Disgusting Trump strikes again

[buttercup]

No hope means there is no chance the baby would survive. This is the doctor's analysis. It is the parent's decision & if they decided life support, etc the doctors would do it.

Doctors say stuff like that all the time, and they are often wrong. There are tons and tons and tons of examples of doctors being wrong about a person’s chances of survival, or their prognosis in general. How can you be unaware of that?

There are SO many problems with the idea that anyone has the right to decide if another human being should live or die. There is SO much room for not only error, but also selfish decisions or “foul play.”

It seems to me a no-brainer that we should always “err on the side of life” so anyone who doesn’t agree with that to me clearly has a wrong motive.

 

[koshergrl]

So you're just going to ignorr what the governor said?

You people are predictably dishonest. I hope someday you surprise me

Look you ignorant fuck, the Governor was talking about exactly that. Babies born with no chance to live,

Bur hey, you remain a God damn ignorant piece of shit. Why would you change now.

so if they have no chance of living, why are we dismembering them?

These are babies born.

Not abortions you stupid fuck.

So if they have no chance of life, why are they alive?

Depends on the condition. Organic life is messy.

"No chance of living" means no chance of living. But where there is life, obviously, there's a chance of life because they are alive.

Baby killers' cognitive dissonance strikes again.

 

[koshergrl]

They are typically addicted to violent porn and kiddie porn, and they're abusive to any person sad enough to come under their control.

Do you have a link to a study for your vile accusation, or do you just feel that way, deep down in yer gut?

Do you believe in legalizing prostitution?

Tell me, what do you think of virtual reality kiddie porn?

 

[koshergrl]

The lack of response is telling.

 

[Siete]

The lack of response is telling.

ignoring your bs is whats telling - get the message ?

 

[BlindBoo]

No hope means there is no chance the baby would survive. This is the doctor's analysis. It is the parent's decision & if they decided life support, etc the doctors would do it.

Doctors say stuff like that all the time, and they are often wrong. There are tons and tons and tons of examples of doctors being wrong about a person’s chances of survival, or their prognosis in general. How can you be unaware of that?

There are SO many problems with the idea that anyone has the right to decide if another human being should live or die. There is SO much room for not only error, but also selfish decisions or “foul play.”

It seems to me a no-brainer that we should always “err on the side of life” so anyone who doesn’t agree with that to me clearly has a wrong motive.

I'll bet they are right more times than not. But the ultimate decision should be up to the mother and family. The doctor should be there to explain the options and the intricacies of those options. But once again they are require to give ordinary care to the infant (or anyone) which includes many procedures that just a few years ago were considered extraordinary.

 

[BlindBoo]

Look you ignorant fuck, the Governor was talking about exactly that. Babies born with no chance to live,

Bur hey, you remain a God damn ignorant piece of shit. Why would you change now.

so if they have no chance of living, why are we dismembering them?

These are babies born.

Not abortions you stupid fuck.

So if they have no chance of life, why are they alive?

Depends on the condition. Organic life is messy.

"No chance of living" means no chance of living. But where there is life, obviously, there's a chance of life because they are alive.

Baby killers' cognitive dissonance strikes again.

Some conditions, if not fixed surgically, will give the infant no chance of living. Some conditions can't be fixed.

 

[BlindBoo]

They are typically addicted to violent porn and kiddie porn, and they're abusive to any person sad enough to come under their control.

Do you have a link to a study for your vile accusation, or do you just feel that way, deep down in yer gut?

Do you believe in legalizing prostitution?

Tell me, what do you think of virtual reality kiddie porn?

Never heard of it before now. If you're into that, please be careful. K?

In 2003, Congress passed the PROTECT Act, which stands for the, “Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today” Act. Under the Protect Act, it is illegal to create, possess, or distribute, "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting", that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is ‘obscene' or ‘depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in...sexual intercourse...and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.” (18 U.S. Code § 1466A). To clarify, under federal law, drawing and animation are considered child pornography, and you can be convicted for possession or marketing of such material.