to tackle this?

I voted for Trump, he makes Clinton look like a piker. Slimy bastard, that weasel ...I hate all politicians, can we find a better alternative?

 

[candycorn]

Not really curious about the intercourse part of it...more that the President, his spokesperson, his attorney(s) cannot get on the same page about a simple "yes" or "no" answer....

Are they going to have this same level of confusion on matters that you guys care about or will you just use apathy as your shield and blanket then too?

 

[Correll]

Simple question...did they have sex? What is the White House's official position on that one basic question?

I would bet than none of the Trumpanzees (like that term) can answer without the requisite "I don't care", "What does it matter", etc...

Trump doesn't seem to know, Rudy seems to say yes, Sarah Huckabee Sanders is mum on the topic....

Anyone of the Trump supporters want to tackle this?

I did vote for him, and I don't care.

 

[candycorn]

Why should anybody care?? ....

Exactly. It happened over a decade ago.

No, the answer hasn't happened yet.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Why should anybody care?? ....

mmm .. Fake News and Democrats love their porno star fanacies is my guess, so many hours spent with Stormy and such.

 

[WTP]

Simple question...did they have sex? What is the White House's official position on that one basic question?

I would bet than none of the Trumpanzees (like that term) can answer without the requisite "I don't care", "What does it matter", etc...

Trump doesn't seem to know, Rudy seems to say yes, Sarah Huckabee Sanders is mum on the topic....

Anyone of the Trump supporters want to tackle this?

Like you said, they only care if it's Bill Clinton. Beyond that, there family values platform is' "I don't care".

 

[emilynghiem]

Simple question...did they have sex? What is the White House's official position on that one basic question?

I would bet than none of the Trumpanzees (like that term) can answer without the requisite "I don't care", "What does it matter", etc...

Trump doesn't seem to know, Rudy seems to say yes, Sarah Huckabee Sanders is mum on the topic....

Anyone of the Trump supporters want to tackle this?

Dear candycorn
If Trump breached his contractual agreement with his wife, that's for them to settle between them first and foremost.
Remember this occurred 10 years before Trump ran for President, when he wasn't even considering such plans.

If anything, it could be a civil grievance between his wife if she were to sue him for
not only breach or abuse, but for the consequent harassment and mental anguish she and her children
are suffering along with him for these problems.

For this to become a legal matter of public trust with a public official,
either Trump would have to break laws, such as by perjuring himself by lying under oath
or lying to the FBI and other federal authorities, or violate campaign financing laws, etc.

His lawyers are trying to make sure Trump steers clear of any such missteps.

Clearly it is legally in the best interest of Trump to remain silent,
and not take any risk of saying anything that can cause more legal disputes.

If I were his ministerial counsel, I would recommend that he make peace with
his wife, with any of these women he had or may have had illicit relations with,
and have an established agreement to work for the best interests of the country
and to restore and maintain all relations in good faith for a positive purpose.

Anyone who wants to come in and exploit conflicts or problems for divisive purposes,
I would also ask to join in seeking counseling to resolve these conflicts for the public good.

so the whole spirit of the redress and grievance process should be changed in attitude
toward wanting to RESOLVE conflicts and restore good faith relations, and that would
ensure due process of laws instead of obstruction and division to undermine one side or another.

I would ask leadership on both left and right, especially Christian counsel, to support more
unifying and healing approaches to these conflicts, in order to further positive outcomes
that will benefit all parties and the whole nation, by putting the public's best interest
before any political and partisan motives to undercut and dominate by destructive tactics.

 

[westwall]

Simple question...did they have sex? What is the White House's official position on that one basic question?

I would bet than none of the Trumpanzees (like that term) can answer without the requisite "I don't care", "What does it matter", etc...

Trump doesn't seem to know, Rudy seems to say yes, Sarah Huckabee Sanders is mum on the topic....

Anyone of the Trump supporters want to tackle this?

I doubt it. trump seems to have better taste than that.

 

[Lewdog]

Why should anybody care?? ....

Exactly. It happened over a decade ago.

Well if he had unprotected sex with a porn star, he couldn't possibly be the germaphobe he says he is... could he?

 

[candycorn]

Again, why can't the White House tell us a simple "yes" or "no"...That is the issue.

 

[Lewdog]

Again, why can't the White House tell us a simple "yes" or "no"...That is the issue.

What would it matter if they answered? It would be a lie.

 

[candycorn]

Simple question...did they have sex? What is the White House's official position on that one basic question?

I would bet than none of the Trumpanzees (like that term) can answer without the requisite "I don't care", "What does it matter", etc...

Trump doesn't seem to know, Rudy seems to say yes, Sarah Huckabee Sanders is mum on the topic....

Anyone of the Trump supporters want to tackle this?

Dear candycorn
If Trump breached his contractual agreement with his wife, that's for them to settle between them first and foremost.
Remember this occurred 10 years before Trump ran for President, when he wasn't even considering such plans.

If anything, it could be a civil grievance between his wife if she were to sue him for
not only breach or abuse, but for the consequent harassment and mental anguish she and her children
are suffering along with him for these problems.

For this to become a legal matter of public trust with a public official,
either Trump would have to break laws, such as by perjuring himself by lying under oath
or lying to the FBI and other federal authorities, or violate campaign financing laws, etc.

His lawyers are trying to make sure Trump steers clear of any such missteps.

Clearly it is legally in the best interest of Trump to remain silent,
and not take any risk of saying anything that can cause more legal disputes.

If I were his ministerial counsel, I would recommend that he make peace with
his wife, with any of these women he had or may have had illicit relations with,
and have an established agreement to work for the best interests of the country
and to restore and maintain all relations in good faith for a positive purpose.

Anyone who wants to come in and exploit conflicts or problems for divisive purposes,
I would also ask to join in seeking counseling to resolve these conflicts for the public good.

so the whole spirit of the redress and grievance process should be changed in attitude
toward wanting to RESOLVE conflicts and restore good faith relations, and that would
ensure due process of laws instead of obstruction and division to undermine one side or another.

I would ask leadership on both left and right, especially Christian counsel, to support more
unifying and healing approaches to these conflicts, in order to further positive outcomes
that will benefit all parties and the whole nation, by putting the public's best interest
before any political and partisan motives to undercut and dominate by destructive tactics.

Thanks for your input.

I would ask the President to be honest.

 

[candycorn]

Again, why can't the White House tell us a simple "yes" or "no"...That is the issue.

What would it matter if they answered? It would be a lie.

At least there would be an answer....not some murky "stay tuned" to see what the story is next week.