Dive: Just 37 percent approve of Obama

[rightwinger]

How honest of you to admit that Bush jr was an abject failure.

That was, and is the point. You cannot compare Obama to anyone but Bush II and Carter since Nixon and argue success. Obama's a failure exactly because of that.

And yet when compare Obama to Clinton and your beloved St Reagan he actually does better!

Talking Points Memo Breaking News and Analysis TPM

Obama Has Tied Reagan In Public Opinion Polls John A. Tures


Too bad the hard FACTS make your partisan claims utterly worthless.

Oh, ffs, stop with the dingbat stuff. Consider your sources before you come off as a dingbat yourself. Wtf is this, a site for idiots?

How about Gallup? Are they a valid site in your esteemed estimation?

Today, Gallup has Obama with a JAR at 47%. Compared to Reagan, who on this date in 1987 had a 49% JAR, according to Gallup.

Is there something wrong with you? Do you understand what history is? Or perhaps you are limited by the scope of dogma. Unless you consider Obama significant because he is the first "black POTUS", which he is, he is a patently insignificant president otherwise. FDR led America through a world war and was a consequential president.

Stop talking nonsense ffs!

Depends what you call consequential

Stopped a depression
Saved financial and auto industries
Led us to economic recovery
Obamacare
Gay rights
Killed bin laden
Immigration reform
Recognition of Cuba
Withstood a Republican Party intent on his failure

Pretty consequential by any measure

 

[Statistikhengst]

Sorry to disappoint you but although the Tea Party has been around for awhile the massive modern Tea Party movement was kicked off when the real conservatives in America realized that the Republicans were delivering the same big government as the Democrats. That came in the last couple of years of Bush' Presidency.

While taxes is a part of the platform so are many other things having to do with an out of control Federal government.

Real Conservatives dumped the Republican Party shortly after 2006 and that is the reason Bush had such a low approval rating. The confused Left Wing shitheads never liked Bush (although they should have) and the real Conservatives didn't like him acting like a big government Liberal. That produced low ratings.

The Left didn't have their heads so far up their asses and so full of hate they would have embraced Bush as one of their own after his record of growing government.

Oh, really?

Where did they meet?

Where was the publicity?

Who was their speaker?

Which public figure was saying the term "Tea Party" in 2007?

Photos? Video? Audio? News Articles?

Don't worry, take your time. We can wait...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Meathead, you are not the 11th grade English teacher.

You simply are a meathead who can't stand being outed on your stupidity. And, son, that is so easy to do.

You act like a low-rent Dante.

Most 11th graders don't write "as worse as", and besides, comparing Obama to Bush II instead of Clinton or Reagan is like comparing your grammar to an inner-city 11th grader. Either is a tacit admission of abject failure. We're not even going to get into you mental pathologies.

You do not even understand the logic of what you you just wrote.

 

[Statistikhengst]

That was, and is the point. You cannot compare Obama to anyone but Bush II and Carter since Nixon and argue success. Obama's a failure exactly because of that.

And yet when compare Obama to Clinton and your beloved St Reagan he actually does better!

Talking Points Memo Breaking News and Analysis TPM

Obama Has Tied Reagan In Public Opinion Polls John A. Tures


Too bad the hard FACTS make your partisan claims utterly worthless.

Oh, ffs, stop with the dingbat stuff. Consider your sources before you come off as a dingbat yourself. Wtf is this, a site for idiots?

How about Gallup? Are they a valid site in your esteemed estimation?

Today, Gallup has Obama with a JAR at 47%. Compared to Reagan, who on this date in 1987 had a 49% JAR, according to Gallup.

Is there something wrong with you? Do you understand what history is? Or perhaps you are limited by the scope of dogma. Unless you consider Obama significant because he is the first "black POTUS", which he is, he is a patently insignificant president otherwise. FDR led America through a world war and was a consequential president.

Stop talking nonsense ffs!

Yes, I do. As in .... ObamaCare is legislation of historic proportions.

Your great great great grandchildren will be learning about why they're on ObamaCare. Just as kids today learn about where social security came from.

Obamacare is not perfect. It was the best possible compromise in order to get a start through Congress. There are a number of tweaks needed, which the Republicans will probably try to stop, because they are in the business of hurting as many Americans as they possibly can for an ideology that says "fuck you, and get off my lawn". But nonetheless, this law is not perfect. However, even our President knows this and has said himself that common-sense changes would be possible.

But yes, the legislation is of historic proportions. As our Vice-President, Joe Biden, said: "this is a big fucking deal!" And I agree with him.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Further: Bush 43, RCP complete average, all pollsters, 17 January 2006:

Disapprove 58
Approve 40

Margin -18

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Bush Job Approval

You can scroll over the interactive graphic.

RCP is a hard right-leaning website.

Bush had a low approval rating the last few years because many on the Right disapproved of his Liberal polices of growing the size of government, increasing debt, increasing entitlements, refusing to seal the borders and interventionist wars.

You know, all the same things that the idiot Obama loves.

Bush even was spouting this AGW scam bullshit.

The Tea Party was started because they figured out that Bush and the mainstream Republicans were just as bad as the Democrats.

Where do you come up with this nonsense? The TEA party was all about protesting taxes increases when they first formed. That had nothing at all to do with Bush.

Sorry to disappoint you but although the Tea Party has been around for awhile the massive modern Tea Party movement was kicked off when the real conservatives in America realized that the Republicans were delivering the same big government as the Democrats. That came in the last couple of years of Bush' Presidency.

While taxes is a part of the platform so are many other things having to do with an out of control Federal government.

Real Conservatives dumped the Republican Party shortly after 2006 and that is the reason Bush had such a low approval rating. The confused Left Wing shitheads never liked Bush (although they should have) and the real Conservatives didn't like him acting like a big government Liberal. That produced low ratings.

The Left didn't have their heads so far up their asses and so full of hate they would have embraced Bush as one of their own after his record of growing government.

The modern Tea Party is not the bastion of the real conservatives, but instead is the hidey hole of the far right reactionaries and social con religious wacks plus some racists.

Ask youself why BHO is twice as popular as the TP freaks.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Meathead, you are not the 11th grade English teacher.

You simply are a meathead who can't stand being outed on your stupidity. And, son, that is so easy to do.

You act like a low-rent Dante.

Most 11th graders don't write "as worse as", and besides, comparing Obama to Bush II instead of Clinton or Reagan is like comparing your grammar to an inner-city 11th grader. Either is a tacit admission of abject failure. We're not even going to get into you mental pathologies.

You do not even understand the logic of what you you just wrote.

I think you are writing to Meathead, whom I have on ignore. I also suspect that he is not on topic, but that's ok, Righties get a pass for not being on topic.

So, back to the OP:

Dive: Just 37 percent approve of Obama

Only, it's not a dive from that particular pollster and the President's average as of today is around 44.6.

 

[Flash]

Further: Bush 43, RCP complete average, all pollsters, 17 January 2006:

Disapprove 58
Approve 40

Margin -18

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Bush Job Approval

You can scroll over the interactive graphic.

RCP is a hard right-leaning website.

Bush had a low approval rating the last few years because many on the Right disapproved of his Liberal polices of growing the size of government, increasing debt, increasing entitlements, refusing to seal the borders and interventionist wars.

You know, all the same things that the idiot Obama loves.

Bush even was spouting this AGW scam bullshit.

The Tea Party was started because they figured out that Bush and the mainstream Republicans were just as bad as the Democrats.

Where do you come up with this nonsense? The TEA party was all about protesting taxes increases when they first formed. That had nothing at all to do with Bush.

Sorry to disappoint you but although the Tea Party has been around for awhile the massive modern Tea Party movement was kicked off when the real conservatives in America realized that the Republicans were delivering the same big government as the Democrats. That came in the last couple of years of Bush' Presidency.

While taxes is a part of the platform so are many other things having to do with an out of control Federal government.

Real Conservatives dumped the Republican Party shortly after 2006 and that is the reason Bush had such a low approval rating. The confused Left Wing shitheads never liked Bush (although they should have) and the real Conservatives didn't like him acting like a big government Liberal.

The Left didn't have their heads so far up their asses and so full of hate they would have embraced Bush as one of their own after his record of growing government.

The TEA party was formed in 2009 as a reaction to Obama promoting the sunset of the Bush tax cuts.

At the time, that's ALL they were about. What do you think TEA stands for.

Sorry, but you don't get to rewrite history to rationalize your delusions.

You are confused.

First of all there is a very small national Tea Party that has been around for a long time but the majority of Tea Party members belong to decentralized group of state and local chapters.

These chapters were kicked off in high gear as a response to the out of control Federal government we saw after the 2006 election that Bush was going along with. Conservatives realized they couldn't trust either the Democrats are the Republicans.

Taxes is only one of many Tea Party issues.

Regardless of any misconceptions you have due to your ignorance of the Tea Party the fact remains that Bush disappointed many Conservatives with his big government polices and that combined with the unjustified Liberal hate of him contributed to his low approval ratings.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Meathead, you are not the 11th grade English teacher.

You simply are a meathead who can't stand being outed on your stupidity. And, son, that is so easy to do.

You act like a low-rent Dante.

Most 11th graders don't write "as worse as", and besides, comparing Obama to Bush II instead of Clinton or Reagan is like comparing your grammar to an inner-city 11th grader. Either is a tacit admission of abject failure. We're not even going to get into you mental pathologies.

You do not even understand the logic of what you you just wrote.

I think you are writing to Meathead, whom I have on ignore. I also suspect that he is not on topic, but that's ok, Righties get a pass for not being on topic.

So, back to the OP:

Dive: Just 37 percent approve of Obama

Only, it's not a dive from that particular pollster and the President's average as of today is around 44.6.

Meathead is indeed off topic and as silly as ever.

 

[Faun]

Sorry to disappoint you but although the Tea Party has been around for awhile the massive modern Tea Party movement was kicked off when the real conservatives in America realized that the Republicans were delivering the same big government as the Democrats. That came in the last couple of years of Bush' Presidency.

While taxes is a part of the platform so are many other things having to do with an out of control Federal government.

Real Conservatives dumped the Republican Party shortly after 2006 and that is the reason Bush had such a low approval rating. The confused Left Wing shitheads never liked Bush (although they should have) and the real Conservatives didn't like him acting like a big government Liberal. That produced low ratings.

The Left didn't have their heads so far up their asses and so full of hate they would have embraced Bush as one of their own after his record of growing government.

Oh, really?

Where did they meet?

Where was the publicity?

Who was their speaker?

Which public figure was saying the term "Tea Party" in 2007?

Photos? Video? Audio? News Articles?

Don't worry, take your time. We can wait...

Please, who needs to be bothered with such pesky details?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Obama is at 37% and even many of those people don't like some of the shit he's pulled.

 

[Meathead]

That was, and is the point. You cannot compare Obama to anyone but Bush II and Carter since Nixon and argue success. Obama's a failure exactly because of that.

And yet when compare Obama to Clinton and your beloved St Reagan he actually does better!

Talking Points Memo Breaking News and Analysis TPM

Obama Has Tied Reagan In Public Opinion Polls John A. Tures


Too bad the hard FACTS make your partisan claims utterly worthless.

Oh, ffs, stop with the dingbat stuff. Consider your sources before you come off as a dingbat yourself. Wtf is this, a site for idiots?

How about Gallup? Are they a valid site in your esteemed estimation?

Today, Gallup has Obama with a JAR at 47%. Compared to Reagan, who on this date in 1987 had a 49% JAR, according to Gallup.

Is there something wrong with you? Do you understand what history is? Or perhaps you are limited by the scope of dogma. Unless you consider Obama significant because he is the first "black POTUS", which he is, he is a patently insignificant president otherwise. FDR led America through a world war and was a consequential president.

Stop talking nonsense ffs!

Depends what you call consequential

Stopped a depression
Saved financial and auto industries
Led us to economic recovery
Obamacare
Gay rights
Killed bin laden
Immigration reform
Recognition of Cuba
Withstood a Republican Party intent on his failure

Pretty consequential by any measure

Actually, everything that you mentioned that were relative to his term was accomplished, and far more significantly. Reagan changed the world. Compare him to Bush II if you will, but in all else whether domestic or international, Obama is a footnote and a failure.

 

[Faun]

Further: Bush 43, RCP complete average, all pollsters, 17 January 2006:

Disapprove 58
Approve 40

Margin -18

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Bush Job Approval

You can scroll over the interactive graphic.

RCP is a hard right-leaning website.

Bush had a low approval rating the last few years because many on the Right disapproved of his Liberal polices of growing the size of government, increasing debt, increasing entitlements, refusing to seal the borders and interventionist wars.

You know, all the same things that the idiot Obama loves.

Bush even was spouting this AGW scam bullshit.

The Tea Party was started because they figured out that Bush and the mainstream Republicans were just as bad as the Democrats.

Where do you come up with this nonsense? The TEA party was all about protesting taxes increases when they first formed. That had nothing at all to do with Bush.

Sorry to disappoint you but although the Tea Party has been around for awhile the massive modern Tea Party movement was kicked off when the real conservatives in America realized that the Republicans were delivering the same big government as the Democrats. That came in the last couple of years of Bush' Presidency.

While taxes is a part of the platform so are many other things having to do with an out of control Federal government.

Real Conservatives dumped the Republican Party shortly after 2006 and that is the reason Bush had such a low approval rating. The confused Left Wing shitheads never liked Bush (although they should have) and the real Conservatives didn't like him acting like a big government Liberal.

The Left didn't have their heads so far up their asses and so full of hate they would have embraced Bush as one of their own after his record of growing government.

The TEA party was formed in 2009 as a reaction to Obama promoting the sunset of the Bush tax cuts.

At the time, that's ALL they were about. What do you think TEA stands for.

Sorry, but you don't get to rewrite history to rationalize your delusions.

You are confused.

First of all there is a very small national Tea Party that has been around for a long time but the majority of Tea Party members belong to decentralized group of state and local chapters.

These chapters were kicked off in high gear as a response to the out of control Federal government we saw after the 2006 election that Bush was going along with. Conservatives realized they couldn't trust either the Democrats are the Republicans.

Taxes is only one of many Tea Party issues.

Regardless of any misconceptions you have due to your ignorance of the Tea Party the fact remains that Bush disappointed many Conservatives with his big government polices and that combined with the unjustified Liberal hate of him contributed to his low approval ratings.

You never answered ... what does TEA stand for. And how is that applied to Bush?

 

[JakeStarkey]

There has never been a national TP around for a long time. That is a falsehood. Any unhappy precursors that were developing because of dissatisfaction were disjointed and ineffectual before the summer of 2009. Almost six years later, the TPM impetus is flush busted.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Sorry to disappoint you but although the Tea Party has been around for awhile the massive modern Tea Party movement was kicked off when the real conservatives in America realized that the Republicans were delivering the same big government as the Democrats. That came in the last couple of years of Bush' Presidency.

While taxes is a part of the platform so are many other things having to do with an out of control Federal government.

Real Conservatives dumped the Republican Party shortly after 2006 and that is the reason Bush had such a low approval rating. The confused Left Wing shitheads never liked Bush (although they should have) and the real Conservatives didn't like him acting like a big government Liberal. That produced low ratings.

The Left didn't have their heads so far up their asses and so full of hate they would have embraced Bush as one of their own after his record of growing government.

Oh, really?

Where did they meet?

Where was the publicity?

Who was their speaker?

Which public figure was saying the term "Tea Party" in 2007?

Photos? Video? Audio? News Articles?

Don't worry, take your time. We can wait...

Please, who needs to be bothered with such pesky details?

Tee potties obviously don't need details...

 

[Faun]

And yet when compare Obama to Clinton and your beloved St Reagan he actually does better!

Talking Points Memo Breaking News and Analysis TPM

Obama Has Tied Reagan In Public Opinion Polls John A. Tures


Too bad the hard FACTS make your partisan claims utterly worthless.

Oh, ffs, stop with the dingbat stuff. Consider your sources before you come off as a dingbat yourself. Wtf is this, a site for idiots?

How about Gallup? Are they a valid site in your esteemed estimation?

Today, Gallup has Obama with a JAR at 47%. Compared to Reagan, who on this date in 1987 had a 49% JAR, according to Gallup.

Is there something wrong with you? Do you understand what history is? Or perhaps you are limited by the scope of dogma. Unless you consider Obama significant because he is the first "black POTUS", which he is, he is a patently insignificant president otherwise. FDR led America through a world war and was a consequential president.

Stop talking nonsense ffs!

Yes, I do. As in .... ObamaCare is legislation of historic proportions.

Your great great great grandchildren will be learning about why they're on ObamaCare. Just as kids today learn about where social security came from.

Obamacare is not perfect. It was the best possible compromise in order to get a start through Congress. There are a number of tweaks needed, which the Republicans will probably try to stop, because they are in the business of hurting as many Americans as they possibly can for an ideology that says "fuck you, and get off my lawn". But nonetheless, this law is not perfect. However, even our President knows this and has said himself that common-sense changes would be possible.

But yes, the legislation is of historic proportions. As our Vice-President, Joe Biden, said: "this is a big fucking deal!" And I agree with him.

For better or for worse, it was monumentally historic. One must be brain-dead to think otherwise.

 

[Statistikhengst]

 

[Statistikhengst]

Oh, ffs, stop with the dingbat stuff. Consider your sources before you come off as a dingbat yourself. Wtf is this, a site for idiots?

How about Gallup? Are they a valid site in your esteemed estimation?

Today, Gallup has Obama with a JAR at 47%. Compared to Reagan, who on this date in 1987 had a 49% JAR, according to Gallup.

Is there something wrong with you? Do you understand what history is? Or perhaps you are limited by the scope of dogma. Unless you consider Obama significant because he is the first "black POTUS", which he is, he is a patently insignificant president otherwise. FDR led America through a world war and was a consequential president.

Stop talking nonsense ffs!

Yes, I do. As in .... ObamaCare is legislation of historic proportions.

Your great great great grandchildren will be learning about why they're on ObamaCare. Just as kids today learn about where social security came from.

Obamacare is not perfect. It was the best possible compromise in order to get a start through Congress. There are a number of tweaks needed, which the Republicans will probably try to stop, because they are in the business of hurting as many Americans as they possibly can for an ideology that says "fuck you, and get off my lawn". But nonetheless, this law is not perfect. However, even our President knows this and has said himself that common-sense changes would be possible.

But yes, the legislation is of historic proportions. As our Vice-President, Joe Biden, said: "this is a big fucking deal!" And I agree with him.

For better or for worse, it was monumentally historic. One must be brain-dead to think otherwise.

I concur. And in 70 years, it will receive the same accolades as FDR's social security law from the 1930s.

 

[rightwinger]

And yet when compare Obama to Clinton and your beloved St Reagan he actually does better!

Talking Points Memo Breaking News and Analysis TPM

Obama Has Tied Reagan In Public Opinion Polls John A. Tures


Too bad the hard FACTS make your partisan claims utterly worthless.

Oh, ffs, stop with the dingbat stuff. Consider your sources before you come off as a dingbat yourself. Wtf is this, a site for idiots?

How about Gallup? Are they a valid site in your esteemed estimation?

Today, Gallup has Obama with a JAR at 47%. Compared to Reagan, who on this date in 1987 had a 49% JAR, according to Gallup.

Is there something wrong with you? Do you understand what history is? Or perhaps you are limited by the scope of dogma. Unless you consider Obama significant because he is the first "black POTUS", which he is, he is a patently insignificant president otherwise. FDR led America through a world war and was a consequential president.

Stop talking nonsense ffs!

Depends what you call consequential

Stopped a depression
Saved financial and auto industries
Led us to economic recovery
Obamacare
Gay rights
Killed bin laden
Immigration reform
Recognition of Cuba
Withstood a Republican Party intent on his failure

Pretty consequential by any measure

Actually, everything that you mentioned that were relative to his term was accomplished, and far more significantly. Reagan changed the world. Compare him to Bush II if you will, but in all else whether domestic or international, Obama is a footnote and a failure.

Reagans economic legacy is fading. His Iran Contra scandal still hangs over his presidency

 

[JakeStarkey]

Reagans economic legacy is fading. His Iran Contra scandal still hangs over his presidency

For the veterans who served under him, the scandal will always be tarnish on the presidential brass that even the finest far right reactionary media brasso can never remove.

 

[Faun]

Obama is at 37% and even many of those people don't like some of the shit he's pulled.

Really? Try posting a link to a poll showing a 37% JAR...