Meathead
Diamond Member
Now that Hilary is toast and everyone else closely associated with the Obama administration probably is too, do the Democrats have a viable candidate not soiled enough to run in 2016?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now that Hilary is toast and everyone else closely associated with the Obama administration probably is too, do the Democrats have a viable candidate not soiled enough to run in 2016?
Now that Hilary is toast and everyone else closely associated with the Obama administration probably is too, do the Democrats have a viable candidate not soiled enough to run in 2016?
Now that Hilary is toast and everyone else closely associated with the Obama administration probably is too, do the Democrats have a viable candidate not soiled enough to run in 2016?
John Kerry! He's currently SecState and holding all the memos and otehr info that will make Hillary look like a witch, knocking her out of consideration for 2016.
Personally I think they will pick Deval patrick, another clean articulate black man who can promise lots of gov't cheese to inner city Negroes, assuring a Democrat victory.
After President Biden pardons Obama for his crimes in the IRS Scandal and lying the the American People over Benghazi, he will appoints Hilly as his VP
How does Benghazi differ from 9/11 in terms of executive culpability? Because Bush used the failure of his security apparatus on 9/11 to increase his polling popularity.
Now that Hilary is toast and everyone else closely associated with the Obama administration probably is too, do the Democrats have a viable candidate not soiled enough to run in 2016?
Sadly Hillary isn't toast. Most of the public is politically ignorant.
Someone did, apparently.Did Bush give a stand order?
I don't understand how this pertains to the issue. There are many causes for Middle Eastern unrest.Did Bush blame a video that no one saw?
Someone did, apparently.Did Bush deny requested security?
How does Benghazi differ from 9/11 in terms of executive culpability? Because Bush used the failure of his security apparatus on 9/11 to increase his polling popularity.
But he didn't lie about it.
How does Benghazi differ from 9/11 in terms of executive culpability? Because Bush used the failure of his security apparatus on 9/11 to increase his polling popularity.
But he didn't lie about it.
How does Benghazi differ from 9/11 in terms of executive culpability? Because Bush used the failure of his security apparatus on 9/11 to increase his polling popularity.
But he didn't lie about it.
Well yeah he did.
He put the blame on Iraq.
How does Benghazi differ from 9/11 in terms of executive culpability? Because Bush used the failure of his security apparatus on 9/11 to increase his polling popularity.
But he didn't lie about it.
He may have. We will never know, because of the layers of secrecy that protected Bush's "testimony." 9/11 looked fishy then, and it still does.