Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stock brokers and fund managers in charge of other peoples retirement funds do not ask for each individuals permission to invest in those illicit companies but the individual will be fined if they invest their own money as they see fit. Again Congress needs to address it.It is not exactly a private company once it goes to public stock options. That difference needs to be addressed properly by Congress.I think a private company serving whoever they want is their choice. Do you agree?
Why not? Did somebody force you to buy stock in Twitter?
Be specific and cite for us all the left leaning sites banned or censored......You’re not very observant.i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
If you were, you’d note that Democrats address the issue often, explaining to conservatives that censorship and the right to free speech concern solely the relationship between government and those governed – not between or among private entities and private persons, such as social networks.
That as private entities, social networks are a liberty to edit their content as they see fit – where such editing constitutes neither a ‘violation’ of free speech nor ‘censorship.’
And that the internet is infinite – that there’s ample opportunity for conservatives to express their views and opinions.
i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
This fails as a false comparison fallacy.what if a restaurants barred people because of their beliefs ?
Public accommodations laws are necessary, proper, and Constitutional regulatory measures authorized by Commerce Clause jurisprudence.
You’re not very observant.i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
If you were, you’d note that Democrats address the issue often, explaining to conservatives that censorship and the right to free speech concern solely the relationship between government and those governed – not between or among private entities and private persons, such as social networks.
That as private entities, social networks are a liberty to edit their content as they see fit – where such editing constitutes neither a ‘violation’ of free speech nor ‘censorship.’
And that the internet is infinite – that there’s ample opportunity for conservatives to express their views and opinions.
meh, I don't have a twitter account, and if I hadn't signed up for Facebook the very first year it was around and know for a fact that you can never delete your account? I would get rid of it.You don't know the law. In the case of a virtual monopoly like twitter and facebook have, the standards are different, just as they are for a public utility. Consumers have almost no choice but to use them and that makes them public. That's why their bosses are being called to appear before Congress. I expect some regulations in the near future.Nothing ‘unfortunate’ about it.Unfortunately, the law is on the side of Twitter and Facebook. The first amendment does not apply to private property. This is a Sup Ct ruling. What I suggest as a tactic to pressure the media is to boycott them. They survive on advertising revenue. If we the consumers don't read those ads, the media will lose money bigtime.i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
Fortunately the First Amendment protects social media sites from unwarranted government preemption and regulation.
d.tube
www.bitchute.com
Media giants hell. . .i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
. . . any one holding a political bent to the left of JFK essentially believes it is OK to censor folks not only on the internet, but on college campuses, in the work place, in the regular media, hell, in all of polite society . . .
Yup.Media giants hell. . .i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
. . . any one holding a political bent to the left of JFK essentially believes it is OK to censor folks not only on the internet, but on college campuses, in the work place, in the regular media, hell, in all of polite society . . .
And to suspend their constitutional rights to prevent the spread of the common cold as well . . .
i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
I notice that the platforms are censoring dis-information. If you don't want to be censored, stick to the truth and honesty.
I think a private company serving whoever they want is their choice. Do you agree?
You’re not very observant.i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
If you were, you’d note that Democrats address the issue often, explaining to conservatives that censorship and the right to free speech concern solely the relationship between government and those governed – not between or among private entities and private persons, such as social networks.
That as private entities, social networks are a liberty to edit their content as they see fit – where such editing constitutes neither a ‘violation’ of free speech nor ‘censorship.’
And that the internet is infinite – that there’s ample opportunity for conservatives to express their views and opinions.
Here is proof of what I saidUnfortunately, the law is on the side of Twitter and Facebook. The first amendment does not apply to private property. This is a Sup Ct ruling. What I suggest as a tactic to pressure the media is to boycott them. They survive on advertising revenue. If we the consumers don't read those ads, the media will lose money bigtime.i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
I notice that the platforms are censoring dis-information. If you don't want to be censored, stick to the truth and honesty.
I do think they are being a little too strict at times really. There was a video from the Trump campaign they supposedly banned. I saw it on one of the platforms with the banner saying (It was banned...). So I don't know but...if it was...I don't know why.
Who should be appointed as the "Truth Police."
apparently leftwing social media determines whats true ....where is hunter ?i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
I notice that the platforms are censoring dis-information. If you don't want to be censored, stick to the truth and honesty.
I do think they are being a little too strict at times really. There was a video from the Trump campaign they supposedly banned. I saw it on one of the platforms with the banner saying (It was banned...). So I don't know but...if it was...I don't know why.
Who determines truth and honesty? You?
you have no problem with your candidate being hidden away from the media and given softball questions to win an election ! our democracy and freedom of information has been hijacked by totalitarian forces and you love it ! wheres hunter ?i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
I notice that the platforms are censoring dis-information. If you don't want to be censored, stick to the truth and honesty.
I do think they are being a little too strict at times really. There was a video from the Trump campaign they supposedly banned. I saw it on one of the platforms with the banner saying (It was banned...). So I don't know but...if it was...I don't know why.
Who determines truth and honesty? You?
meh, I don't have a twitter account, and if I hadn't signed up for Facebook the very first year it was around and know for a fact that you can never delete your account? I would get rid of it.You don't know the law. In the case of a virtual monopoly like twitter and facebook have, the standards are different, just as they are for a public utility. Consumers have almost no choice but to use them and that makes them public. That's why their bosses are being called to appear before Congress. I expect some regulations in the near future.Nothing ‘unfortunate’ about it.Unfortunately, the law is on the side of Twitter and Facebook. The first amendment does not apply to private property. This is a Sup Ct ruling. What I suggest as a tactic to pressure the media is to boycott them. They survive on advertising revenue. If we the consumers don't read those ads, the media will lose money bigtime.i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
Fortunately the First Amendment protects social media sites from unwarranted government preemption and regulation.
They aren't virtual monopolies. You can stay in contact with your friends via email, and have male relatives that don't own either of those. They aren't necessary.
And if you want to create a social community with your own friends and family, there are so many other choices. Hell, other nations and different social enclaves don't even used Facebook. My kid uses Instagram. In Southeast Asia, or was it Indonesia? I think they still use Myspace. Seriously, Myspace is still ranked like number six or seven, yet, no one in the west uses it anymore.
It's bullshit to think it is a "virtual" monopoly.
But all this whining will assure government stepping in, and then? Yeah, hell yeah it will BECOME a monopoly. That is exactly what these tech giants want!
This one was hard to find, it was deleted. I checked several different platforms.
It was here;
DTube
DTube is a community powered video sharing platform where users vote on videos to reward creators, curators, influencers and viewers in cryptocurrency
But I couldn't get it to play.
This version played better.
James Corbett Interview - The Social Media Regulation Psyop
In a time of such obvious deceit and aggressive manipulation, not only by those who once sought our votes or our subservience, but today even by each other, unwittingly doing the bidding of those who seek to control our every purchase, our every cli…
The Social Media Exodus Has Begun. Here's Where Everybody's Going.
Look at the date of this video!
•Jan 13, 2017
Even Conservative Constitutionalist Mark Levin defends Constitutional free speech of independent entities.i noticed that dems remain silent on the censorship being placed on conservatives by social networks ..... do they agree with censorship.
